Elsevier

Biochemical Pharmacology

Volume 63, Issue 9, 1 May 2002, Pages 1653-1662
Biochemical Pharmacology

Intercalation of imidazoacridinones to DNA and its relevance to cytotoxic and antitumor activity

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-2952(02)00916-4Get rights and content

Abstract

Imidazoacridinones (IA) are a class of antitumor agents which includes C-1311, an interesting drug in clinical trials. This study investigated the mechanism of IA binding to DNA for a series of 13 analogs that differ in their cytotoxic potency. Using C-1311 as a model compound, crystallographic, spectroscopic and biochemical techniques were employed to characterize drug–DNA interactions. X-ray crystallographic analysis revealed a planar structure of imidazoacridinone core that is capable of intercalative DNA binding. Accordingly, C-1311 binding to DNA followed ‘classical’ pattern observed for intercalation, as proved by the DNA topoisomerase I—unwinding experiments, with relatively weak binding affinity (Ki=1.2×105 M−1), and the binding site size of 2.4 bp. Other IA also bound to DNA with the binding affinity in the range of 105 M−1 and binding site size of 2–3 bp, suggesting a prevalence of the intercalative mechanism, similar to C-1311. Considerable DNA binding affinity was displayed by all the highly cytotoxic derivatives. However, none of the analyzed drug–DNA binding parameters was significantly correlated with IA biological activities such as cell growth, DNA and RNA synthesis inhibition, or tumor growth inhibition, which suggests that the IA ability to non-covalently bind to DNA is not crucial for their biological activity. These results show that the ability to intercalate into DNA is a prominent attribute of IA, although factors other than intercalative binding seem to be required for the biological activities of IA drugs.

Introduction

IA (see Table 1 for structures) are a group of antitumor compounds synthesized in our laboratory [1], [2]. IA are cytotoxic in vitro against various human and murine cell lines and exhibit in vivo activity against leukemia P388, melanoma B16, ascites colon 26 adenocarcinoma, colon 38 adenocarcinoma, MAC29 colon carcinoma and HT29 colon in mice [3], [4]. The most promising analog, C-1311 (for review see [5]), has been selected for the clinical development by European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC).

Despite the advanced stage in clinical development, the knowledge of the mechanism of action of IA is limited. C-1311 was shown to accumulate in the cell nucleus [4], [6], [7], to inhibit cellular nucleic acids synthesis [4], [8], and to trap topoisomerase II cleavage complexes [6]. Cell growth inhibition by IA was accompanied by the induction of G2 block of the cell cycle [9] followed by apoptosis [7]. This pattern suggested that cellular DNA might be a target for the IA drugs. Given the structural resemblance of IA to other anticancer agents, such as anthracenediones, that are known to bind to DNA, it was possible that DNA binding may play a role also in the case of IA.

Preliminary report of this study [8] and the data published by others [4], [7] suggested indeed that IA drugs are capable of binding to DNA. The nature of these interactions and their relevance to cytotoxic and antitumor properties of IA compounds remains unknown. Since targeting cellular DNA is likely to be significant for the cytotoxic and antitumor properties of IA, it became necessary to evaluate in a quantitative and systematic way various aspects of drug–DNA interactions using a coherent set of analogs displaying divergent biological activities.

In this study, we verified by X-ray crystallography that C-1311 contains planar polycyclic aromatic ring system required for the intercalation into DNA. Intercalative DNA binding has been demonstrated for C-1311 by several approaches. Analysis of several IA analogs of C-1311 showed that the ability to interact with DNA is a common attribute of cytotoxic IA drugs. The differences in DNA binding properties, however, do not fully account for the diverse biological activities of the IA drugs studied.

Section snippets

Chemicals

IA were synthesized and purified as described earlier [1], [2]. Stock solutions (1 mM) were prepared in water and stored at −20°. The RPMI-1640 medium, fetal calf serum, simian virus (SV40) supercoiled DNA and human topoisomerase I were obtained from Life Technologies (Paisley, UK). Methyl-[3H]-thymidine, 5-[3H]-uridine were from Amersham Ltd. (Piscataway, NJ, USA). Calf thymus DNA (ctDNA) (type II) from Sigma (St. Louis, MO, USA) was used after sonication. The concentrations of DNA solutions

Results

The imidazoacridinone derivatives examined in this study have been selected to include analogs with divergent structures, covering a range of cytotoxic and anticancer activities (Table 1). All these compounds share the same core structure of IA with two varying elements: (1) ring substitutions in the position 5, 7 or 8, and (2) diaminoalkyl side chain of variable length.

Discussion

IA are a group of interesting anticancer agents and the lead compound, C-1311, is accepted for phase I clinical trials. Various observations suggested that DNA binding might be involved in the action of IA [4], [7], [8], [22]. The ability to interact with DNA, in general, and specific binding properties such as: (a) mode of interactions, (b) affinity to DNA, (c) DNA duplex stabilization, and (d) kinetics of association/dissociation can influence biological effects of the drugs. This study

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Dr. Jan M. Woynarowski (Institute for Drug Development, San Antonio, TX) for helpful discussions and critical reading of this manuscript, and to Dr. Jan Kapuścinski (University of Gdańsk, Poland) for his invaluable methodological suggestions. This work was supported in part by the Polish National Committee for Scientific Research (KBN), Grant no. 4PO5F 00612.

References (33)

  • A.M. Burger et al.

    Preclinical evaluation of novel imidazoacridinone derivatives with potent activity against experimental colorectal cancer

    Br. J. Cancer

    (1996)
  • Z. Mazerska et al.

    C-1311

    Drugs Fut.

    (1998)
  • A. Składanowski et al.

    Inhibition of DNA topoisomerase II by imidazoacridinones, new antineoplastic agents with strong activity against solid tumors

    Mol. Pharmacol.

    (1996)
  • A.M. Burger et al.

    Cellular uptake, cytotoxicity and DNA binding studies of the novel imidazoacridinone antineoplastic agent C-1311

    Br. J. Cancer

    (1999)
  • J. Dzięgielewski et al.

    Noncovalent binding of potent imidazoacridinones to DNA

    Ann. Oncol.

    (1996)
  • E. Augustin et al.

    Imidazoacridinones arrest cell-cycle progression in the G2 phase of L1210 cells

    Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol.

    (1996)
  • Cited by (56)

    • Electrochemical and in silico approaches for liver metabolic oxidation of antitumor-active triazoloacridinone C-1305

      2020, Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis
      Citation Excerpt :

      The N-dealkylation and dehydrogenation reactions in the dialkylaminoalkylamino side chain, analogous to those described above, were also predicted by in silico analysis for imidazoacridinone derivative, C-1311 [37]. Such substituent is flexible and, after metabolic activation, it may be able to induce interstrand covalent crosslinks in DNA of tumor cells playing a key role in biological (antitumor) activity of these compounds [24,38,39]. Such mechanism mediating the cytotoxicity was also demonstrated in the case of the clinically used antitumor drugs, mitoxantrone and ametantrone [22].

    • Imidazoacridinone antitumor agent C-1311 as a selective mechanism-based inactivator of human cytochrome P450 1A2 and 3A4 isoenzymes

      2016, Pharmacological Reports
      Citation Excerpt :

      Multiple studies on the molecular mode of C-1311 antitumor action revealed that the metabolic activation of this drug by intracellular enzymes might be a prerequisite step in the biochemical mechanism of its action [10]. Activation under enzymatic oxidative conditions resulted in the intercalation and the following covalent binding of the drug to DNA and other cellular macromolecules [11]. Thus, studies on the molecular mechanism of the enzymatic oxidative activation of C-1311 with different liver drug-metabolizing enzymes were investigated.

    • Polypharmacology: Principles and methodologies

      2022, Polypharmacology: Principles and Methodologies
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Preliminary account of these studies has been presented at 9th EORTC-NCI Symposium on New Drug Development, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1996.

    1

    Present address: Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, USA.

    View full text