Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Fast Forward
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Sections
    • Archive
  • Information
    • Instructions to Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • FAQs
    • For Subscribers
    • Terms & Conditions of Use
    • Permissions
  • Editorial Board
  • Alerts
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Virtual Issues
  • Feedback
  • Submit
  • Other Publications
    • Drug Metabolism and Disposition
    • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
    • Molecular Pharmacology
    • Pharmacological Reviews
    • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
    • ASPET

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Molecular Pharmacology
  • Other Publications
    • Drug Metabolism and Disposition
    • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
    • Molecular Pharmacology
    • Pharmacological Reviews
    • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
    • ASPET
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Molecular Pharmacology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Fast Forward
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Sections
    • Archive
  • Information
    • Instructions to Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • FAQs
    • For Subscribers
    • Terms & Conditions of Use
    • Permissions
  • Editorial Board
  • Alerts
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Virtual Issues
  • Feedback
  • Submit
  • Visit molpharm on Facebook
  • Follow molpharm on Twitter
  • Follow molpharm on LinkedIn
Abstract

Role of differential drug uptake, efflux, and binding of etoposide in sensitive and resistant human tumor cell lines: implications for the mechanisms of drug resistance.

P M Politi and B K Sinha
Molecular Pharmacology March 1989, 35 (3) 271-278;
P M Politi
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
B K Sinha
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

In order to study the mechanism of etoposide (VP-16) resistance in human tumor cells and to assess the role of P-170 glycoprotein in VP-16 accumulation, we have examined the uptake and efflux of VP-16 in both sensitive and multidrug-resistant MCF-7 human breast and HL60 human promyelocytic leukemia cells. The drug-resistant cells, MCF-7/ADR and HL60/ADR, were selected for resistance to adriamycin and were 200- to 250-fold resistant to VP-16. Whereas MCF-7/ADR cells overexpress the P-170 glycoprotein and show the multidrug-resistant phenotype, HL60/ADR cells do not overexpress the P-170 glycoprotein. Although there was a 2-fold decrease in accumulation of VP-16 in MCF-7/ADR cells, this decrease did not correlate with a 250-fold resistance to the drug. VP-16 efflux was rapid and almost complete from MCF-7 cell lines and it was decreased at 4 degrees. Further, there was a significant increase in VP-16 accumulation in the MCF-7/ADR cells in the presence of glucose-free medium supplemented with sodium azide. However, no change in the pattern of VP-16 efflux was observed. Under these conditions, addition of glucose caused release of VP-16 from MCF-7/ADR cells, suggesting energy-dependent modifications in the drug binding. Coincubation of vincristine with VP-16 also increased the drug accumulation and decreased the rate of efflux of VP-16 in both sensitive and resistant MCF-7 cells, suggesting that vincristine and VP-16 may compete for similar binding and efflux mechanisms in these cell lines. In contrast, daunorubicin increased VP-16 accumulation only in the sensitive MCF-7 cell line, whereas the efflux rate of VP-16 was not significantly changed in either cell line. HL60 sensitive cells accumulated 4- to 5-fold more VP-16 than the resistant subline. Both sensitive and resistant cells showed an important noneffluxable pool of the drug, 3-fold larger for sensitive cells (79 +/- 12 versus 25 +/- 2 pmol of VP-16/mg of protein, for sensitive and resistant cells, respectively). The efflux of VP-16 was temperature dependent only in sensitive cells. VP-16 accumulation in HL60/ADR cells was increased in glucose-free medium supplemented with sodium azide; however, the noneffluxable pool of VP-16 was not significantly changed. In contrast, although these conditions had no effect on the drug accumulation in the parental line, they caused a decrease in the noneffluxable pool of VP-16, suggesting an energy-dependent binding and retention of VP-16.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

MolPharm articles become freely available 12 months after publication, and remain freely available for 5 years. 

Non-open access articles that fall outside this five year window are available only to institutional subscribers and current ASPET members, or through the article purchase feature at the bottom of the page. 

 

  • Click here for information on institutional subscriptions.
  • Click here for information on individual ASPET membership.

 

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?

Purchase access

You may purchase access to this article. This will require you to create an account if you don't already have one.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Molecular Pharmacology
Vol. 35, Issue 3
1 Mar 1989
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Editorial Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Molecular Pharmacology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Role of differential drug uptake, efflux, and binding of etoposide in sensitive and resistant human tumor cell lines: implications for the mechanisms of drug resistance.
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Molecular Pharmacology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Molecular Pharmacology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Abstract

Role of differential drug uptake, efflux, and binding of etoposide in sensitive and resistant human tumor cell lines: implications for the mechanisms of drug resistance.

P M Politi and B K Sinha
Molecular Pharmacology March 1, 1989, 35 (3) 271-278;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Abstract

Role of differential drug uptake, efflux, and binding of etoposide in sensitive and resistant human tumor cell lines: implications for the mechanisms of drug resistance.

P M Politi and B K Sinha
Molecular Pharmacology March 1, 1989, 35 (3) 271-278;
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

Similar Articles

Advertisement
  • Home
  • Alerts
Facebook   Twitter   LinkedIn   RSS

Navigate

  • Current Issue
  • Fast Forward by date
  • Fast Forward by section
  • Latest Articles
  • Archive
  • Search for Articles
  • Feedback
  • ASPET

More Information

  • About Molecular Pharmacology
  • Editorial Board
  • Instructions to Authors
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Customized Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions
  • Terms & Conditions of Use

ASPET's Other Journals

  • Drug Metabolism and Disposition
  • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
  • Pharmacological Reviews
  • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
ISSN 1521-0111 (Online)

Copyright © 2023 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics