Visual Overview
Abstract
Cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) is the dominant P450 involved in human xenobiotic metabolism. Competition for CYP3A4 therefore underlies several adverse drug–drug interactions. Despite its clinical significance, the mechanisms CYP3A4 uses to bind diverse ligands remain poorly understood. Highly monodisperse CYP3A4 embedded in anionic lipoprotein nanodiscs containing an equal mixture of 1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-glycero-3-phosphocholine and 1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phospho-(1’-rac-glycerol) were used to determine which of the limiting kinetic schemes that include protein conformational change, conformational selection (CS) or induced fit (IF), best described the binding of four known irreversible inhibitors. Azamulin, retapamulin, pleuromutilin, and mibrefadil binding to CYP3A4 nanodiscs conformed to a single-site binding model. Exponential fits of stopped-flow UV-visible absorption spectroscopy data supported multiple-step binding mechanisms. Trends in the rates of relaxation to equilibrium with increasing ligand concentrations were ambiguous as to whether IF or CS was involved; however, global fitting and consideration of the rate constants favored an IF mechanism. In the case of mibrefadil, a transient complex was observed in the stopped-flow UV-visible experiment, definitively assigning the presence of IF in ligand binding. While these studies only consider a small region of CYP3A4’s vast ligand space, they provide kinetic evidence that CYP3A4 can use an IF mechanism.
SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT CYP3A4 is capable of oxidizing numerous xenobiotics, including many drugs. Such promiscuity could not be achieved without conformational changes to accommodate diverse substrates. It is unknown whether conformational heterogeneity is present before (conformational selection) or after (induced fit) ligand binding. Stopped-flow measurements of suicide inhibitors binding to nanodisc-embedded CYP3A4 combined with sophisticated numerical analyses support that induced fit better describes ligand binding to this important enzyme.
Footnotes
- Received March 14, 2023.
- Accepted July 20, 2023.
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health National Institute of General Medical Sciences [Grant R01GM135414]. The Research Excellence Initiative at the University of Wrocław supported K.S.S. while in the Hackett laboratory. This work was also conducted at the Advanced Light Source (ALS), a national user facility operated by Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory on behalf of the Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, through the Integrated Diffraction Analysis Technologies (IDAT) program, supported by DOE Office of Biological and Environmental Research. Additional support comes from National Institutes of Health project ALS-ENABLE [Grant P30GM124169] and a High-End Instrumentation Grant [Grant S10OD018483].
No author has an actual or perceived conflict of interest with the contents of this article.
↵
This article has supplemental material available at molpharm.aspetjournals.org.
- Copyright © 2023 by The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
MolPharm articles become freely available 12 months after publication, and remain freely available for 5 years.Non-open access articles that fall outside this five year window are available only to institutional subscribers and current ASPET members, or through the article purchase feature at the bottom of the page.
|