Functional characterization of bradykinin analogues on recombinant human bradykinin B1 and B2 receptors

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-2999(00)00046-7Get rights and content

Abstract

We have examined the activity of a range of kinins on recombinant human bradykinin receptors, using a high throughput functional assay which measures intracellular Ca2+ responses. The most potent agonist for Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells stably expressing recombinant human bradykinin B1 receptors were Des-Arg9-bradykinin (EC50=7.9 nM) and Des-Arg10-kallidin (EC50=8.6 nM), while the most potent agonist for CHO cells expressing human bradykinin B2 receptors was bradykinin (EC50=2.0 nM). These findings confirm the validity of the recombinant system and the microtitre plate imaging-based characterization system when compared to known agonist properties of the native receptors. The concentration–response relationship for bradykinin at bradykinin B2 receptors was potently inhibited by [d-Arg0,Hyp3,β-(2-thienyl)-Ala5,d-Tic7,Oic8]-bradykinin (Hoe140) (IC50=71 nM), which was 500-fold more potent against the B2-expressing cells than the B1 cells. Bradykinin B1 receptor-mediated responses activated by Des-Arg10-kallidin were fully antagonized by Des-Arg9-[Leu8]bradykinin (IC50=59 nM), Des-Arg10-Hoe140 (IC50=211 nM) and most potently by Lys-Lys-Arg-Pro-Hyp-Gly-Igl-Ser-d-Igl-Oic (B9858) (IC50=14 nM), none of which displayed any activity against the bradykinin B2 receptor cell line up to 3 μM. None of the antagonists displayed partial agonism activity in these cell lines. All bradykinin B1 and B2 receptor antagonists tested acted in an apparently non-competitive manner that is likely to be due in part to their kinetics and to the nature of the functional assay used.

Introduction

Kinin receptors have been classified into two distinct subtypes, bradykinin receptors B1 and B2, initially on the basis of distinct induction and agonist activation profiles (Regoli and Barabe, 1980). Subsequently separate gene products for B1 and B2-mediated responses were identified and cloned from a number of tissues and species, and subtype-specific antagonists have been developed Hess et al., 1992, Wirth et al., 1992, Menke et al., 1994, Marceau et al., 1998. Both have been suggested to play important roles in the inflammatory response to tissue injury, with the constitutively expressed bradykinin B2 receptor likely to be important in the early stages of the response, and the inducible bradykinin B1 receptor thought to be involved in the chronic period of inflammation and pain transduction Dray and Perkins, 1993, Marceau et al., 1998. The involvement of kinin receptors in inflammation and pain transduction has been supported by the results of studies on mice lacking bradykinin B2 receptor expression Borkowski et al., 1995, Rupniak et al., 1997, Seabrook et al., 1997.

The nature of the bradykinin receptor modulation evoked by some kinins is not clearly established from literature reports. Distinct differences in agonist and antagonist potency and selectivity have been reported for the native kinin receptors found in different species and tissues Wirth et al., 1992, Hall, 1997, MacNeil et al., 1997, Wohlfart et al., 1997. Also, compounds with subtype selectivity in one tissue have been reported to affect both subtypes in other preparations (Wirth et al., 1992). However, to date, no genetic evidence has been reported for subtypes of either the B1 or B2 bradykinin receptor. It is currently unclear whether these discrepancies are due to differences in assay format, equilibration period, or receptor reserve, such that compounds with low intrinsic activity may be detected as antagonists if the physiological response requires stimulation of a large proportion of the expressed receptors (Kenakin, 1993).

The study of antagonism using functional efficacy measurement is preferable to radioligand binding for understanding the nature and consequences of the ligand–receptor interaction. As both human subtypes have been cloned, it is possible to study receptor modulation in cell lines stably expressing one or other subtype. Luminescence studies in an aequorin-human embryonic kidney cell line (aequorin-HEK-293 cells) transiently transfected with bradykinin B1 receptors have shown that Ca2+-based screening is a viable approach to bradykinin receptor ligand characterization (MacNeil et al., 1997). We have, therefore, developed a Ca2+-based high throughput screen for bradykinin receptor activity using Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells expressing recombinant human kinin receptors in a 96-well real-time fluorometric imaging plate reader (FLIPR). In the present study, we have reexamined the functional effects of a range of known kinin receptor ligands for both agonist and antagonist activity.

Section snippets

Preparation of experimental buffer and drug solutions

Balanced salt solution containing either 2.5 or 1.25 mM CaCl2 was prepared daily in deionized water. Probenecid was prepared in 1 M sodium hydroxide solution giving a 500 mM stock solution, and the buffer made up to 2.5 mM probenecid concentration before being adjusted to pH 7.4 with sodium hydroxide solution. Des-Arg10-kallidin and bradykinin were stored in aliquots at 50 mM at −20°C. Antagonists and agonists were made up in two separate plates at ×5 final desired concentration, 250 μl per

B1 and B2 agonists

Initial experiments were performed to characterize the responses activated in either human B1 or bradykinin B2 receptor-expressing CHO cells by a range of kinins. The peak increase in fluo 3 fluorescence measured by FLIPR within the CHO cells after stimulation with agonist was used to assess the agonist properties of a given compound. Several kinins were found to act as agonists on bradykinin B1 receptors, with both Des-Arg9-bradykinin and Des-Arg10-kallidin being full agonists with EC50∼10 nM (

Discussion

In this study, functional activation of recombinant human kinin receptor subtypes has been measured, and the potency, selectivity and efficacy of bradykinin receptor antagonists compared. The agonist profiles obtained from the stably transfected receptors closely reflects that obtained in native tissues, with Des-Arg9-bradykinin and Des-Arg10-kallidin being potent bradykinin B1 receptor agonists, whereas kallidin and bradykinin were found to be potent B2 receptor agonists. Previous binding

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Graham Foster for writing computation routines to facilitate data analysis, and Julie Kerby for her expert assistance with tissue culture. The B1- and B2-CHO cell lines were developed by the laboratories of Dr. Paul Whiting and Dr. Fred Hess, respectively.

References (35)

  • J.A. Santiago et al.

    Inhibitory effects of Hoe140 on vasodilator responses to bradykinin in the mesenteric vascular bed of the cat

    Eur. J. Pharmacol.

    (1993)
  • G.R. Seabrook et al.

    Expression of B1 and B2 bradykinin receptor mRNA and their functional roles in sympathetic ganglia and sensory dorsal root ganglia neurones from wild-type and B2 receptor knockout mice

    Neuropharmacology

    (1997)
  • P.B. Simpson et al.

    Neuronal Ca2+ stores: activation and function

    Trends Neurosci.

    (1995)
  • J.M. Stewart et al.

    A new generation of bradykinin antagonists

    Immunopharmacology

    (1996)
  • S.N. Allogho et al.

    Kinin B1 and B2 receptors in the mouse

    Can. J. Physiol. Pharmacol.

    (1995)
  • M. Andre et al.

    Bradykinin stimulates the intracellular calcium activity in human mesothelial cells

    Nephrol., Dial., Transplant.

    (1998)
  • A.W. Cuthbert et al.

    Antagonism of kinin effects on epithelia by Hoe140, apparently competitive and non-competitive interactions

    Br. J. Pharmacol.

    (1992)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text