Elsevier

Neuropharmacology

Volume 66, March 2013, Pages 24-30
Neuropharmacology

Invited review
Molecular mechanisms that desensitize metabotropic glutamate receptor signaling: An overview

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropharm.2012.05.005Get rights and content

Abstract

The purpose of the present article is to review our actual knowledge on the desensitization of metabotropic glutamate receptors based on the literature available so far, with the attempt to emphasize all converging data and to give a possible explanation to those evidences that still remain controversial. 1. We review our knowledge on the regulation of mGlu receptors based on the available literature 2. We report converging data and we comment on issues that still remain controversial.

This article is part of a Special Issue entitled ‘Metabotropic Glutamate Receptors’.

Highlights

► We review our knowledge on the desensitization of mGlu receptors. ► We focus both on converging data and on issues that still remain controversial. ► GRK2 regulates mGlu1 receptor by a phosphorylation-independent mechanism. ► The mGlu2 (but not the mGlu3) receptor is resistant to homologous desensitization.

Introduction

Receptor responsiveness is regulated at the level of the G-protein coupled receptors (GPCR) by a process termed desensitization. This involves a combination of events including receptor phosphorylation by different kinases, internalization and interaction with specific regulatory proteins. Receptor homologous desensitization is a “feedback” mechanism that protects against both acute and chronic receptor over-stimulation and occurs shortly after exposure of GPCR to agonists (Liggett, 2011). In the process of homologous desensitization, G-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs) were initially identified as serine/threonine kinases that, acting in concert with their functional partner arrestins, regulate the activity of most GPCR (recently reviewed by Penela et al., 2010). The GRKs, a family of seven members in mammals, phosphorylate the agonist-occupied receptor. Arrestin then binds to the phosphorylated receptor, which in turn uncouples from heterotrimeric G-proteins and becomes desensitized (Penela et al., 2003; Premont and Gainetdinov, 2007). Phosphorylated receptors are then targeted to clathrin-coated vesicles, where they are resensitized and recycled back to plasma membranes (Reiter and Lefkowitz, 2006; Moore et al., 2007). Besides this “classical paradigm”, emerging evidence indicates that both GRKs and arrestins actively participate to signal propagation. They can interact with proteins involved in signal transduction, driving the signal and finely modulating the cellular responses to GPCR activation. The potential for GRKs to interact with different proteins is predicted by their molecular structure, which clearly indicates that these are multi-domain proteins. All GRKs share a highly conserved catalytic domain; in the βARK subfamily (which includes GRK2 and GRK3), this catalytic domain is flanked by an N-terminal domain and by a C-terminal domain. The N-terminal domain is important for receptor recognition, for intracellular membrane anchoring, and also contains an RH domain (regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) homology domain) which enables GRK2 and GRK3 to specifically interact with Gαq family members, thus blocking their interaction with their effector, phospholipase C beta (PLCβ). In the C-terminal region, GRK2 and GRK3 contain a pleckstrin homology domain (PH) that allows the interaction with the phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate and free Gβγ subunits (Penela et al., 2010). It has been documented in several studies that GRK2 has a wide pattern of interacting proteins, ranging from GPCR, tyrosine kinase receptors such as PDGF-Rβ (Hildreth et al., 2004), to non-receptor substrates such as tubulin, synucleins, phosducin, ribosomal protein P2, the ERM family protein ezrin, the calcium-binding protein DREAM, IκBα or the p38 MAPK (Peregrin et al., 2006; Patial et al., 2009). Different studies have documented that β-arrestins act as scaffold proteins bringing to the receptors signaling molecules such as src, the phosphodiesterase PDE4, components of the MAPK cascade, components of the NFκB cascade and many others (reviewed in Reiter and Lefkowitz, 2006; Premont and Gainetdinov, 2007; DeWire et al., 2007).

Metabotropic glutamate (mGlu) receptors belong to class C of the GPCR superfamily. Similar to all GPCRs, mGlu receptors contain a heptahelical domain in the membrane region and they share with other members of class C GPCRs an extended extracellular N-terminal domain in which the binding region for glutamate is located. The 8 subtypes identified are classified into 3 groups based on amino-acid sequence, transduction mechanisms and pharmacological profile. Group I includes mGlu1 and mGlu5 receptors, which are coupled to Gq and activate phospholipase C-β (PLCβ). mGlu1 and mGlu5 receptors are mainly found in the peripheral portions of postsynaptic elements, where they modulate excitatory synaptic transmission and synaptic plasticity. Group II (mGlu2 and mGlu3) and Group III (mGlu4, mGlu6 mGlu7 and mGlu8) mGlu receptors are coupled to Gi/Go and negatively regulate adenylyl cyclase activity. All these receptor subtypes, with the exception of mGlu6, are preferentially localized on presynaptic terminals, where they inhibit neurotransmitter release (see Nicoletti et al., 2011 for a recent review). As the mGlu receptors have a significant similarity in overall structure, it sounds interesting to study the desensitization of these receptors, in order to establish the molecular determinants that drive their signal transduction towards specific cellular responses. The characterization of these mechanisms and their regulation might be important for the pathophysiology of the diseases in which mGlu receptors are known to be involved.

The purpose of the present article is to review our knowledge on the desensitization of mGlu receptors based on the literature available so far, with the attempt to emphasize all converging data and to comment on issues that still remain controversial.

Section snippets

Group I mGlu receptors

Group I mGlu receptors, mGlu1 and mGlu5 are by far the most extensively investigated among mGlu receptors. As expected, several mechanisms of receptor desensitization were identified, involving signaling-dependent kinases, GRK/arrestins, RGS proteins and also phosphorylation-independent GRK effects. It is conceivable that the relative contribution of these different mechanisms drives the final receptor-mediated response and this interplay likely depends on the relative expression of these

Group II mGlu receptors

mGlu2 and mGlu3 receptors are coupled to Gi/Go proteins. After agonist stimulation, Gαi/o inhibits adenylyl cyclase, whereas Gβγ subunits activate the MAPK pathway. The study of how these two pathways are regulated is particularly interesting because mGlu2/3 receptor agonist are under clinical development for the treatment of anxiety, schizophrenia, and other disorders (Swanson et al., 2005; Corti et al., 2007; Patil et al., 2007).

Inhibition of cAMP formation is the canonical signaling pathway

Group III mGlu receptors

The regulation of group III metabotropic glutamate receptors has been poorly investigated. The mechanisms involved in the processes of mGlu4 receptor desensitization and internalization are, at least in part, elucidated and a signal-dependent regulation of mGlu4 receptor has been documented. Regulation of the mGlu6 and mGlu7 receptor signaling is poorly understood, while the regulation of the mGlu8 receptor has not been investigated as yet.

Conclusions

Several mechanisms are involved in the regulation of mGlu receptors. Although these receptors show a low degree of similarity with the classical GPCRs, such as rhodopsin or β-adrenergic receptors, in many cases they share similar mechanisms of regulation. Some aspects however deserve to be outlined: (i) the mGlu1 receptor signaling is regulated by GRK2 through a phosphorylation-independent mechanism which involves the ability of the RH domain of this kinase to regulate Gαq; (ii) as opposed to

References (54)

  • H. Hirbec et al.

    The PDZ proteins PICK1, GRIP, and syntenin bind multiple glutamate receptor subtypes. Analysis of PDZ binding motifs

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (2002)
  • L. Iacovelli et al.

    Role of G protein-coupled receptor kinase 4 and beta-arrestin 1 in agonist-stimulated metabotropic glutamate receptor 1 internalization and activation of mitogen-activated protein kinases

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (2003)
  • R.J. Lefkowitz et al.

    Beta-arrestins: traffic cops of cell signaling

    Curr. Opin. Cell. Biol.

    (2004)
  • S.M. Lennon et al.

    Metabotropic glutamate receptor mGlu2 is resistant to homologous agonist-induced desensitization but undergoes protein kinase C-mediated heterologous desensitization

    Eur. J. Pharmacol.

    (2010)
  • F. Nicoletti et al.

    Metabotropic glutamate receptors: from the workbench to the bedside

    Neuropharmacology

    (2011)
  • P. Penela et al.

    Mechanisms of regulation of the expression and function of G protein-coupled receptor kinases

    Cell Signal.

    (2003)
  • S. Peregrin et al.

    Phosphorylation of p38 by GRK2 at the docking groove unveils a novel mechanism for inactivating p38MAPK

    Curr. Biol.

    (2006)
  • J.P. Pin et al.

    The metabotropic glutamate receptors: structure and functions

    Neuropharmacology

    (1995)
  • E. Reiter et al.

    GRKs and beta-arrestins: roles in receptor silencing, trafficking and signaling

    Trends Endocrinol. Metab.

    (2006)
  • F.M. Ribeiro et al.

    Phosphorylation-independent regulation of metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 desensitization and internalization by G protein-coupled receptor kinase 2 in neurons

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (2009)
  • S.D. Sorensen et al.

