Properties, regulation and function of muscarinic receptorDual effects of muscarinic M2 receptors on the synthesis of cyclic AMP in CHO cells: Background and model
References (0)
Cited by (13)
Bell-shaped agonist activation of 5-HT<inf>1A</inf> receptor-coupled Gαi<inf>3</inf> G-proteins: Receptor density-dependent switch in receptor signaling
2019, Cellular SignallingCitation Excerpt :Although the present data, together with the above-mentioned literature, point to high receptor expression levels as being a key factor in detection of bell-shape responses, the exact mechanisms underlying such responses are a matter of discussion. One group [27,28] suggested that U-shaped concentration-response in forskolin-stimulated cAMP production was due to a progressive saturation of muscarinic M2 receptor coupling to a “preferred Gα protein” (Gαi), followed by progressive receptor coupling to a “second preferred Gα protein” (Gαs), thus resulting in neutralization of the inhibitory response mediated by Gαi by the opposite effect of stimulatory Gαs. A similar idea was described for adenosine A1-induced cAMP accumulation in CHO cells.
Competitive interaction of 5-HT<inf>1A</inf> receptors with G-protein subtypes in CHO cells demonstrated by RNA interference
2011, Cellular SignallingCitation Excerpt :Thus, at porcine α2A-adrenoceptors, the agonist UK14304 can both inhibit adenylyl cyclase via Gi/o proteins and stimulate it via Gs proteins for higher concentrations [26]. Several mechanisms may give rise to bell-shaped isotherms in pharmacological systems [27]. Bell-shaped drug concentration response isotherms in in vitro models have been attributed to the presence of cross-reacting receptors [28,29] or promiscuous coupling to two or more signal transduction systems [30].
Section I. The Cholinergic System
2005, International Review of NeurobiologyCitation Excerpt :Signaling to a new form of MAPK—ERK5—involves the G‐proteins Gα(q) and Gα(12/13) and not Gα(i), Gα(s), or Gβγ subunits (Fukuhara et al., 2000). This variability is marked in pancreatic cells, where M2Rs and M4Rs if bound to G(i) inhibit adenylyl cyclase VI, whereas, if they are bound to G(s), they stimulate adenylyl cyclases VI and VII (Tucek et al., 2001). Alfonzo et al. (1998) show that membrane‐bound guanylyl cyclase (GC) is regulated by muscarinic agents through two opposing signaling pathways.
Modelling the consequences of receptor-G-protein promiscuity
2002, Trends in Pharmacological SciencesModulation of G-protein expression and adenylyl cyclase signaling by high glucose in vascular smooth muscle
2004, Cardiovascular ResearchDrug-acceptor interactions: Modeling theoretical tools to test and evaluate experimental equilibrium effects
2017, Drug-Acceptor Interactions: Modeling Theoretical Tools to Test and Evaluate Experimental Equilibrium Effects