Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Fast Forward
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Sections
    • Archive
  • Information
    • Instructions to Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • FAQs
    • For Subscribers
    • Terms & Conditions of Use
    • Permissions
  • Editorial Board
  • Alerts
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Virtual Issues
  • Feedback
  • Submit
  • Other Publications
    • Drug Metabolism and Disposition
    • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
    • Molecular Pharmacology
    • Pharmacological Reviews
    • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
    • ASPET

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Molecular Pharmacology
  • Other Publications
    • Drug Metabolism and Disposition
    • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
    • Molecular Pharmacology
    • Pharmacological Reviews
    • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
    • ASPET
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Molecular Pharmacology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Fast Forward
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Sections
    • Archive
  • Information
    • Instructions to Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • FAQs
    • For Subscribers
    • Terms & Conditions of Use
    • Permissions
  • Editorial Board
  • Alerts
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Virtual Issues
  • Feedback
  • Submit
  • Visit molpharm on Facebook
  • Follow molpharm on Twitter
  • Follow molpharm on LinkedIn
Research ArticleArticle

Endogenous Regulators of G Protein Signaling Differentially Modulate Full and Partial μ-Opioid Agonists at Adenylyl Cyclase as Predicted by a Collision Coupling Model

M. J. Clark, J. J. Linderman and J. R. Traynor
Molecular Pharmacology May 2008, 73 (5) 1538-1548; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1124/mol.107.043547
M. J. Clark
Department of Pharmacology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan (M.J.C., J.R.T.); and Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan (J.J.L.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J. J. Linderman
Department of Pharmacology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan (M.J.C., J.R.T.); and Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan (J.J.L.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J. R. Traynor
Department of Pharmacology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan (M.J.C., J.R.T.); and Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan (J.J.L.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins accelerate the endogenous GTPase activity of Gαi/o proteins to increase the rate of deactivation of active Gα-GTP and Gβγ signaling molecules. Previous studies have suggested that RGS proteins are more effective on less efficiently coupled systems such as with partial agonist responses. To determine the role of endogenous RGS proteins in functional responses to μ-opioid agonists of different intrinsic efficacy, Gαi/o subunits with a mutation at the pertussis toxin (PTX)-sensitive cysteine (C351I) and with or without a mutation at the RGS binding site (G184S) were stably expressed in C6 glioma cells expressing a μ-opioid receptor. Cells were treated overnight with PTX to inactivate endogenous G proteins. Maximal inhibition of forskolin-stimulated adenylyl cyclase by the low-efficacy partial agonists buprenorphine and nalbuphine was increased in cells expressing RGS-insensitive GαoCIGS, Gαi2CIGS, or Gαi3CIGS compared with their GαCI counterparts, but the RGS-insensitive mutation had little or no effect on the maximal inhibition by the higher efficacy agonists DAMGO and morphine. The potency of all the agonists to inhibit forskolin-stimulated adenylyl cyclase was increased in cells expressing RGS-insensitive GαoCIGS, Gαi2CIGS, or Gαi3CIGS, regardless of efficacy. These data are comparable with predictions based on a collision coupling model. In this model, the rate of G protein inactivation, which is modulated by RGS proteins, and the rate of G protein activation, which is affected by agonist intrinsic efficacy, determine the maximal agonist response and potency at adenylyl cyclase under steady state conditions.

  • The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
View Full Text

MolPharm articles become freely available 12 months after publication, and remain freely available for 5 years. 

Non-open access articles that fall outside this five year window are available only to institutional subscribers and current ASPET members, or through the article purchase feature at the bottom of the page. 

 

  • Click here for information on institutional subscriptions.
  • Click here for information on individual ASPET membership.

 

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?

Purchase access

You may purchase access to this article. This will require you to create an account if you don't already have one.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Molecular Pharmacology: 73 (5)
Molecular Pharmacology
Vol. 73, Issue 5
1 May 2008
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Editorial Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Molecular Pharmacology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Endogenous Regulators of G Protein Signaling Differentially Modulate Full and Partial μ-Opioid Agonists at Adenylyl Cyclase as Predicted by a Collision Coupling Model
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Molecular Pharmacology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Molecular Pharmacology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Research ArticleArticle

Endogenous Regulators of G Protein Signaling Differentially Modulate Full and Partial μ-Opioid Agonists at Adenylyl Cyclase as Predicted by a Collision Coupling Model

M. J. Clark, J. J. Linderman and J. R. Traynor
Molecular Pharmacology May 1, 2008, 73 (5) 1538-1548; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1124/mol.107.043547

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Research ArticleArticle

Endogenous Regulators of G Protein Signaling Differentially Modulate Full and Partial μ-Opioid Agonists at Adenylyl Cyclase as Predicted by a Collision Coupling Model

M. J. Clark, J. J. Linderman and J. R. Traynor
Molecular Pharmacology May 1, 2008, 73 (5) 1538-1548; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1124/mol.107.043547
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Appendix
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Mechanism of the selective action of paraherquamide A
  • Fatty Acid Amide Hydrolase in Cisplatin Nephrotoxicity
  • Use-Dependent Relief of A-887826 Inhibition
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

Advertisement
  • Home
  • Alerts
Facebook   Twitter   LinkedIn   RSS

Navigate

  • Current Issue
  • Fast Forward by date
  • Fast Forward by section
  • Latest Articles
  • Archive
  • Search for Articles
  • Feedback
  • ASPET

More Information

  • About Molecular Pharmacology
  • Editorial Board
  • Instructions to Authors
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Customized Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions
  • Terms & Conditions of Use

ASPET's Other Journals

  • Drug Metabolism and Disposition
  • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
  • Pharmacological Reviews
  • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
ISSN 1521-0111 (Online)

Copyright © 2023 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics