Elsevier

Cellular Signalling

Volume 16, Issue 11, November 2004, Pages 1211-1227
Cellular Signalling

Review
What turns CREB on?

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cellsig.2004.05.001Get rights and content

Abstract

The transactivation domain of the cAMP response element-binding protein (CREB) consists of two major domains. The glutamine-rich Q2 domain, which interacts with the general transcription factor TAFII130/135, is sufficient for the recruitment of a functional RNA polymerase II complex and allows basal transcriptional activity. The kinase-inducible domain, however, mediates signal-induced activation of CREB-mediated transcription. It is generally believed that recruitment of the coactivators CREB-binding protein (CBP) and p300 after signal-induced phosphorylation of this domain at serine-133 strongly enhances CREB-dependent transcription. Transcriptional activity of CREB can also be potentiated by phosphoserine-133-independent mechanisms, and not all stimuli that provoke phosphorylation of serine-133 stimulate CREB-dependent transcription. This review presents an overview of the diversity of stimuli that induce CREB phosphorylation at Ser-133, focuses on phosphoserine-133-dependent and -independent mechanisms that affect CREB-mediated transcription, and discusses different models that may explain the discrepancy between CREB Ser-133 phosphorylation and activation of CREB-mediated transcription.

Introduction

Induction of gene expression by the second messenger cyclic adenosine 3′,5′-monophosphate (cAMP) is generally believed to be mediated by binding of the cAMP response element-binding protein (CREB) to a conserved TGACGTCA sequence present in the promoter of many cAMP-responsive genes. CREB was originally shown to become phosphorylated at serine residue 133 (Ser-133) by an activated cAMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA) and phosphorylation of CREB at this residue allows recruitment of the CREB-binding protein CBP or its paralogue p300. The intrinsic histone acetyltransferase activities and the bridging properties with RNA polymerase II via RNA helicase A of the coactivators CBP/p300 contribute to the augmented CREB-mediated transcription. The functions of CREB and the molecular mechanisms governing cAMP-induced activation of CREB-mediated gene expression have been excellently reviewed elsewhere [1], [2], [3], [4], [5].

Section snippets

Stimuli that induce phosphorylation of CREB at Ser-133

A stringent genome-wide analysis for CREB binding motifs resulted in 1349 sites in the mouse genome and 1663 hits in the human genome [6]. This vast amount of putative CREB-regulated genes and the enormous functional diversity of the proteins encoded by these genes indicate the important biological role of CREB in many cellular processes. One mode to investigate the involvement of CREB in the regulation of a specific target gene is by examining whether a stimulus, known to activate the

Other post-translational modifications of CREB

Although phosphorylation of Ser-133 is generally accepted to be a key event in the regulation of CREB-mediated transcription, several additional modifications can influence the transcriptional activation state of CREB, including other post-translational modifications as discussed below.

CREB-interacting proteins

The CREB protein has a modular structure with distinct domains exerting different functions. The basic leucine zipper motif mediates dimerization and DNA binding, while the glutamine-rich domains Q1 and Q2, and the kinase-inducible domain (KID) constitute the transcription activation domains of CREB. These different domains can recruit distinct proteins that can modify the transcriptional activity of CREB. CREB-interacting proteins and their effect on CREB-dependent transcription are summarised

Ser-133 phosphorylation: foreplay or main act?

It is generally accepted that phosphorylation of Ser-133 is necessary, but not always sufficient for stimulus-induced activation of CREB. Stimuli like serum, dibutyryl cAMP, TPA, hypoxia, glutamate, TGF-β, and ionophore A23187 induce phosphorylation, but not activation of CREB in some cell types, while they provoke both phosphorylation and activation in other cell types (Table 1 and references in table of supplementary data). Other stimuli can provoke CREB phosphorylation with comparable

Conclusions and further challenges

Almost 20 years have elapsed since CREB was isolated, the major molecular mechanisms of CREB-mediated transcription were solved, and many of the biological functions of CREB were identified. Despite intensive research, reflected in the more than 4000 articles on CREB published in PubMed, researches are left with a crucial unanswered question: how to explain the discrepancy between CREB phosphorylation at Ser-133 and activation of CREB-mediated transcription? Solving this enigma forms a true

References (274)

  • D. De Cesare et al.

