Why does the rapid delivery of drugs to the brain promote addiction?

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tips.2004.12.007Get rights and content

It is widely accepted that the more rapidly drugs of abuse reach the brain the greater their potential for addiction. This might be one reason why cocaine and nicotine are more addictive when they are smoked than when they are administered by other routes. Traditionally, rapidly administered drugs are thought to be more addictive because they are more euphorigenic and/or more reinforcing. However, evidence for this is not compelling. We propose an alternative (although not mutually exclusive) explanation based on the idea that the transition to addiction involves drug-induced plasticity in mesocorticolimbic systems, changes that are manifested behaviourally as psychomotor and incentive sensitization. Recent evidence suggests that rapidly administered cocaine or nicotine preferentially engage mesocorticolimbic circuits, and more readily induce psychomotor sensitization. We conclude that rapidly delivered drugs might promote addiction by promoting forms of neurobehavioural plasticity that contribute to the compulsive pursuit of drugs.

Section snippets

Greater euphoria?

Two complimentary explanations have been proposed to account for the relationship between the rate of drug delivery and the addictive potential of drugs. The first explanation suggests that rapidly administered drugs promote the transition to addiction because they are more euphorigenic 4, 6. Indeed, ratings of subjective pleasurable effects are more immediate and more intense when addicting drugs are delivered rapidly. For example, self-reports of a ‘high’, pleasantness and drug-liking are

The search for an alternative explanation: rate of drug delivery and psychomotor sensitization

If neither an increase in euphoria nor an increase in reinforcing effects fully accounts for why rapidly administered drugs are potentially more addictive, what does? One possibility arises from the idea that addiction is due, at least in part, to the ability of drugs of abuse to reorganize brain regions involved in reward and motivation, such as the dorsal and ventral striatum, and brain regions involved in the inhibitory control of behaviour, such as the prefrontal cortex 15, 27, 28, 29, 30,

The influence of the rate of drug delivery on the neurobiological impact of drugs

Given that it is so widely accepted that the rapid delivery of drugs to the brain promotes addiction, it is surprising that only few studies have examined how the rate of drug delivery influences the neurobiological effects of drugs. The few studies to examine dopamine (DA) activity have not revealed large effects. For example, in vivo microdialysis used to quantify DA overflow in the nucleus accumbens of rats following intravenous infusions of a fixed dose of cocaine delivered over 6 s or 150 s

Concluding remarks

These findings demonstrate that differences in the rate at which addicting drugs are administered determine their ability to produce psychomotor sensitization, and presumably its associated adaptations in the brain. These results represent a first step in characterizing an as yet unknown and unappreciated relationship between the rate of drug delivery and the ability of addicting drugs to produce forms of neurobehavioural plasticity that might lead to excessive incentive motivation for drugs

Acknowledgements

Our work has been supported by grants from NIDA (R37 DA04294/K05 DA00473/T32 DA07267).

References (58)

  • C.R. Gerfen

    The neostriatal mosaic: multiple levels of compartmental organization

    Trends Neurosci.

    (1992)
  • A. Badiani

    Environmental modulation of amphetamine-induced c-fos expression in D1 versus D2 striatal neurons

    Behav. Brain Res.

    (1999)
  • P.V. Piazza

    Behavioral and biological factors associated with individual vulnerability to psychostimulant abuse

    NIDA Res. Monogr.

    (1998)
  • G. Winger

    A Handbook on Drug and Alcohol Abuse: The Biomedical Aspects

    (1992)
  • M. Gossop

    Severity of dependence and route of administration of heroin, cocaine and amphetamines

    Br. J. Addict.

    (1992)
  • D.K. Hatsukami et al.

    Crack cocaine and cocaine hydrochloride. Are the differences myth or reality?

    J. Am. Med. Assoc.

    (1996)
  • J.E. Henningfield et al.

    Nicotine delivery kinetics and abuse liability

    J. Consult. Clin. Psychol.

    (1993)
  • H. de Wit

    Subjective and behavioral effects of diazepam depend on its rate of onset

    Psychopharmacology (Berl.)

    (1993)
  • R.B. Resnick

    Acute systemic effects of cocaine in man: a controlled study by intranasal and intravenous routes

    Science

    (1977)
  • S.D. Comer

    Comparison of intravenous and intranasal heroin self-administration by morphine-maintained humans

    Psychopharmacology (Berl.)

    (1999)
  • M.W. Fischman et al.

    Injection duration of cocaine in humans

    Fed. Proc.

    (1984)
  • M.E. Abreu

    Effect of intravenous injection speed on responses to cocaine and hydromorphone in humans

    Psychopharmacology (Berl.)

    (2001)
  • L.A. Marsch

    Effects of infusion rate of intravenously administered morphine on physiological, psychomotor, and self-reported measures in humans

    J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.

    (2001)
  • S.H. Kollins

    Comparison of acute behavioral effects of sustained-release and immediate-release methylphenidate

    Exp. Clin. Psychopharmacol.

    (1998)
  • H. de Wit

    Rate of increase of plasma drug level influences subjective response in humans

    Psychopharmacology (Berl.)

    (1992)
  • G. Zernig

    Intravenous drug injection habits: drug users' self-reports versus researchers' perception

    Pharmacology

    (2003)
  • R.J. Lamb

    The reinforcing and subjective effects of morphine in post-addicts: a dose–response study

    J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.

    (1991)
  • M.W. Fischman

    Relationship between self-reported drug effects and their reinforcing effects: studies with stimulant drugs

    NIDA Res. Monogr.

    (1989)
  • Jaffe, J.H. (1990) Drug addiction and drug abuse. In The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics (Vol. 8th Edn) (Gilman,...
  • Cited by (180)

    • Nicotine pharmacokinetics of electronic cigarettes: A pooled data analysis from the literature

      2021, Toxicology Reports
      Citation Excerpt :

      As with the Cmax data, these differences are likely due to differences in product design / performance as well as user behavior. It has been suggested previously that the speed of absorption of nicotine is related to product abuse liability [49]. The basis for this theory comes from studies on drugs of abuse, such as cocaine and heroin, which demonstrate that formulations and routes of administration that enhance the speed of drug delivery to the brain increase the propensity for addiction [50,51].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text