Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Fast Forward
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Sections
    • Archive
  • Information
    • Instructions to Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • FAQs
    • For Subscribers
    • Terms & Conditions of Use
    • Permissions
  • Editorial Board
  • Alerts
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Virtual Issues
  • Feedback
  • Submit
  • Other Publications
    • Drug Metabolism and Disposition
    • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
    • Molecular Pharmacology
    • Pharmacological Reviews
    • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
    • ASPET

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Molecular Pharmacology
  • Other Publications
    • Drug Metabolism and Disposition
    • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
    • Molecular Pharmacology
    • Pharmacological Reviews
    • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
    • ASPET
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Molecular Pharmacology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Fast Forward
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Sections
    • Archive
  • Information
    • Instructions to Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • FAQs
    • For Subscribers
    • Terms & Conditions of Use
    • Permissions
  • Editorial Board
  • Alerts
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Virtual Issues
  • Feedback
  • Submit
  • Visit molpharm on Facebook
  • Follow molpharm on Twitter
  • Follow molpharm on LinkedIn
Research ArticleArticle

Constitutive Cyclooxygenase-2 Expression in Healthy Human and Rabbit Gastric Mucosa

Katja C. Zimmermann, Mario Sarbia, Karsten Schrör and Artur-Aron Weber
Molecular Pharmacology September 1998, 54 (3) 536-540; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1124/mol.54.3.536
Katja C. Zimmermann
1 2
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mario Sarbia
1 2
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Karsten Schrör
1 2
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Artur-Aron Weber
1 2
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Selective cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitors are expected to cause fewer gastric side effects because of sparing of COX-1-dependent prostaglandin (PG) synthesis in the gastric mucosa. However, the possible contribution of COX-2 to overall gastric PG biosynthesis is not known. This study demonstrates constitutive expression of COX-2 mRNA and protein in apparently healthy human and rabbit gastric mucosa. This basal expression of COX-2 protein in human gastric mucosa was increased by lipopolysaccharide and phorbol ester, indicating its up-regulation in response to appropriate stimuli. The functional significance of COX-2-dependent PG formation was studied in terms of PGE2 generation in the rabbit mucosa and its inhibition by the COX-2-selective inhibitor flosulide. There was concentration-dependent (IC50 = 107 ± 55 nm) and ultimately complete inhibition of PGE2generation by flosulide. In addition, gastric mucosa generated 15-hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acid upon treatment with acetylsalicylic acid. The data suggest an important role for COX-2-dependent PG production in apparently healthy gastric mucosa and raise the issue of whether selective COX-2 inhibitors might also interfere with physiological PG formation and actions in the stomach.

The COX step is rate-limiting in PG biosynthesis. COX exists in two isoforms, referred to as COX-1 and COX-2 (reviewed by Otto and Smith, 1995). COX-1 is constitutively expressed in most cells and tissues and is thought to carry out ‘housekeeping’ functions, such as local regulation of blood flow in the stomach, heart, and kidney and control of hemostasis by modulation of platelet function. In contrast, COX-2 mRNA and protein are normally undetectable in most tissues but can be rapidly induced by proinflammatory or mitogenic stimuli, including cytokines, endotoxin, and growth factors (Habib et al.,1993; Lyons-Giordano et al., 1993; Hempel et al.,1994). Thus, COX-2 appears to play a major role in body defense mechanisms by producing PGs that modulate inflammatory and immune responses (Otto and Smith, 1995). Consequently, it has been proposed that selective inhibitors of COX-2 would suppress PG biosynthesis at sites of inflammation but would not impair COX-1-dependent biosynthesis of PGs that are involved in the control of body homeostasis, including the generation of vasodilatory and tissue-protective PGs in the gastrointestinal tract (Mitchell et al., 1994).

This concept was challenged recently by the detection of constitutive COX-2 activity in several tissues and organs, including the kidney (Harris et al., 1994), the brain (Breder et al.,1995), and tracheal epithelial cells (Walenga et al., 1996). Interestingly, severe nephropathy was observed in COX-2-knockout mice (Morham et al., 1995), whereas these animals were still susceptible to inflammatory stimuli (Dinchuk et al., 1995). In contrast, COX-1-knockout mice did not develop gastric ulcers (Langenbach et al., 1995). These data suggest that the biological functions of COX-2 might be more complex than originally thought (Wu, 1998).

The present study investigated the possible constitutive expression of COX-2 mRNA and protein, as well as the cellular localization of protein, in apparently healthy human and rabbit gastric mucosa. We found the enzyme to be constitutively expressed in both species, mainly in smooth muscle cells of the muscularis mucosae and in fibroblast-like cells of the mucosa. In addition, PGE2 biosynthesis in the gastric mucosa was completely suppressed by the COX-2-selective inhibitor flosulide, suggesting that COX-2 activity accounts for a significant portion of endogenous PG formation. These data might have significant implications for the development and clinical use of COX-2-selective inhibitors.

Experimental Procedures

Materials.

Reagents used for the experiments were as follows: acetylsalicylic acid (aspirin), Bayer (Leverkusen, Germany); flosulide, Schering AG (Berlin, Germany); anti-COX-1 antibodies, Cayman Chemicals (Ann Arbor, MI); anti-COX-2 antibodies, Dianova (Hamburg, Germany). Electrophoresis reagents were from Bio-Rad Laboratories (München, Germany). All other reagents were of analytical-grade purity and, unless otherwise indicated, were purchased from Sigma (Deisenhofen, Germany). Human stomach tissue was obtained during tumor gastrectomy surgery (three samples). These specimens were taken from stomach regions that were unaffected by the tumors. For immunohistochemical analysis, diagnostic biopsy material (10 samples) that had been found to be negative for signs of inflammation or tumor was used. All biopsy material was negative forHelicobacter pylori antigen. Gastric tissue was also obtained from New Zealand White rabbits.

Preparation of gastric mucosa.

After removal, the tissues were rinsed with physiological saline solution and stored in ice-cold physiological saline solution. All additional procedures were performed on ice. The mucosa/submucosa layer was carefully cut away from the muscularis propria layer and was further processed as described below.

RT-PCR.

Mucosal pieces (3 × 5 mm) were homogenized, and total RNA was prepared using the Trizol method (Gibco-BRL, Eggenstein, Germany). Poly(A)+ RNA was isolated using the POLYATtract mRNA Isolation System IV (Promega, Madison, WI). After RT, PCR was performed using the following primers (at 0.15 μm): human COX-1 (481-base pair fragment), sense, 5′-CCGTCCTGCTCGCGGACCCAGGGGC-3′; antisense, 5′-AAGCGGCGGGCCAGGAGCTGGGCA-3′; human COX-2 (421-base pair fragment), sense, 5′-AATGAGTACCGAAAATTC-3′; antisense, 5′-CATCTAGTCCGGAGCGGGAAG-3′. The PCR was carried out using the GeneAmp RNA PCR kit (Perkin Elmer, Branchburg, NJ). The samples were predenatured for 2 min at 94°, and the cycle profiles (40 cycles) were as follows: human COX-1 and COX-2, 1 min at 95°, 1 min at 60°, and 1.5 min at 72°. Fragments were identified by fragment size and restriction analysis, using ClaI, HaeIII,HinfI, NcoI, and PstI.

Western blotting.

For Western blot analysis, gastric mucosa was homogenized in RIPA buffer (150 mm NaCl, 1% Nonidet P-40, 1% sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate, 50 mm Tris·HCl, pH 8.0), supplemented with the protease inhibitors leupeptin (1 μg/ml), aprotinin (1 μg/ml), pepstatin (0.5 μg/ml), and phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (100 μg/ml). Proteins (100 μg) were separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate (8%)-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and transferred to Immobilon-P membranes (Millipore Inc., Bedford, MA). For immunodetection, the membranes were probed with anti-COX-2 antibodies (1/1000) or anti-COX-1 antibodies (1/1000), followed by incubation with peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies (anti-mouse IgG, 1/3000; Dianova, Hamburg, Germany). COX proteins were visualized by enhanced chemiluminescence (Amersham Buchler, Braunschweig, Germany).

Immunohistochemical analysis.

Gastric mucosal pieces (3 × 5 mm) were fixed in neutral buffered 4% formaldehyde and embedded in paraffin. Sections (5 μm) were mounted on poly-l-lysine-coated glass slides. Dried slides were baked at 56° for 2 hr, dewaxed with xylol, and rehydrated. Slides were then heated in a microwave oven, in 10 mm citrate buffer, pH 6.0, for 17 min. Endogenous peroxidase activity was blocked with 3% hydrogen peroxide in methanol. Immunohistochemical analysis was performed using an avidin-biotin-peroxidase system (Vectastain Elite ABC kit; Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA). Briefly, tissue sections were treated for 15 min with avidin, washed with PBS, treated for 15 min with biotin, and blocked for 20 min at room temperature with PBS/2% fat-free bovine serum albumin, to saturate nonspecific binding sites. Anti-COX-1 and anti-COX-2 antibodies were diluted in PBS (1/50) and incubated with the sections for 12 hr at 4°, in a humidified chamber. The sections were rinsed with PBS and then incubated with the biotinylated secondary antibody (goat anti-mouse IgG, 1/200; Vector Laboratories) for 1 hr, in a humidified chamber. Diaminobenzidine was used as a substrate, and slides were counterstained with Meyer’s hemalaun. Specificity was determined by substitution of the primary antibody with PBS.

Measurement of PG production.

To measure PG production, rabbit mucosal tissue was cut into approximately equal pieces (3 × 5 mm), weighed, and preincubated for 15 min in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium containing penicillin (100 units/ml)/streptomycin (0.1 mg/ml) (Gibco BRL, Eggenstein, Germany), to remove PGs possibly generated by mechanical irritation of the tissue during the preparation procedures. Mucosal tissues were then placed in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium for 5 hr at 37°, in the absence or presence of flosulide (0.01–3 μm) or aspirin (0.01–5 mm). PG formation was measured, in terms of bicyclo-PGE2, by radioimmunoassay of aliquots of the incubation mixtures (Bothwellet al., 1982).

Measurement of 15-HETE production.

15-HETE production was analyzed by two-dimensional thin-layer chromatography according to the method of Miller et al. (1994), with some modifications. Briefly, rabbit gastric mucosa was homogenized in Tris buffer (50 mm, pH 8.0). An aliquot (500 μl) of this preparation was added to 500 μl of reaction buffer (10 mm Tris, pH 8.0, 1 mm tryptophan, 1 mm epinephrine, 0.3 mm glutathione), in the absence or presence of acetylsalicylic acid (5 mm). The reaction was started by addition of 0.5 μCi of [3H]arachidonic acid (New England Nuclear, Boston, MA). After 20 min at 37°, 500 μl of 10% formic acid was added. PGs were extracted with 8 ml of ethyl acetate and finally redissolved in 100 μl of ethyl acetate. Two-dimensional thin-layer chromatography (LK6D plates; Whatman, Clifton, NJ) was performed using ethyl acetate/isooctane/acetic acid/water (11:5:2:10) for the first dimension and chloroform/methanol/acetic acid (90:8:6) for the second dimension. Radioactive spots were visualized by autoradiography using En3Hance spray (Dupont de Nemours, Bruxelles, Belgium). Products were identified by comigration with PG standards (Biomol, Springhouse, PA).

Results

Constitutive expression of COX-1 and COX-2 in human gastric mucosa.

The expression of COX-1 and COX-2 mRNA in human gastric mucosa was demonstrated by RT-PCR. The mRNA for both COX isoforms was found in all gastric mucosal specimens examined (data not shown). Consistent with these findings, COX-1 and COX-2 protein was detected in mucosal tissue by Western blotting (Fig.1). All biopsy specimens (10 samples) were positive for both COX isoforms.

Figure 1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1

Western blots demonstrating COX-1 (a) and COX-2 (b) protein expression in three different human gastric mucosa samples.

Cellular localization of COX-1 and COX-2 proteins in human gastric mucosa.

The cellular localization of COX-1 and COX-2 in human gastric mucosa was studied by immunohistochemical analysis. All diagnostic biopsy samples used for these studies were negative for signs of inflammation or malignancy and were negative for H. pylori antigen. COX-1 immunoreactivity was most prominent in the muscularis mucosae layer. Furthermore, both endothelial and smooth muscle cells of arterial and venous vessels showed strong COX-1 signals (data not shown). The immunohistochemical localization of COX-2 protein was similar. The enzyme protein was found primarily in the muscularis mucosae layer. Immunopositive cells were identified as smooth muscle cells, whereas cells of the mucosal glands were negative. COX-2 immunoreactivity was also detected in fibroblast-like cells of the mucosa and endothelial cells of both arteries and veins (Fig.2).

Figure 2
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2

Immunohistochemical localization of COX-2 in human gastric mucosa. COX-2-positive cells were detected in the mucosal layer (a and b), in the muscularis mucosae (c), and in endothelial cells of mucosal blood vessels (d, arrows). Scale bars, 20 μm.

Induction of COX-2 in human gastric mucosa by LPS and PMA.

To establish that COX-2 protein expression could be further stimulated by activation of transcription factors, gastric mucosal samples (3 × 5 mm) were placed in culture medium and stimulated with LPS (10 μg/ml) or PMA (1 μm) for 9–24 hr (Inoue et al., 1995). In these experiments, a smaller amount of protein (25 μg) was loaded onto the gel, for easier detection of any stimulation. Both LPS and PMA markedly enhanced the expression of COX-2 protein (Fig. 3).

Figure 3
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3

Induction of COX-2 protein in human gastric mucosa by LPS (10 μg/ml) and PMA (1 μm). This Western blot is representative of those for three different stomach preparations.

Expression of COX-1 and COX-2 in rabbit gastric mucosa.

Because only very limited amounts of human stomach tissue were available, studies on the functional significance of COX-2-dependent PG formation were conducted in rabbits. First, constitutive COX-1 and COX-2 expression in rabbit gastric mucosa was verified by RT-PCR and Western blotting, respectively (data not shown). The immunohistochemical localization of COX isoforms was similar to that observed in human tissue (data not shown).

Suppression of PGE2 production in rabbit gastric mucosa by flosulide and aspirin.

The functional relevance of the COX-2 isoform in PG production was studied by measuring the inhibition of PGE2 generation by the COX-2-selective inhibitor flosulide, compared with aspirin. Flosulide caused concentration-dependent and ultimately complete inhibition of gastric PGE2 production (IC50 = 107 ± 55 nm), indicating that COX-2 was the major COX isoform contributing to endogenous PG generation. In contrast, aspirin, a more COX-1-selective compound (Mitchell et al., 1994), inhibited PGE2 formation completely only at 1 mm. These data are summarized in Fig.4.

Figure 4
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4

Inhibition of bicyclo-PGE2 formation in rabbit gastric mucosa by the COX-2-selective inhibitor flosulide (bottom), compared with aspirin (ASA) (top). Data are means ± standard errors from three independent experiments.

15-HETE formation by aspirin-treated rabbit gastric mucosa.

It is known that high concentrations of aspirin inhibit COX-2-dependent PG production. However, in contrast to COX-1, COX-2 is still able to generate 15-HETE after aspirin treatment (Lecomte et al.,1994). We therefore measured possible 15-HETE production by aspirin (5 mm)-treated gastric mucosa. Untreated gastric tissue released mainly PGE2 and PGD2, as well as PGF2αand 6-keto-PGF1α to a lesser extent, into the culture medium (Fig. 5). When the tissue was treated with aspirin, PG formation was completely inhibited. However, aspirin-treated gastric mucosa released 15-HETE (Fig. 5), demonstrating the presence of functionally active COX-2.

Figure 5
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 5

Two-dimensional thin-layer chromatography demonstrating 15-HETE formation by aspirin (ASA) (5 mm)-treated gastric mucosa. Numbers, product formation, as determined by comigration with PG standards;1, PGF2α; 2, 6-keto-PGF1α; 3, PGE2;4, PGD2; 5, arachidonic acid;6, 15-HETE; X, sample application.

Discussion

COX-2 mRNA was previously found in normal gastric tissue (O’Neill and Ford-Hutchinson, 1993; Ristimäki et al., 1997). However, no study has yet detected COX-2 protein in human gastric mucosa (O’Neill and Ford-Hutchinson, 1993; Kargman et al.,1996; Ristimäki et al., 1997), and there was only a low level of COX-2 protein expression in rat stomach tissue (Iseki, 1995). Accordingly, it was concluded that PGs produced in normal gastrointestinal tissue are mainly, if not entirely, derived from the COX-1 isoform (Kargman et al., 1996).

This study is the first to demonstrate the constitutive expression of both COX-2 mRNA and protein in apparently healthy human and rabbit gastric mucosa. Gastric PGE2 production was potently inhibited by flosulide at nanomolar concentrations (IC50 = 107 ± 55 nm). At these concentrations, the compound is assumed to act as a COX-2-selective inhibitor. In contrast, the IC50 values for COX-1 inhibition by flosulide range between 10 and 100 μm(Klein et al., 1994, 1996; Cromlish and Kennedy, 1996; Greig et al., 1997; Wong et al., 1997). We have studied the effects of flosulide on platelet aggregation and thromboxane formation (Muck et al., 1998). In those studies, flosulide inhibited both aggregation and thromboxane formation, with an IC50 of 1–3 μm (Weber A-A, Zimmermann KC, and Schrör K, unpublished observations). At concentrations that inhibited gastric PG formation, no effects on platelet COX were seen. The presence of COX-2 was also demonstrated by 15-HETE production (Lecomte et al., 1994) in aspirin-treated homogenates of rabbit gastric mucosa. These findings, taken together, demonstrate the presence and an important functional role of COX-2 in apparently healthy gastric mucosa.

Gastrointestinal ulcers are often accompanied by mucosal inflammation.Wallace and Cirino (1994) hypothesized that these inflammatory reactions might cause COX-2 expression in the stomach. Similar considerations might apply to local inflammatory responses associated with malignancies; COX-2 expression has been found in human gastric carcinomas (Ristimäki et al., 1997). We have demonstrated that, in addition to its constitutive expression, COX-2 protein can be up-regulated by known activators of the COX-2 promoter, such as LPS or PMA (Inoue et al., 1995). Therefore, COX-2-derived PG formation might be involved in physiological functions of the mucosa (i.e., inhibition of secretion or cytoprotection), and might become up-regulated in ulcers or inflammation of the gastric mucosa, to facilitate healing processes (Kobayashi and Arakawa, 1995;Schmassmann et al., 1998).

Taken together, these findings indicate that COX-2 is an important enzyme generating vasodilatory and possibly cytoprotective PGs in the gastric mucosa. This raises the issue of whether selective COX-2 inhibitors might disturb physiological PG actions in the human stomach.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Dr. J. Heise and Dr. N. Bösing, Zentrum für Operative Medizin I, Heinrich-Heine-Universität (Düsseldorf, Germany), for providing human stomach tissue. The generous provision of flosulide by Schering AG (Berlin, Germany) is acknowledged. The competent technical assistance of Petra Kuger and Irmhild Rüter and the secretarial assistance of Erika Lohmann are gratefully acknowledged.

Footnotes

    • Received April 2, 1998.
    • Accepted June 3, 1998.
  • Send reprint requests to: Dr. Karsten Schrör, Institut für Pharmakologie, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, D-40225 Düsseldorf, Germany. E-mail: schroer{at}pharma.uni-duesseldorf.de

  • The study was supported in part by the Forschungsgruppe Herz-Kreislauf e.V. Düsseldorf. The data presented in this article are part of a doctoral thesis.

Abbreviations

COX
cyclooxygenase
PBS
phosphate-buffered saline
PG
prostaglandin
15-HETE
15-hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acid
LPS
lipopolysaccharide
PMA
phorbol-12-myristate-13-acetate
PCR
polymerase chain reaction
RT
reverse transcription
  • The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics

References

  1. ↵
    1. Bothwell W,
    2. Verburg M,
    3. Wynalda M,
    4. Daniels EG, and
    5. Fitzpatrick FA
    (1982) A radioimmunoassay for the unstable pulmonary metabolites of prostaglandin E1 and E2: an indirect index of their in vivo disposition and pharmacokinetics. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 220:229–235.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Breder CD,
    2. DeWitt DL, and
    3. Kraig RP
    (1995) Characterization of inducible cyclooxygenase in rat brain. J Comp Neurol 355:296–315.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Cromlish WA and
    2. Kennedy BP
    (1996) Selective inhibition of cyclooxygenase-1 and -2 using intact cell assays. Biochem Pharmacol 52:1777–1785.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Dinchuk JE,
    2. Car BD,
    3. Focht RJ,
    4. Johnston JJ,
    5. Jaffee BD,
    6. Covington MB,
    7. Contel NR,
    8. Eng VM,
    9. Collins RJ,
    10. Czerniak PM,
    11. Gorry SA, and
    12. Trzaskos JM
    (1995) Renal abnormalities and an altered inflammatory response in mice lacking cyclooxygenase II. Nature (Lond) 378:406–409.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Greig GM,
    2. Francis DA,
    3. Falgueyret J-P,
    4. Ouellet M,
    5. Percival MD,
    6. Roy P,
    7. Bayly C,
    8. Mancini JA, and
    9. O’Neill GP
    (1997) The interaction of arginine 106 of human prostaglandin G/H synthase-2 with inhibitors is not a universal component of inhibition mediated by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Mol Pharmacol 52:829–838.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    1. Habib A,
    2. Creminon C,
    3. Frobert Y,
    4. Grassi J,
    5. Pradelles P, and
    6. Maclouf J
    (1993) Demonstration of an inducible cyclooxygenase in human endothelial cells using antibodies against the carboxyl-terminal region of cyclooxygenase-2. J Biol Chem 268:23448–23454.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    1. Harris RC,
    2. McKanna JA,
    3. Akai Y,
    4. Jacobson HR,
    5. DuBois RN, and
    6. Breyer MD
    (1994) Cyclooxygenase-2 is associated with the macula densa of rat kidney and increases with salt restriction. J Clin Invest 94:2504–2510.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Hempel SL,
    2. Monick MM, and
    3. Hunninghake GW
    (1994) Lipopolysaccharide induces prostaglandin H synthase-2 protein and mRNA in human alveolar macrophages and blood monocytes. J Clin Invest 93:391–396.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Inoue H,
    2. Yokoyama C,
    3. Hara S,
    4. Tone Y, and
    5. Tanabe T
    (1995) Transcriptional regulation of human prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase-2 gene by lipopolysaccharide and phorbol ester in vascular endothelial cells. J Biol Chem 270:24965–24971.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. Iseki S
    (1995) Immunocytochemical localization of cyclooxygenase-1 and cyclooxygenase-2 in the rat stomach. Histochem J 27:323–328.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Kargman S,
    2. Charleson S,
    3. Cartwright M,
    4. Frank J,
    5. Riendeau D,
    6. Mancini J,
    7. Evans J, and
    8. O’Neill G
    (1996) Characterization of prostaglandin G/H synthase 1 and 2 in rat, dog, monkey, and human gastrointestinal tracts. Gastroenterology 111:445–454.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Klein T,
    2. Nüsing RM,
    3. Pfeilschifter J, and
    4. Ullrich V
    (1994) Selective inhibition of cyclooxygenase-2. Biochem Pharmacol 48:1605–1610.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Klein T,
    2. Nüsing RM,
    3. Wiesenberg-Boettcher I, and
    4. Ullrich V
    (1996) Mechanistic studies on the selective inhibition of cyclooxygenase-2 by indanone derivatives. Biochem Pharmacol 51:285–290.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    Kobayashi K and Arakawa T (1995) Arachidonic acid cascade and gastric mucosal injury, protection, and healing: topics of this decade.J Clin Gastroenterol 21 (Suppl 1):S12–S17.
  15. ↵
    1. Langenbach R,
    2. Morham SG,
    3. Tiano HF,
    4. Loftin CD,
    5. Ghanayem BI,
    6. Chulada PC,
    7. Mahler JF,
    8. Lee CA,
    9. Goulding EH,
    10. Kluckman KD,
    11. Kim HS, and
    12. Smithies O
    (1995) PG synthase 1 gene disruption in mice reduces arachidonic acid-induced inflammation and indomethacin-induced gastric ulceration. Cell 83:483–492.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Lecomte M,
    2. Laneuville O,
    3. Ji C,
    4. DeWitt DL, and
    5. Smith WL
    (1994) Acetylation of human prostaglandin endoperoxide synthase-2 (cyclooxygenase-2) by aspirin. J Biol Chem 269:13207–13215.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    1. Lyons-Giordano B,
    2. Pratta MA,
    3. Galbraith W,
    4. Davis GL, and
    5. Arner EC
    (1993) Interleukin-1 differentially modulates chondrocyte expression of cyclooxygenase-2 and phospholipase A2. Exp Cell Res 206:58–62.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Miller DB,
    2. Munster D,
    3. Wasvary JS,
    4. Simke JP,
    5. Peppard JV,
    6. Bowen BR, and
    7. Marshall PJ
    (1994) The heterologous expression and characterization of human prostaglandin G/H synthase-2 (COX-2). Biochem Biophys Res Commun 201:356–362.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Mitchell JA,
    2. Akarasereenont P,
    3. Thiemermann C,
    4. Flower RJ, and
    5. Vane J
    (1994) Selectivity of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs as inhibitors of constitutive and inducible cyclooxygenase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90:11693–11697.
    OpenUrl
  20. ↵
    1. Morham SG,
    2. Langenbach R,
    3. Loftin CD,
    4. Tiano HF,
    5. Vouloumanos N,
    6. Jennette JC,
    7. Mahler JF,
    8. Kluckman KD,
    9. Ledford A,
    10. Lee CA, and
    11. Smithies O
    (1995) Prostaglandin synthase 2 gene disruption causes severe renal pathology in the mouse. Cell 83:473–482.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Muck S,
    2. Weber A-A, and
    3. Schrör K
    (1998) Effects of terbogrel on platelet function and prostaglandin endoperoxide transfer. Eur J Pharmacol 344:45–48.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. O’Neill GP and
    2. Ford-Hutchinson AW
    (1993) Expression of mRNA for COX-1 and COX-2 in human tissues. FEBS Lett 330:156–160.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Otto JC and
    2. Smith WL
    (1995) Prostaglandin endoperoxide synthase-1 and -2. J Lipid Mediat Cell Signal 12:139–156.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Ristimäki A,
    2. Hokanen N,
    3. Jankala H,
    4. Sipponen P, and
    5. Harkonen M
    (1997) Expression of cyclooxygenase-2 in human gastric carcinoma. Cancer Res 57:1276–1280.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    1. Schmassmann A,
    2. Peskar BM,
    3. Stettler C,
    4. Netzer P,
    5. Stroff T,
    6. Flogerzi B, and
    7. Halter F
    (1998) Effects of inhibition of prostaglandin endoperoxide synthase-2 in chronic gastro-intestinal ulcer models in rats. Br J Pharmacol 123:795–804.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Walenga RW,
    2. Kester M,
    3. Coroneos E,
    4. Butcher S,
    5. Dwivedi R, and
    6. Statt C
    (1996) Constitutive expression of PGHS-2 but not PGHS-1 in human tracheal epithelial cells in vitro. Prostaglandins 52:341–359.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Wallace JL and
    2. Cirino G
    (1994) The development of gastrointestinal-sparing nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Trends Pharmacol Sci 15:405–406.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Wong E,
    2. DeLuca C,
    3. Boily C,
    4. Charleson S,
    5. Cromlish W,
    6. Denis D,
    7. Kargman S,
    8. Kennedy BP,
    9. Ouellet M,
    10. Skorey K,
    11. O’Neill GP,
    12. Vickers PJ, and
    13. Riendeau D
    (1997) Characterization of autocrine inducible prostaglandin H synthase-2 (PGHS-2) in human osteosarcoma cells. Inflamm Res 46:51–59.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Wu KK
    (1998) Biochemical pharmacology of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Biochem Pharmacol 55:543–547.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Molecular Pharmacology: 54 (3)
Molecular Pharmacology
Vol. 54, Issue 3
1 Sep 1998
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Molecular Pharmacology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Constitutive Cyclooxygenase-2 Expression in Healthy Human and Rabbit Gastric Mucosa
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Molecular Pharmacology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Molecular Pharmacology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Research ArticleArticle

Constitutive Cyclooxygenase-2 Expression in Healthy Human and Rabbit Gastric Mucosa

Katja C. Zimmermann, Mario Sarbia, Karsten Schrör and Artur-Aron Weber
Molecular Pharmacology September 1, 1998, 54 (3) 536-540; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1124/mol.54.3.536

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Research ArticleArticle

Constitutive Cyclooxygenase-2 Expression in Healthy Human and Rabbit Gastric Mucosa

Katja C. Zimmermann, Mario Sarbia, Karsten Schrör and Artur-Aron Weber
Molecular Pharmacology September 1, 1998, 54 (3) 536-540; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1124/mol.54.3.536
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Experimental Procedures
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • Abbreviations
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Mechanism of the selective action of paraherquamide A
  • Relapsed-Leukemia Model with NT5C2/PRPS1 Hotspot Mutations
  • The Binding Site for KCI807 in the Androgen Receptor
Show more Article

Similar Articles

Advertisement
  • Home
  • Alerts
Facebook   Twitter   LinkedIn   RSS

Navigate

  • Current Issue
  • Fast Forward by date
  • Fast Forward by section
  • Latest Articles
  • Archive
  • Search for Articles
  • Feedback
  • ASPET

More Information

  • About Molecular Pharmacology
  • Editorial Board
  • Instructions to Authors
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Customized Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions
  • Terms & Conditions of Use

ASPET's Other Journals

  • Drug Metabolism and Disposition
  • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
  • Pharmacological Reviews
  • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
ISSN 1521-0111 (Online)

Copyright © 2023 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics