Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Fast Forward
    • Latest Articles
    • Archive
  • Information
    • Instructions to Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • FAQs
    • For Subscribers
    • Terms & Conditions of Use
    • Permissions
  • Editorial Board
  • Alerts
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Virtual Issues
  • Feedback
  • Other Publications
    • Drug Metabolism and Disposition
    • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
    • Molecular Pharmacology
    • Pharmacological Reviews
    • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
    • ASPET

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Molecular Pharmacology
  • Other Publications
    • Drug Metabolism and Disposition
    • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
    • Molecular Pharmacology
    • Pharmacological Reviews
    • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
    • ASPET
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Molecular Pharmacology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Fast Forward
    • Latest Articles
    • Archive
  • Information
    • Instructions to Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • FAQs
    • For Subscribers
    • Terms & Conditions of Use
    • Permissions
  • Editorial Board
  • Alerts
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Virtual Issues
  • Feedback
  • Visit molpharm on Facebook
  • Follow molpharm on Twitter
  • Follow molpharm on LinkedIn
Research ArticleArticle

Transgenic Animals with Inducible, Targeted Gene Expression in Brain

Jingshan Chen, Max B. Kelz, Guoqi Zeng, Norio Sakai, Cathy Steffen, Penny E. Shockett, Marina R. Picciotto, Ronald S. Duman and Eric J. Nestler
Molecular Pharmacology September 1998, 54 (3) 495-503; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1124/mol.54.3.495
Jingshan Chen
1 2
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Max B. Kelz
1 2
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Guoqi Zeng
1 2
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Norio Sakai
1 2
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Cathy Steffen
1 2
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Penny E. Shockett
1 2
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marina R. Picciotto
1 2
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ronald S. Duman
1 2
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Eric J. Nestler
1 2
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Several inducible gene expression systems have been developed in vitro in recent years to overcome limitations with traditional transgenic mice. One of these, the tetracycline-regulated system, has been used successfully in vivo. Nevertheless, concerns remain about the ability of this system to direct high levels of transgene expression in vivo and to enable such expression to be turned on and off effectively. We report here the generation, using a modified tetracycline-regulated system under the control of the neuron-specific enolase promoter, of several lines of mice that direct transgene expression to specific brain regions, including the striatum, cerebellum, CA1 region of the hippocampus, or deep layers of cerebral neocortex. Transgene expression in these mice can be turned off completely with low doses of doxycycline (a tetracycline derivative) and driven to very high levels in the absence of doxycycline. We demonstrate this tissue-specific, inducible expression for three transgenes: those that encode luciferase (a reporter protein) or ΔFosB or the cAMP-response element binding protein (CREB) (two transcription factors). The various lines of transgenic mice demonstrate an inducible system that generates high levels of transgene expression in specific brain regions and represent novel and powerful tools with which to study the functioning of these (or potentially any other) genes in the brain.

The utility of transgenic mice for studying the function of a particular gene in the nervous system has been limited, because transgene expression typically occurs constitutively throughout development and in most tissues. As a result, any phenotypic abnormality observed in a particular brain region of adult mice, for example, could be caused by, or complicated by, abnormalities that occur any time during development or that exist in any other brain region or tissue of the adult animal. Inducible expression systems have been developed in recent years to overcome these limitations, and several have been shown to provide tight control of gene expression in vitro (e.g., Wyborski and Short, 1991; Gossen and Bujard, 1992; Wang et al., 1994;Gossen et al., 1995; Shockett et al., 1995; Noet al., 1996). However, it has been difficult in many cases to demonstrate the ability of such systems to direct high levels of transgene expression in vivo and to turn such expression on and off effectively.

Recently, inducible forebrain-specific expression of a mutant form of CaMKII has been achieved successfully with the use of the tetracycline-regulated system (Mayford et al., 1996). This system involves two genes: one gene encodes tTA (a tetracycline-inhibitable transcription factor) and the other encodes the gene of interest under the control of the tTA-responsive TetOp promoter (Gossen and Bujard, 1992; Gossen et al., 1995). In the 1996 Mayford report, tTA expression was placed under the control of a portion of the promoter of the CaMKII gene in an attempt to direct expression to certain forebrain regions. The resulting mice showed inducible and brain region-specific transgene expression, although the level of transgene expression achieved was not clear. In another study, high levels of transgene expression were obtained selectively in heart by use of the α myosin heavy chain promoter to drive tTA expression (Passman and Fishman, 1994). The latter finding raises the possibility that strong neuron-specific promoters could be used to direct particularly high levels of transgene expression in the brain.

The objective of the present study was 2-fold. First, we set out to determine whether such a strategy could be used to obtain inducible, region-specific expression of specific genes in brain. We focused on luciferase, a reporter protein, and two transcription factors that have been implicated in neural plasticity: ΔFosB (a member of the Fos family) and CREB (see Results and Discussion). Second, our goal was to achieve robust levels of transgene expression. To achieve the latter goal, we placed the tTA gene under the control of the NSE promoter. We used a 1.8 kb fragment of the promoter, which was shown previously to drive very high levels of expression of a reporter gene in brain (Forss-Petter et al., 1990). We also used a modified form of the tTA gene to enhance levels of its expression.

We show here that the resulting bigenic mice support luciferase, ΔFosB, or CREB expression with striking region-specific patterns in brain and that such expression can be turned off completely or driven to very high levels by adding or removing doxycycline (a tetracycline derivative) in the drinking water. Preliminary reports of this work have appeared (Chen et al., 1997b; Duman et al., 1997a).

Materials and Methods

Construction of plasmids.

Δ FosB cDNA in pcDEB vector under the control of the constitutive SR-α promoter was provided by Y. Nakabeppu (Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan) (Nakabeppuet al., 1993). The ΔFosB cDNA was released from the pcDEBΔFosB by digestion with SalI and BamHI restriction endonucleases. The ends of theSalI-BamHI fragment was blunted with Klenow and subcloned into the blunted SalI site of pTet-splice (Shockett et al., 1995). The new plasmid was designated as pTetOp-ΔFosB, in which the ΔFosB was under the control of tetracycline-regulated promoter (TetOp). A 1.2-kbBamHI-EcoRI fragment of the rat CREB cDNA (supplied by M. Montminy, Salk Institute, La Jolla, CA) was cloned into the blunted SalI site of pTet-splice. The new plasmid was designated as pTetOp-CREB. An ∼1.8-kb fragment of the NSE promoter in pNSE-LacZ (Forss-Petter et al., 1990) was released by digestion with SacI and HindIII, and subcloned into the ptTAk (Shockett et al., 1995) in place of the TetOp-minimal cytomegalovirus promoter. The new plasmid was designated pNSE-tTA, in which the XhoI-HindIII fragment of the ptTAk was replaced by the SaCI-HindIII fragment of pNSE-LacZ. Construction of these plasmids, and their activity in cultured neural cell lines in vitro, have been reported recently (Chen et al., 1997a).

Transgenic mice.

DNA fragments (containing the promoter, open reading frame, SV40 intron, and poly(A)+signal) from pNSE-tTA, pTetOp-ΔFosB, and pTetOp-CREB were purified by electroelution and microinjected into the pronuclei of oocytes from SJL × C57BL6 mice. Tail DNA from resulting mice was isolated using a Tissue Amp DNA kit (Qiagen, Chatsworth, CA), and analyzed for the transgene by PCR, dot blotting, or Southern blotting (Sambrook et al., 1989). Of these techniques, PCR was used for routine genotyping of the transgenic mice. The NSE-tTA transgene was detected by PCR with the primers NSE-F1: 23-mer, 5′ GTC CTC ATC CAT CAC TGC TTC CA 3′ and NSE-B1: 24-mer, 5′ CTA CCA GCT ATG TCT GTA GAG ACA 3′. The ΔFosB transgene was identified by PCR with the primers FosBF2: 20-mer, 5′ GAG TCT CAG TAC CTG TCT TC 3′ and FosBB2: 19-mer, 5′ GTC CAC TGG TGC TTG TGC T 3′. The TetOp-CREB transgene was detected by PCR with the primers CREB F1: 25-mer, 5′ CAG CCA TCA GTT ATT CAG TCT CCA C 3′ and CREB B1: 24-mer, 5′ GCT GCA TTG GTC ATG GTT AAT GTC 3′. The founder mice were crossbred with the ICR outbred mouse line to generate F1 mice. F2 homozygous transgenic mice were obtained by crossbreeding F1 siblings; homozygous genotype was confirmed by crossbreeding them with wild-type mice. Transgenic mice carrying both TetOp-luciferase andTetOp-tTA genes were provided by D. Schatz (Yale University, New Haven, CT) (Shockett et al., 1995). To turn off transgene expression in mice carrying theNSE-tTA gene plus the TetOp-luciferase,TetOp-ΔFosB, or TetOp-CREB gene, the mice were fed with water containing doxycycline (Sigma Chemical, St. Louis, MO) and 5% sucrose. All of the transgenic mice used in this study were maintained in strict accordance with National Institutes of Health and institutional animal care guidelines.

Luciferase assay.

Tissues from different organs or different brain regions were obtained by gross dissection. The tissues were homogenized in 500 μl of 1 × lysis buffer (according to manufacturer’s specifications) using a sonicator or polytron. The homogenate was centrifuged for 5 min in a microcentrifuge. Ten microliters of the supernatant was used for measurement of luciferase activity in a luminometer by use of the luciferase reporter gene assay kit (Boehringer-Mannheim Biochemicals, Indianapolis, IN). Luciferase activity was normalized to total protein concentration.

Western blotting.

One-dimensional Western blotting for ΔFosB was performed exactly as described previously (Chen et al., 1997a), by using an anti-Fos-related antigen antibody (supplied by M. Iadarola, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD) and chemiluminescence detection (Amersham, Arlington Heights, IL). Levels of ΔFosB immunoreactivity were quantified by measuring the optical density of specific bands using a Macintosh-based image analysis system with National Institutes of Health image software.

Immunohistochemistry.

Immunohistochemical analysis of ΔFosB and of CREB was performed according to published procedures (Nibuya et al., 1996; Hiroi et al., 1997). Transgenic mice were perfused with 4% paraformaldehyde-phosphate-buffered saline. Brains were protected by 20% glycerol treatment overnight and cut into 40-μm sections with a microtome. Sections were labeled with a rabbit polyclonal anti-FosB antibody (1:5000; Santa Cruz Biochemicals, Santa Cruz, CA) or a rabbit polyclonal anti-CREB antibody (1:500, Upstate Biotechnology, Lake Placid, NY). Immunoreactivity was detected by diaminobenzidine staining by use of standard protocols (Nibuyaet al., 1996; Hiroi et al., 1997).

RT-PCR.

Total RNA was isolated from striatum of transgenic mice using the RNAqueous phenol-free total RNA isolation kit (Ambion, Austin, TX), and poly(A)+ mRNA was isolated using the Oligotex mRNA mini kit (Qiagen, Chatsworth, CA). One microgram of poly(A)+ mRNA was used as template for cDNA synthesis using the Marathon cDNA amplification kit (Clontech, Palo Alto, CA). PCR was carried out according to standard protocols from Clontech. PCR primer pairs were designed to distinguish expression of the transgene from that of the endogenous gene. By use of a ΔFosB primer (FosBF2, see above) and an SV40 primer (SV40-B2: 24-mer, 5′ GTC AGC AGT AGC CTC ATC ATC ACT 3′), it was possible to detect expression of the ΔFosB transgene, which contains both ΔFosB and SV40 sequences. Similarly, by use of a CREB primer (CREBF1, see above) and an SV40 primer (SV40-B2), it was possible to detect expression of the CREB transgene, which contains both CREB and SV40 sequences. By use of twoFosB primers (mFosBF1: 23-mer, 5′ CCT TTG ACT CTT CTG TCT GAC CA 3′ and mFosBB1: 21-mer, 5′ AGC TAT CTT GGT CAC CCT GCA 3′) that were specific for the 3′ untranslated region of the endogenous gene, which is not included in the ΔFosBtransgene, it was possible to detect endogenous FosB and ΔFosB mRNA.

In situ hybridization.

Frozen brains were cut into 16 mm sections. Sections were then subjected to in situhybridization with a 35S-labeled CREB riboprobe exactly according to published procedures (Nibuya et al., 1996).

Results

Generation of transgenic mice with inducible, region-specific luciferase expression.

The strategy we used to generate mice with inducible, targeted gene expression in brain, by use of the tetracycline-regulated system, is illustrated in Fig.1A. The first step was to generate mice containing the tTA gene under the control of a 1.8-kb fragment of the NSE promoter, as described in Materials and Methods. We used a tTA gene with two modifications intended to enhance levels of tTA expression: 1) an SV40 intron was introduced into the 3′ untranslated region of the tTA gene to enhance stability of the encoded mRNA, and 2) the tTA gene contained mutations around the start AUG codon to enhance translation efficiency of the mRNA (see Discussion).

Figure 1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1

A, Schematic diagram of a neuron-specific tetracycline-regulated gene expression system. Gene 1 encodes tTA under the control of the NSE promoter. Gene 2 encodes the gene of interest under the control of the tetracycline-responsive promoter, TetOp. B, Analysis of tissue-specific expression of luciferase in four lines of transgenic mice carrying the NSE-tTA gene (gene 1) plus the TetOp-luciferase and TetOp-tTA genes (gene 2). The TetOp-tTA gene was added as a positive autoregulatory feedback mechanism to enhance levels of tTA expression (Shockett et al., 1995). Lines A and D showed highest level of luciferase expression in striatum, line B in cerebellum and striatum, and line C in cerebral cortex. Results are representative of the analysis of at least three animals in each treatment group.

Twelve founder mice carrying the NSE-tTA gene were identified by PCR and Southern blotting. Four lines of these NSE-tTA mice were crossbred with a transgenic TetOp reporter mouse line, which carries two genes: TetOp-luciferase andTetOp-tTA. The TetOp-tTA gene had been engineered into this line as a way to provide higher levels of tTA expression (Shockett et al., 1995). However, these bigenic reporter mice showed very low levels of luciferase expression in the brain and most other tissues even in the absence of tetracycline. Such low levels of expression were replicated in the present study, as shown in Fig. 1B.

In contrast, under such tetracycline-free conditions, the progeny from our crossbreeding, which carry the NSE-tTA,TetOp-luciferase, and TetOp-tTA genes, were found to express very high levels of luciferase in the brain, but not in peripheral tissues such as kidney and liver (Fig. 1B). Moreover, the various lines of NSE-tTA mice were found to direct different patterns of luciferase expression in the brain. Two lines (lines A and D) showed the highest levels of luciferase expression in striatum, one line (line B) in both cerebellum and striatum, and one line (line C) in cerebral cortex. These differences in expression patterns among the NSE-tTA mice are presumably due to the different insertion sites of theNSE-tTA gene.

One concern with the tetracycline-regulated system is the potential toxicity of the tTA protein: its transactivation domain is derived from the VP16 gene of the herpes simplex virus. However, we observed no detectable toxicity in our NSE-tTA mice. The mice yielded normal-size litters, with roughly equal numbers of mutants and wild-types, and the progeny seemed normal in all respects. Indeed, one useful feature of the NSE promoter is that its expression is turned on at relatively late stages of development (Forss-Petter et al., 1990). These findings are consistent with earlier reports in cell culture, wherein no toxic effects (e.g., cell death or slowed cell growth) of tTA were observed in several neural cell lines transfected stably or transiently with the NSE-tTA or TetOp-tTA gene (see Chen et al., 1997a).

Generation of transgenic mice with inducible, region-specific expression of ΔFosB.

To test whether these NSE-tTA mice could be used as tools to direct tissue-specific expression of a gene of interest other than a reporter gene, we generated mice carrying theTetOp-ΔFosB gene (see Materials and Methods) and crossed them with two lines (lines A and B) of the NSE-tTA mice. ΔFosB, a truncated splice variant of the FosB gene, is a Fos family member transcription factor (Nakabeppu and Nathans, 1991). It is known to be induced in a region-specific manner in brain in response to several types of chronic (but not acute) perturbation, including drugs of abuse, antipsychotic drugs, antidepressant drugs, seizures, and lesions (see Hope et al., 1994a, 1994b; Pennypacker et al., 1994; Chen et al., 1997a; Hiroi et al., 1997; Mandelzys et al., 1997). Recent work has provided direct evidence for an important functional role of this protein under some of these conditions (Hiroi et al., 1997,1998).

Bigenic NSE-tTA × TetOp-ΔFosB mice were found to express very high levels of ΔFosB, which migrates as two isoforms of 35 and 37 kD (see Chen et al., 1997a), as analyzed by Western blotting (Fig. 2). Consistent with the patterns of luciferase expression stated above (Fig. 1B), line A NSE-tTA mice directed highly selective expression of ΔFosB to striatum (Fig. 2A), whereas line B directed expression to striatum and cerebellum (Fig.2B). In contrast, mice containing only theTetOp-ΔFosB gene showed no detectable ΔFosB expression (Fig. 2A and B), consistent with the absence of significant leak expression from this transgene and with the very low levels of expression of the endogenous gene under control conditions (Hopeet al., 1994b; Hiroi et al., 1997).

Figure 2
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2

Tissue-specific expression of ΔFosB in NSE-tTA × TetOp-ΔFosB transgenic mice detected by Western blotting. A, NSE-tTA (line A) × TetOp-ΔFosB mice. Expression of ΔFosB, which migrates at 35–37 kD (Chen et al., 1997;Hiroi et al., 1997), was highly enriched in striatum of the bigenic mice (+ΔFosB/+tTA), but not in mice carrying only theTetOp-ΔFosB gene (+ΔFosB/−tTA). B, NSE-tTA (line B) × TetOp-ΔFosB mice. ΔFosB was detected in cerebellum and striatum of the bigenic mice. C. NSE-tTA (line A) × TetOp-ΔFosB mice. ΔFosB expression in bigenic mice, which was highly enriched in striatum and not seen in several peripheral tissues, was turned off completely by including 200 μg/ml of doxycycline in the drinking water. Results are representative of the analysis of at least three animals in each treatment group.

Importantly, treatment of mice with doxycycline, a tetracycline analog with higher penetration of the brain-blood barrier and 1000-fold higher affinity for tTA, completely shut off ΔFosB expression in the NSE-tTA × TetOp-ΔFosB mice (Fig. 2C). These findings highlight the tissue-specific and inducible nature of transgene expression supported by these bigenic animals.

Further information on ΔFosB expression in NSE-tTA × TetOp-ΔFosB mice was obtained by immunohistochemistry, using a specific anti-FosB antibody (see Materials and Methods). As shown in Fig. 3A, line A NSE-tTA mice directed selective and high levels of ΔFosB expression in striatum, with highest levels seen in dorsal-medial aspects of this structure. ΔFosB-like immunoreactivity was largely nuclear, as would be expected given its role as a transcription factor. Consistent with the Western blot data, lower levels of ΔFosB expression were evident in cerebral cortex (where expression was enriched in deep layers) and in the hippocampus (where expression was highly specific for the CA1 subfield) (Fig. 3A). The same expression patterns were observed in the progeny from crossbreedings between line A NSE-tTA mice and two other TetOp-ΔFosB lines (data not shown), although these bigenic mice showed different overall levels of ΔFosB expression—one higher and one lower than that shown in Fig. 3A—presumably based on their insertion sites in the genome.

Figure 3
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3

Region-specific expression of ΔFosB in bigenic mice. A, NSE-tTA (line A) × TetOp-ΔFosB mice. B, NSE-tTA (line B) × TetOp-ΔFosB mice. +ΔFosB/−tTA, mice carrying only TetOp-ΔFosB; −Δ FosB/+tTA, mice carrying only NSE-tTA; +ΔFosB/+tTA, bigenic mice carrying both NSE-tTA and TetOp-ΔFosB. ΔFosB was detected by immunohistochemistry with an anti-FosB antibody as described in Materials and Methods. A, ΔFosB immunoreactivity in light field.Top row, high levels of ΔFosB expression in dorsal-medial aspects of striatum. Middle row, lower levels of ΔFosB expression in deep layers of cerebral neocortex. Bottom row, ΔFosB expression that was highly restricted to the CA1 region of hippocampus, apparently within pyramidal neurons. B, ΔFosB immunoreactivity in dark field (ΔFosB immunoreactivity appears as brown staining on a black and white background). Top, high levels of ΔFosB expression selectively throughout dorsal and ventral striatum.Bottom, high levels of ΔFosB expression in cerebellum, which on higher magnification was localized to Purkinje cells (data not shown). Results are representative of the analysis of at least three animals in each treatment group.

In contrast to line A mice, progeny of line B NSE-tTA mice, when crossed with any of the three TetOp-ΔFosB mouse lines, showed high levels of ΔFosB expression in both striatum and cerebellum (Fig. 3B). These findings are consistent with Western blot analysis of these animals (see Fig. 2B). In the line B-derived mice, unlike the line A-derived mice, expression of ΔFosB was not enriched in dorsal-medial aspects of the striatum; rather, high levels of expression were seen throughout the dorsal-ventral and medial-lateral aspects of this brain region. Also in these line B-derived mice, cerebellar expression was highly enriched in Purkinje cells. Together, these results indicate that the NSE-tTA mice determine the pattern of transgene expression, whereas the TetOp-ΔFosB mice can influence the level of transgene expression.

To confirm that the increase in ΔFosB immunoreactivity in the NSE-tTA × TetOp-ΔFosB bigenic mice was due to induction of the ΔFosB transgene and not induction of the endogenousFosB gene, we analyzed mRNA from striatum of the bigenic mice by RT-PCR. Using a primer pair (FosBF2-SV40B2, see Materials and Methods) specific for ΔFosB and SV40 sequences contained within the ΔFosB transgene, we demonstrated robust expression of the transgene in bigenic mice carrying both the NSE-tTA and TetOp-ΔFosBgenes, but not in transgenic mice carrying only theNSE-tTA gene (Fig.4A). In contrast, expression of the endogenous FosB gene, detected by a primer pair (mFosBB1 and mFosBF1) specific for the 3′ untranslated region of FosB and ΔFosB mRNA (and not present in the ΔFosB transgene) was similar between the NSE-tTA mice versus the NSE-tTA × TetOp-ΔFosB mice. Two other genes, those for ribosomal protein L32 and melanocortin-4 receptor, which were used as internal controls, also showed similar expression levels. To confirm that there was no contamination of the striatal mRNA samples with genomic DNA, regular PCR reactions were performed on these samples. No signals were detected in the striatal mRNA samples (Fig. 4B), which indicates the lack of DNA contamination. Together, these results indicate that the increase in ΔFosB immunoreactivity seen in the bigenic mice is due to the induction of the ΔFosBtransgene.

Figure 4
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4

Analysis of mRNA from striatum of transgenic mice by RT-PCR. poly(A)+ mRNA from five transgenic mice in each group was pooled and used as template for synthesis of cDNA by reverse transcription. The cDNA was amplified by PCR with specific primer pairs (see Material and Methods). A, mRNA samples from bigenic mice carrying both the NSE-tTA and TetOp-ΔFosBgenes, and from transgenic mice carrying only theNSE-tTA gene, were analyzed by RT-PCR with primers specific for the ΔFosB transgene or for endogenous FosB/ΔFosB, melanocortin-4 receptor, or ribosomal protein L32. B, mRNA samples from the transgenic mice were analyzed by regular PCR to confirm the lack of DNA contamination in the mRNA samples. The plasmid containing TetOp-ΔFosB was used as a positive control and water was used as a negative control for the PCR. C, mRNA samples from bigenic mice carrying both the NSE-tTA andTetOpCREB genes, and from transgenic mice carrying only the NSE-tTA gene, were analyzed by RT-PCR with primers specific for the CREB transgene or endogenous CREB.

Generation of transgenic mice with inducible, region-specific expression of CREB

Further evidence of the utility of the NSE-tTA mice in driving expression of a transgene of interest came from crossbreeding line A NSE-tTA mice with mice containing the TetOp-CREB gene (as described in Materials and Methods). CREB is a highly regulated transcription factor that has been implicated as an important mediator of many forms of neural plasticity, including learning and memory (seeMayford et al., 1995; Yin and Tully, 1996; Kornhauser and Greenberg, 1997) and the long-term actions of drugs of abuse and antidepressant treatments (Hyman, 1996; Duman et al., 1997b; Nestler and Aghajanian, 1997).

Fig. 5 shows that the line A NSE-tTA × TetOp-CREB mice support expression of CREB immunoreactivity that is enriched in dorsal-medial aspects of striatum. CREB immunoreactivity showed a clear nuclear localization, as would be expected for this transcription factor. A similar pattern of expression was seen for CREB mRNA as measured by in situ hybridization (data not shown). Note that the pattern of CREB expression in these mice is very similar to that seen for ΔFosB in the line A mice (see Fig. 3A). This further supports the view, stated earlier, that the NSE-tTA mice determine the cell type-specificity of transgene expression. The increase in CREB immunoreactivity as detected by immunostaining, or in CREB mRNA level as detected by in situ hybridization, seems to be due to the induction of the CREB transgene. Thus, as shown in Fig. 4C, a primer pair (CREBF1-SV40B2) specific for CREB and SV40 sequences contained within the CREB transgene revealed strong expression of the transgene in bigenic mice carrying both theNSE-tTA and TetOp-CREB genes, but not in transgenic mice carrying only the NSE-tTA gene.

Figure 5
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 5

Region-specific expression of CREB in bigenic mice. NSE-tTA (line A) mice were crossbred with TetOp-CREB mice. +CREB/−tTA, mice carrying only TetOp-CREB; +CREB/+tTA, bigenic mice containing both NSE-tTA and TetOp-CREB. CREB was detected by immunohistochemistry with an anti-CREB antibody as described in Materials and Methods. The +CREB/−tTA mice showed low, but widespread, levels of CREB expression that were indistinguishable from that seen in wild-type mice (data not shown). The +CREB/+tTA mice showed induction of CREB that was selective in dorsal-medial aspects of striatum. Top, low magnification; Bottom, higher magnification. Results are representative of the analysis of at least three animals in each treatment group.

Control of transgenic expression with low doses of doxycycline

One of the major perceived drawbacks of the tetracycline-regulated expression system is the very high doses of doxycycline that have been used. Several groups have used more than 2 mg/ml of doxycycline in the drinking water to turn expression of the targeted gene off (Mayfordet al., 1996; Kistner et al., 1996). However, these earlier studies did not assess the dose dependence of doxycycline action.

Because the NSE-tTA mice offer the advantage of high levels of transgene expression, we performed a dose-response study of doxycycline, first in the NSE-tTA × TetOp-luciferase × TetOp-tTA mice. It was found that 25 μg/ml of doxycycline in the drinking water turned luciferase expression off as effectively as any higher dose (Fig. 6). Even much lower doses of doxycycline, such as 2.5 and 0.25 μg/ml, substantially, albeit partially, turned expression off. These findings demonstrate that the level of transgene expression is adjustable in vivoby use of the tetracycline-regulated system. Similar dose-response data were obtained for ΔFosB in NSE-tTA × TetOp-ΔFosB mice; for example, Fig. 2C shows complete blockade of ΔFosB expression at the 200 μg/ml dose of doxycycline. Such low doses of doxycycline are highly unlikely to produce any deleterious effects, because they result in blood levels far below those that are used clinically (e.g., the 200 μg/ml dose yields blood levels of <500 ng/ml, the lower limit of detection of the drug in clinical assays).

Figure 6
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 6

Dose-response of luciferase expression in NSE-tTA (line A) × TetOp-luciferase × TetOp-tTA mice. The graph shows luciferase activity in striatum of trigenic mice, which had been exposed to drinking water containing various concentrations of doxycycline (from 0 to 200 μg/ml) for 3 weeks. −, control mouse containing the TetOp-luciferase andTetOp-tTA genes only.

The use of lower doses of doxycycline is critical for more rapid induction of the transgene of interest. For example, it was found that bigenic mice expressing luciferase, which had been maintained on 2 mg/ml of doxycycline, showed only 10–15% induction of luciferase (compared with maximal levels of induction seen in the absence of doxycycline) after an 8 week washout period (Fig.7A). In contrast, when mice were maintained on 50 μg/ml of doxycycline, luciferase expression was >50% of maximal levels within 2 weeks (Fig. 7B). Even more rapid induction was observed in mice maintained on 25 μg/ml of doxycycline. A similar time course of transgene expression was seen in the NSE-tTA × TetOp-ΔFosB mice. In fact, levels of ΔFosB attained in the brains of these mice after 2 weeks off doxycycline were comparable with levels of ΔFosB induced by chronic (2 weeks) administration of cocaine (data not shown). These data therefore establish that the tetracycline system can be used to obtain physiological induction of a transgene: physiological with respect to both the level and the time course of transgene expression.

Figure 7
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 7

Induction of luciferase expression in NSE-tTA (line A) × TetOp-luciferase × TetOp-tTA mice. Trigenic mice were exposed to drinking water containing 2,000 (A) or 50 (B) μg/ml of doxycycline in the drinking water from conception through adulthood. The graph shows luciferase activity in striatum of such adult mice from which doxycycline was then removed for the indicated time period (off Dox, 0–8 wk). Mice that were never exposed to doxycycline (i.e., in which gene expression had always been on) are shown for comparison (no Dox). Results are representative of the analysis of at least three animals in each treatment group.

Discussion

The major finding of this study is that NSE-tTA transgenic mice can be used as tools to direct high levels of inducible transgene expression to specific brain regions, including the striatum, cerebellum, CA1 region of hippocampus, and deep layers of neocortex. We demonstrate that genes encoding three different target proteins (luciferase, ΔFos, or CREB) under the control of the TetOp promoter were expressed in the same brain regions by any given line of the NSE-tTA mice. This finding suggests that the transgenic mouse line that carries the tTA gene under the control of some tissue-specific promoter determines the expression pattern of target genes under the control of the TetOp promoter.

The forebrain-specific CaMKII promoter has been used to direct tissue-specific expression of the CaMKII mutant andCre genes (Mayford et al., 1996; Tsien et al., 1996). The expression patterns determined by the CaMKII-tTA mice are different from those determined by the NSE-tTA mice. Therefore, an important goal of future research is to develop more tTA-expressing mice, in which the tTA gene is under the control of various tissue-specific promoters to direct targeted gene expression to increasingly discrete and anatomically defined brain regions. Ultimately, a transgenic mouse bank containing different tissue-specific tTA transgenic mice could be very useful for inducible, tissue-specific expression of numerous target genes of interest.

A major distinctive feature of the NSE-tTA mice described in this study is that they support very high levels of transgene expression. Thus, this is the first case where inducible expression of a transgene in brain is demonstrated by Western blotting and immunohistochemistry. Indeed, the maximal level of ΔFosB induction that can be achieved with this system far exceeds levels of the protein induced in brain by various psychotropic drugs or other treatments. The high levels of transgene expression supported by our bigenic mice seems to have at least three causative factors. First, an SV40 intron was introduced into the 3′ untranslated region (Shockett et al., 1995) [instead of the 5′ untranslated region (Mayford et al., 1996)] of both the tTA gene and the target gene. 3′ Introns have been shown to result in much higher levels of mRNA accumulation, presumably because of increased polyadenylation efficiency (Wassarman and Steitz, 1993; Gunderson et al., 1997) or transport efficiency from the nucleus to the cytoplasm (Pante et al., 1997). Second, the tTA gene used in the present study contains mutations around the start AUG codon to better match a Kozak consensus sequence, which can enhance translation efficiency of the mRNA (Kozak, 1984). Third, the NSE promoter is a strong promoter, which has been shown to drive high levels of expression of theLacZ reporter gene (Forss-Petter et al., 1990) and the bcl-2 gene (Farlie et al., 1995) in neuronal tissues.

An important consideration in the generation of additional tTA-expressing mice will be the relative strength of the other neuron-specific promoters used to drive the tTA gene. Many promoters that direct highly restricted patterns of expression (e.g., those controlling specific receptor subtypes) may be weaker than the NSE promoter based on the much lower levels of expression of the encoded proteins. A lower level of tTA expression, and hence of target gene expression, may be encountered if such promoters are used. One potential solution is to include a third gene, TetOp-tTA, in the system (Shockett et al., 1995). In this case, it is possible that a low level of tTA expression driven by a weak, but highly tissue-specific, promoter could trigger an autoregulatory positive feedback loop in the TetOp-tTA gene so that a higher level of tTA would be expressed in the specific tissue. Our results with such a three-gene regulation system (NSE-tTA × TetOp-luciferase ×TetOp-tTA) show very high and tissue-specific levels of luciferase expression in the absence of tetracycline, but virtually no expression in the presence of tetracycline (Fig. 1B), which suggests that a three-gene regulation system is capable of tightly regulated transgene expression.

One major problem associated with the tetracycline-regulated system is the slow induction of transgene expression upon removal of standard doses of doxycycline (e.g., 2 mg/ml) from the drinking water (e.g., Fig. 7A). This has been a disappointing feature of the technology. We attempted to overcome this problem by dramatically reducing the dose of doxycycline used. Surprisingly, it was found that almost a one hundred-fold lower dose of doxycycline (25 μg/ml) was equally effective at turning transgene expression off as the higher doses (see Fig. 6). Use of such lower doses of doxycycline is critical, because it markedly shortened the induction time of transgene expression (Fig.7B). The more rapid induction of transgene expression seen with the lower doses of doxycycline is presumably caused by the shorter period of time needed for the drug to be cleared from the animals. Additional advantages of the reduction in doxycyline dose are a decrease in potential nonspecific side effects of higher doses (2 mg/ml) and a greatly reduced cost of doxycycline.

The tTA system used in the present study is just one of several approaches that are being explored to obtain inducible and tissue-specific expression in transgenic mice (see Gingrich and Roder, 1998). One modification under investigation is the use of a mutated tTA protein, rtTA, which is activated, not inhibited, by tetracycline (seeFreundlieb et al., 1997). This approach holds promise for more rapid transgene induction, but has not yet been reported to workin vivo. Other inducible systems are under investigation, but the low induction ratios obtained with the progesterone-inducible system (Wang et al., 1994) and the requirement for three transgenes in the ecdysone-inducible system (No et al., 1996) represent current limitations that require further refinements.

In the meantime, the results of the present study establish the feasibility of obtaining high yet adjustable levels of tissue-specific, inducible gene expression in transgenic mice with the tTA system. Findings with the TetOp-luciferase, TetOp-ΔFosB, and TetOp-CREB mice indicate that the NSE-tTA mice are largely responsible for directing the pattern of transgene expression, regardless of the transgene involved. In addition, the findings show that the various lines of NSE-tTA mice can be used as novel tools to obtain tissue-specific and inducible expression of potentially any transgene placed under the control of the TetOp promoter. These mice represent powerful tools that will enable detailed studies of the function of individual genes in the adult brain.

Footnotes

    • Received March 2, 1998.
    • Accepted May 18, 1998.
  • Send reprint requests to: Dr. Eric J. Nestler, Dept. of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, 34 Park Street, New Haven, CT 06508. E-mail: eric.nestler{at}qm.yale.edu

  • This work was supported by grants from the National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institute of Mental Health, National Alliance for Research in Schizophrenia and Depression, and the Abraham Ribicoff Research Facilities of the Connecticut Mental Health Center, State of Connecticut Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services.

  • J.C. and M.B.K contributed equally to this work.

Abbreviations

CaMKII
calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II
tTA
tetracycline transactivator
TetOp
tetracycline-responsive promoter
CREB
cAMP-responsive element binding protein
NSE
neuron-specific enolase
kb
kilobase
PCR
polymerase chain reaction
RT
reverse transcription
  • The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics

References

  1. ↵
    1. Chen JS,
    2. Kelz MB,
    3. Hope BT,
    4. Nakabeppu Y, and
    5. Nestler EJ
    (1997a) Chronic FRAs: stable variants of DFosB induced in brain by chronic treatments. J Neurosci 17:4933–4941.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Chen JS,
    2. Kelz MB,
    3. Zeng GQ,
    4. Duman RS,
    5. Picciotto M, and
    6. Nestler EJ
    (1997b) Inducible, tissue-specific expression of chronic FRAs, stable variants of ΔFosB, in transgenic mice. Soc Neurosci Abstr 23:410.
    OpenUrl
  3. ↵
    1. Duman RS,
    2. Chen JS,
    3. Li ZW,
    4. Kelz MB,
    5. Zeng GQ,
    6. Picciotto M, and
    7. Nestler EJ
    (1997a) Development of inducible, tissue-specific CREB and dominant negative CREB transgenic mice. Soc Neurosci Abstr 23:410.
    OpenUrl
  4. ↵
    1. Duman RS,
    2. Heninger GR, and
    3. Nestler EJ
    (1997b) A molecular and cellular theory of depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry 54:597–606.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Farlie PG,
    2. Dringen R,
    3. Rees SM,
    4. Kannourakis G, and
    5. Bernard O
    (1995) Bcl-2 transgene expression can protect neurons against developmental and induced cell death. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92:4397–4401.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    1. Forss-Petter S,
    2. Danielson PE,
    3. Catsicas S,
    4. Battenberg E,
    5. Price J,
    6. Nerenberg M, and
    7. Sutcliffe JG
    (1990) Transgenic mice expressing beta-galactosidase in mature neurons under neuron-specific enolase promoter. Neuron 5:187–197.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Freundlieb S,
    2. Baron U,
    3. Bonin AL,
    4. Gossen M, and
    5. Bujard H
    (1997) Use of tetracycline-controlled gene expression systems to study mammalian cell cycle. Methods Enzymol 283:159–173.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Gingrich JR and
    2. Roder J
    (1998) Inducible gene expression in the nervous system of transgenic mice. Annu Rev Neurosci 21:377–405.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Gossen M and
    2. Bujard H
    (1992) Tight control of gene expression in mammalian cells by tetracycline-responsive promoters. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89:5547–5551.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. Gossen M,
    2. Freundlieb S,
    3. Bender G,
    4. Muller G,
    5. Hillen W, and
    6. Bujard H
    (1995) Transcriptional activation by tetracyclines in mammalian cells. Science (Washington DC) 268:1766–1769.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    1. Gunderson SI,
    2. Vagner S,
    3. Polycarpou-Schwarz M, and
    4. Mattaj IW
    (1997) Involvement of the carboxyl terminus of vertebrate poly(A) polymerase in U1A autoregulation and in the coupling of splicing and polyadenylation. Genes Dev 11:761–773.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    1. Hiroi N,
    2. Brown JR,
    3. Haile CN,
    4. Ye H,
    5. Greenberg ME, and
    6. Nestler EJ
    (1997) FosB mutant mice: loss of chronic cocaine induction of Fos-related proteins and heightened sensitivity to cocaine’s psychomotor and rewarding effects. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:10397–10402.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    1. Hiroi N,
    2. Marek G,
    3. Brown J,
    4. Ye H,
    5. Saudou F,
    6. Vaidya VA,
    7. Duman RS,
    8. Greenberg ME, and
    9. Nestler EJ
    (1998) Essential role of the FosB gene in molecular, cellular, and behavioral adaptations to chronic electroconvulsive seizures. J Neurosci 18:6952–6962.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    1. Hope BT,
    2. Kelz MB,
    3. Duman RS, and
    4. Nestler EJ
    (1994a) Chronic electroconvulsive seizure (ECS) treatment results in expression of a long-lasting AP-1 complex in brain with altered composition and characteristics. J Neurosci 14:4318–4328.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  15. ↵
    1. Hope BT,
    2. Nye HE,
    3. Kelz MB,
    4. Self DW,
    5. Iadarola M,
    6. Nakabeppu Y,
    7. Duman RS, and
    8. Nestler EJ
    (1994b) Induction of a long-lasting AP-1 complex composed of altered Fos-like proteins in brain by chronic cocaine and other chronic treatments. Neuron 13:1235–1244.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Hyman SE
    (1996) Addiction to cocaine and amphetamine. Neuron 16:901–904.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Kistner A,
    2. Gossen M,
    3. Zimmermann F,
    4. Jerecic J,
    5. Ullmer C,
    6. Lubbert H, and
    7. Bujard H
    (1996) Doxycycline-mediated quantitative and tissue-specific control of gene expression in transgenic mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:10933–10938.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    1. Kornhauser JM and
    2. Greenberg ME
    (1997) A kinase to remember: dual roles for MAP kinase in long-term memory. Neuron 18:839–842.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Kozak M
    (1984) Compilation and analysis of sequences upstream from the translational start site in eukaryotic mRNAs. Nucleic Acids Res 12:857–872.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    1. Mandelzys A,
    2. Gruda MA,
    3. Bravo R, and
    4. Morgan JI
    (1997) Absence of a persistently elevated 37 kDa Fos-related antigen and AP-1-like DNA-binding activity in the brains of kainic acid-treated FosB null mice. J Neurosci 17:5407–5415.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    1. Mayford M,
    2. Abel T, and
    3. Kandel E
    (1995) Transgenic approaches to cognition. Curr Opin Neurobiol 5:141–148.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Mayford M,
    2. Bach E,
    3. Huang YY,
    4. Wang L,
    5. Hawkins RD, and
    6. Kandel ER
    (1996) Control of memory formation through regulated expression of a CaMKII transgene. Science (Washington DC) 274:1678–1683.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. ↵
    1. Nakabeppu Y and
    2. Nathans D
    (1991) A naturally occurring truncated form of FosB that inhibits Fos/Jun transcriptional activity. Cell 64:751–759.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Nakabeppu Y,
    2. Oda S, and
    3. Sekiguchi M
    (1993) Proliferative activation of quiescent rat-1A cells by FosB. Mol Cell Biol 13:4157–4166.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    1. Nestler EJ and
    2. Aghajanian GK
    (1997) Molecular and cellular basis of addiction. Science (Washington DC) 278:58–63.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    1. Nibuya M,
    2. Nestler EJ, and
    3. Duman RS
    (1996) Chronic antidepressant administration increases the expression of cAMP response element binding protein (CREB) in rat hippocampus. J Neurosci 16:2365–2372.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    1. No D,
    2. Yao TP, and
    3. Evans RM
    (1996) Ecdysone-inducible gene expression in mammalian cells and transgenic mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:3346–3351.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. ↵
    1. Pante N,
    2. Jarmolowski A,
    3. Izaurralde E,
    4. Sauder U,
    5. Baschong W, and
    6. Mattaj IW
    (1997) Visualizing nuclear export of different classes of RNA by electron microscopy. RNA 3:498–513.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  29. ↵
    1. Passman RS and
    2. Fishman GI
    (1994) Regulated expression of foreign genes in vivo after germline transfer. J Clin Invest 94:2421–2425.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Pennypacker KR,
    2. Thai L,
    3. Hong JS, and
    4. McMillian MK
    (1994) Prolonged expression of AP-1 transcription factors in the rat hippocampus after systemic kainate treatment. J Neurosci 14:3998–4006.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  31. ↵
    1. Sambrook J,
    2. Fritsch EF, and
    3. Maniatis T
    (1989) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY), p 9.31.
  32. ↵
    1. Shockett P,
    2. Difilippantonio M,
    3. Hellman N, and
    4. Schatz DG
    (1995) A modified tetracycline-regulated system provides autoregulatory, inducible gene expression in cultured cells and transgenic mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92:6522–6526.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. ↵
    1. Tsien JZ,
    2. Chen DF,
    3. Gerber D,
    4. Tom C,
    5. Mercer EH,
    6. Anderson DJ,
    7. Mayford M,
    8. Kandel ER, and
    9. Tonegawa S
    (1996) Subregion- and cell type-restricted gene knockout in mouse brain. Cell 87:1317–1326.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    1. Wang Y,
    2. O’Malley BW Jr.,
    3. Tsai SY, and
    4. O’Malley BW
    (1994) A regulatory system for use in gene transfer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91:8180–8184.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. ↵
    1. Wassarman KM and
    2. Steitz JA
    (1993) Association with terminal exons in pre-mRNAs: a new role for the U1 snRNP? Genes Dev 7:647–659.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. ↵
    1. Wyborski DL and
    2. Short JM
    (1991) Analysis of inducers of the E. coli lac repressor system in mammalian cells and whole animals. Nucleic Acids Res 19:4647–4653.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. ↵
    1. Yin JC and
    2. Tully T
    (1996) CREB and the formation of long-term memory. Curr Opin Neurobiol 6:264–268.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Molecular Pharmacology: 54 (3)
Molecular Pharmacology
Vol. 54, Issue 3
1 Sep 1998
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Molecular Pharmacology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Transgenic Animals with Inducible, Targeted Gene Expression in Brain
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Molecular Pharmacology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Molecular Pharmacology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Research ArticleArticle

Transgenic Animals with Inducible, Targeted Gene Expression in Brain

Jingshan Chen, Max B. Kelz, Guoqi Zeng, Norio Sakai, Cathy Steffen, Penny E. Shockett, Marina R. Picciotto, Ronald S. Duman and Eric J. Nestler
Molecular Pharmacology September 1, 1998, 54 (3) 495-503; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1124/mol.54.3.495

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Research ArticleArticle

Transgenic Animals with Inducible, Targeted Gene Expression in Brain

Jingshan Chen, Max B. Kelz, Guoqi Zeng, Norio Sakai, Cathy Steffen, Penny E. Shockett, Marina R. Picciotto, Ronald S. Duman and Eric J. Nestler
Molecular Pharmacology September 1, 1998, 54 (3) 495-503; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1124/mol.54.3.495
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • Abbreviations
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • P2X7 Positive Modulator Structure-Activity Relationship
  • Predicting Drug Interactions with ENT1 and ENT2
  • GABAAR Molecular Identity in Oligodendrocytes
Show more Article

Similar Articles

  • Home
  • Alerts
Facebook   Twitter   LinkedIn   RSS

Navigate

  • Current Issue
  • Fast Forward by date
  • Fast Forward by section
  • Latest Articles
  • Archive
  • Search for Articles
  • Feedback
  • ASPET

More Information

  • About Molecular Pharmacology
  • Editorial Board
  • Instructions to Authors
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Customized Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions
  • Terms & Conditions of Use

ASPET's Other Journals

  • Drug Metabolism and Disposition
  • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
  • Pharmacological Reviews
  • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
ISSN 1521-0111 (Online)

Copyright © 2021 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics