Abstract
A series of kappa/mu receptor chimeras and a number of kappa receptors substituted in the second transmembrane segment (TM-II) were investigated using as radioligands, respectively, the kappa-selective agonist [3H]C1977 and the nonselective opioid antagonist [3H]diprenorphine (DIP). All of the receptor constructs bound [3H]DIP with similar and high affinity, whereas the apparent affinity of the nonpeptide agonist C1977, when estimated in competition binding with the antagonist [3H]DIP, was impaired between 42- and > 500-fold in the kappa/mu chimeras and between 64- and 153-fold in three of the kappa receptor mutants that had been substituted in the TM-II segment. However, homologous competition binding experiments, using [3H]C1977 as radioligand, showed that the high affinity binding of this nonpeptide agonist was in fact not impaired in four of the kappa/mu chimeras and in three TM-II substituted kappa receptors compared with the wild-type kappa receptor. In all cases in which mutations decreased the apparent affinity of C1977 without affecting its actual affinity, as determined in homologous assays using [3H]C1977, the calculated number of receptor sites (Bmax) was decreased. In three of the kappa/mu constructs, binding of [3H]C1977 was undetectable, indicating that in these chimeras the affinity of the nonpeptide agonist had actually been affected. Also, for the kappa-selective peptide agonist dynorphin A(1-8), the measured affinity for the receptor mutants was strongly dependent on whether it was determined using the antagonist [3H]DIP or the agonist [3H]C1977 in that < or = 800-fold higher Ki values were determined in competition with the antagonist. It is concluded that mutations in the kappa-opioid receptor can cause large discrepancies between the affinity determined for agonists in homologous versus heterologous competition binding assays and that this pattern, which is compatible with a partial uncoupling of receptors, is observed in surprisingly many types of receptor mutations.
MolPharm articles become freely available 12 months after publication, and remain freely available for 5 years.Non-open access articles that fall outside this five year window are available only to institutional subscribers and current ASPET members, or through the article purchase feature at the bottom of the page.
|