Elsevier

Neuropharmacology

Volume 55, Issue 5, October 2008, Pages 860-864
Neuropharmacology

ω-Conotoxin inhibition of excitatory synaptic transmission evoked by dorsal root stimulation in rat superficial dorsal horn

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropharm.2008.06.049Get rights and content

Abstract

A number of ω-conotoxins are potent and selective antagonists of N-type voltage-gated calcium channels (VGCCs) and are potentially effective as analgesic agents. ω-Conotoxins CVID and CVIB, venom peptides from Conus catus, inhibit N-type and N/P/Q-type VGCCs, respectively, in rat dorsal root ganglion sensory neurons. In the present study, we tested the effects of five different ω-conotoxins, CVID, CVIB, MVIIA, MVIIC and GVIA, on excitatory synaptic transmission between primary afferents and dorsal horn superficial lamina neurons of rat spinal cord. The N-type VGCC antagonists CVID (200 nM) and MVIIA (500 nM) completely and irreversibly inhibited excitatory postsynaptic currents (EPSCs) in the dorsal horn superficial lamina. The N- and P/Q-type VGCC antagonist CVIB (200 nM) reversibly reduced evoked EPSC amplitude an average of 34 ± 8%, whereas MVIIC (200 nM) had no effect on excitatory synaptic transmission. In neurons receiving polysynaptic input, CVIB reduced both the EPSC amplitude and the “success rate” calculated as the relative number of primary afferent stimulations that resulted in postsynaptic responses. These results indicate that (i) the analgesic action of ω-conotoxins that antagonise N-type VGCCs may be attributed to inhibition of neurotransmission between primary afferents and superficial dorsal horn neurons, (ii) nociceptive synaptic transmission between primary afferents and superficial lamina neurons is mediated predominantly by N-type VGCCs, and (iii) in contrast to the irreversible inhibition by CVID, MVIIA and GVIA, the inhibition of excitatory monosynaptic transmission by CVIB is reversible.

Introduction

Voltage-gated calcium channels (VGCCs) are critical in the transduction of nociceptive information from the periphery to the central nervous system. Action potential propagation along the primary afferents conducts nociceptive information from the periphery, depolarising the presynaptic terminal. This results in the opening of VGCCs, inducing the release of a neurotransmitter into the synaptic cleft. It has been demonstrated that the N-type VGCC is the major class of VGCC associated with nociceptive synaptic transmission (Heinke et al., 2004), and N-type VGCCs are situated on both pre- and post-synaptic membranes of the synapse between primary nociceptive afferents and superficial lamina neurons of the substantia gelatinosa (SG) (Bao et al., 1998, Soeda et al., 2002, Westenbroek et al., 1998).

ω-Conotoxins are a large family of structurally related peptides containing a characteristic cystine knot motif with a wide range of specificities for inhibition of different types of VGCCs (Uchitel, 1997, Schroeder et al., 2004). An important application of VGCCs antagonists is related to their use as anti-nociceptive agents for the management of chronic pain (Scott et al., 2002). In spite of difficulties with delivery, the use of conotoxins in chronic pain management may have some advantages compared to opiates in terms of habituation and tolerance (Miljanich, 2004). Previous studies of conotoxins as anti-nociceptive agents have largely focused on the VGCC antagonists GVIA or MVIIA (Ziconotide) which potently and irreversibly inhibit N-type VGCCs. However, a number of peptides that antagonise VGCCs have been isolated from the predatory cone snail Conus catus (Lewis at al., 2000), including ω-conotoxin CVID which exhibits the highest selectivity for N- over P/Q-type VGCCs in radioligand binding assays. CVID (AM336) inhibits the release of substance P in rat spinal cord slices and has potent anti-nociceptive activity (Smith et al., 2002). ω-Conotoxin CVIB, a non-selective N- and P/Q-type antagonist, has recently been shown to block N-type VGCCs reversibly and P/Q-type VGCCs irreversibly in dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurons (Motin et al., 2007a). However, the effectiveness of these ω-conotoxins for inhibition of nociceptive synaptic transmission mediated by primary afferent nerve stimulation in the spinal cord has not been examined.

The aim of the present study was to compare the effects of known anti-nociceptive ω-conotoxins CVID, MVIIA and GVIA and the non-selective N- and P/Q-type VGCC antagonists, ω-conotoxins CVIB and MVIIC, on excitatory synaptic transmission between Aδ and C fibres of the dorsal root and lamina I–II neurons of the superficial dorsal horn. A preliminary report of some of these results has been presented in abstract form (Motin et al., 2007b).

Section snippets

Spinal cord slice preparation

Briefly, 8–15 day old Wistar rats were killed by cervical dislocation in accordance with guidelines of the University of Queensland Animal Ethics Committee. The spinal cord was removed in ice-cold oxygenated artificial cerebrospinal fluid (ACSF). Transverse 500–600 μm slices from L4–5 segments with attached 2–4 mm dorsal root were cut using a NVSLM1 motorised vibroslice (World Precision Instruments, Sarasota, FL, USA).

Patch-clamp recordings

A spinal cord slice was placed on the bottom of the recording chamber and

Results

In the present study, we used an experimental model mimicking nociceptive synaptic transmission in the rat spinal cord to elucidate the effects of different ω-conotoxins. Primary afferent fibres that are responsible for the conduction of nociceptive signals were electrically stimulated and recordings made primarily from lamina I and II neurons of the dorsal horn. Synaptic events were therefore monitored at the site where the primary nociceptive afferents terminate and the first synaptic relay

Discussion

The present findings provide new information on the inhibition of excitatory synaptic transmission between primary afferents and superficial lamina neurons in the dorsal horn of the rat spinal cord by five different ω-conotoxins: CVID, MVIIA and GVIA, highly selective antagonists for N-type VGCCs, and CVIB and MVIIC which inhibit both N- and P/Q-type VGCCs (Uchitel, 1997, Schroeder et al., 2004). The selective N-type VGCC antagonist CVID has been shown to effectively inhibit VGCCs in rat DRG

Acknowledgements

We thank the laboratory of Prof. Paul Alewood and Dr Richard Lewis (Institute for Molecular Bioscience, University of Queensland) for preparing ω-conotoxin samples. Supported by a National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Program Grant.

References (22)

  • J. Bao et al.

    Differences in Ca2+ channels governing generation of miniature and evoked excitatory synaptic currents in spinal laminae I and II

    Journal of Neuroscience

    (1998)
  • Cited by (24)

    • Injury-specific functional alteration of N-type voltage-gated calcium channels in synaptic transmission of primary afferent C-fibers in the rat spinal superficial dorsal horn

      2016, European Journal of Pharmacology
      Citation Excerpt :

      At central synapses, neurotransmitter release is mediated by several types of voltage-gated calcium channels (VGCCs; L-, N-, P/Q-, T- and R-type channels) which are classified by their electrophysiological and pharmacological properties (Heinke et al., 2004; Takahashi and Momiyama, 1993). In the spinal dorsal horn, N-type VGCCs are functionally expressed as key molecules in the pain signal pathway (Motin and Adams, 2008; Rycroft et al., 2007). For example, the development of pain hypersensitivity is correlated with increased expression of a pore α subunit of N-type VGCCs in the spinal dorsal horn (Cizkova et al., 2002).

    • Recent progress in the discovery and development of N-type calcium channel modulators for the treatment of pain

      2014, Progress in Medicinal Chemistry
      Citation Excerpt :

      While the specific amino acid residues responsible for conferring selectivity of particular ω-conotoxins to different CaV2 channels are still under investigation, it appears that the homogeneity of peptide loops 2 and 4 within the conotoxin secondary structure is an important determinant of differential selectivity between the CaV2 channel subtypes [70]. It is also clear that the presence of α2δ and β subunits as well as the membrane potential can have profound effects on the affinity and reversibility of binding of ω-conotoxins to CaV α1 subunits, thus further increasing the diversity of pharmacological effects among this class of peptides [71–74]. Compared to the cone snail, relatively fewer peptide blockers with specificity for N-type channels have been identified from the venoms of terrestrial arthropods [8,75].

    • Regulation of spinal substance P release by intrathecal calcium channel blockade

      2011, Anesthesiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      As noted, the three channel classes examined here are all present on small afferents. However, electrophysiologic studies in slices have indicated that monosynaptic excitation evoked by root stimulation in slices is most strongly attenuated by N- and less so by L- and T-type channels.38 Such studies likely reflect the depolarization evoked by glutamate and not necessarily just by substance P. However, in the current studies we found that release of substance P evoked by intraplantar formalin was blocked by doses of N-type channel blocker that blocked formalin-induced flinching, whereas L- and T-type channel blockades had significant effects upon flinching but no effect, even at higher doses, on substance P release.

    • Intravenous injection of leconotide, an omega conotoxin: Synergistic antihyperalgesic effects with morphine in a rat model of bone cancer pain

      2011, Pain Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      The rationale for combining an opioid receptor agonist such as morphine with an N-type neuronal calcium channel blocker stems from the fact that both of these compounds, while acting at structurally different receptor sites in the CNS, share the same physiological effect. Both compounds attenuate and decrease neuronal excitability in dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurons as well as the second order neurons in the spinal cord by way of inhibiting calcium channel dependent current in those cells [42–45]. Neuronal hyperexcitability is one of the main features of cancer-induced bone pain, highlighting the phenomenon of spinal cord sensitization that is caused by number of pathological changes induced by cancer bone metastasis and tumor growth in bones [46–49].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text