Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Fast Forward
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Sections
    • Archive
  • Information
    • Instructions to Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • FAQs
    • For Subscribers
    • Terms & Conditions of Use
    • Permissions
  • Editorial Board
  • Alerts
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Virtual Issues
  • Feedback
  • Submit
  • Other Publications
    • Drug Metabolism and Disposition
    • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
    • Molecular Pharmacology
    • Pharmacological Reviews
    • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
    • ASPET

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Molecular Pharmacology
  • Other Publications
    • Drug Metabolism and Disposition
    • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
    • Molecular Pharmacology
    • Pharmacological Reviews
    • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
    • ASPET
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Molecular Pharmacology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Fast Forward
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Sections
    • Archive
  • Information
    • Instructions to Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • FAQs
    • For Subscribers
    • Terms & Conditions of Use
    • Permissions
  • Editorial Board
  • Alerts
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Virtual Issues
  • Feedback
  • Submit
  • Visit molpharm on Facebook
  • Follow molpharm on Twitter
  • Follow molpharm on LinkedIn
Abstract

Site-directed mutagenesis of the human A1 adenosine receptor: influences of acidic and hydroxy residues in the first four transmembrane domains on ligand binding.

H Barbhaiya, R McClain, A Ijzerman and S A Rivkees
Molecular Pharmacology December 1996, 50 (6) 1635-1642;
H Barbhaiya
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
R McClain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A Ijzerman
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S A Rivkees
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

To provide new insights into ligand/A1 adenosine receptor (A1 AR) interactions, site-directed mutagenesis was used to test the role of several residues in the first four transmembrane (TM) domains of the human A1 AR. Based on multiple sequence analysis of all known ARs, both acidic (glutamic acid and aspartic acid) and polar hydroxy (serine and threonine) amino acids were identified that could potentially play a role in binding adenosine. Glu16 (TM1), Asp55 (TM2), Ser93 and Ser94 (TM3), Ser135 (TM4), and Thr 141 (TM4) were identified in all ARs, and Ser6 and Ser23 (TM1) were identified in all A1 ARs. To test the role of these residues, each was individually mutated to alanine. When Ala6, Ala23, Ala50, Ala93, Ala135, and Ala141 constructs were tested, affinities for [3H]2-chloro-N6-cyclopentyladenosine (CCPA) and [3H]1,3-dipropyl-8-cyclopentylxanthine (DPCPX) were similar to those seen for the wild-type receptor. After conversion of Glu16 to Ala16, the affinity for [3H]CCPA and other agonists fell 10-100-fold, whereas the affinity for [3H]DPCPX and other antagonists was not affected. After conversion of Asp55 to Ala55, the affinity for [3H]CCPA and other agonists increased < or = 100-fold, whereas the affinity for [3H]DPCPX and other antagonists was not affected. Studies of the Ala55 construct also revealed that Asp55 is responsible for allosteric regulation of binding by sodium because the affinity for [3H]CCPA did not change over broad ranges of sodium concentrations. When Ser94 was converted to Ala94, A1 AR immunoreactivity was present on stable cell lines; however, functional binding sites could not be detected. When Ser94 was converted to Thr94, the affinity for some xanthine antagonists fell. These data show that Glu16 in TM1 and Asp55 in TM2 play important roles in agonist/A1 AR interactions and show that Asp55 is responsible for allosteric regulation of ligand/A1 AR binding by sodium. We also identify Ser94 as an important site for ligand binding.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Molecular Pharmacology
Vol. 50, Issue 6
1 Dec 1996
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Editorial Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Molecular Pharmacology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Site-directed mutagenesis of the human A1 adenosine receptor: influences of acidic and hydroxy residues in the first four transmembrane domains on ligand binding.
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Molecular Pharmacology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Molecular Pharmacology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Abstract

Site-directed mutagenesis of the human A1 adenosine receptor: influences of acidic and hydroxy residues in the first four transmembrane domains on ligand binding.

H Barbhaiya, R McClain, A Ijzerman and S A Rivkees
Molecular Pharmacology December 1, 1996, 50 (6) 1635-1642;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Abstract

Site-directed mutagenesis of the human A1 adenosine receptor: influences of acidic and hydroxy residues in the first four transmembrane domains on ligand binding.

H Barbhaiya, R McClain, A Ijzerman and S A Rivkees
Molecular Pharmacology December 1, 1996, 50 (6) 1635-1642;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

Similar Articles

Advertisement
  • Home
  • Alerts
Facebook   Twitter   LinkedIn   RSS

Navigate

  • Current Issue
  • Fast Forward by date
  • Fast Forward by section
  • Latest Articles
  • Archive
  • Search for Articles
  • Feedback
  • ASPET

More Information

  • About Molecular Pharmacology
  • Editorial Board
  • Instructions to Authors
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Customized Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions
  • Terms & Conditions of Use

ASPET's Other Journals

  • Drug Metabolism and Disposition
  • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
  • Pharmacological Reviews
  • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
ISSN 1521-0111 (Online)

Copyright © 2023 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics