Cancer Letters

Cancer Letters

Volume 320, Issue 2, 28 July 2012, Pages 150-157
Cancer Letters

Mini-review
A-class prostaglandins: Early findings and new perspectives for overcoming tumor chemoresistance

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canlet.2012.03.003Get rights and content

Abstract

The antiproliferative properties of cyclopentenone prostaglandins of the A-class have long been known. Considerable research has led to the elucidation of some of the mechanisms of action of these pleiotropic compounds. A-class prostaglandins or derived molecules (A-PG) may block the cell cycle, inhibit anti-apoptotic transcription factors, activate apoptotic cascades, induce a stress response and inhibit protein synthesis in a cell type-dependent manner. In addition, recent reports indicate that A-class PG may interact with various cellular detoxification systems and drug metabolizing enzymes used by cancer cells as mechanisms of chemoresistance. Some of these findings may open new perspectives for the development of strategies aimed at overcoming cancer resistance to widely used antitumor drugs. Here we outline the mechanisms of action for the antitumoral effects of PGA and related compounds, emphasizing those with impact on cellular defence systems which may contribute to cancer chemoresistance. The ability of A-PG to form covalent adducts with thiol groups in proteins and in glutathione is essential for their biological actions. Therefore, identification of the protein targets and elucidation of the interactions of A-PG with the glutathione biotransformation system will be critical for understanding the antitumoral effects of these compounds per se or through their ability to sensitize cancer cells towards other drugs.

Introduction

Tumor chemoresistance is one of the major problems encountered during cancer chemotherapy and overcoming this adverse situation is an important challenge nowadays [1]. Combination therapies of tailored drugs targeting tumor type-specific mechanisms of tumorigenesis or resistance are showing improved performance and offering new strategies [2]. The anti-tumoral properties of prostaglandins of the A-class have been the subject of intense study in the search for compounds with novel mechanisms of action which could display antitumoral effects on their own or potentiate the effects of some of the widely used anti-cancer drugs.

Prostaglandins of the A-class were identified in human seminal plasma in the 1960s [3] and were detected at low nanomolar concentrations in human plasma [4]. Formation of A-type PG occurs in vivo by dehydration of their parent PG, that is PGE1 or PGE2, formed in turn by the sequential action of cyclooxygenase (COX) enzymes and PGE synthases on unsaturated fatty acids of 20 carbon atoms [5], [6]. Organic synthesis of these compounds greatly facilitated the assessment of their effects in diverse biological systems. Notably, it was found that A-class PG were able to inhibit the proliferation of tumor cells in vitro, including melanoma and leukemia cells, and display antitumor activity against several kinds of tumors in vivo [7], [8], [9]. A-class PG were found to block the cell cycle and induce apoptosis in various cancer cell lines and, in some cases, potentiate the effects of other anticancer drugs [10], [11], [12]. In addition, A-class PG were shown to enhance cell differentiation in certain tumor cell lines [13], [14]. A-class PG have also shown antiviral activity against poliovirus, Sendai and HIV virus, among others [15], [16]. The mechanisms of these effects may be multiple and involve the interaction of A-class PG with both cellular and viral targets. Early studies identified the induction of a heat shock response and the inhibition of transcription factor nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB) as important events in the antiviral effect [15], [17]. More recently other mechanisms have been put forward including interference with viral morphogenesis [18]. Moreover, the ability of these compounds to inhibit NF-κB drew attention to their potential as anti-inflammatory agents and indeed, anti-inflammatory effects of A-class PG have been observed both in cellular and animal models of inflammation [19], [20]. Here again, the involvement of other potential targets including the inhibition of transcription factor activator protein 1 (AP-1) or the activation of peroxisome proliferator activated receptor gamma (PPARγ), need to be considered [21], [22], [23]. The observation of these effects led to the definition of the three main potentially therapeutic properties of these PG, namely antiproliferative, antiviral and anti-inflammatory.

From the early studies it was noted that the particular chemical structure of these compounds and their electrophilic nature played an important role in their biological activity [13], [24]. A-class PG possess a cyclopentenone structure bearing an α,β-unsaturated carbonyl group and one or more electrophilic carbons which is key for activity. Thus, PG with cyclopentenone structure (cyPG) may suffer nucleophilic attacks and form covalent adducts with nucleophiles, including several residues in proteins and with the cysteine residue of the tripeptide glutathione (see [25] for review), through a reaction known as Michael addition (Fig. 1). In recent years, the use of cyPG has helped unveil novel mechanisms of cellular regulation and signal transduction common to other electrophilic species or to redox-modulating agents [23], [26], [27]. It should be noted that their reactivity may be one of the advantages but also of the drawbacks of the use of cyPG in clinical settings and further work is needed to elucidate their antitumoral potential. Although initial studies on the properties or A-class PG revealed antitumoral effects in preclinical studies in vivo, as far as we know the use of these compounds has not reached the clinical practice yet. However, in the last few years there has been a renewed interest in the potential clinical use of these compounds and several new formulations of cyPG analogs, with improved bioavailability and the possibility of a more targeted administration, are under study [20]. In addition, the functional cyclopentenone moiety is shared by a number of natural and synthetic products which are showing antitumoral properties and offering novel leads for drug design [28].

In this review we address the mechanisms of the antitumoral action of A-series PG and various derived molecules, which we will refer in general as A-PG, making particular emphasis on their ability to overcome cancer chemoresistance in experimental settings. Moreover, given the fact that covalent modification of proteins constitutes the main mechanism for cyPG action, we discuss the importance of target identification to open new perspectives for the potential use of these or related compounds as therapeutic tools.

Section snippets

Antitumoral effects of A-PG

Early studies observed that A-class PG inhibited DNA synthesis and proliferation of tumor cells more potently than some of the known chemotherapeutic agents and apparently through unrelated mechanisms [29]. This raised hope on the potential use of these agents alone or in combination with antitumoral drugs to increase the therapeutic anticancer arsenal and overcome chemoresistance. A summary of the proposed mechanisms for the antitumoral actions of A-PG is shown in Fig. 2. Initial hypotheses on

Structure–activity relationships of A-PG

The potential use of PGA1 or its derivatives in the clinic would require adequate stability and pharmacokinetics. However, PGA1 was found to be rapidly metabolized in serum [43]. Several PGA-derived compounds have been synthesized to achieve higher potency or stability. Compounds such as Δ7-PGA1 and 13,14-dihydro-15-deoxy-Δ7-PGA1 methyl ester showed higher cytotoxicity and increased antitumoral potency in nude mice bearing ovarian cancer cells [8], [9]. On the other hand, compounds in which the

Effects of A-PG on tumor resistance mechanisms

Multidrug resistance (MDR) is a phenomenon by which cells display cross-resistance to a variety of structurally unrelated agents. Drug resistance may be intrinsic and/or acquired, the latter arising as a consequence of exposure to the treatment. Clinically, a MDR phenotype implies that the patient does not respond to the treatment, and is the main cause of death in patients with cancer. Hence, understanding chemoresistance mechanisms is of great importance to develop co-adjuvant therapies able

Interactions of A-PG with GSH: a mechanism of functional diversity and selectivity

The GSH biotransformation system is one of the major pathways of chemoresistance. The interactions of PGA-type PG with GSH may occur at various levels and have diverse functional consequences (Fig. 4). Due to their electrophilic nature, cyPG may form Michael adducts with GSH both enzymatically, through the action of GSTs, and non-enzymatically [62], [63]. Conjugation with GSH is generally considered as a mechanism for PGA detoxification, linked to a lower biological activity of the adduct

Elucidating the mechanisms of action of PGA: identification of PGA targets

As outlined above, the targets and mechanisms of action of A-type cyPG are multiple. Various works have identified and characterized a number of proteins which are targets for the covalent binding of PGA1 through biochemical and proteomic approaches. Among the targets identified are proteins involved in cell defence mechanisms or in the maintenance of cellular homeostasis or redox status, the inactivation of which could contribute to PG antitumoral effects or sensitization towards the action of

Conclusions

cyPG are endogenous lipidic mediators that have raised considerable interest due to their anti-inflammatory and antiproliferative actions. From the early studies in which the importance of their electrophilic nature for biological action was ascertained there has been intense research leading to the delineation of their multiple effects and mechanisms of action. In this review we have focused on the A-class cyPG and their derivatives to give a global view of the numerous evidences for their

Acknowledgements

Work in the authors’ laboratory is financed by Grants SAF2009-11642 from MiCInn and RETICS RD07/0064/0007 from ISCIII. We acknowledge the work of all the members of the group who have contributed to the findings reported in this review. Feedback from COST Action CM1001 is appreciated. The sponsors had no role in study design, collection, analysis and interpretation of data; writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

References (85)

  • D. Pérez-Sala et al.

    Molecular basis for the inhibition of AP-1 DNA binding by 15-deoxy-Δ12,14-prostaglandin J2

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (2003)
  • B. Garzón et al.

    A biotinylated analog of the anti-proliferative prostaglandin A1 allows assessment of PPAR-independent effects and identification of novel cellular targets for covalent modification

    Chem. Biol. Interact.

    (2010)
  • D. Pérez-Sala

    Electrophilic eicosanoids: signaling and targets

    Chem. Biol. Interact.

    (2011)
  • B. Garzón et al.

    Proteomic studies on protein modification by cyclopentenone prostaglandins: expanding our view on electrophile actions

    J. Proteom.

    (2011)
  • H. Tanaka et al.

    Effective irreversible alkylating reagents based on the structure of clavulones

    Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.

    (2004)
  • S. Fukushima et al.

    Preparation and evaluation of o/w type emulsions containing antitumor prostaglandin

    Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev.

    (2000)
  • M.H. Wiley et al.

    Evidence for cAMP-independent inhibition of S-phase DNA synthesis by prostaglandins

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1983)
  • A.M. Choi et al.

    Cell growth inhibition by prostaglandin A2 results in elevated expression of gadd153 mRNA

    Exp. Cell Res.

    (1992)
  • M. Tanikawa et al.

    Potent prostaglandin A1 analogs that suppress tumor cell growth through induction of p21 and reduction of cyclin E

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1998)
  • S.Y. Lee et al.

    Prostaglandin A2 activates intrinsic apoptotic pathway by direct interaction with mitochondria in HL-60 cells

    Prostagland. Other Lipid Mediat.

    (2010)
  • E. Cernuda-Morollón et al.

    15-Deoxy-Δ12,14-prostaglandin J2 inhibition of NF-κB DNA binding through covalent modification of the p50 subunit

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (2001)
  • L. Pavithra et al.

    Heat-shock protein 70 binds to a novel sequence in 5′ UTR of tumor suppressor SMAR1 and regulates its mRNA stability upon prostaglandin A2 treatment

    FEBS Lett.

    (2010)
  • P.C. Chiang et al.

    Induction of Fas clustering and apoptosis by coral prostanoid in human hormone-resistant prostate cancer cells

    Eur. J. Pharmacol.

    (2006)
  • U. Kellner et al.

    Culprit and victim – DNA topoisomerase II

    Lancet Oncol.

    (2002)
  • L.M. Cagen et al.

    The conjugation of prostaglandin A1 and glutathione catalyzed by homogeneous glutathione S-transferases from human and rat liver

    Biochim. Biophys. Acta

    (1975)
  • M.L. van Iersel et al.

    Interactions of prostaglandin A2 with the glutathione-mediated biotransformation system

    Biochem. Pharmacol.

    (1999)
  • R. Evers et al.

    Transport of glutathione prostaglandin A conjugates by the multidrug resistance protein 1

    FEBS Lett.

    (1997)
  • J.F. Bickley et al.

    Reactions of some cyclopentenones with selected cysteine derivatives and biological activities of the product thioethers

    Bioorg. Med. Chem.

    (2004)
  • J. Gayarre et al.

    Differential selectivity of protein modification by the cyclopentenone prostaglandins PGA1 and 15-deoxy-Δ12,14-PGJ2: role of glutathione

    FEBS Lett.

    (2005)
  • F.J. Sánchez-Gómez et al.

    Direct evidence for the covalent modification of glutathione-S-transferase P1-1 by electrophilic prostaglandins: implications for enzyme inactivation and cell survival

    Arch. Biochem. Biophys.

    (2007)
  • T. Shibata et al.

    Thioredoxin as a molecular target of cyclopentenone prostaglandins

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (2003)
  • F. Su et al.

    Glutathione S transferase pi indicates chemotherapy resistance in breast cancer

    J. Surg. Res.

    (2003)
  • T. Nishinaka et al.

    Regulation of aldo–keto reductase AKR1B10 gene expression: involvement of transcription factor Nrf2

    Chem. Biol. Interact.

    (2011)
  • H. Lage

    An overview of cancer multidrug resistance: a still unsolved problem

    Cell. Mol. Life Sci.

    (2008)
  • M.J. Higgins et al.

    Targeted therapies for breast cancer

    J. Clin. Invest.

    (2011)
  • C.D. Funk

    Prostaglandins and leukotrienes: advances in eicosanoid biology

    Science

    (2001)
  • M.D. Bregman et al.

    Inhibition of human melanoma growth by prostaglandin A, D, and J analogues

    Cancer Res.

    (1986)
  • T. Kato et al.

    Antitumor activity of delta 7-prostaglandin A1 and delta 12-prostaglandin J2 in vitro and in vivo

    Cancer Res.

    (1986)
  • H. Sasaki et al.

    Antitumor activity of 13,14-dihydro-15-deoxy-delta7-prostaglandin-A1-methyl ester integrated into lipid microspheres against human ovarian carcinoma cells resistant to cisplatin in vivo

    Cancer Res.

    (1999)
  • T. Ishikawa et al.

    Anti-cancer-prostaglandin-induced cell-cycle arrest and its modulation by an inhibitor of the ATP-dependent glutathione S-conjugate export pump (GS-X pump)

    Biochem. J.

    (1998)
  • J.D. Liu et al.

    Involvement of c-jun N-terminal kinase activation in 15-deoxy-delta12,14-prostaglandin J2-and prostaglandin A1-induced apoptosis in AGS gastric epithelial cells

    Mol. Carcinog.

    (2003)
  • Y. Kikuchi et al.

    Preclinical studies of antitumor prostaglandins by using human ovarian cancer cells

    Cancer Metast. Rev.

    (1994)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text