Elsevier

Life Sciences

Volume 68, Issues 22–23, 27 April 2001, Pages 2501-2510
Life Sciences

Properties, regulation and function of muscarinic receptor
Dual effects of muscarinic M2 receptors on the synthesis of cyclic AMP in CHO cells: Background and model

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-3205(01)01045-1Get rights and content

Abstract

It has been observed in several laboratories that muscarinic agonists have dual effects on the synthesis of cyclic AMP in cell lines expressing muscarinic M2 or M4 receptors, producing strong inhibition at low agonist concentrations and lesser inhibition or stimulation at high agonist concentrations. Data obtained on CHO cells (known to express adenylyl cyclases VI and VII) are best interpreted on the assumption that the upward phase of the concentration-response curves reflects simultaneous inhibition of adenylyl cyclase VI via the Gi proteins, with which the M2 and M4 receptors communicate with high affinity, and stimulation of adenyly cyclases VI and VII via the Gs proteins, with which the M2 and M4 receptors communicate with low affinity. A simplified model is described which permits one to predict how the shapes of the concentration-response curves will be affected by changes in the concentration of receptors, the affinities of activated receptors for Gi or Gs proteins, and other parameters.

References (0)

Cited by (13)

  • Bell-shaped agonist activation of 5-HT<inf>1A</inf> receptor-coupled Gαi<inf>3</inf> G-proteins: Receptor density-dependent switch in receptor signaling

    2019, Cellular Signalling
    Citation Excerpt :

    Although the present data, together with the above-mentioned literature, point to high receptor expression levels as being a key factor in detection of bell-shape responses, the exact mechanisms underlying such responses are a matter of discussion. One group [27,28] suggested that U-shaped concentration-response in forskolin-stimulated cAMP production was due to a progressive saturation of muscarinic M2 receptor coupling to a “preferred Gα protein” (Gαi), followed by progressive receptor coupling to a “second preferred Gα protein” (Gαs), thus resulting in neutralization of the inhibitory response mediated by Gαi by the opposite effect of stimulatory Gαs. A similar idea was described for adenosine A1-induced cAMP accumulation in CHO cells.

  • Competitive interaction of 5-HT<inf>1A</inf> receptors with G-protein subtypes in CHO cells demonstrated by RNA interference

    2011, Cellular Signalling
    Citation Excerpt :

    Thus, at porcine α2A-adrenoceptors, the agonist UK14304 can both inhibit adenylyl cyclase via Gi/o proteins and stimulate it via Gs proteins for higher concentrations [26]. Several mechanisms may give rise to bell-shaped isotherms in pharmacological systems [27]. Bell-shaped drug concentration response isotherms in in vitro models have been attributed to the presence of cross-reacting receptors [28,29] or promiscuous coupling to two or more signal transduction systems [30].

  • Section I. The Cholinergic System

    2005, International Review of Neurobiology
    Citation Excerpt :

    Signaling to a new form of MAPK—ERK5—involves the G‐proteins Gα(q) and Gα(12/13) and not Gα(i), Gα(s), or Gβγ subunits (Fukuhara et al., 2000). This variability is marked in pancreatic cells, where M2Rs and M4Rs if bound to G(i) inhibit adenylyl cyclase VI, whereas, if they are bound to G(s), they stimulate adenylyl cyclases VI and VII (Tucek et al., 2001). Alfonzo et al. (1998) show that membrane‐bound guanylyl cyclase (GC) is regulated by muscarinic agents through two opposing signaling pathways.

  • Modelling the consequences of receptor-G-protein promiscuity

    2002, Trends in Pharmacological Sciences
  • Drug-acceptor interactions: Modeling theoretical tools to test and evaluate experimental equilibrium effects

    2017, Drug-Acceptor Interactions: Modeling Theoretical Tools to Test and Evaluate Experimental Equilibrium Effects
View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text