Gut microbiota, enteroendocrine functions and metabolism

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coph.2013.09.008Get rights and content

Highlights

  • The gut microbiota interacts with enteroendocrine cells.

  • SCFAs triggers gut peptide secretion through GPR43-dependent and GPR41-dependent mechanisms.

  • The gut microbiota links the endocannabinoid system to L cell functions.

  • A. muciniphila interacts with enteroendocrine cells to modulate gut barrier function.

  • Several GPCRs expressed on intestinal L cells may constitute putative therapeutic targets.

The gut microbiota affects host metabolism through a number of physiological processes. Emerging evidence suggests that gut microbes interact with the host through several pathways involving enteroendocrine cells (e.g. L cells). The activation of specific G protein coupled receptors expressed on L cells (e.g. GPR41, GPR43, GPR119 and TGR5) triggers the secretion of glucagon-like peptides (GLP-1 and GLP-2) and PYY. These gut peptides are known to control energy homeostasis, glucose metabolism, gut barrier function and metabolic inflammation. Here, we explore how crosstalk between the ligands produced by the gut microbiota (short chain fatty acids, or SCFAs), or produced by the host but influenced by gut microbes (endocannabinoids and bile acids), impact host physiology.

Introduction

Obesity is associated with numerous metabolic comorbidities, such as insulin resistance, diabetes, cardiovascular disease and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. The reduction of excessive body weight is effective for alleviating many of these metabolic abnormalities; however, the prevention of positive energy balance remains a widely practised cornerstone of obesity-prevention strategies [1]. Therefore, more effective weight loss induction strategies are needed to decrease the incidence and severity of metabolic abnormalities. Alternatively, approaches that can treat obesity-related metabolic abnormalities independent of weight loss are extremely attractive. Recent data indicate that certain microbes may provide templates for the development of such strategies (reviewed in [2, 3]). Over the years, the understanding of the role of these cells (i.e. gut bacteria) has changed, leading to novel and interesting findings. The gut microbiota has profound impacts on host physiology, including in the control of energy homeostasis, the immune system, vitamin synthesis and digestion [4, 5, 6•].

Owing to its huge surface area and multiple functions, the intestine represents one of the most important organs, and it permits vital interactions with the external world, including the gut microbiota. The intestinal epithelium allows the absorption of nutrients and fluids while acting as an efficient barrier against toxins and microorganisms. The gut epithelium is comprised of different cell types, including epithelial absorptive cells, Goblet cells, Paneth cells and enteroendocrine cells. Enteroendocrine cells represent approximately 1% of all epithelial cells in the intestine and are subdivided into more than 10 different cell types based on their major secretory products and their localisation along the gastrointestinal tract. Given that multiple biological functions are physiologically regulated by the gut hormones produced by enteroendocrine cells (e.g. food intake, gastric emptying, gut motility, gut barrier formation, glucose metabolism) (Figure 1), these cells have been positioned at the forefront of research to find novel therapies. The enteroendocrine cells play key roles in the maintenance of gut homeostasis both by enabling nutrient absorption and by preserving the essential function of the gut as a barrier between the external environment (gut lumen) and the host tissues. Because enteroendocrine cells are distributed all along the gastrointestinal tract and are in close proximity to gut bacteria and/or metabolites produced by the metabolic activity of the gut microbiota, it is of utmost interest to unravel the crosstalk between the gut microbiota and these cells and the impact of this crosstalk on host physiology (Figure 1). However, the study of the gut microbiota and its relationship with the host represents a real challenge. Among the enteroendocrine cells, L cells have attracted particular interest because of the pleiotropic effects of their secreted peptides [7, 8, 9]. Although these cells are known to respond to nutrients present in the intestinal lumen, they are also able to detect many other luminal compounds. This is especially true in the colon, where the gut microbiota and most of its metabolites are largely present.

In this review, we discuss the body of evidence linking gut microbes (and specific metabolites produced by these bacteria) with enteroendocrine function and thereby host physiology.

Section snippets

Gut microbiota and enteroendocrine functions: effects on glucose and energy homeostasis

We have previously shown that the modulation of the gut microbiota using prebiotics in mice and humans significantly affects energy and glucose homeostasis (for review [10]). In rodents, we found that this was consistently associated with and improved insulin sensitivity [11] and leptin sensitivity [12], two major features of obesity and type 2 diabetes. The fermentation of non-digestible carbohydrates not only changes gut microbiota composition and activity but also contributes to the

Gut microbiota and enteroendocrine functions: effects on gut barrier function

Gut barrier disruption has been observed in several pathological situations and is involved in the pathophysiologic process of multiple diseases. Obesity is associated with an increase in gut permeability that leads to the abnormal translocation of gut bacteria or gut bacteria components from the intestinal lumen through the host blood circulation and tissues [42, 43, 44, 45]. We have shown that these changes in gut barrier activity are associated with increased plasma levels of gram-negative

Conclusions

Several studies have shown that modification of the gut microbiota affects various physiological processes. However, it has so far proven difficult to determine the precise mechanisms linking gut microbiota composition and/or activity with specific metabolic pathways involved in energy and glucose homeostasis. The gut microbiota represents an extremely diverse group of microbes and is not a static ecosystem but is subject to rapid modifications that are directly associated with nutrient intake.

References and recommended reading

Papers of particular interest, published within the period of review, have been highlighted as:

  • • of special interest

  • •• of outstanding interest

Acknowledgements

PDC is a research associate from the FRS-FNRS (Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique) Belgium. AE is a doctoral fellow from the FRS-FNRS. TD is postdoctoral fellow from the FRM (Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale, France). PDC is recipients of an ERC Starting Grant 2013 (336452-ENIGMO), FSR and FRSM subsidies (Fonds spéciaux de recherches, UCL, Belgium; Fonds de la recherche scientifique médicale, Belgium) and ARC (Action de Recherche Concertée).

References (61)

  • N.V. Dhurandhar

    When commonsense does not make sense

    Int J Obes (Lond)

    (2012)
  • N.V. Dhurandhar et al.

    Harnessing the beneficial properties of adipogenic microbes for improving human health

    Obes Rev

    (2013)
  • L.V. Hooper et al.

    Immune adaptations that maintain homeostasis with the intestinal microbiota

    Nat Rev Immunol

    (2010)
  • J.L. Round et al.

    The gut microbiota shapes intestinal immune responses during health and disease

    Nat Rev Immunol

    (2009)
  • V. Tremaroli et al.

    Functional interactions between the gut microbiota and host metabolism

    Nature

    (2012)
  • A. des Rieux et al.

    Targeted nanoparticles with novel non-peptidic ligands for oral delivery

    Adv Drug Deliv Rev

    (2013)
  • F. Reimann et al.

    Glucose sensing in L cells: a primary cell study

    Cell Metab

    (2008)
  • P.D. Cani et al.

    Improvement of glucose tolerance and hepatic insulin sensitivity by oligofructose requires a functional glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor

    Diabetes

    (2006)
  • A. Everard et al.

    Responses of gut microbiota and glucose and lipid metabolism to prebiotics in genetic obese and diet-induced leptin-resistant mice

    Diabetes

    (2011)
  • A.L. Kau et al.

    Human nutrition, the gut microbiome and the immune system

    Nature

    (2011)
  • G.G. Muccioli et al.

    The endocannabinoid system links gut microbiota to adipogenesis

    Mol Syst Biol

    (2010)
  • I. Kimura et al.

    The gut microbiota suppresses insulin-mediated fat accumulation via the short-chain fatty acid receptor GPR43

    Nat Commun

    (2013)
  • E.M. Dewulf et al.

    Inulin-type fructans with prebiotic properties counteract GPR43 overexpression and PPARgamma-related adipogenesis in the white adipose tissue of high-fat diet-fed mice

    J Nutr Biochem

    (2011)
  • K.P. Scott et al.

    The influence of diet on the gut microbiota

    Pharmacol Res

    (2013)
  • C. Kruger et al.

    Brain transcriptional responses to high-fat diet in Acads-deficient mice reveal energy sensing pathways

    PLOS ONE

    (2012)
  • J. Anastasovska et al.

    Fermentable carbohydrate alters hypothalamic neuronal activity and protects against the obesogenic environment

    Obesity (Silver Spring)

    (2012)
  • F. Reimann et al.

    G-protein-coupled receptors in intestinal chemosensation

    Cell Metab

    (2012)
  • P. Plaisancie et al.

    Luminal glucagon-like peptide-1(7-36) amide-releasing factors in the isolated vascularly perfused rat colon

    J Endocrinol

    (1995)
  • J. Tarini et al.

    The fermentable fibre inulin increases postprandial serum short-chain fatty acids and reduces free-fatty acids and ghrelin in healthy subjects

    Appl Physiol Nutr Metab

    (2010)
  • H.V. Lin et al.

    Butyrate and propionate protect against diet-induced obesity and regulate gut hormones via free fatty acid receptor 3-independent mechanisms

    PLOS ONE

    (2012)
  • Cited by (285)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text