Developmental regulation of the concentrative nucleoside transporters CNT1 and CNT2 in rat liver
Introduction
Plasma membrane transporters selectively up-regulate their activity during liver cell proliferation, probably in response to either increased metabolic needs or osmotic challenges during cell cycle progression. One of these transport systems, system A for neutral amino acid transport, is up-regulated soon after partial hepatectomy in rat liver plasma membrane vesicles in a manner that is consistent with de novo synthesis of carrier proteins [1]. Selective activation of Na+-dependent concentrative transporters is counterbalanced by the early increase in Na,K-ATPase activity that follows the accumulation of both α1 and β1 pump subunit protein and mRNA[2].
In an attempt to determine whether other plasma membrane carriers show this type of regulatory adaptation during liver cell growth, we initially characterized nucleoside transport activity in rat liver plasma membrane vesicles [3], showed that this activity was regulated by the endocrine status of the animal, both in vivo [4], [5] and in isolated hepatocytes [5], and found that it was up-regulated simultaneously to system A during the early phase of liver regeneration after partial hepatectomy [4], [6]. More recently, it has been established that the transport of nucleosides into liver parenchymal cells is mediated by at least two Na+-dependent transport systems [7], which are likely to be CNT2 (SPNT), initially cloned as a ‘liver’ specific nucleoside transporter [8], and CNT1 [9], previously characterized as a specific transporter from absorptive epithelia, such as small intestine and kidney [10] CNT2 mRNA levels increase only 2 h after partial hepatectomy in the rat [4] and it has recently been shown that CNT2 may be a cell-cycle-dependent regulated gene [11]. Polyclonal isoform-specific antibodies against CNT1 and CNT2 proteins [9] have allowed us to show that they are differentially regulated during liver regeneration [4], whereas a selective loss of nucleoside carrier expression has been reported in hepatoma cell lines [11].
The possibility that the expression of the concentrative nucleoside carrier isoforms CNT1 and CNT2 may be dependent on the differentiation and proliferation status of the hepatocyte prompted us to analyze a physiological model of liver growth and differentiation: fetal and postnatal development in the rat. We also tried to determine whether differentiation of fetal parenchymal cells in culture is associated with nucleoside carrier up-regulation.
Section snippets
Animals and isolation of liver parenchymal cells
All animals used in this study were maintained, handled and killed according to the European Union laws on biomedical research involving laboratory animals. Female albino Wistar rats (200 g body weight) were individually mated, and day 0 of pregnancy was defined by the presence of spermatozoa in vaginal smears. Fetuses were obtained by cesarean section on days 20 and 21. Neonates were studied between 12 and 24 h after birth. Suckling and weaned rats were also studied at the indicated times.
Nucleoside transport activity in fetal, neonatal and adult rat hepatocytes
Uridine was used as substrate to monitor the overall capacity for nucleoside uptake into hepatocytes. This nucleoside is a permeant for both concentrative isoforms with relatively similar affinities. Na+-dependent uridine uptake into hepatocytes is linear for at least 4 min [7] and thus, nucleoside uptake into isolated rat liver parenchymal cells was routinely measured at 3 min (initial velocity conditions). Na+-dependent uridine uptake into freshly isolated hepatocytes from 20-day-old fetuses,
Discussion
The possibility that cell differentiation and transformation are associated with selective up- and down-regulation of plasma membrane transporters has been previously analyzed for a variety of carrier proteins and cell systems. For the gene family of glucose transporters, GLUT, isoform-specific modulation of their expression has been reported in the developing rat liver and hepatoma cells, GLUT 2 expression being a feature of differentiated parenchymal cells [18], [19]. Similarly, the kinetic
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Drs Isabel Fabregat and César Roncero for help and advice in the isolation and culture of fetal and neonatal hepatocytes. We thank Robin Rycroft for his editorial help. This study was funded by research grants PB95-0975 from DGICYT (Ministerio de Educación y Cultura, Spain), SAF-99-0115, 2FD97-1268 (Plan Nacional de I+D) and from Fundació August Pi i Sunyer-Marató de TV3 Contra el Càncer. B.d.S. hold a Fellowship from Fundació August Pi i Sunyer (FAPS)-Marató de TV3 contra el
References (32)
- et al.
Up-regulation of system A activity in the regenerating rat liver
FEBS Lett
(1993) - et al.
Na+, K+-ATPase expression during the early phase of liver growth after partial hepatectomy
FEBS Lett
(1995) - et al.
Early induction of Na+-dependent uridine uptake in the regenerating rat liver
FEBS Lett
(1993) - et al.
Primary structure and functional expression of a cDNA encoding the bile canalicular, purine-specific Na+-nucleoside cotransporter
J Biol Chem
(1995) - et al.
Expression of sodium-dependent purine nucleoside carrier (SPNT) mRNA correlates with nucleoside transport activity in rat liver
Biochem Biophys Res Commun
(1997) - et al.
Cloning and functional expression of a complementary DNA encoding a mammalian nucleoside transport protein
J Biol Chem
(1994) - et al.
Transport and mode of action of nucleoside derivatives used in chemical and antiviral therapies
Trends Pharmacol Sci
(1998) - et al.
Over-expression of facilitative glucose transporter genes in human cancer
Biochem Biophys Res Commun
(1990) - et al.
Glucose regulation of glucose transporters in cultured adult and fetal hepatocytes
Metab Clin Exp
(1995) - et al.
Evidence for inherent differences in the system A carrier from normal and transformed liver tissue
J Biol Chem
(1987)