Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Fast Forward
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Sections
    • Archive
  • Information
    • Instructions to Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • FAQs
    • For Subscribers
    • Terms & Conditions of Use
    • Permissions
  • Editorial Board
  • Alerts
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Virtual Issues
  • Feedback
  • Submit
  • Other Publications
    • Drug Metabolism and Disposition
    • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
    • Molecular Pharmacology
    • Pharmacological Reviews
    • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
    • ASPET

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Molecular Pharmacology
  • Other Publications
    • Drug Metabolism and Disposition
    • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
    • Molecular Pharmacology
    • Pharmacological Reviews
    • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
    • ASPET
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Molecular Pharmacology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Fast Forward
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Sections
    • Archive
  • Information
    • Instructions to Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • FAQs
    • For Subscribers
    • Terms & Conditions of Use
    • Permissions
  • Editorial Board
  • Alerts
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Virtual Issues
  • Feedback
  • Submit
  • Visit molpharm on Facebook
  • Follow molpharm on Twitter
  • Follow molpharm on LinkedIn
Research ArticleArticle

CPCCOEt, a Noncompetitive Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor 1 Antagonist, Inhibits Receptor Signaling Without Affecting Glutamate Binding

Stephane Litschig, Fabrizio Gasparini, Doris Rueegg, Natacha Stoehr, Peter Josef Flor, Ivo Vranesic, Laurent Prézeau, Jean-Philippe Pin, Christian Thomsen and Rainer Kuhn
Molecular Pharmacology March 1999, 55 (3) 453-461;
Stephane Litschig
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Fabrizio Gasparini
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Doris Rueegg
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Natacha Stoehr
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter Josef Flor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ivo Vranesic
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Laurent Prézeau
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jean-Philippe Pin
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christian Thomsen
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rainer Kuhn
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) are a family of G protein-coupled receptors characterized by a large, extracellular N-terminal domain comprising the glutamate-binding site. In the current study, we examined the pharmacological profile and site of action of the non-amino-acid antagonist 7-hydroxyiminocyclopropan[b]chromen-1a-carboxylic acid ethyl ester (CPCCOEt). CPCCOEt selectively inhibited glutamate-induced increases in intracellular calcium at human mGluR1b (hmGluR1b) with an apparent IC50 of 6.5 μM while having no agonist or antagonist activity at hmGluR2, -4a, -5a, -7b, and -8a up to 100 μM. Schild analysis indicated that CPCCOEt acts in a noncompetitive manner by decreasing the efficacy of glutamate-stimulated phosphoinositide hydrolysis without affecting the EC50 value or Hill coefficient of glutamate. Similarly, CPCCOEt did not displace [3H]glutamate binding to membranes prepared from mGluR1a-expressing cells. To elucidate the site of action, we systematically exchanged segments and single amino acids between hmGluR1b and the related subtype, hmGluR5a. Substitution of Thr815 and Ala818, located at the extracellular surface of transmembrane segment VII, with the homologous amino acids of hmGluR5a eliminated CPCCOEt inhibition of hmGluR1b. In contrast, introduction of Thr815 and Ala818 at the homologous positions of hmGluR5a conferred complete inhibition by CPCCOEt (IC50 = 6.6 μM), i.e., a gain of function. These data suggest that CPCCOEt represents a novel class of G protein-coupled receptor antagonists inhibiting receptor signaling without affecting ligand binding. We propose that the interaction of CPCCOEt with Thr815 and Ala818 of mGluR1 disrupts receptor activation by inhibiting an intramolecular interaction between the agonist-bound extracellular domain and the transmembrane domain.

Metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) are coupled to heterotrimeric G proteins, and through this interaction they modulate intracellular concentrations of second messengers and ion channel functions (see reviews by Knoepfel et al., 1995; Pin and Duvoisin, 1995; Conn and Pin, 1997). Molecular cloning has revealed the existence of eight distinct mGluR subtypes subdivided into three groups based on sequence similarities, agonist profiles, and main signal transduction pathways activated in heterologous systems. Further multiplicity in this receptor family is generated by splice variants in the cytoplasmic C-terminal domain. Group I receptors (mGluR1 and -5) mobilize intracellular calcium ([Ca2+]i) by stimulating phospholipase C and are activated selectively by dihydroxyphenylglycine (DHPG). Group II receptors (mGluR2 and -3) and group III receptors (mGluR4, -6, -7, and -8) inhibit adenylate cyclase. Group II receptors are activated selectively by (+)-2-aminobicyclo[3.1.0]hexane-2,6-dicarboxylate (LY354740) and (2R,4R)-4-aminopyrrolidine-2,4-dicarboxylate [(2R,4R)-APDC], whereasl-2-amino-4-phosphonobutyrate (l-AP4) andl-serine-O-phosphate are selective agonists of group III mGluRs.

mGluRs, together with the γ-aminobutyric acid type B receptor (Kaupmann et al., 1997), the parathyroid calcium-sensing receptors (Brown et al., 1993), and the vomeronasal receptors (Bargmann, 1997) form a separate family within the G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) superfamily and show no significant sequence homology to other cloned receptors. A particular feature of the mGluR family is the remarkable large, extracellular N-terminal domain that comprises the ligand-binding site (O’Hara et al., 1993; Takahashi et al., 1993;Tones et al., 1995; Wroblewska et al., 1997; Okamoto et al., 1998;Parmentier et al., 1998). This contrasts with most other GPCRs, where ligand binding occurs in the transmembrane (TM) domain (Savarese and Fraser, 1992; Trumpp-Kallmeyer et al., 1992), and thus raises great interest to understand how extracellular signals are transmitted into the cells.

In addition, there is a need to identify novel selective ligands that are specific for each subtype to characterize unambiguously the physiological role of individual mGluRs. Thus far, group I mGluR ligands are rigidified analogs of glutamate, such as the phenylglycine derivatives (see review by Watkins and Collingridge, 1994), competitive mGluR ligands exhibiting agonist, antagonist, and/or partial agonist activity depending on the mGluR subtypes. However, most of these compounds are neither subtype-selective nor potent. Only recently synthesized antagonists such as (R,S)-1-aminoindan-1,5-dicarboxylic acid (AIDA), (S)-(+)-2-(3′-carboxybicyclo[1.1.1]pentylglycine [(S)-CBPG], and (+)-2-methyl-4-carboxy-phenylglycine (LY-367385) exhibit good selectivity for group I mGluR subtypes (Pellicciari et al., 1995; Clark et al., 1997; Moroni et al. 1997).

A recently discovered member of a novel structural class of mGluR ligands is 7-hydroxyiminocyclopropan[b]chromen-1a-carboxylic acid ethyl ester (CPCCOEt) (Annoura et al., 1996). This compound is structurally different from phenylglycines or glutamate and exhibited selective antagonist activity at cloned rat mGluR1a (Annoura et al., 1996) and human mGluR1b (Casabona et al., 1997). In this study, we have characterized the pharmacological profile of CPCCOEt at cloned rat and human receptors (rmGluR1a, hmGluR1b, -2, -4a, -5a, -7b, -8a) expressed in stable cell lines. The mode of inhibition by CPCCOEt was examined and the amino acids mediating the selective inhibition at hmGluR1b were identified using a series of chimeric receptors and point mutations in which segments or single amino acids of the hmGluR1b receptor were exchanged with the corresponding amino acids of hmGluR5a. Our results indicate that CPCCOEt is a selective noncompetitive mGluR1 antagonist interacting with Thr815 and Ala818 in TM segment VII. We propose that CPCCOEt specifically inhibits receptor signaling without affecting glutamate binding by disrupting an intramolecular interaction between the glutamate-bound extracellular domain and the TM region.

Materials and Methods

Compounds.

CPCCOEt was synthesized according to the procedure described by Annoura et al. (1996). Glutamate, DHPG, quisqualate, (1S,3R)-1-amino-cyclopentane-1,3-dicarboxylate [(1S,3R)-ACPD], and l-AP4 were obtained from Tocris (Bristol, UK). Other chemicals were purchased from Sigma (Buchs, Switzerland).

Construction of Chimeric Receptors and Site-Directed Mutagenesis.

cDNAs encoding wild-type hmGluR1b, -5a, and the chimera hmGluR4/1b were described previously (Daggett et al., 1995;Tones et al., 1995; Lin et al., 1997). cDNAs encoding chimeric hmGluR5/1b and hmGluR1/5a receptor proteins were constructed in the mammalian expression vector pCMV-T7–3 (Daggett et al., 1995) using standard cloning techniques (Sambrook et al., 1989) based on unique restriction sites in hmGluR1b and -5a, novel restriction sites introduced by site-directed mutagenesis, or the polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based overlap extension technique (Horton et al., 1989). The authenticity of the chimeric cDNAs (Table1) was confirmed by restriction enzyme analysis and sequencing of all amplified DNA fragments. Site-directed mutagenesis of sequences encoding amino acids of TMVII in hmGluR1b was performed using a 679-bp AccI-NotI fragment cloned into pBluescript SK(−) vector and the QuickChange Site-Directed Mutagenesis kit (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA). The authenticity of each point mutation was confirmed by DNA sequencing of the entire fragment before recloning into pCMV-T7–3. Point mutations were introduced into TMVII of hmGluR5a using a 469-bp AccI-ApaI fragment cloned into pBluescript KS(−) (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1

Chimeric receptor constructs

Cell Lines, Cell Culture, and Transfections.

Culturing of baby hamster kidney cells stably expressing rmGluR1a and Chinese Hamster Ovary (CHO) and L cell lines stably expressing hmGluR1b, -2, -4a, -5a, and -7b was performed as described previously (Thomsen et al., 1993; Daggett et al., 1995; Flor et al., 1995a,b, 1997). The generation of a human embryonic kidney (HEK)-hmGluR8a cell line is described by Gasparini et al. (1999). Mammalian expression constructs for wild-type and mutant mGluR cDNAs were transiently transfected into COS1 cells (American Type Culture Collection, CRL1650) by the DEAE dextran method as described by Al-Moslih and Dubes (1973). Transient expression of rmGluR1a in HEK 293 cells was performed as described previously (Parmentier et al., 1998).

[3H]Glutamate Binding.

[3H]glutamate binding to membranes prepared form baby hamster kidney cells expressing rmGluR1a was performed essentially as described by Thomsen et al. (1993). In brief, [3H]glutamate with a specific activity of 56 Ci/mmol (Amersham, Buckinghamshire, UK) was mixed with test compounds and membranes (1 mg protein/sample) suspended in assay buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 2.5 mM CaCl2). After 60-min incubation at 0°C samples were centrifuged (40000g, 3 min, 0°C) and the pellets were rinsed twice with 1 ml of cold assay buffer, solubilized in 2 N NaOH, and transferred to scintillation vials. Nonspecific binding was defined as the binding in the presence of 10 μM quisqualate.

Measurements of cAMP Formation.

Mammalian cells stably expressing hmGluR2, -4a, -7b, and -8a were seeded in 24-well plates and cultured for 20 to 40 h. Treatment of cells with drugs and cytoplasmic cAMP determinations were performed as described previously (Flor et al., 1995a,b).

Measurement of [3H]Inositol Phosphate Formation.

Clonal cell lines expressing hmGluR1b or hmGluR5a receptors were seeded in 24-well tissue culture plates. Cells were labeled to equilibrium with 2 μCi/ml myo-[3H]inositol (American Radiolabeled Chemicals, St. Louis, MO) for 20 h in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium, washed twice in Krebs-Henseleit buffer (Sigma), and incubated for 30 min at room temperature. Subsequently, cells were washed in buffer containing 10 mM LiCl and incubated in the same medium for 20 min at 37°C. After aspiration of medium, compounds were added to triplicate wells. For test of antagonist activity, a submaximal concentration of quisqualate (hmGluR1b: 20 μM; hmGluR5a: 0.3 μM) was added immediately after application of the test compound.

Inositol phosphate formation was measured essentially as described bySeuwen et al. (1988). In brief, the reaction was stopped after an incubation of 20 min at 37°C by aspiration of the medium and lysis of the cells with 0.75 ml of ice-cold 10 mM formic acid (pH 3). After 30 min the extract was diluted into 2 ml of 5 mM NH3solution (yielding a final pH of 8–9) and applied to a column containing DOWEX-1 × 8 (Fluka, Buchs, Switzerland). After flow-through of the extract, columns were washed with 10 ml of H2O and 6 ml of 5 mM sodium tetraborate, 60 mM sodium formate, respectively. Inositol monophosphates were eluted with 6 ml of 100 mM formic acid, 200 mM ammonium formate. The eluted samples were counted 7 h after addition of 15 ml Irgasave Plus scintillation cocktail (Packard, Zurich, Switzerland) in a Tricarb 2700tr counter (Packard, Zurich, Switzerland). Each data point represents triplicate measurements expressed as mean ± S.E.M.

Measurement of IP production in HEK293 cells transiently expressing the rat mGluR1a has been described previously (Parmentier et al., 1998).

Measurement of [Ca2+]i.

Cells were cultured and grown until confluency on glass coverslips (9 × 18 mm; Vitromed, Basel, Switzerland). Cells were loaded with the fluorescent indicator for 30 min at room temperature in HEPES-buffered saline solution supplemented with 1.8 mM CaCl2 (Life Technologies, Basel, Switzerland) containing 10 μg/ml 1-[2-(5-carboxyoxal-2-yl)-6-aminobenzofuran-5-Oxyl]-2-(2′-amino-5′-methylphenoxyethane-N,N,N′,N′-tetraacetic acid) (fura-2/AM; Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) and 0.5% Pluronic F-127 (Molecular Probes). After dye loading, cells were washed in buffer and kept at room temperature to recover for at least 60 min. For recordings of [Ca2+]i, glass coverslips were mounted into a continuously perfused cuvette (flow rate, 1 ml/min) in a fluorescence spectrophotometer (Hitachi F-4500, Tokyo, Japan) to measure fura-2 fluorescence intensity at 510 nm (bandpass filter, 20-nm bandwidth) while alternating excitation wavelengths between 340 and 380 nm (excitation filters, 20-nm bandwidth) at a switching frequency of 1.6 Hz. In a typical recording, the resting fluorescence intensity was measured during the first minute. The perfusate then was switched to one containing the test drugs at the desired concentrations for 1 min, after which the perfusion was switched back to buffer to wash. When a second drug application was performed during a recording, a 3- to 5-min wash-out period was allowed between applications. Recordings lasted 5 or 10 min (one or two applications, respectively). Before actual experiments, proper dye loading and positioning of the coverslips was ascertained by directly monitoring the resting fura-2 fluorescence intensities excited alternately at the two excitation wavelengths.

To quantitatively assess changes in [Ca2+]i in response to receptor stimulation, two-wavelength ratiometry was used. The fluorescence intensity ratio (FIR), as calculated from the fluorescence intensity measurements at 340 nm (F340) and 380 nm (F380), r = F380/F340, is a direct, but nonlinear measure for [Ca2+]i. Therefore, response amplitudes were expressed in terms of FIR rather than absolute calcium concentrations. Because the actually measured FIR values depend on the optical characteristics of the recording device, they cannot be directly compared with FIR values obtained with another optical apparatus. Concentration-response curves were obtained by fitting the four-parametric logistic equation to the data using GraphPad Prism 2.0 (GraphPad, San Diego, CA). Maximum and minimum parameters were fixed to 1 and 0, respectively.

Results

CPCCOEt Is a Selective Noncompetitive mGluR1 Antagonist.

We previously showed that CPCCOEt potently reduces stimulation of phosphoinositide (PI) hydrolysis by quisqualate in a concentration-dependent manner in CHO cells stably expressing hmGluR1b with an IC50 value of 9.9 μM, whereas in L cells stably expressing hmGluR5a CPCCOEt had no significant effect up to a concentration of 100 μM (Casabona et al., 1997). To analyze the mode of inhibition of CPCCOEt on hmGluR1b, concentration-response curves for stimulation of PI hydrolysis in response to glutamate were compared in the absence and presence of 1 μM, 3 μM, and 20 μM CPCCOEt. With increasing concentrations of CPCCOEt a profound reduction in the amplitude of PI hydrolysis was observed as compared with the stimulation evoked by glutamate alone (Fig.1A). However, the reduction in the amplitude affected neither the EC50 value nor the Hill coefficient of glutamate (Fig. 1, B and C). Similarly, CPCCOEt (100 μM) was equally effective in inhibiting PI hydrolysis to basal levels in hmGluR1b expressing cells maximally stimulated with quisqualate (200 μM), glutamate (1 mM), DHPG (1 mM), and (1S,3R)-ACPD (3 mM) (Fig. 2A). As shown previously, (1S,3R)-ACPD displayed only a 2.5-fold stimulation of PI hydrolysis over basal levels, corresponding to approximately 45% of the effect of 1 mM glutamate (Lin et al., 1997). No CPCCOEt inhibition was noted when PI hydrolysis was stimulated with ATP (10 μM), which activates an endogenously expressed purinoreceptor in CHO-K1 cells (EC50 of 1.9 μM; R. Kuhn, unpublished observation). When tested as an agonist, CPCCOEt did not significantly enhance basal PI hydrolysis in hmGluR1b expressing cells up to a concentration of 100 μM.

Figure 1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1

Noncompetitive inhibition of glutamate-stimulated PI hydrolysis by CPCCOEt in CHO cells expressing hmGluR1b. A, concentration-response curves of glutamate alone or together with 1 μM (▴), 3 μM (▾), and 20 μM (♦) CPCCOEt. Data are expressed as a percentage of PI hydrolysis over basal level and are mean ± S.E.M. of two to three experiments performed in triplicate. B, Log IC50 values (means ± S.E.M.) of indicated concentration-response curves. C, Hill coefficients (means ± S.E.M.) of indicated concentration-response curves.

Figure 2
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2

Effect of CPCCOEt on PI hydrolysis stimulated by quisqualate (Quis), glutamate (Glu), DHPG, (1S,3R)-ACPD (ACPD), and ATP at hmGluR1b-expressing cells (A) and on constitutive activity of rmGluR1a (B). Results are expressed as a percentage of PI hydrolysis over basal level measured in hmGluR1b-expressing CHO cells (A) or mock-transfected HEK293 cells (B) (mean ± S.E.M.). Data shown are representative examples of three separate experiments performed in triplicate.

We reported previously that the mGluR1a splice variant displayed detectable constitutive activity when transiently overexpressed in HEK 293 cells (Prézeau et al., 1996). Surprisingly, none of the characterized mGluR1 competitive antagonists were able to inhibit this constitutive activity. Therefore, we wondered whether or not CPCCOEt could act as an inverse agonist, inhibiting the mGluR1a constitutive activity. In HEK 293 cells transiently expressing rmGluR1a, CPCCOEt also inhibited in a noncompetitive manner the effect of glutamate (Fig. 2B and data not shown). However, CPCCOEt was unable to inhibit the basal IP production measured in mGluR1a-expressing cells (Fig. 2B). The basal IP production in mGluR1a-expressing cells can be potentiated by coexpressing this receptor with the α subunit of the Gq protein (Parmentier et al., 1998). Even under this condition, CPCCOEt did not inhibit the basal IP formation (data not shown).

Because CPCCOEt concentration-dependently antagonized glutamate-stimulated PI hydrolysis in a noncompetitive manner, it was suggestive that CPCCOEt does not influence the binding of glutamate to the extracellular glutamate-binding domain. To confirm this hypothesis, displacement of [3H]glutamate from membranes prepared from baby hamster kidney cells stably expressing rmGluR1a was examined (Thomsen et al., 1993). As shown in Fig.3A, [3H]glutamate binding was displaced in a concentration-dependent manner by the mGluR1 agonists glutamate and quisqualate and the competitive mGluR1 antagonist AIDA (Pellicciari et al., 1995; Moroni et al., 1997). In contrast, CPCCOEt did not displace [3H]glutamate binding at concentrations of up to 100 μM. Saturation-binding experiments with [3H]glutamate in the presence and absence of 100 μM CPCCOEt also revealed no significant change in theKd andBmax values (Fig. 3B). Thus, glutamate binding is not influenced in the presence of the noncompetitive mGluR1 antagonist CPCCOEt.

Figure 3
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3

Effect of CPCCOEt on [3H]glutamate binding to rmGluR1a. A, displacement of [3H]glutamate binding to membranes prepared from rmGluR1a cells by mGluR1 agonists glutamate (○) and quisqualate (•) and competitive antagonist AIDA (▪). CPCCOEt (□) did not displace binding at concentrations of up to 100 μM. Data are expressed as total [3H]glutamate binding and are mean ± S.E.M. of two to three experiments, which were performed in triplicate. B, saturation-binding experiments with [3H]glutamate in absence (○) or presence (•) of 100 μM CPCCOEt. [3H]glutamate (40 nM) was diluted with nonlabeled l-glutamate at seven concentrations ranging from 0.01 μM to 10 μM, and experiments (n = 3) were performed in triplicate as described in Materials and Methods. Nonspecific binding was defined as binding in presence of 10 μM quisqualate.

To determine the activity at group II and III metabotropic glutamate receptors, CPCCOEt was tested for agonist and antagonist activity in cell lines stably expressing the human subtypes mGluR2, -4a, -7b, and -8a (Fig. 4). Maximal inhibition of forskolin-stimulated cAMP formation was 80% for (1S,3R)-ACPD at hmGluR2 and between 45 and 80% for l-AP4 at hmGluR4a, -7b, and -8a, respectively (data not shown). When examined as an agonist, CPCCOEt (tested at 100 μM) did not reveal any inhibitory effect on forskolin-stimulated cAMP formation in all four cell lines. However, CPCCOEt (100 μM) slightly potentiated the effect of forskolin in cells expressing hmGluR7b by approximately 35% (Fig. 4C). When tested as an antagonist, CPCCOEt (100 μM) did not suppress the inhibition of forskolin-stimulated cAMP formation by an EC80 concentration of (1S,3R)-ACPD in hmGluR2 cells or byl-AP4 in hmGluR4a, -7b, and -8a cells. These results indicate that CPCCOEt (100 μM) is neither an agonist nor antagonist at the human mGluR subtypes 2, -4a, -7b, and -8a.

Figure 4
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4

Lack of agonist and antagonist effect of CPCCOEt in cell lines stably expressing human mGluR2, -4a, -7b, and -8a. Forskolin (10 μM) stimulated cAMP levels about 40-fold (taken as control). Results are expressed as fraction of control. Antagonist activity was measured against approximately EC80 concentrations of agonists. A, hmGluR2: 30 μM (1S,3R)-ACPD. B, hmGluR4a: 1 μMl-AP4. C, hmGluR7b: 500 μM l-AP4. D, hmGluR8a: 1 μM l-AP4. Columns represent mean values ± S.E.M. from at least two experiments (n ≥ 5).

Chimeric Receptors and Point Mutants Indicate that the Inhibition by CPCCOEt Is Mediated by Thr815 and Ala818 of hmGluR1b.

Because CPCCOEt selectively inhibits hmGluR1b activity in a noncompetitive manner and does not influence glutamate binding, it can be concluded that CPCCOEt acts at a site different from the glutamate-binding site. To localize the structural determinants mediating this inhibition, we generated a set of chimeric hmGluR1/5a, -5/1b, and -4/1b (Tones et al., 1995) receptors fused at the border between the large N-terminal extracellular domain and the first TM segment (Fig.5). All chimeric receptors described are coupled to PI turnover and a subsequent release of [Ca2+]i from internal stores. As shown previously for rat mGluR2/1 and mGluR3/1, human mGluR4/1b, Drosophila mGluRA/rmGluR1, and rmGluR1/DmGluRA receptors (Takahashi et al., 1993; Tones et al., 1995;Wroblewska et al., 1997; Parmentier et al., 1998), the rank order of agonist potency of chimeric human mGluR1/5 and -5/1 receptors is determined by the N-terminal extracellular domain of the receptor. When COS1 cells were transfected with the different chimeric cDNAs, all transfected cells responded with a transient increase in [Ca2+]i after stimulation with 300 μM glutamate (Fig. 5A). Coapplication of glutamate together with CPCCOEt (40 μM) completely inhibited the [Ca2+]i response in cells transfected with hmGluR1b and the chimeras hmGluR5/1b and -4/1b, respectively. In contrast, the glutamate-stimulated [Ca2+]i transient was not affected by CPCCOEt in hmGluR5a- or hmGluR1/5a-expressing cells. Comparison of the hmGluR5/1b chimera with wild-type hmGluR1b (Fig. 5B) revealed no significant difference in the IC50values (7.7 ± 2.0 μM versus 6.5 ± 1.4 μM, respectively). This indicates that the inhibitory effect of CPCCOEt is mediated by the TM and/or intracellular regions of hmGluR1b and not by the large N-terminal extracellular domain.

Figure 5
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 5

Effect of CPCCOEt at wild-type hmGluR1b and -5a and chimeric receptors hmGluR1/5a, -5/1b, and -4/1b. A, CPCCOEt selectively inhibits glutamate-induced changes in [Ca2+]iin cells transiently expressing receptor constructs hmGluR1b, -5/1b, and -4/1b, but not hmGluR5a and -5a/1b. Left, schematic diagram of receptor constructs indicating location of fusion sites in front of TMI. Right, traces show representative time courses of [Ca2+]i transients as measured with fura-2 microfluorimetry. Black column indicate application of drugs below each trace. Glutamate (Glu) was applied at a concentration of 300 μM and CPCCOEt at 40 μM, respectively. Between drug applications a 3- to 5-min period was allowed for washout and recovery. Measurements were repeated at least five times in separate transfection experiments. B, concentration-response curves for inhibition of glutamate-induced [Ca2+]i transients by CPCCOEt in cells expressing wild-type hmGluR1b and hmGluR5/1b chimera p253. Results are normalized as a percentage of stimulation of [Ca2+]i with 300 μM (hmGluR1b) and 100 μM glutamate (p253), respectively, monitored every 30 min during recording of a concentration-response curve. Between successive recordings with different concentration of CPCCOEt, an interval of at least 10 min was allowed for washout and recovery. Measurements were performed six times in separate transfection experiments.

To determine more precisely the region(s) mediating the inhibition by CPCCOEt, we created a second series of chimeric hmGluR1/5a and -R5/1b receptors fused at different positions in the TM domains. Each cDNA construct was transiently transfected into COS1 cells, and the activity of the chimeric receptor was measured in the calcium assay (Fig.6). Whereas all chimeras responded to a test application of glutamate (300 μM), inhibition of glutamate-induced [Ca2+]iresponses by CPCCOEt was observed only in chimeras containing the TMVII segment of hmGluR1b. All chimeric receptors containing the TMVII segment derived from hmGluR5a were not inhibited by CPCCOEt. These findings were substantiated further with chimeras in which only parts of the TM domain were exchanged between hmGluR1b and -5a (Fig. 6). For instance, CPCCOEt selectively inhibited glutamate-induced [Ca2+]i responses in p322, a chimeric hmGluR5a receptor with the TMVII segment derived from hmGluR1. In contrast, CPCCOEt was ineffective at the reciprocal hmGluR1b chimera p321 with TMVII derived from hmGluR5a.

Figure 6
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 6

Inhibition by CPCCOEt is mediated by TMVII of hmGluR1b. A left, schematic diagram of a series of chimeric receptor constructs indicating location of fusion sites between hmGluR1b and hmGluR5a. Right, receptor constructs were transiently expressed in COS1 cells and tested for [Ca2+]i responses to glutamate (Glu) and inhibition of glutamate-induced responses by CPCCOEt. +, Complete inhibition of glutamate-induced [Ca2+]i response by 40 μM CPCCOEt. −, no inhibition of glutamate-induced calcium response by 40 μM CPCCOEt. Data were reproduced at least three times in separate transfection experiments. B, traces show representative time courses of [Ca2+]i transients with constructs p321 and p322. Consecutive application of drugs is indicated below each trace. Glutamate was applied at a concentration of 300 μM and CPCCOEt was applied at a concentration of 40 μM, respectively. Data were repeated at least five times in separate transfection experiments.

Sequence alignment of hmGluR1b and hmGluR5a revealed that the TMVII segment of hmGluR1 and hmGluR5 is highly conserved and differs in only 6 out of 26 amino acid residues (see Fig.7A). To precisely identify the amino acids mediating the inhibition by CPCCOEt, we constructed point mutations of hmGluR1b and -5a, in which the nonconserved amino acids were substituted by the homologous amino acids of the related receptor subtype. Substitution of Thr815 (T815) and Ala818 (A818) of hmGluR1b with the homologous amino acids Met802 (M802) and Ser805 (S805) of hmGluR5a eliminated the CPCCOEt inhibition at hmGluR1b but did not affect the induction of [Ca2+]i responses by glutamate (Fig. 7B). Substitution of Met802 of hmGluR5a with Thr815 of hmGluR1b (M802T) resulted in a partial inhibition by CPCCOEt (40 μM), whereas substitution of Ser805 of hmGluR5a with Ala818 (S805A) had no effect. However, substitution of both amino acids in hmGluR5a (M802T, S805A) conferred complete CPCCOEt inhibition at 40 μM. To quantitatively demonstrate that Thr815 and Ala818 of hmGluR1b are sufficient to mediate the antagonist effect of CPCCOEt, an inhibition curve was performed with the mutant hmGluR5a (M802T, S805A). As shown in Fig. 7C, the half-maximal inhibition of CPCCOEt was 6.6 ± 0.9 μM and, thus, very similar to the IC50 value of the wild-type hmGluR1b receptor (IC50= 6.5 ± 1.4 μM; see also Fig. 5). Taken together, these data indicate that the amino acids Thr815 and Ala818 of hmGluR1b are both necessary and sufficient to mediate the subtype-specific inhibition of CPCCOEt.

Figure 7
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 7

Inhibition by CPCCOEt is mediated by Thr815 and Ala818 of hmGluR1b. A, schematic diagram of hmGluR1b and -5a receptors indicating high degree of sequence conservation in TM segment VII. Conserved amino acid residues are indicated by (−). Numbers reveal positions of homologous amino acid residues in hmGluR1b and -5a, respectively. B, Traces show representative time courses of [Ca2+]i transients in mutant receptors. Application of drugs is indicated below each trace. Glutamate was applied at a concentration of 300 μM and CPCCOEt was applied at a concentration of 40 μM, respectively. Data were repeated at least five times in independent transfection experiments. C, Concentration-response inhibition of glutamate-induced [Ca2+]i transients by CPCCOEt in cells expressing mutant receptor hmGluR5a(M802T, S805A) and wild-type hmGluR1b. Results are expressed as a percentage of stimulation of [Ca2+]i with 100 μM and 300 μM glutamate, respectively. Measurements were performed six times in separate transfection experiments.

Discussion

mGluRs together with the γ-aminobutyric acid type B receptor (Kaupmann et al., 1997), the parathyroid calcium-sensing receptors (Brown et al., 1993), and the vomeronasal receptors (Bargmann, 1997) form a separate family within the superfamily of GPCRs (Conn and Pin, 1997). The most striking difference between the mGluR family and most other GPCR resides in their ligand-binding domain. In the latter group numerous studies of structure-function relationships indicated that ligands either interact directly with amino acid residues in the TM domain or in addition with residues in the extracellular domains. For instance, monoamines and other small ligands are bound directly in a pocket formed within the TM segments, whereas the binding sites for neuropeptides and chemokines are defined by complex interactions with residues in the N-terminal extracellular domain, the extracellular loops, and TM segments (Betancur et al., 1997). In contrast, the ligand-binding site of mGluRs is thought to be located completely in the large (500-amino-acid-residue) extracellular domain homologous to bacterial periplasmic-binding proteins (PBPs) (O’Hara et al., 1993;Takahashi et al., 1993). Modeling based on the three-dimensional structures of several PBPs (Adams and Oxender, 1989; Sack et al., 1989;Quiocho, 1990) has predicted that the glutamate-binding domain of mGluR1 consists of two lobes with a hinge region where glutamate binds (O’Hara et al., 1993). In support of this model, mutation of two amino acids proposed to be critically involved in agonist binding completely abolished [3H]glutamate binding (O’Hara et al., 1993). In addition, several studies using chimeric receptors demonstrated that the agonist selectivity is determined solely by the extracellular domain (Takahashi et al., 1993; Tones et al., 1995;Wroblewska et al., 1997; Parmentier et al., 1998). Furthermore, a soluble form of the extracellular domain of mGluR1 was shown recently to fully retain the ligand-binding characteristics of the full-length receptor (Okamoto et al., 1998). This indicates that the ligand-binding event of mGluRs is dissociable from receptor signaling across the membrane and allows to predict that novel antagonist ligands may function either as competitive glutamate antagonists at the extracellular ligand-binding site or as inhibitors of G protein coupling by preventing receptor intramolecular signaling. Currently known mGluR antagonists such as the widely studied carboxyphenylglycines are glutamate analogs and, as such, are likely to interact with the extracellular glutamate-binding site in a competitive manner as demonstrated for (R,S)-α-methyl-4-carboxyphenylglycine, (S)-4-carboxyphenylglycine, and AIDA by a parallel right shift of concentration-response curves of agonist-stimulated PI hydrolysis (Birse et al., 1993; Eaton et al., 1993; Hayashi et al., 1994; Thomsen et al., 1994; Brabet et al., 1995; Moroni et al., 1997).

In this report we provide evidence for the existence of compounds with a different mode of inhibition. We show that CPCCOEt (Annoura et al., 1996), a selective mGluR1 antagonist structurally unrelated to glutamate-derived mGluR ligands, inhibits receptor activity without affecting glutamate binding. Coapplication of glutamate and increasing concentrations of CPCCOEt decreased the efficacy of hmGluR1b activity in the PI hydrolysis assay but did not influence the EC50 or Hill coefficient of glutamate. In addition, [3H]glutamate binding to membranes prepared from rat mGluR1a-expressing cells was not inhibited in the presence of CPCCOEt. Very recently, CPCCOEt also was shown not to displace [3H]quisqualate binding to the glutamate-binding domain of rat mGluR1 expressed in a soluble form (Okamoto et al., 1998). Taken together, these data indicate a noncompetitive mode of inhibition via interaction of CPCCOEt with a novel receptor site independent from the glutamate-binding domain.

Different binding domains for agonists and antagonists previously have been identified for a number of GPCRs such as tachykinins, cholecystokinin, angiotensin, opioids, neurotensin, and vasopressin (for review see Betancur et al., 1997). However, in contrast to CPCCOEt, agonists and antagonists were shown to act as competitive ligands, which compete for binding to the receptor in a mutually exclusive fashion. To elucidate the site of action of the noncompetitive antagonist CPCCOEt, a detailed molecular investigation using chimeric receptors and point mutations of hmGluR1b and hmGluR5a was performed. We show that CPCCOEt specifically interacts with Thr815 and Ala818 located at the extracellular surface of TMVII of hmGluR1b. Substitution of these amino acids with the homologous amino acids of hmGluR5a (hmGluR1b-T815M, A818S) suppressed the CPCCOEt inhibition of glutamate-induced [Ca2+]iresponses, whereas introduction of Thr815 and Ala818 from hmGluR1b at the corresponding position of hmGluR5a generated a gain-of-function mutant as sensitive to the inhibition by CPCCOEt as the wild-type receptor hmGluR1b (IC50 of 5 μM versus 12 μM, respectively). Thus, Thr815 and Ala818 of hmGluR1b both are sufficient and necessary to fully mediate the subtype-specific inhibition of CPCCOEt. Because both residues are found only in mGluR1 but not in the homologous position at the subtypes mGluR2 to -8, these data are consistent with the observed lack of interaction of CPCCOEt in functional assays of other cloned mGluR subtypes.

The existence of distinct binding sites for glutamate and CPCCOEt at mGluR1 and their noncompetitive interaction raises questions about the intramolecular mechanism of receptor activation and its inhibition by CPCCOEt. As described above, mGluRs are constituted of two main domains: the glutamate-binding domain (B) that corresponds to the extracellular PBP-like domain and a TM region (E) constituted of seven TM helices. The current hypothesis on the functioning of GPCRs that are constituted of a seven-TM region (TMVII) only is that they naturally oscillate between at least two conformations (or states), an active (R*) and an inactive (R) one (Lefkowitz et al., 1993). This proposal results from the observation that many mutated as well as wild-type receptors possess constitutive activity. A follow-up of this model is that the agonists stabilize the R* state whereas the antagonists with inverse agonist activity stabilizes the R state. This hypothesis also may be valid for the TM domain of mGluRs, because it is likely structurally related to the other seven TM receptors. This mGluR domain therefore also may oscillate between at least two states, E and E*. The observation that CPCCOEt does not act as an inverse agonist (it does not inhibit the constitutive activity of mGluR1a) although it interacts directly with the TM region indicates that it does not modify the natural equilibrium between E and E*. As already mentioned, glutamate binds on the B domain, which is structurally related to PBPs. It also has been proposed that this domain, like the PBPs, undergoes a large conformational change upon agonist binding (a closure of the two lobes) (Quiocho, 1990; O’Hara et al., 1993). Accordingly, glutamate is unlikely, by itself, to directly stabilize the E* state of the TM region of mGluRs. Instead, glutamate may stabilize a conformation of the extracellular B domain that will stabilize E*. By interacting on top of TMVII of mGluR1, CPCCOEt may prevent the activation of the TM domain by the glutamate-occupied B domain. CPCCOEt therefore may be considered as an inhibitor of the intramolecular-signaling mechanism of mGluR1, disconnecting the cross-talk between the two domains of the receptor. This may occur in several ways. CPCCOEt and the glutamate-bound B domain might compete directly for the same site on the TM region. Alternatively, interaction of CPCCOEt with Thr815 and Ala818 in TMVII might create a steric obstacle, preventing the glutamate-bound B domain to interact with the TM region and, subsequently, to stabilize.

Taken together, our data demonstrate that CPCCOEt is a subtype-selective, noncompetitive mGluR1 antagonist interacting with Thr815 and Ala818 in TMVII. To our knowledge, this is the first demonstration of a compound acting at a GPCR by specifically inhibiting TM signaling without affecting binding of the endogenous agonist. The discovery of a novel pharmacological site separated from the extracellular glutamate-binding domain may allow the discovery of new structural classes of subtype-specific mGluR ligands unrelated to amino acids.

Acknowledgments

We thank Werner Inderbitzin, Christine Stierlin, Peter Wicki, Snezana Lukic, Therese Leonhardt, and Sonja Reutlinger for excellent technical assistance and Benny Bettler, Graeme Bilbe, Klemens Kaupmann, and Anne Feltz for helpful discussions and careful reading of the manuscript.

Footnotes

  • Send reprint requests to: Dr. Rainer Kuhn, K-125.6.08, Nervous System, Novartis Pharma AG, CH-4002 Basel, Switzerland. E-mail:Rainer.kuhn{at}pharma.novartis.com

  • Abbreviations:
    (1S
    3R)-ACPD, (1S,3R)-1-amino-cyclopentane-1,3-dicarboxylate
    AIDA
    (RS)-1-aminoindan-1,5-dicarboxylate
    AP4
    l-2-amino-4-phosphonbutyrate
    CPCCOEt
    7-hydroxyiminocyclopropan[b]chromen-1a-carboxylic acid ethyl ester
    mGluR
    metabotropic glutamate receptor
    GPCR
    G protein-coupled receptor
    TM
    transmembrane
    fura-z/AM
    1-[2-(5-carboxyoxal-2-yl)-6-aminobenzofuran-5-Oxyl]-2-(2′-amino-5′-methylphenoxyethane-N,N,N′,N′-tetraacetic acid)
    PBP
    periplasmic-binding protein
    • Received August 10, 1998.
    • Accepted November 6, 1998.
  • The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics

References

  1. ↵
    1. Adams MD,
    2. Oxender DL
    (1989) Bacterial periplasmic binding protein tertiary structures. J Biol Chem 264:15739–15742.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Al-Moslih MI,
    2. Dubes GR
    (1973) The kinetics of DEAE-dextran-induced cell sensitization to transfection. J Gen Virol 73:189–193.
    OpenUrl
  3. ↵
    1. Annoura H,
    2. Fukunaga A,
    3. Uesugi M,
    4. Tatsuoka T,
    5. Horikawa Y
    (1996) A novel class of antagonists for metabotropic glutamate receptors, 7-(hydroxyimino)cyclopropachromen-1a-carboxylates. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 6:763–766.
  4. ↵
    1. Bargmann C
    (1997) Olfactory receptors, vomersonasal receptors, and the organization of olfactory information. Cell 90:585–587.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Betancur C,
    2. Azzi M,
    3. Rostene W
    (1997) Nonpeptide antagonists of neuropeptide receptors: Tools for research and therapy. Trends Pharmacol Sci 18:372–386.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Birse EF,
    2. Eaton SA,
    3. Jane DE,
    4. Jones PLSJ,
    5. Porter RHP,
    6. Pook PC-K,
    7. Sunter DC,
    8. Udvarhelyi PM,
    9. Wharton B,
    10. Roberts PJ,
    11. Salt TE,
    12. Watkins JC
    (1993) Phenylglycine derivatives as new pharmacological tools for investigating the role of metabotropic glutamate receptors in the central nervous system. Neuroscience 52:481.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Brabet I,
    2. Mary S,
    3. Bockaert J,
    4. Pin J-P
    (1995) Phenylglycine derivatives discriminate between mGluR1 and mGluR5 mediated responses. Neuropharmacology 34:895–903.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Brown EM,
    2. Gamba G,
    3. Riccardi D,
    4. Lombardi M,
    5. Butters R,
    6. Kifor O,
    7. Sun A,
    8. Hediger MA,
    9. Lytton J,
    10. Hebert SC
    (1993) Cloning and characterization of an extracellular Ca(2+)-sensing receptor from bovine parathyroid. Nature (London) 366:575–580.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Casabona G,
    2. Knoepfel T,
    3. Kuhn R,
    4. Gasparini F,
    5. Baumann P,
    6. Sortino MA,
    7. Copani A,
    8. Nicoletti F
    (1997) Expression and coupling to polyphosphoinositide hydrolysis of group I metabotropic glutamate receptors in early postnatal and adult rat brain. Eur J Neurosci 9:12–17.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Clark BP,
    2. Baker SR,
    3. Goldsworthy J,
    4. Harris JR,
    5. Kingston AE
    (1997) Methyl-4-carboxyphenylglycince (LY367385) selectively antagonizes metabotropic glutamate mGluR1 receptors. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 7:2777–2780.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  11. ↵
    1. Conn PJ,
    2. Pin JP
    (1997) Pharmacology and functions of metabotropic glutamate receptors. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 37:205–237.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Daggett LP,
    2. Sacaan AI,
    3. Akong M,
    4. Rao SP,
    5. Hess SD,
    6. Liaw C,
    7. Urrutia A,
    8. Jachec C,
    9. Ellis SB,
    10. Dreessen J,
    11. Knoepfel T,
    12. Landwehrmeyer GB,
    13. Testa CM,
    14. Young AB,
    15. Varney M,
    16. Johnson EC,
    17. Velicelebi G
    (1995) Molecular and functional characterization of recombinant human glutamate receptor subtype 5. Neuropharmacology 34:871–886.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Eaton SA,
    2. Jane DE,
    3. Jones PLSJ,
    4. Porter RHP,
    5. Pook PC-K,
    6. Sunter DC,
    7. Udvarhelyi PM,
    8. Roberts PJ,
    9. Salt TE,
    10. Watkins JC
    (1993) Competitive antagonism at metabotropic glutamate receptors by (S)-4-carboxyphenylglycine and (R,S)-a-methyl-4-carboxyphenylglycine. Eur J Pharmacol 244:195–197.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Flor PJ,
    2. Lindauer K,
    3. Puettner I,
    4. Rueegg D,
    5. Lukic S,
    6. Knoepfel T,
    7. Kuhn R
    (1995a) Molecular cloning, functional expression and pharmacological characterization of the human metabotropic glutamate receptor type 2. Eur J Neurosci 7:622–629.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Flor PJ,
    2. Lukic S,
    3. Rueegg D,
    4. Leonhardt T,
    5. Knoepfel T,
    6. Kuhn R
    (1995b) Molecular cloning, functional expression and pharmacological characterization of the human metabotropic glutamate receptor type 4. Neuropharmacology 34:149–155.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Flor PJ,
    2. van der Putten H,
    3. Rueegg D,
    4. Lukic S,
    5. Leonhardt T,
    6. Bence M,
    7. Sansig G,
    8. Knoepfel T,
    9. Kuhn R
    (1997) A novel splice variant of a metabotropic glutamate receptor, human mGluR7b. Neuropharmacology 36:1532–1539.
    OpenUrl
  17. ↵
    Gasparini F, Bruno V, Battaglia G, Lukic S, Leonhardt T, Inderbitzin W, Laurie D, Sommer B, Varney MA, Hess SD, Johnson EC, Kuhn R, Urwyler S, Sauer D, Portet C, Schmutz M, Nicoletti F, Flo PY (1999) (R, S)-PPG, a potent and selective group III metabotropic glutamate receptor agonist is anticonvulsive and neuroprotective in vivo. J Pharmacol Exp Therapeutic, in press..
  18. ↵
    1. Hayashi Y,
    2. Sekiyama N,
    3. Nakanishi S,
    4. Jane DE,
    5. Sunter DC,
    6. Birse EW,
    7. Udvarhelyi PM,
    8. Watkins JC
    (1994) Analysis of agonist and antagonist activities of phenylglycine derivatives for different cloned metabotropic glutamate receptor subtypes. J Neurosci 14:3370–3377.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  19. ↵
    1. Horton RM,
    2. Hunt HD,
    3. Ho SN,
    4. Pullen JK,
    5. Pease LR
    (1989) Engineering hybrid genes without the use of restriction enzymes: Gene splicing by overlap extension. Gene 77:61–68.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Kaupmann K,
    2. Huggel K,
    3. Heid J,
    4. Flor PJ,
    5. Bischoff S,
    6. Mickel SJ,
    7. McMaster G,
    8. Angst C,
    9. Bittiger H,
    10. Froestl W,
    11. Bettler B
    (1997) Expression cloning of GABAB receptors uncovers similarity to metabotropic glutamate receptors. Nature (London) 386:239–246.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Knoepfel T,
    2. Kuhn R,
    3. Allgeier H
    (1995) Metabotropic glutamate receptors: Novel targets for drug development. J Med Chem 38:1417–1426.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Lefkowitz RJ,
    2. Cotecchia S,
    3. Samana P,
    4. Costa T
    (1993) Constitutive activity of receptors coupled to guanine regulatory proteins. Trends Pharmacol Sci 14:303–307.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Lin FF,
    2. Varney M,
    3. Sacaan AI,
    4. Jachec C,
    5. Daggett LP,
    6. Rao S,
    7. Flor P,
    8. Kuhn R,
    9. Kerner JA,
    10. Standaert D,
    11. Young AB,
    12. Velicelebi G
    (1997) Cloning and stable expression of the mGluR1b subtype of human metabotropic receptors and pharmacological comparison with the mGluR5a subtype. Neuropharmacology 36:917–931.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Moroni F,
    2. Lombardi G,
    3. Thomsen C,
    4. Leonardi P,
    5. Attucci S,
    6. Peruginelli F,
    7. Torregrossa SA,
    8. Pellegrini-Giampietro DE,
    9. Luneia R,
    10. Pellicciari R
    (1997) Pharmacological characterization of 1-aminoindan-1,5-dicarboxylic acid, a potent mGluR1 antagonist. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 281:721–729.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    1. O’Hara PJ,
    2. Sheppard PO,
    3. Thogersen H,
    4. Venezia D,
    5. Haldeman BA,
    6. McGrane V,
    7. Houamed KM,
    8. Thomsen C,
    9. Gilbert TL,
    10. Mulvihill ER
    (1993) The ligand-binding domain in metabotropic glutamate receptors is related to bacterial periplasmic binding proteins. Neuron 11:41–52.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Okamoto T,
    2. Sekiyama N,
    3. Otsu M,
    4. Shimada Y,
    5. Sato A,
    6. Nakanishi S,
    7. Jingami H
    (1998) Expression and purification of the extracellular ligand binding region of metabotropic glutamate receptor subtype 1. J Biol Chem 273:13089–13096.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    1. Parmentier M-L,
    2. Joly C,
    3. Restituito S,
    4. Bockaert J,
    5. Grau Y,
    6. Pin J-P
    (1998) The G-protein coupling profile of metabotropic glutamate receptors, as determined with exogenous G-proteins, is independent of their ligand recognition domain. Mol Pharmacol 53:778–786.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. ↵
    1. Pellicciari R,
    2. Luneia R,
    3. Costantino G,
    4. Marinozzi M,
    5. Natalini B,
    6. Jakobsen P,
    7. Kanstrup-A,
    8. Lombardi G,
    9. Moroni F,
    10. Thomsen C
    (1995) 1-Aminoindan-1,5-dicarboxylic acid: A novel antagonist at phospholipase C-linked metabotropic glutamate receptors. J Med Chem 38:3717–3719.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Pin JP,
    2. Duvoisin R
    (1995) The metabotropic glutamate receptors: Structure and functions. Neuropharmacology 34:1–26.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Prezeau L,
    2. Gomeza F,
    3. Ahern S,
    4. Mary S,
    5. Galvez T,
    6. Bockaer TJ,
    7. Pin YP
    (1996) Changes in the carboxy-terminal domain of metabotropic glutamate receptor 1 by alternative splicing generate receptors with different agonist-independent activity. Mol Pharmacol 49:422–429.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  31. ↵
    1. Quiocho FA
    (1990) Atomic structures of periplasmic binding proteins and the high-affinity active transport systems in bacteria. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 326:341–351.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. ↵
    1. Sack JS,
    2. Trakhanov SD,
    3. Tsigannik IH,
    4. Quiocho FA
    (1989) Structure of the L-leucine-binding protein refined at 2.4 A resolution and comparison with the Leu/Ile/Val-binding protein structure. J Mol Biol 206:193–207.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    1. Sambrook J,
    2. Fritsch EF,
    3. Maniatis T
    (1989) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, New York).
  34. ↵
    1. Savarese TM,
    2. Fraser CM
    (1992) In vitro mutagenesis and the search for structure-function relationships among G-protein coupled receptors. Biochem J 283:1–19.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
    1. Schwartz TW,
    2. Gether U,
    3. Schambye HT,
    4. Hjorth SA
    (1995) Molecular mechanism of action of non-peptide ligands for peptide receptors. Curr Pharm Design 1:325–342.
    OpenUrl
  35. ↵
    1. Seuwen K,
    2. Lagarde A,
    3. Pouyssegur J
    (1988) Deregulation of hamster fibroblast proliferation by mutated ras oncogenes is not mediated by constitutive activation of phosphoinositide specific phospholipase C. EMBO J 7:161–168.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  36. ↵
    1. Takahashi K,
    2. Tsuchida K,
    3. Tanabe Y,
    4. Masu M,
    5. Nakanishi S
    (1993) Role of the large extracellular domain of metabotropic glutamate receptors in agonist selectivity determination. J Biol Chem 268:19341–19345.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. ↵
    1. Thomsen C,
    2. Boel W,
    3. Suzdak PD
    (1994) Actions of phenylglycine analogs at subtypes of the metabotropic glutamate receptor family. Eur J Pharmacol 267:77–84.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. ↵
    1. Thomsen C,
    2. Mulvihill ER,
    3. Haldeman B,
    4. Pickering DS,
    5. Hampson DR,
    6. Suzdak PD
    (1993) A pharmacological characterization of the mGluR1a subtype of the metabotropic glutamate receptor expressed in a cloned baby hamster kidney cell line. Brain Res 619:22–28.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. ↵
    1. Tones MA,
    2. Bendali N,
    3. Flor PJ,
    4. Knoepfel T,
    5. Kuhn R
    (1995) The agonist selectivity of a class III metabotropic glutamate receptor, human mGluR4a, is determined by the N-terminal extracellular domain. NeuroReport 7:117–120.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. ↵
    1. Trumpp-Kallmeyer S,
    2. Hoflack J,
    3. Bruinvels A,
    4. Hibert M
    (1992) Modeling of G-protein coupled receptors: Application to dopamine, adrenaline, serotonine, acetylcholine and mammalian opsin receptors. J Med Chem 35:3448–3462.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. ↵
    1. Watkins J,
    2. Collingridge G
    (1994) Phenylglycine derivatives as antagonists of metabotropic glutamate receptors. Trends Pharmacol Sci 15:333–342.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. ↵
    1. Wroblewska B,
    2. Wroblewski JT,
    3. Pshenichkin S,
    4. Surin A,
    5. Sullivan SE,
    6. Neale JH
    (1997) N-acetylaspartylglutamate selectively activates mGluR3 receptors in transfected cells. J Neurochem 69:174–181.
    OpenUrlPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Molecular Pharmacology: 55 (3)
Molecular Pharmacology
Vol. 55, Issue 3
1 Mar 1999
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Molecular Pharmacology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
CPCCOEt, a Noncompetitive Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor 1 Antagonist, Inhibits Receptor Signaling Without Affecting Glutamate Binding
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Molecular Pharmacology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Molecular Pharmacology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Research ArticleArticle

CPCCOEt, a Noncompetitive Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor 1 Antagonist, Inhibits Receptor Signaling Without Affecting Glutamate Binding

Stephane Litschig, Fabrizio Gasparini, Doris Rueegg, Natacha Stoehr, Peter Josef Flor, Ivo Vranesic, Laurent Prézeau, Jean-Philippe Pin, Christian Thomsen and Rainer Kuhn
Molecular Pharmacology March 1, 1999, 55 (3) 453-461;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Research ArticleArticle

CPCCOEt, a Noncompetitive Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor 1 Antagonist, Inhibits Receptor Signaling Without Affecting Glutamate Binding

Stephane Litschig, Fabrizio Gasparini, Doris Rueegg, Natacha Stoehr, Peter Josef Flor, Ivo Vranesic, Laurent Prézeau, Jean-Philippe Pin, Christian Thomsen and Rainer Kuhn
Molecular Pharmacology March 1, 1999, 55 (3) 453-461;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • The binding site for KCI807 in the androgen receptor
  • Fatty acid amide hydrolase in cisplatin nephrotoxicity
  • eCB Signaling System in hiPSC-Derived Neuronal Cultures
Show more Article

Similar Articles

Advertisement
  • Home
  • Alerts
Facebook   Twitter   LinkedIn   RSS

Navigate

  • Current Issue
  • Fast Forward by date
  • Fast Forward by section
  • Latest Articles
  • Archive
  • Search for Articles
  • Feedback
  • ASPET

More Information

  • About Molecular Pharmacology
  • Editorial Board
  • Instructions to Authors
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Customized Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions
  • Terms & Conditions of Use

ASPET's Other Journals

  • Drug Metabolism and Disposition
  • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
  • Pharmacological Reviews
  • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
ISSN 1521-0111 (Online)

Copyright © 2023 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics