Potent antagonists of the CCR2b receptor. Part 3: SAR of the (R)-3-aminopyrrolidine series

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmcl.2008.02.015Get rights and content

Abstract

SAR studies were conducted around lead compound 1 using high-throughput parallel solution and solid phase synthesis. Our lead optimization efforts led to the identification of several CCR2b antagonists with potent activity in both binding and functional assays [Compound 71 CCR2b Binding IC50 3.2 nM; MCP-1-Induced Chemotaxis IC50 0.83 nM; Ca2+ Flux IC50 7.5 nM].

Graphical abstract

SAR studies of a 3-amino pyrrolidine series led to the identification of potent CCR2b antagonists with low nanomolar activity in binding and functional assays as exemplified by compound 71.

  1. Download : Download full-size image

Section snippets

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to acknowledge Dr. Erin Bradley and Dr. David Spellmeyer for computational support on this program, Dr. Dan Kassel, Dr. Lu Zeng and Ms. Xiaoli Wang for their technical expertise in setting up systems for mass triggered HPLC purification, Ms. Akiko Takeuchi for her expertise on the Ca2+ flux inhibition assay and Dr. Takeshi Hara and Dr. Seizi Kurozumi for general support.

References and notes (18)

  • B.J. Rollins

    Blood

    (1997)
    J. Saunders et al.

    Drug Discov. Today

    (1999)
    P.M. Murphy et al.

    Pharmacol. Rev.

    (2000)
    R. Horuk

    Cytokine Growth Factor Rev.

    (2001)
    P.H. Carter

    Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol.

    (2002)
    M.K. Schwarz et al.

    Nat. Rev. Drug Disc.

    (2002)
    I.F. Charo et al.

    N. Eng. J. Med.

    (2006)
  • B.J. Rollins et al.

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.

    (1988)
    I.F. Charo et al.

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.

    (1994)
  • B. Lu et al.

    J. Exp. Med.

    (1998)
  • H. Ogata et al.

    J. Pathol.

    (1997)
    J.-H. Gong et al.

    J. Exp. Med.

    (1997)
  • P.N. Craig

    J. Med. Chem.

    (1972)
    P.N. Craig

    J. Med. Chem.

    (1971)
  • L. Boring et al.

    J. Clin. Invest.

    (1997)
  • L. Boring et al.

    Nature

    (1998)
    T.C. Dawson et al.

    Atherosclerosis

    (1999)
  • C.M. Lloyd et al.

    J. Exp. Med.

    (1997)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (25)

  • Structure-based studies of chemokine receptors

    2013, Current Opinion in Structural Biology
    Citation Excerpt :

    The models deemed most consistent with the available data are then further refined by molecular dynamics simulation in the lipid bilayer. This method has been used to model CCR2 in complex with the dual CCR2/5 antagonist TAK-779 and the CCR2 selective Teijin antagonist [26,27]. However, the key residues involved in the receptor/ligand interaction were not entirely consistent with the reported mutagenesis data [28], which suggested that the suitability of rhodopsin as the template for chemokine receptor homology modeling was low.

  • Introducing new dimensions in MIA-QSAR: A case for chemokine receptor inhibitors

    2013, European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
    Citation Excerpt :

    Thus, a more descriptive MIA-QSAR method is presented, in which chemical structures are built by taking into account atoms with sizes proportional to their van der Waals radii and a variety of colors to differentiate atom types. This novel approach has been compared to traditional MIA-QSAR and to a 3D-QSAR reported in the literature [10], using a series of chemokine receptor (CCR2) inhibitors. CCR2 is targeted for diseases like arthritis, multiple sclerosis, vascular disease, obesity and type 2 diabetes.

  • Chapter 12 The Use of Receptor Homology Modeling to Facilitate the Design of Selective Chemokine Receptor Antagonists

    2009, Methods in Enzymology
    Citation Excerpt :

    Analysis of the resultant trajectory allows the assessment of the stability of the proposed binding mode and the predicted interactions. This method has been used to generate models of CCR2 in complex with dual CCR2/5 antagonist TAK‐779 (7) (Baba et al., 1999) and the CCR2 selective Teijin/Combichem (5) antagonist (Moree et al., 2008). Because it was difficult to predict which expanded receptor conformation would give rise to a disparate set of poses, docking studies were carried out in receptors that had been expanded with a range of particle radii.

View all citing articles on Scopus

Present address: Pfizer Global Research & Development, La Jolla Laboratories, Discovery Chemistry, 10614 Science Center Drive (CB6), San Diego, CA 92121, USA.

Present address: Pfizer Global Research and Development, Nagoya Laboratories, 5-2 Taketoyo, Aichi 470-2393, Japan.

§

Present address: Bizen Chemical Co., Ltd, Research and Development Department, 363-Tokutomi, Kumayama-Cho, Akaiwa-Gun, Okayama 709-0716, Japan.

Present address: Vertex, 11010 Torreyana Road, San Diego, CA 92121, USA.

††

Present address: LEAD Therapeutics, Inc., 999 Bayhill Drive, Suite 130, San Bruno, CA 94066, USA.

‡‡

Present address: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, PO Box 4000, Princeton, NJ 08543, USA.

View full text