Elsevier

Biochemical Pharmacology

Volume 59, Issue 7, 1 April 2000, Pages 831-837
Biochemical Pharmacology

Chemotherapy and Metabolic Inhibitors
Pharmacological properties of a new aziridinylbenzoquinone, RH1 (2,5-diaziridinyl-3-(hydroxymethyl)-6-methyl-1,4-benzoquinone), in mice

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-2952(99)00391-3Get rights and content

Abstract

RH1(2,5-diaziridinyl-3-(hydroxymethyl)-6-methyl-1,4-benzoquinone) has shown preferential activity against human tumour cell lines which express high levels of DTD (EC 1.6.99.2; NAD(P)H:quinone oxidoreductase, NQO1, DT-diaphorase) and is a candidate for clinical trials. EO9 (3-hydroxy-5-aziridinyl-1-methyl-2-[1H indole-4,7-dione]prop-β-en-α-ol) is a known substrate for DTD but clinical trials were disappointing, as a result of rapid plasma clearance and reversible dose-limiting kidney toxicity. It is an obvious concern that RH1 does not exhibit the same limitations. We therefore describe the antitumour activity and pharmacology of RH1 in mice and compare its pharmacological characteristics to those of EO9. Significant antitumour activity (P = 0.01) was seen for RH1 (0.5 mg/kg, i.p.) against the high DTD-expressing H460 human lung carcinoma. Pharmacokinetic analysis of RH1 in mice showed a t1/2 of 23 min with an area under the curve of 43.0 ng hr mL−1 resulting in a calculated clearance of 5.1 mL min−1, 10-fold slower than EO9. RH1 was also more stable than EO9 in murine blood, where the breakdown was thought to be DTD-related. NADH-dependent microsomal metabolism of RH1 and EO9 in both liver and kidney was slow (<100 pmol/min/g tissue), reflecting the low microsomal DTD expression (<35 nmol/mg/min). Liver cytosol metabolism was rapid for both compounds (>4500 pmol/min/g tissue), although DTD levels were low (21.4 ± 0.6 nmol/mg/min). DTD activity in the kidney cytosol was high (125 ± 8.2 nmol/mg/min) and EO9 was rapidly metabolised (4396 ± 1678 pmol/min/g), but the metabolic rate for RH1 was 7-fold slower (608 ± 86 pmol/min/g), even though RH1 was shown to be an excellent substrate for DTD (Vmax = 800 μmol/min/mg and a Km of 11.8 μM). The two DTD substrates RH1 and EO9 are clearly metabolised differently, suggesting that RH1 may have different pharmacological properties to those of EO9 in the clinic.

Section snippets

Antitumour activity

All animal experiments were carried out under a project licence approved by the Home Office, London, U.K., and UK CCCR guidelines [20] were followed throughout. The H460 is a high diaphorase-expressing lung carcinoma [21] and was grown subcutaneously as a xenograft in NCR-Nu mice of approximately 25 g (supplied by the NCI). H460 tumours were transplanted as fragments by trocar. Groups of 5–10 tumour-bearing mice were treated with RH1 at the previously established single i.v. maximum tolerated

Antitumour activity

Figure 2 shows the in vivo antitumour activity of RH1 against the high DTD-expressing H460 tumour. There was a significant (P = 0.01) growth delay of 2.5 days for the tumour doubling time following i.p. administration of RH1 at a dose of 0.5 mg/kg.

Chromatography

Chromatographic separation was good using the system described with no interfering substances apparent in the control (drug-free) samples tested, which included blood, plasma, liver, and kidney extracts. Calibration curves were linear over the range

Discussion

RH1 is a novel aziridinylbenzoquinone that was synthesised as a substrate for DTD and is shortly to enter clinical trial. It is unusually potent and we describe here the first report of its significant antitumour activity against the high DTD-expressing H460 human lung carcinoma. This study has also investigated several of the factors that are likely to influence the pharmacokinetics of RH1 and compared these to the other DTD substrate EO9. It has been acknowledged for some time that the

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by War on Cancer, Bradford, U.K. We would also like to acknowledge the helpful contribution of Dr. John Butler, Paterson Institute for Cancer Research, Manchester, U.K., to this study. Dr. Butler also provided the HPLC conditions used. EO9 was a gift from the Screening and Pharmacology Group of the EORTC.

References (29)

  • P Khan et al.

    Development and validation of a sensitive solid-phase extraction and high-performance liquid chromatographic assay for the novel bio-reductive anti-tumour agent RH1 in human and mouse plasma

    J Chromatogr B Biomed Sci App

    (1999)
  • J.M Brown et al.

    The unique physiology of solid tumorsOpportunities (and problems) for cancer therapy

    Cancer Res

    (1998)
  • L Ernster

    DT-diaphorase; A historical review

    Chem Scripta

    (1987)
  • J.J Schlager et al.

    Cytosolic NAD(P)H:(quinone-acceptor)oxidoreductase in human normal and tumor tissueEffects of cigarette smoking and alcohol

    Int J Cancer

    (1990)
  • Cited by (33)

    • Apaziquone for Nonmuscle Invasive Bladder Cancer: Where Are We Now?

      2020, Urologic Clinics of North America
      Citation Excerpt :

      Despite reports of 3 partial responses in phase 1 studies, no responses were seen in phase 2 clinical trials with intravenous apaziquone. It was hypothesized that the rapid pharmacokinetic elimination and relatively poor penetration of the drug could have compromised drug delivery to tumors following systemic administration.48 If this is the case, these unfavorable pharmacokinetic properties of intravenous administration could be turned to an advantage for apaziquone in the treatment of cancers in third compartments like the urinary bladder.

    • The orthotopic Fischer/AY-27 rat bladder urothelial cell carcinoma model to test the efficacy of different apaziquone formulations

      2012, Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, no clinical responses were documented in the subsequent phase II clinical trials [6,7]. Most probably, the rapid elimination [5] and relatively poor penetration of the drug compromised drug delivery to tumors following systemic administration [16]. Thereafter, apaziquone was tested in the intravesical treatment of urinary bladder cancer, where rapid clearance does not occur [9].

    • Phase I pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study of the bioreductive drug RH1

      2011, Annals of Oncology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Unlike mitomycin C, RH1 quinone reduction products are more stable, less likely to generate toxic reactive oxygen species and less likely to be influenced by hypoxia than mitomycin C [16]. In keeping with RH1 being an excellent substrate for DTD, it is significantly more cytotoxic in vitro in cells that overexpress DTD, naturally or through transfection with NQO1, than in cells with low DTD [13, 17–20]. Preclinical in vivo xenograft testing demonstrated significant activity in NSCLC, breast, colorectal and ovarian xenograft models [12, 19].

    • Structure, Function, and Mechanism of Cytosolic Quinone Reductases

      2008, Vitamins and Hormones
      Citation Excerpt :

      Reduction of these antitumor compounds gives rise to reactive intermediates that can undergo nucleophilic additions to DNA (N7 of adenine) and other macromolecules, suggesting a possible mechanism for their cytotoxicity. In the last few years, there has been an explosion in the number of groups developing compounds that can be activated by QR1 (Craigo et al., 1999; Flader et al., 2000; Hargreaves et al., 2000; Knox et al., 2000; Loadman et al., 2000; Miskiniene et al., 1999; Okamura et al., 2000; Phillips, 1999; Schulz and Skibo, 2000; Xing and Skibo, 2000). Some of these studies have used the structures of the complexes to guide design.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text