    Prog. Nucleic Acid Res. Mol. Biol.

    (2000)
  • B.E. Lonze et al.

    Neuron

    (2002)
  • P.G. Quinn

    Prog. Nucleic Acid Res. Mol. Biol.

    (2002)
  • M.D. Conkright et al.

    Mol. Cell

    (2003)
  • K. Matsumoto et al.

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1998)
  • A.K. Boer et al.

    Blood

    (2002)
  • H.J. Lee et al.

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1995)
  • S. Pugazhenthi et al.

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1999)
  • B.H. Kang et al.

    Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.

    (2003)
  • G. Zauli et al.

    Blood

    (1998)
  • L.D. Mayo et al.

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (2001)
  • N. Kanda et al.

    J. Invest. Dermatol.

    (2003)
  • J. Kim et al.

    Arch. Oral Biol.

    (2001)
  • J. Doi et al.

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (2002)
  • Y. Funakoshi et al.

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (2002)
  • I.R. Gupta et al.

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1999)
  • M. Hocker et al.

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1998)
  • D.M. Kemp et al.

    Biochem. Pharmacol.

    (2002)
  • D.J. Klemm et al.

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1998)
  • E.R. Price et al.

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1998)
  • J.C. Gevrey et al.

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (2002)
  • K.A. Buckley et al.

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (2001)
  • N.R. Mahapatra et al.

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (2003)
  • K. Hashimoto et al.

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (2000)
  • H.C. Cheng et al.

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (2002)
  • K.L. Kopnisky et al.

    Neuroscience

    (2003)
  • X. Qu et al.

    FEBS Lett.

    (2002)
  • W.Q. Zhao et al.

    Neurobiol. Dis.

    (2002)
  • W.M. Cheung et al.

    FEBS Lett.

    (2000)
  • S.C. Hu et al.

    Neuron

    (1999)
  • S.F. Sheriff et al.

    Peptides

    (2002)
  • W. Bilecki et al.

    Eur. J. Pharmacol.

    (2000)
  • N. del Olmo et al.

    Neuropharmacology

    (2003)
  • S.S. Grewal et al.

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (2000)
  • B. Mayr et al.

    Nat. Rev., Mol. Cell Biol.

    (2001)
  • A.J. Shaywitz et al.

    Ann. Rev. Biochem.

    (1999)
  • J.T. Swarthout et al.

    J. Bone Miner. Res.

    (2002)
  • Y. Tan et al.

    EMBO J.

    (1996)
  • P. Mahler

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1999)
  • A. Trumper et al.

    Mol. Endocrinol.

    (2001)
  • M. Böhm et al.

    Cell Growth Differ.

    (1995)
  • W. Liu et al.

    Endocrinology

    (2002)
  • A. Taberno et al.

    Mol. Cell. Neurosci.

    (1998)
  • T. Tokudome et al.

    Endocrinology

    (2004)
  • O.M. Seternes et al.

    Mol. Endocrinol.

    (1999)
  • S. McNulty et al.

    J. Pineal Res.

    (1997)
  • T. Tokuno et al.

    Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol.

    (2001)
  • M. Christ et al.

    Circulation

    (1999)
  • D. Whitehead et al.

    J. Mol. Endocrinol.

    (1997)
  • C.B. Wade et al.

    Endocrinology

    (2003)
  • Cited by (537)

    • Sunlight, skin cancer and vitamin D

      2023, Feldman and Pike's Vitamin D: Volume Two: Disease and Therapeutics
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Supplementary data associated with this article can be found in the on line version, at doi:10.1016/j.cellsig.2004.05.001.

    View full text