Elsevier

Brain Research

Volume 905, Issues 1–2, 29 June 2001, Pages 178-187
Brain Research

Research report
Involvement of the cerebellar adenosine A1 receptor in cannabinoid-induced motor incoordination in the acute and tolerant state in mice

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-8993(01)02533-1Get rights and content

Abstract

Cannabinoids are known to impair motor function in humans and laboratory animals. We have demonstrated an accentuation of cannabinoid (CP55,940)-induced motor incoordination in mice by the adenosine A1 receptor-selective agonist N6-cyclohexyladenosine (CHA) (4 ng) using an intracerebellar (ICB) microinjection method. This effect was mediated by the A1 receptor because pre-treatment with ICB 8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine (DPCPX) (100 ng), an adenosine A1 receptor selective antagonist, completely abolished the accentuation. Furthermore, ICB pre-treatment with DPCPX (100 ng) before ICB CP55,940 (15 μg) attenuated the motor incoordination suggesting a modulation by an endogenous adenosine A1 system. ICB microinjection of CHA or DPCPX prior to ICB vehicle had no effect on normal motor coordination. ICB microinjection of dipyridamole (25 μg), an adenosine transport inhibitor, significantly accentuated the motor incoordination by ICB CP55,940 (15 μg), providing further support for the involvement of endogenous adenosine in the action of CP55,940. Tolerance to the motor incoordinating effect of ICB CP55,940 was demonstrated following 3 days of i.p. CP55,940 (0.1, 1 or 2 mg/kg every 12 or 24 h; total of six or three injections, respectively). Interestingly, animals which exhibited tolerance to ICB CP55,940 also demonstrated tolerance to the accentuating effect of ICB CHA suggesting cross-tolerance between adenosine agonists and cannabinoids. Cross-tolerance was also demonstrated following 3 days of i.p. CHA (0.25 or 1 mg/kg every 24 h; total of three injections) as further evidence of the modulatory role of the cerebellar adenosine system in the acute manifestation of CP55,940-induced motor incoordination. The involvement of cerebellar adenosine and the A1 receptor in cannabinoid actions is circumstantially supported by previous evidence that CB1 receptors and A1 receptors are both localized on cerebellar granule cell parallel fiber terminals and basket cell neurons where they serve to inhibit the release of neurotransmitters.

Introduction

Cannabinoids are known to impair motor function in humans and laboratory animals [1]. We have previously demonstrated that Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ9-THC), the main psychoactive component of marijuana, impairs motor coordination through a cerebellar CB1 receptor mechanism in mice [7]. This behavioral effect of Δ9-THC was not surprising due to previous evidence of dense CB1 receptor localization in the cerebellum and the well-known function of the cerebellum in coordinating movements [19].

Autoradiographical studies have demonstrated a presynaptic localization of CB1 receptors on cerebellar granule cell axonal terminals in the molecular layer of the cerebellum [19], [23]. It is likely that these receptors inhibit glutamate release from the neuronal terminal upon activation by cannabinoid agonists such as CP55,940 and anandamide [19]. There is also evidence for localization of CB1 receptors on the inhibitory basket cells and excitatory climbing fiber terminals which synapse onto Purkinje cell bodies [23], [33]. Several inhibitory presynaptic receptors appear to be co-localized with CB1 receptors such as the GABAB, adenosine A1 and κ opioid. As for these receptors, the CB1 receptors are Gi/o protein-coupled to inhibit adenylate cyclase and modulate the conductance of Ca2+ and K+ channels [1], [12], [17], [20], [21]. In vitro studies have demonstrated additive GTPase activity when GABAB and A1 agonists are co-incubated [35] and also when CB1 and GABAB agonists are co-incubated [26]. It was concluded that these receptors may couple to their own pool of G-proteins but converge to inhibit common adenylate cyclase enzymes [26]. Such an interaction is plausible between CB1 and A1 receptors.

The purpose of our study was to expand on our previous work which demonstrated a functional interaction between CB1 and A1 receptors in the cerebellum of male CD-1 mice using motor incoordination as the behavioral test. We have recently demonstrated accentuation of Δ9-THC-induced motor incoordination by the adenosine A1 selective agonist, N6-cyclohexyladenosine (CHA), through a cerebellar mechanism [7]. The dose of CHA utilized was too low by itself to induce motor incoordination but significantly accentuated the motor incoordination by intracerebellar (ICB) Δ9-THC when co-administered. Furthermore, ICB administration of the selective A1 receptor antagonist, 8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine (DPCPX), significantly attenuated the motor incoordination induced by Δ9-THC.

The purpose of the present investigation was to establish whether the synthetic cannabinoid agonist, CP55,940, shares the same interaction with the adenosine A1 receptor system when microinjected directly into the mouse cerebellum. We also set out to extend present and previous research by hypothesizing that tolerance to intracerebellar cannabinoid-induced motor incoordination occurs following repeated systemic administration. As further support of the adenosine A1 receptor involvement in cannabinoid-induced motor incoordination, we tested for a cross-tolerance effect with the A1 selective agonist, CHA, by daily systemic dosing for 3 days with CHA followed by an ICB CP55,940 challenge. We suggest that the acute and chronic interactions between drugs acting through CB1 and A1 receptors may result from anatomical co-localization and overlap in their signal transduction cascade.

Section snippets

Animals

Male CD-1 mice were purchased from Charles River Labs (Raleigh, NC). The mice were 5–6 weeks old and weighed between 23 and 28 g at the time of the behavioral experiments. The mice were maintained in a housing facility under controlled humidity and temperature (23–25°C) and kept on a 12:12-h light/dark cycle. Each animal was housed in its own individual plastic cage. Mice had free access to water and commercial mouse chow. All experiments were evaluated and approved by the Animal Use and Care

Rotorod experiments

The doses of CP55,940 used in the present experiments (15 and 20 μg) were selected based on a previous dose–response analysis [13]. The 15-μg dose was established to be the median dose in production of motor incoordination. The 20-μg dose produced a more pronounced motor incoordination and was therefore deemed appropriate for use in the tolerance experiments with systemic CP55,940.

Fig. 1 shows the effects of ICB microinjection of CHA and DPCPX on CP55,940-induced motor incoordination. A

Discussion

The results of this investigation support the hypothesis of an adenosinergic modulation of CP55,940-induced motor incoordination. An acute interaction was noted following ICB microinjection of an A1 receptor selective agonist (CHA) and/or antagonist (DPCPX) prior to ICB CP55,940. Furthermore, repeated systemic injection of CHA resulted in cross-tolerance to CP55,940.

CHA accentuated the motor incoordination produced by CP55,940 at all three evaluation times (see Fig. 1). It should be noted that

References (35)

  • P. Mailleux et al.

    Distribution of neuronal cannabinoid receptors in adult rat brain: a comparative receptor binding radioautography and in situ hybridization histochemistry

    Neuroscience

    (1992)
  • M.A. Pacheco et al.

    Identification of cannabinoid receptors in cultures of rat cerebellar granule cells

    Brain Res.

    (1993)
  • D.W. Rowen et al.

    Antisense oligodeoxynucleotides to the kappa1 receptor enhance Δ9-THC-induced antinociceptive tolerance

    Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav.

    (1998)
  • A. Ruiz et al.

    Desensitization and internalization of adenosine A1 receptors in rat brain by in vivo treatment with R-PIA: involvement of coated vesicles

    Biochim. Biophys. Acta

    (1996)
  • K. Tsou et al.

    Immunohistochemical distribution of cannabinoid CB1 receptors in the rat central nervous system

    Neuroscience

    (1998)
  • I.B. Adams et al.

    Cannabis: pharmacology and toxicology in animals and humans

    Addiction

    (1996)
  • C.S. Breivogel et al.

    Chronic Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol treatment produces a time-dependent loss of cannabinoid receptors and cannabinoid receptor-activated G proteins in rat brain

    J. Neurochem.

    (1999)
  • Cited by (18)

    • Functional interaction and cross-tolerance between ethanol and δ<sup>9</sup>-THC: Possible modulation by mouse cerebellar adenosinergic A<inf>1</inf>/GABAergic-A receptors

      2014, Behavioural Brain Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      Similarly, the animals that are administered chronic Δ9-THC infusion, when challenged with acute CHA + ethanol treatments, demonstrate a marked (p < 0.001) decrease in the potentiating effect of CHA (Fig. 7; ■----■ vs. ×---×). We have previously demonstrated that cerebellar adenosinergic A1 receptors modulate ethanol- [19,24,28] and Δ9-THC-induced [3,24,34,35] cerebellar ataxia. We have also made a preliminary observation during one of our previous study [3], that functional cross-tolerance develops between systemic ethanol administration and ICB Δ9-THC microinfusion.

    • Medical marijuana: Emerging applications for the management of neurologic disorders

      2004, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America
    • Acute ethanol/cannabinoid-induced ataxia and its antagonism by oral/systemic/intracerebellar A<inf>1</inf> adenosine receptor antisense in mice

      2002, Brain Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      The anatomical colocalization of A1 adenosine and CB1 cannabinoid receptors on the granule cells, their axons and axonal terminals, the coupling of both receptor types to adenylate cyclase via pertussis toxin-sensitive Gi/Go proteins provided further strong circumstantial evidence for A1 adenosinergic modulation of ethanol- and cannabinoid-induced ataxia as well as for a common post-receptor signaling pathway [19]. It was also the basis of our recent studies [8–10] in which A1 adenosine receptors were shown to be involved in the neuromodulation of intracerebellar cannabinoid-induced ataxia. To further confirm the involvement of A1 adenosine receptors in the neuromodulation of both the ethanol- and Δ9-THC-induced ataxia, we decided to use the novel approach of A1 adenosine receptor antisense oligodeoxynucleotide.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text