Elsevier

Analytical Biochemistry

Volume 340, Issue 2, 15 May 2005, Pages 295-302
Analytical Biochemistry

In vivo bioluminescence imaging to evaluate estrogenic activities of endocrine disrupters

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ab.2005.02.032Get rights and content

Abstract

Reporter gene technology is widely used to measure activity of hormone analogs, and bioluminescent in vitro assays have allowed rapid screening of numerous chemicals either to identify new agonists or antagonists of hormones or to detect the presence of endocrine disrupters in the environment. Stable bioluminescent cell lines have been established and they provide reproducible dose–response curves and accurate determination of in vitro efficiencies of various chemicals. In vivo, however, these molecules can be metabolized, bound by proteins, or stored in fats and thus could display efficiencies different from those observed in vitro. In vivo assays, such as the uterotrophic bioassay, require numerous sacrificed animals, and responses not only are dependent on an estrogenic action but also imply other factors. For a faster assay and to avoid the use of numerous animals, we developed an in vivo biosensor constituted of stable bioluminescent cells implanted in nude mice. MCF-7 bioluminescent cell lines were chosen since their proliferation is low in the absence of estrogen and the xenograft size can thus be stable for several weeks. Luciferase gene expression was monitored noninvasively with a cooled charge-coupled device camera. Quantitative analysis allowed us to compare in vitro and in vivo actions of different estrogenic compounds (estradiol, estrone) and endocrine disruptors (ethynylestradiol, genistein, octylphenol, and 2,4′-dichlorodiphenyldichloroethylene) in the same cell lines and to follow hormone action on a living animal as a function of time. Different administration protocols have been used and good correlation was observed for most products. However, we found that ethynylestradiol was the most efficient chemical when orally administered.

Section snippets

Materials

Materials for cell culture were obtained from Invitrogen (Cergy-Pontoise, France). Luciferin was purchased from Promega (Charbonnières, France). Tribromoethanol (TBE), 17β estradiol (E2), ethynylestradiol (EE2), estrone (E1), genistein (Gen), 2,4′-dichlorodiphenyldichloroethylene (2,4′-DDE), and 4-tert-octylphenol (OP) were purchased from Sigma Chemical (Saint Quentin-Fallavier, France). Effectors were dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide at 10−2 M.

Generation of stably transfected reporter cell lines

The stably transfected luciferase reporter MELN cell

MELN cell in vitro assay

A great number of compounds able to activate ERα were tested with the MELN cell in vitro assay. The typical dose–response curve of most estrogenic compounds in the MELN cell assay was a sigmoid curve leveling off at a value corresponding to the maximal inductive effect (Fig. 1). Maximum value, taken as 100, was obtained in presence of 10 nM E2 in cell medium; basal activity was 15% of maximal activity and presence of antagonist reduced transactivation [15], [22]. Since antiestrogens were able to

Discussion

In this study, bioluminescence-based measurements were performed to evaluate estrogenic activities of several estrogens and endocrine disrupters using in vitro and in vivo luciferase-expressing tumor cells. The optical reporter gene that we used in our oncology models is a modified version of that isolated from firefly P. pyralis. Luciferase enzyme produces light in presence of luciferin substrate, oxygen, and ATP [25]. in vitro, luciferase uses intracellular oxygen and ATP, and adding 0.3 μM

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by INSERM (ATC), Montpellier 1 University (BQR), l’ARC and la Ligue de lutte contre le cancer (RA). The authors thank Michel Brissac for help in performing animal experiments.

References (27)

  • C. Desbrow et al.

    Identification of estrogenic chemicals in STW effluent. 1. chemical fractionation and in vitro biological screening

    Environ. Sci. Technol.

    (1998)
  • D.M. Klotz et al.

    Identification of environmental chemicals with estrogenic activity using a combination of in vitro assays

    Environ. Health Perspect.

    (1996)
  • J. Legler et al.

    Development of a stably transfected estrogen receptor-mediated luciferase reporter gene assay in the human T47D breast cancer cell line

    Toxicol. Sci.

    (1999)
  • Cited by (42)

    • From bench to bedside: Biosensing strategies to evaluate endocrine disrupting compounds based on epigenetic events and their potential use in medicine

      2020, Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology
      Citation Excerpt :

      The main characteristics to develop biosensors with good-performance include accurate selectivity and fast response to target epigenomic-level biomolecules based on field and diagnostic strategies (Moran et al., 2017). For example, a sensitive and highly-selective biosensor may be used in vivo, avoiding the use of laboratory animals (Pillon et al., 2005) to detect oncoproteins and EDCs in cancer (Jun et al., 2014). Environmental exposure to EDC’s during critical development periods can permanently reprogram normal physiological responses, thus increasing susceptibility to different diseases during life, a process known as developmental reprogramming.

    • Estrogenic and anti-estrogenic activity of 23 commercial textile dyes

      2012, Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety
      Citation Excerpt :

      Raw water samples were centrifuged (2000 g, 15 min) to eliminate solids in suspension. Supernatants were then extracted by solid-phase extraction as described by Pillon et al. (2005). Briefly, aqueous samples were concentrated on reverse-phase C18 (5 g, 20 mL) cartridges (Sigma-Aldrich, St Quentin-Fallavier, France) preconditioned with methanol.

    • An evaluation on combination effects of phenolic endocrine disruptors by estrogen receptor binding assay

      2012, Toxicology in Vitro
      Citation Excerpt :

      Both in vivo and in vitro assays have been developed to screen for estrogenic activity of chemicals (Richter et al., 2007; Li et al., 2010). In vivo assays, such as vitellogenin induction assay, uterotropic assay and pubertal onset assay, have been widely used for estrogenicity confirmation (Pillon et al., 2005; Borgert et al., 2011; Knudsen et al., 2011). Concurrently, in vitro assays, such as estrogen receptor binding assay, yeast estrogen screen (YES) assay and MCF-7 breast cancer cell proliferation assay (E-screen), have also been designed for the rapid screening of the estrogen-mimicking potential of fairly unknown compounds or samples (Vanparys et al., 2010; Connolly et al., 2011; Pomatto et al., 2011).

    • Intraperitoneal administration of novel doxorubicin loaded polymeric delivery systems against peritoneal carcinomatosis: Experimental study in a murine model of ovarian cancer

      2011, Gynecologic Oncology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Cell line was cultured at 37 °C, 95% relative humidity in an atmosphere containing 5% carbon dioxide in air. Exponentially grown SK-OV3 cells at 30% confluency were transfected with luciferase-expressing vector CMV-Luc-Hygro kindly donated by P. Balaguer (U896, Montpellier Cancer Research Institute, Montpellier, France) [26,27], using the calcium phosphate transfection kit from Sigma–Aldrich (Saint-Quentin-Fallavier, France). Transfected cells (SK-OV3-Luc) were cultured in the presence of 400 μg/ml hygromycine B. Luciferase expression of individual clones was determined by luminescence using a Microbeta® plate reader luminometer (PerkinElmer Wallac, Turku, Finland).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text