    G protein-coupled receptor kinases regulate metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 function and expression

    Neuropharmacology

    (2003)
  • R. Sterne-Marr et al.

    Characterization of GRK2 RH domain-dependent regulation of GPCR coupling to heterotrimeric G proteins

    Methods Enzymol.

    (2004)
  • M.V. Catania et al.

    Desensitization of metabotropic glutamate receptors in neuronal cultures

    J. Neurochem.

    (1991)
  • L.B. Dale et al.

    Agonist-stimulated and tonic internalization of metabotropic glutamate receptor 1a in human embryonic kidney 293 cells: agonist-stimulated endocytosis is beta-arrestin1 isoform-specific

    Mol. Pharmacol.

    (2001)
  • S.M. DeWire et al.

    Beta-arrestins and cell signaling

    Annu. Rev. Physiol.

    (2007)
  • E. Doumazane et al.

    A new approach to analyze cell surface protein complexes reveals specific heterodimeric metabotropic glutamate receptors

    FASEB J.

    (2011)
  • A. Francesconi et al.

    Opposing effects of protein kinase C and protein kinase A on metabotropic glutamate receptor signaling: selective desensitization of the inositol trisphosphate/Ca2+ pathway by phosphorylation of the receptor-G protein-coupling domain

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.

    (2000)
  • Cited by (21)

    • Metabotropic glutamate receptor trafficking

      2018, Molecular and Cellular Neuroscience
    • Chronic oral administration of MPEP, an antagonist of mGlu<inf>5</inf> receptor, during gestation and lactation alters mGlu<inf>5</inf> and A<inf>2A</inf> receptors in maternal and neonatal brain

      2017, Neuroscience
      Citation Excerpt :

      This phenomenon, termed desensitization, protects against receptor overstimulation and involves several processes such as receptor internalization. Concerning mGlu receptors, multiple works using in vivo and in vitro approaches have shown significant loss of group I receptors and desensitization in the signaling pathways after prolonged treatment with mGlu receptors agonists (Dhami and Fergusson, 2006; Iacovelli et al., 2013). The desensitization of group I mGlu receptors following chronic MPEP consumption observed in the present work agrees with the decrease in the functional effects mediated by the mGlu5 agonist CHPG in the striatum of 6-hydroxipopamine-lesioned rats after chronic treatment with MPEP (Domenici et al., 2005).

    • The neuroprotective effects of orthosteric agonists of group II and III mGluRs in primary neuronal cell cultures are dependent on developmental stage

      2016, Neuropharmacology
      Citation Excerpt :

      NMDA antagonist, MK-801 completely prevented the Glu-evoked changes in PI staining in 12 DIV HIP neurons (Table 6). Since the previous studies pointed to the engagement of MAPK/ERK kinases in the mechanism of group II and III mGluR-mediated neuroprotection (Caraci et al., 2012; Iacovelli et al., 2004, 2013; Jiang et al., 2006; Maiese et al., 2008), we analyzed the activity of this pro-survival intracellular pathway. We demonstrated by Western blotting that group II and III mGluR activators at their neuroprotective concentrations: LY354740 (1 μM), ACPT-I (10 μM), AMN082 (0.1 μM) and VU0361737 (0.1 μM) did not change pERK/ERK ratio after 4 h of treatment of 12 DIV HIP neuronal cells (Fig. 7A), whereas treatment with MAPK/ERK1/2 inhibitor, PD98059 (10 μM) significantly decreased pERK/ERK level by ∼60% [F(5,30) = 18.75; P < 0.0001].

    • Dysregulation of group-I metabotropic glutamate (mGlu) receptor mediated signalling in disorders associated with Intellectual Disability and Autism

      2014, Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews
      Citation Excerpt :

      Of note, a PKC-mediated phosphorylation of a particular threonine residue (T840) that is present in mGlu5 but not mGlu1 receptors, generates the oscillatory pattern of Ca2+ release from the intracellular stores (Kawabata et al., 1996), but has no impact on mGlu5 receptor desensitization. Phosphorylation by GRK2, GRK4, and GRK5 mediates homologous desensitization of mGlu1 receptors, whereas homologous desensitization of mGlu5 receptors is mediated by GRK2 and GRK3 (reviewed by Iacovelli et al., 2013). Activation of mGlu5 receptors is involved in the induction of NMDA receptor-dependent Long Term Potentiation (LTP), induction of protein synthesis dependent LTD, and in mechanisms regulating depotentiation, i.e. the activity-dependent persistent reversal of previously established synaptic LTP.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text