Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Protocol
  • Published:

Culture of Drosophila S2 cells and their use for RNAi-mediated loss-of-function studies and immunofluorescence microscopy

Abstract

Cultured Drosophila cell lines have become an increasingly popular model system for cell biological and functional genomic studies. One of the most commonly used lines, S2 cells, is particularly useful as it is easy to grow and maintain in the lab, is highly susceptible to gene inhibition using RNAi and is well suited to high-resolution light microscopic assays. Here, we provide protocols for the routine culture and RNAi treatment of S2 cells and methods to prepare these cells for fluorescence microscopy. Using these techniques, loss-of-function experiments may be performed after 4–7 d of RNAi-mediated protein depletion.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Inhibition of Rho1 using RNAi produces a clearly recognizable change in S2 cells.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fire, A. et al. Potent and specific genetic interference by double-stranded RNA in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature 391, 806–811 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Elbashir, S.M. et al. Duplexes of 21-nucleotide RNAs mediate RNA interference in cultured mammalian cells. Nature 411, 494–498 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Echeverri, C.J. & Perrimon, N. High-throughput RNAi screening in cultured cells: a user's guide. Nat. Rev. Genet. 7, 373–384 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Schneider, I. Cell lines derived from late embryonic stages of Drosophila melanogaster. J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 27, 353–365 (1972).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ramet, M. et al. Functional genomic analysis of phagocytosis and identification of a Drosophila receptor for E. coli. Nature 416, 644–648 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Yanagawa, S. et al. Identification and characterization of a novel line of Drosophila Schneider S2 cells that respond to wingless signaling. J. Biol. Chem. 273, 32353–32359 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Rogers, S.L. et al. Drosophila EB1 is important for proper assembly, dynamics, and positioning of the mitotic spindle. J. Cell Biol. 158, 873–884 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Rogers, S.L. et al. Molecular requirements for actin-based lamella formation in Drosophila S2 cells. J. Cell Biol. 162, 1079–1088 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Saleh, M.C. et al. The endocytic pathway mediates cell entry of dsRNA to induce RNAi silencing. Nat. Cell Biol. 8, 793–802 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ulvila, J. et al. Double-stranded RNA is internalized by scavenger receptor-mediated endocytosis in Drosophila S2 cells. J. Biol. Chem. 281, 14370–14375 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ramadan, N. et al. Design and implementation of high-throughput RNAi screens in cultured Drosophila cells. Nat. Protoc. 2, 2245–2264 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Clemens, J.C. et al. Use of double-stranded RNA interference in Drosophila cell lines to dissect signal transduction pathways. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97, 6499–6503 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Echeverri, C.J. et al. Minimizing the risk of reporting false positives in large-scale RNAi screens. Nat. Methods 3, 777–779 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kulkarni, M.M. et al. Evidence of off-target effects associated with long dsRNAs in Drosophila melanogaster cell-based assays. Nat. Methods 3, 833–838 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Somma, M.P. et al. Molecular dissection of cytokinesis by RNA interference in Drosophila cultured cells. Mol. Biol. Cell 13, 2448–2460 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Bjorklund, M. et al. Identification of pathways regulating cell size and cell-cycle progression by RNAi. Nature 439, 1009–1013 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Magie, C.R. et al. Rho1 interacts with p120ctn and α-catenin, and regulates cadherin-based adherens junction components in Drosophila. Development 129, 3771–3782 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Drechsel, D.N. et al. A requirement for Rho and Cdc42 during cytokinesis in Xenopus embryos. Curr. Biol. 7, 12–23 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephen L Rogers.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rogers, S., Rogers, G. Culture of Drosophila S2 cells and their use for RNAi-mediated loss-of-function studies and immunofluorescence microscopy. Nat Protoc 3, 606–611 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2008.18

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2008.18

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing