Comparison of behavioral effects of the NMDA receptor channel blockers memantine and ketamine in rats

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbb.2013.05.005Get rights and content

Highlights

  • In rats, low doses of memantine and ketamine have similar behavioral effects.

  • High doses of these drugs tend to have qualitatively different behavioral effects.

  • Delay between drug delivery and behavioral testing has little influence on outcome.

  • Divergent behavioral effects cannot be explained by differences in pharmacokinetics.

Abstract

Memantine and ketamine block N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptors with similar affinity and kinetics, yet their behavioral consequences differ: e.g., memantine is used to alleviate symptoms of Alzheimer's disease, whereas ketamine reproduces symptoms of schizophrenia. The two drugs exhibit different pharmacokinetics, which may play a principal role in their differential behavioral effects. To gain insight into the drugs' behavioral consequences, we treated adult male rats acutely with varying doses (0–40 mg/kg i.p.) of memantine or ketamine and assessed exploratory behavior and spatial working memory. To examine the importance of pharmacokinetics, we assessed behavior either 15 or 45 min after drug administration. Both drugs decreased ambulation, fine movements, and rearing at the beginning of the exploratory activity test; however, at the end of the test, high doses of only memantine increased ambulation and fine movements. High doses of both drugs disrupted spontaneous alternation, a measure of working memory, but high doses of only memantine elicited perseverative behavior. Surprisingly, ketamine's effects were influenced by the delay between drug administration and testing no more frequently than were memantine's. Our findings show that, regardless of test delay, memantine and ketamine evoke similar behavioral effects at lower doses, consistent with NMDA receptors being both drugs' principal site of action, but can have divergent effects at higher doses. Our results suggest that the divergence of memantine's and ketamine's behavioral consequences is likely to result from differences in mechanisms of NMDA receptor antagonism or actions at other targets.

Introduction

Although N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor inhibitors exhibit therapeutic potential, their clinical use often is limited by their tendency to produce unacceptable side effects. For instance, the NMDA receptor channel blocker ketamine shows great promise in the treatment of both pain (Prommer, 2012) and depression (Duman and Aghajanian, 2012). However, ketamine also reproduces the positive, negative, and cognitive symptoms of schizophrenia in healthy humans, and exacerbates symptoms in schizophrenics (Krystal et al., 2003, Lahti et al., 2001); as a result, ketamine has been critical in furthering understanding of the pathology of schizophrenia and is used widely to generate animal models of schizophrenia (Greene, 2001, Gunduz-Bruce, 2009, Jentsch and Roth, 1999). The channel blocker memantine, which inhibits NMDA receptor activity with affinity and kinetics similar to those of ketamine (Kotermanski and Johnson, 2009, Mealing et al., 1999, Parsons et al., 1995), is far less prone to induce the psychotomimetic side-effects of ketamine and other NMDA receptor channel blockers. Furthermore, memantine, but not ketamine, has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration to treat moderate-to-severe Alzheimer's disease (Parsons et al., 2007). Improved understanding of the bases of these drugs' differential effects could shed light on mechanisms of Alzheimer's disease therapy and the etiology of schizophrenia.

Subanesthetic doses (≤ 100 mg/kg) of ketamine were reported to increase rats' locomotor activity and stereotypic behavior, decrease rearing and lever-pressing for food, and impair attention and spatial and non-spatial memory (Alessandri et al., 1989, Danysz et al., 1994, Dix et al., 2010, Grant et al., 1996, Hetzler and Wautlet, 1985, Koros et al., 2007, Smith et al., 2011, Verma and Moghaddam, 1996). Similar, although generally less pronounced, effects were observed with memantine (Creeley et al., 2006, Danysz et al., 1994, Dix et al., 2010, Gilmour et al., 2009, Grant et al., 1996, Koros et al., 2007, More et al., 2008, Smith et al., 2011). Unlike ketamine, however, low doses of memantine were found by some groups to exert beneficial effects on memory function (Danysz and Parsons, 2003, Wise and Lichtman, 2007, Yuede et al., 2007, Zoladz et al., 2006).

The differential behavioral effects of memantine and ketamine could arise from at least three mechanistic differences between the drugs: differences in pharmacokinetics, differences in actions at targets other than NMDA receptors, or differences in mechanism of inhibition of NMDA receptors (Danysz et al., 1994, Gilmour et al., 2009, Grant et al., 1996, Johnson and Kotermanski, 2006, Jones et al., 2001, Kotermanski et al., 2009, Rogawski and Wenk, 2003). One goal of the current study was to examine the hypothesis that the pharmacokinetic differences between the drugs may explain differences in their behavioral effects. Reported pharmacokinetic differences between memantine and ketamine, which are likely to have multiple causes, including differences in drug metabolism and lipid solubility (Beconi et al., 2011, Cohen et al., 1973, Cohen and Trevor, 1974, White et al., 1982), are substantial. After intraperitoneal (i.p.) administration in rats, memantine peak plasma concentration is reached within 30–60 min, and half-life is ~ 120 min (Hesselink et al., 1999b, Zoladz et al., 2006); the time course in brain is similar or moderately slower (Hesselink et al., 1999a, Spanagel et al., 1994). We could not find time course data on ketamine after i.p. administration in rats; however, after intravenous administration, peak plasma concentration is reached immediately, and half-life is ~ 10 min; the time course in brain is very similar (Cohen et al., 1973, Marietta et al., 1976, White et al., 1976). After intramuscular administration, peak plasma concentration is observed within 5–20 min, and half-life is ~ 30 min (White et al., 1976, Williams et al., 2004). Because ketamine has much faster pharmacokinetics than memantine, the two drugs may inhibit NMDA receptors with different time courses (Jones et al., 2001), which, in turn, may contribute to differential behavioral consequences of the two drugs (Gilmour et al., 2009, Johnson and Kotermanski, 2006).

In previous studies on memantine and ketamine, behavioral testing was conducted at only one time point after drug administration (Danysz et al., 1994, Gilmour et al., 2009, Koros et al., 2007). Here, we compared directly the behavioral effects of memantine and ketamine using two different delays after drug administration chosen to accentuate any differential effects that may result from the drugs' differences in pharmacokinetics. We found that the behavioral consequences of low doses of memantine and ketamine are similar regardless of delay. At higher doses, some divergent effects emerged; however, they too were largely delay-independent. Our findings suggest that the drugs' differential pharmacokinetics do not lead to differences in behavioral outcome.

Section snippets

Animals

Protocols were approved by the University of Pittsburgh Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. Adult male Sprague–Dawley rats (Hilltop Labs, Scottdale, PA, USA), weighing 250–275 g at the beginning of the study, were single-housed and given free access to standard rat chow and tap water. The housing facility was maintained on a 12/12 h light–dark cycle (lights on 0700), with a temperature of 22 ± 1 °C and a humidity level of 45 ± 5%.

Drugs and drug administration

Memantine hydrochloride (Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, USA)

Effects of memantine in the exploratory activity test and the spontaneous alternation task

Activity patterns of rats treated with saline (open symbols) or memantine (filled/half-filled symbols) are shown for the entire 30-min test period in Supplementary Fig. 1. As is typical for rats when placed into a novel environment (Creeley et al., 2006, Danysz et al., 1994, Suto et al., 2001), saline-treated control rats were very active at the beginning of the test period. As time in and familiarity with the test environment increased, the activity levels of saline controls declined and

Discussion and conclusions

Both memantine and ketamine caused a dose-dependent reduction in ambulatory distance, fine movements, and rearing at the beginning of the exploratory activity test, when the test environment was novel and evoked a high level of exploratory activity by control rats (Fig. 1, Fig. 2). At the end of the exploratory activity test, when the test environment was familiar, the reduction in motor behaviors was less pronounced and high doses (≥ 20 mg/kg) of memantine, but not of ketamine, caused increases

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Karen Bouch for her technical assistance, Eloise Peet for her invaluable help with the behavioral testing, and Drs. Takeaki Miyamae and Robert Kass for their statistical advice. This work was supported by National Institutes of Health grants R01MH045817 and R21NS074056 to JWJ, and R01NS046423 to ET.

Disclosure statement

The authors have no actual or potential conflict of interest with the information reported here.

References (62)

  • C.G. Parsons et al.

    Memantine: a NMDA receptor antagonist that improves memory by restoration of homeostasis in the glutamatergic system — too little activation is bad, too much is even worse

    Neuropharmacology

    (2007)
  • S. Ryder et al.

    Comparative pharmacology of the optical isomers of ketamine in mice

    Eur J Pharmacol

    (1978)
  • A. Sobolevsky et al.

    Two blocking sites of amino-adamantane derivatives in open N-methyl-d-aspartate channels

    Biophys J

    (1998)
  • R. Spanagel et al.

    Memantine-induced dopamine release in the prefrontal cortex and striatum of the rat — a pharmacokinetic microdialysis study

    Eur J Pharmacol

    (1994)
  • F.X. Vollenweider et al.

    Differential psychopathology and patterns of cerebral glucose utilisation produced by (S)- and (R)-ketamine in healthy volunteers using positron emission tomography (PET)

    Eur Neuropsychopharmacol J Eur Coll Neuropsychopharm

    (1997)
  • L.E. Wise et al.

    The uncompetitive N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist memantine prolongs spatial memory in a rat delayed radial-arm maze memory task

    Eur J Pharmacol

    (2007)
  • P.R. Zoladz et al.

    Enhancement of long-term spatial memory in adult rats by the noncompetitive NMDA receptor antagonists, memantine and neramexane

    Pharmacol Biochem Behav

    (2006)
  • Y. Aracava et al.

    Memantine blocks alpha7* nicotinic acetylcholine receptors more potently than N-methyl-d-aspartate receptors in rat hippocampal neurons

    J Pharmacol Exp Ther

    (2005)
  • M.G. Beconi et al.

    Pharmacokinetics of memantine in rats and mice

    PLoS Curr

    (2011)
  • T.A. Blanpied et al.

    Trapping channel block of NMDA-activated responses by amantadine and memantine

    J Neurophysiol

    (1997)
  • H.S.V. Chen et al.

    Pharmacological implications of two distinct mechanisms of interaction of memantine with N-methyl-d-aspartate-gated channels

    J Pharmacol Exp Ther

    (2005)
  • K.M. Coates et al.

    Ketamine and its preservative, benzethonium chloride, both inhibit human recombinant alpha7 and alpha4beta2 neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in Xenopus oocytes

    Br J Pharmacol

    (2001)
  • M.L. Cohen et al.

    On the cerebral accumulation of ketamine and the relationship between metabolism of the drug and its pharmacological effects

    J Pharmacol Exp Ther

    (1974)
  • M.L. Cohen et al.

    Distribution in the brain and metabolism of ketamine in the rat after intravenous administration

    Anesthesiology

    (1973)
  • C. Creeley et al.

    Low doses of memantine disrupt memory in adult rats

    J Neurosci

    (2006)
  • W. Danysz et al.

    The NMDA receptor antagonist memantine as a symptomatological and neuroprotective treatment for Alzheimer's disease: preclinical evidence

    Int J Geriatr Psychiatry

    (2003)
  • S. Dix et al.

    A within-subject cognitive battery in the rat: differential effects of NMDA receptor antagonists

    Psychopharmacology (Berl)

    (2010)
  • S.M. Dravid et al.

    Subunit-specific mechanisms and proton sensitivity of NMDA receptor channel block

    J Physiol

    (2007)
  • R.S. Duman et al.

    Synaptic dysfunction in depression: potential therapeutic targets

    Science

    (2012)
  • G. Gilmour et al.

    Diverse and often opposite behavioural effects of NMDA receptor antagonists in rats: implications for “NMDA antagonist modelling” of schizophrenia

    Psychopharmacology (Berl)

    (2009)
  • R. Greene

    Circuit analysis of NMDAR hypofunction in the hippocampus, in vitro, and psychosis of schizophrenia

    Hippocampus

    (2001)
  • Cited by (30)

    • Sex-related differences in intravenous ketamine effects on dissociative stereotypy and antinociception in male and female rats

      2020, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior
      Citation Excerpt :

      The current findings from male rats are consistent with the results from our previous study that reported increased head weaving, ataxia, and circling following i.v. ketamine administration in male Sprague-Dawley rats (Radford et al., 2017). Other studies also described similar dissociative behaviors following i.p. injection of ketamine and other NMDA receptor antagonists including PCP and MK-801 in male (Hetzler & Wautlet, 1985; Kotermanski et al., 2013; Sturgeon et al., 1979) and female (Ali et al., 1994; Loscher & Honack, 1992) rodents. Numerous studies have reported sex-related differences in stereotypy following NMDA receptor antagonist injection.

    • Association between intravenous ketamine-induced stress hormone levels and long-term fear memory renewal in Sprague-Dawley rats

      2020, Behavioural Brain Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      The IV ketamine reduced locomotor activity during the infusion, indicating a sedative effect at this dose. This is consistent with our previous findings [46] and other studies that observed reduced locomotor activity following a low-dose ketamine injection while sparing dissociative behaviors [52–54]. The ketamine infusion also produced antinociception based on the tail flick test, indicating analgesic properties of this dose (10 mg/kg).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    Current address: Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Duquesne University, Pittsburgh, PA 15282, United States.

    View full text