Mechanistic pharmacology, new developments
Seeking ligand bias: assessing GPCR coupling to β-arrestins for drug discovery

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ddtec.2010.06.005Get rights and content

G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCR) are the major sites of action for endogenous hormones and neurotransmitters. Early drug discovery efforts focused on determining whether ligands could engage G protein coupling and subsequently activate or inhibit cognate ‘second messengers.’ Gone are those simple days as we now realize that receptors can also couple β-arrestins. As we delve into the complexity of ligand-directed signaling and receptosome scaffolds, we are faced with what may seem like endless possibilities triggered by receptor–ligand-mediated events.

Introduction

GPCRs are ideal targets for pharmaceutical development with the goal of either mimicking the normal transmitter response or tempering it. In recent years, targeting GPCRs has become more complicated as we realize that drug action at receptors is ‘context dependent’ such that activation and inhibition are limited to the response evaluated and ‘agonist’ and ‘antagonist’ become terms that reflect a particular condition of the experimental or physiological output [1, 2, 3]. Further, we have realized that GPCRs couple to other proteins besides G proteins. Of these, the β-arrestins have proven to be crucial regulators of GPCR signaling. Therefore, rather than limiting the concept of receptor activation to its coupling to a particular G protein, GPCR signaling may be envisioned as an event caused by a ligand-mediated conformational shift in receptor structure that leads to rearrangement of a signaling scaffold to recruit or dispel certain signaling players. In this sense β-arrestins play a pivotal role in determining what players are recruited or rejected, and thus, acting as facilitators, stabilizers or dampening agents, function in directing GPCR signaling.

In recent years, signaling via β-arrestins has been demonstrated in cell culture models for many GPCRs (see [4 for review]) and there appears to be some bias whereby certain ligands will preferentially engage β-arrestins to activate particular cascades [5, 6, 7]. An interesting example of this is carvedilol, which has been known as a ‘beta-blocker’ but now has been shown to activate ERK pathways via β-arrestin-dependent signaling mechanisms suggesting that it is an ‘activator’ at the β2 adrenergic receptor with respect to this pathway [6]. As the implications of the β-arrestin-directed signaling pathways begin to emerge in cellular and in animal studies [8], screening for both β-arrestin interaction and second messenger activation may prove to be an important early step in drug discovery efforts.

Section snippets

High content screening technology

The monitoring of β-arrestin recruitment to activated receptors has become a popular mode of measuring GPCR activity and is described as a ‘universal’ GPCR platform owing to the fact that it is G-protein independent and that GPCRs will recruit β-arrestins regardless of the nature of the G protein to which they couple [9]. One of the earliest methods for detecting GPCR-β-arrestin interactions evaluated the ‘translocation’ or redistribution of a green-fluorescent protein (GFP)-tagged β-arrestin

High throughput screening technologies

More recently, other β-arrestin recruitment assay methods, that do not require expensive imaging instruments and have the advantage that they can be read with conventional multimode readers, have been developed. These include: (1) bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET) [14, 15] a protease-activated transcriptional reporter gene (TANGO™, Invitrogen (http://www.invitrogen.com/, [14, 16, 17]), (2) Enzyme Fragment Complementation (EFC) (Pathfinder™, DiscoveRx, http://www.discoverx.com/ [18

Conclusions and comparison of the HTS assays

Both of the commercial assays offer the platforms for β-arrestin2 specifically, although both companies will work with the researcher to develop custom cell lines, including those that assess the interaction with β-arrestin1. Although there is certainly much less in the research literature regarding β-arrestin1-mediated regulation versus β-arrestin2 mediated regulation of GPCRs, researchers should be cautioned that this does not necessarily indicate that β-arrestin1 may be less important than

Acknowledgments

LMB is funded by NIH/NIDA grants DA025158; DA025259 and DA018860. PHM is funded by NIH/NINDS/NIDDK grants NS067631 and DK088125. LMB is a consultant to Trevena, Inc.

References (36)

Cited by (0)

View full text