Vasopressin receptor antagonists in heart failure

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coph.2003.06.005Get rights and content

Abstract

There is ample evidence that arginine vasopressin (AVP) is a component of the neurohormonal response to congestive heart failure (CHF). Furthermore, AVP might play a role in the development, progression and worsening of CHF. Because of the need for further improvement in the treatment of CHF, randomized clinical trials were conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of non-peptide AVP receptor antagonists in patients with CHF. In pivotal trials of three non-peptide AVP receptor antagonists, these compounds improved the fluid status, osmotic balance and hemodynamics of patients with CHF. These studies support the approval of this class of agents for the symptomatic treatment of CHF, but long-term studies are required to demonstrate their role in the outcome and quality of life of these patients.

Introduction

Congestive heart failure (CHF) is a growing medical problem with significant morbidity and mortality rates despite the use of complex medical treatments combining diuretics, digitalis, inhibitors/blockers of the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system, and β-adrenergic receptor blockers [1]. Close to five million Americans are afflicted with CHF, and heart failure is the reason for at least 20% of all hospitalizations among patients over the age of 65 years [2]. In CHF patients, the annual mortality rate is 8–10%, the quality of life is poor and hospital stays are frequent. Each year, an estimated 500 000 new cases of CHF are diagnosed in the USA, and CHF-related complications result in one million hospital admissions and 40 000 deaths per year. Thus, there is a need to develop additional therapies to improve the outcome of CHF patients in terms of their quality of life and survival 3., 4..

In CHF, various neurohormonal systems (e.g. sympathetic nervous system, rennin–angiotensin–aldosterone system, endothelin, cytokines and arginine vasopressin [AVP]) are activated to maintain arterial pressure and circulatory homeostasis [2]. However, excessive activation of these systems can lead to increased cardiac preload through water and sodium retention, peripheral vasoconstriction, reduced renal blood flow and cardiac remodeling. This situation fuels a vicious cycle that worsens CHF, but which could be interrupted by specific blockers of these systems.

The neurohypophysial antidiuretic hormone AVP regulates free water reabsorption, body fluid osmolality, blood volume, blood pressure, cell contraction, cell proliferation and adrenocorticotropic hormone secretion via the stimulation of specific G-protein-coupled receptors currently classified into V1-vascular receptor (V1R), V2-renal receptor (V2R) and V3-pituitary receptor (V3R) subtypes. Each of these has distinct pharmacological profiles and intracellular second messengers [5]. Circulating levels of AVP are often elevated during the progression and/or exacerbation of CHF in response to various non-osmotic stimuli, including low arterial pressure and diminished effective arterial volume [6]. This stimulation of AVP secretion can occur despite low plasma osmolality and hyponatremia. For example, in the Studies of Left Ventricular Dysfunction (SOLVD) population (ejection fraction of ≤ 35%), patients with asymptomatic left ventricular dysfunction had higher AVP levels (mean median plasma AVP=2.2 pg/ml) than did control patients (mean median plasma AVP=1.8 pg/ml), whereas patients with symptomatic mild-to-moderate CHF had even higher AVP levels (mean median plasma AVP=3.0 pg/ml) [7]. Sustained AVP release can worsen CHF through V1R-mediated vasoconstriction and V2R-mediated water retention. Furthermore, activation of V1R subtypes in the myocardium can lead to hypertrophy; stimulation of V3R subtypes can result in adrenocorticotropic hormone-mediated aldosterone secretion and subsequent sodium reabsorption. In the Survival and Ventricular Enlargement (SAVE) population of post-myocardial infarction patients with left ventricular dysfunction, AVP levels one month after infarction were independently associated with long-term cardiovascular outcomes, including heart failure, recurrent myocardial infarction and death [8].

Accordingly, blockade of AVP receptors might prove beneficial in the treatment of CHF [9]. Recently, orally active non-peptide AVP receptor antagonists were developed following the random screening of chemical entities and optimization of lead compounds [10]; these were studied in experimental and human CHF.

Section snippets

Blockade of AVP receptors in experimental models of CHF

In several studies of acute and chronic models of heart failure in animals, selective blockade of V1R and/or V2R subtypes produced hemodynamic and volume status improvement, as described below.

In a model of CHF induced by rapid ventricular pacing in conscious dogs, the non-peptide V1R antagonist OPC-21268 (1-(1-[4-(3-acetylaminopropoxy)benzoyl]-4-piperidyl)-3,4-dihydro-2(1H)-quinolinone) significantly increased cardiac output and reduced total peripheral resistance and mean arterial blood

Blockade of AVP receptors in patients with CHF

The results of the aforementioned animal studies suggest that blockade of AVP receptors alone, and in combination with other therapeutic agents, may be beneficial in patients with CHF. Therefore, randomized clinical trials were designed to assess the efficacy and safety of AVP receptor antagonists in patients with CHF.

VPA-985 (5-fluoro-2-methyl-N-[4-(5H-pyrrolo[2,1-c] [1,4]benzodiazepin-10(11H)-yl carbonyl)-3-chlorophenyl]benzamide) is a specific and selective non-peptide V2-R antagonist that

Conclusions

The unacceptably high rates of morbidity and mortality of patients with CHF call for the development of new drug therapies. Non-peptide AVP receptor antagonists have reached Phase II and Phase IIIa stages of clinical development, and were shown to improve fluid status, osmotic balance and hemodynamic status. However, several questions remain unanswered at the present time. Firstly, does their aquaretic effect lead to a self-limited correction of hyponatremia or is there a risk of hypernatremia,

References and recommended reading

Papers of particular interest, published within the annual period of review, have been highlighted as:

  • of special interest

  • ••

    of outstanding interest

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (Grant HL39757). We would like to thank Mrs Sandra Salzman for her skilled assistance.

References (26)

  • S.R Goldsmith

    Congestive heart failure: potential role of arginine vasopressin antagonists in the therapy of heart failure

    Congest. Heart Fail

    (2002)
  • G.S Francis et al.

    Comparison of neuroendocrine activation in patients with left ventricular dysfunction with and without congestive heart failure. A substudy of the Studies of Left Ventricular Dysfunction (SOLVD)

    Circulation

    (1990)
  • J.L Rouleau et al.

    Prognostic value of neurohumoral activation in patients with an acute myocardial infarction: effect of captopril

    J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.

    (1994)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text