Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Fast Forward
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Sections
    • Archive
  • Information
    • Instructions to Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • FAQs
    • For Subscribers
    • Terms & Conditions of Use
    • Permissions
  • Editorial Board
  • Alerts
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Virtual Issues
  • Feedback
  • Submit
  • Other Publications
    • Drug Metabolism and Disposition
    • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
    • Molecular Pharmacology
    • Pharmacological Reviews
    • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
    • ASPET

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Molecular Pharmacology
  • Other Publications
    • Drug Metabolism and Disposition
    • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
    • Molecular Pharmacology
    • Pharmacological Reviews
    • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
    • ASPET
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Molecular Pharmacology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Fast Forward
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Sections
    • Archive
  • Information
    • Instructions to Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • FAQs
    • For Subscribers
    • Terms & Conditions of Use
    • Permissions
  • Editorial Board
  • Alerts
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Virtual Issues
  • Feedback
  • Submit
  • Visit molpharm on Facebook
  • Follow molpharm on Twitter
  • Follow molpharm on LinkedIn
Abstract

Binding of semirigid nicotinic agonists to nicotinic and muscarinic receptors.

C E Spivak, J A Waters and R S Aronstam
Molecular Pharmacology July 1989, 36 (1) 177-184;
C E Spivak
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J A Waters
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
R S Aronstam
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Isoarecolone methiodide (1-methyl-4-acetyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine methiodide) was previously shown to be among the most potent agonists tested at the frog neuromuscular junction. Because nicotinic receptors from different sources vary in their selectivities, isoarecolone methiodide as well as 19 additional congeners, most of which were also previously tested at the frog neuromuscular junction, were studied in binding assays. Torpedo nobiliana was the tissue source for nicotinic receptors. Two types of experiments were conducted. The first evaluated the affinities of the agonists (including acetylcholine and carbamylcholine) for the recognition site by allowing the agonists to compete for that site with 125I-alpha-bungarotoxin. The inhibition potencies obtained correlated strongly (Spearman's correlation coefficient,-0.91) with the potency obtained at the frog neuromuscular junction. The second type of experiment evaluated the agonists for their ability to activate the receptor. The binding of [3H]perhydrohistrionicotoxin, which was employed as an indicator of the activation of the receptor, was measured in the presence of each of the agonists. Isoarecolone methiodide was the most potent of all. A few of the agonists (partial agonists) were incapable of fully enhancing this binding. For the full agonists, the concentration that produced half of the maximum binding of [3H]perhydrohistrionicotoxin was defined as the EC50. The correlation coefficient (Spearman's) for EC50 versus potency at the frog neuromuscular junction was -0.73, indicating innate differences between Torpedo and frog receptors. In addition, these compounds were tested for their affinity at muscarinic receptors from rat brain. Competition experiments were carried out using [3H]N-methylscopolamine. The affinity of isoarecolone methiodide was only about 7-fold lower than that of acetylcholine and less than 2-fold lower than that of carbamylcholine. In contrast, 1-methyl-4-acetylpiperazine methiodide was much more selective for nicotinic receptors. Its activity was similar to isoarecolone methiodide at the nicotinic receptor, but it was among the weakest compounds in its affinity for the muscarinic receptor.

MolPharm articles become freely available 12 months after publication, and remain freely available for 5 years. 

Non-open access articles that fall outside this five year window are available only to institutional subscribers and current ASPET members, or through the article purchase feature at the bottom of the page. 

 

  • Click here for information on institutional subscriptions.
  • Click here for information on individual ASPET membership.

 

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?

Purchase access

You may purchase access to this article. This will require you to create an account if you don't already have one.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Molecular Pharmacology
Vol. 36, Issue 1
1 Jul 1989
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Editorial Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Molecular Pharmacology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Binding of semirigid nicotinic agonists to nicotinic and muscarinic receptors.
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Molecular Pharmacology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Molecular Pharmacology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Abstract

Binding of semirigid nicotinic agonists to nicotinic and muscarinic receptors.

C E Spivak, J A Waters and R S Aronstam
Molecular Pharmacology July 1, 1989, 36 (1) 177-184;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Abstract

Binding of semirigid nicotinic agonists to nicotinic and muscarinic receptors.

C E Spivak, J A Waters and R S Aronstam
Molecular Pharmacology July 1, 1989, 36 (1) 177-184;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

Similar Articles

Advertisement
  • Home
  • Alerts
Facebook   Twitter   LinkedIn   RSS

Navigate

  • Current Issue
  • Fast Forward by date
  • Fast Forward by section
  • Latest Articles
  • Archive
  • Search for Articles
  • Feedback
  • ASPET

More Information

  • About Molecular Pharmacology
  • Editorial Board
  • Instructions to Authors
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Customized Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions
  • Terms & Conditions of Use

ASPET's Other Journals

  • Drug Metabolism and Disposition
  • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
  • Pharmacological Reviews
  • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
ISSN 1521-0111 (Online)

Copyright © 2022 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics