Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Fast Forward
    • Latest Articles
    • Archive
  • Information
    • Instructions to Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • FAQs
    • For Subscribers
    • Terms & Conditions of Use
    • Permissions
  • Editorial Board
  • Alerts
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Virtual Issues
  • Feedback
  • Other Publications
    • Drug Metabolism and Disposition
    • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
    • Molecular Pharmacology
    • Pharmacological Reviews
    • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
    • ASPET

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Molecular Pharmacology
  • Other Publications
    • Drug Metabolism and Disposition
    • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
    • Molecular Pharmacology
    • Pharmacological Reviews
    • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
    • ASPET
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Molecular Pharmacology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Fast Forward
    • Latest Articles
    • Archive
  • Information
    • Instructions to Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • FAQs
    • For Subscribers
    • Terms & Conditions of Use
    • Permissions
  • Editorial Board
  • Alerts
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Virtual Issues
  • Feedback
  • Visit molpharm on Facebook
  • Follow molpharm on Twitter
  • Follow molpharm on LinkedIn
Abstract

Structure-activity relationships for cannabinoid receptor-binding and analgesic activity: studies of bicyclic cannabinoid analogs.

L S Melvin, G M Milne, M R Johnson, B Subramaniam, G H Wilken and A C Howlett
Molecular Pharmacology November 1993, 44 (5) 1008-1015;
L S Melvin
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
G M Milne
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M R Johnson
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
B Subramaniam
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
G H Wilken
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A C Howlett
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Cannabimimetic compounds, such as delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol (delta 9-THC), evoke analgesia in addition to other behavioral responses in humans and animals. The cannabinoid receptor mediating this response has been characterized by its ability to bind the cannabinoid agonist [3H]CP-55,940 and to inhibit adenylyl cyclase via Gi. An investigation of structural requirements for antinociceptive activity of cannabinoid structures led to the development of a simple bicyclic cannabinoid agonist, CP-47,497, that possessed a spectrum of cannabinoid activities in animals that resembled that of delta 9-THC. The present investigation examines several series of CP-47,497 analogs for their binding affinity at the cannabinoid receptor and their ability to evoke analgesia in rodents. Analogs substituted at the C-3 alkyl side chain exhibited maximal affinity for the cannabinoid receptor with side chains of seven or eight carbons in length. Analgesic potency paralleled the receptor-binding affinity. The cyclohexyl ring was optimized as a six- or seven-membered ring structure for binding as well as analgesic activity. Cyclohexyl alkyl side chain extensions of up to four carbons in length had little influence on the affinity for the receptor or analgesic activity. Hydroxyalkyl side chains exhibited optimal binding affinity and antinociceptive activity at three or four carbon atoms in length; however, polar groups closer to the ring diminished binding to the receptor. The importance of the phenolic and cyclohexyl hydroxyl groups for binding affinity was demonstrated. In general, analgesic activity correlated well with the affinity of these analogs for the cannabinoid receptor. Exceptions could be explained by metabolic transformations likely to occur in vivo.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Molecular Pharmacology
Vol. 44, Issue 5
1 Nov 1993
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Editorial Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Molecular Pharmacology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Structure-activity relationships for cannabinoid receptor-binding and analgesic activity: studies of bicyclic cannabinoid analogs.
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Molecular Pharmacology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Molecular Pharmacology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Abstract

Structure-activity relationships for cannabinoid receptor-binding and analgesic activity: studies of bicyclic cannabinoid analogs.

L S Melvin, G M Milne, M R Johnson, B Subramaniam, G H Wilken and A C Howlett
Molecular Pharmacology November 1, 1993, 44 (5) 1008-1015;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Abstract

Structure-activity relationships for cannabinoid receptor-binding and analgesic activity: studies of bicyclic cannabinoid analogs.

L S Melvin, G M Milne, M R Johnson, B Subramaniam, G H Wilken and A C Howlett
Molecular Pharmacology November 1, 1993, 44 (5) 1008-1015;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

Similar Articles

Advertisement
  • Home
  • Alerts
Facebook   Twitter   LinkedIn   RSS

Navigate

  • Current Issue
  • Fast Forward by date
  • Fast Forward by section
  • Latest Articles
  • Archive
  • Search for Articles
  • Feedback
  • ASPET

More Information

  • About Molecular Pharmacology
  • Editorial Board
  • Instructions to Authors
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Customized Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions
  • Terms & Conditions of Use

ASPET's Other Journals

  • Drug Metabolism and Disposition
  • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
  • Pharmacological Reviews
  • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
ISSN 1521-0111 (Online)

Copyright © 2021 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics