Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Fast Forward
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Sections
    • Archive
  • Information
    • Instructions to Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • FAQs
    • For Subscribers
    • Terms & Conditions of Use
    • Permissions
  • Editorial Board
  • Alerts
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Virtual Issues
  • Feedback
  • Submit
  • Other Publications
    • Drug Metabolism and Disposition
    • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
    • Molecular Pharmacology
    • Pharmacological Reviews
    • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
    • ASPET

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Molecular Pharmacology
  • Other Publications
    • Drug Metabolism and Disposition
    • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
    • Molecular Pharmacology
    • Pharmacological Reviews
    • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
    • ASPET
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Molecular Pharmacology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Fast Forward
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Sections
    • Archive
  • Information
    • Instructions to Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • FAQs
    • For Subscribers
    • Terms & Conditions of Use
    • Permissions
  • Editorial Board
  • Alerts
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Virtual Issues
  • Feedback
  • Submit
  • Visit molpharm on Facebook
  • Follow molpharm on Twitter
  • Follow molpharm on LinkedIn
Research ArticleArticle

Identification of AICP as a GluN2C-Selective N-Methyl-d-Aspartate Receptor Superagonist at the GluN1 Glycine Site

Maja Jessen, Kristen Frederiksen, Feng Yi, Rasmus P. Clausen, Kasper B. Hansen, Hans Bräuner-Osborne, Paul Kilburn and Anders Damholt
Molecular Pharmacology August 2017, 92 (2) 151-161; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1124/mol.117.108944
Maja Jessen
Department of Molecular Screening, H. Lundbeck A/S, Valby, Denmark (M.J., K.F., A.D.); Department of Drug Design and Pharmacology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark (M.J., R.P.C., H.B.-O.); Department of Medicinal Chemistry 1, H. Lundbeck A/S, Valby, Denmark (P.K.); Department of Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Montana, Missoula, Montana (F.Y., K.B.H.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kristen Frederiksen
Department of Molecular Screening, H. Lundbeck A/S, Valby, Denmark (M.J., K.F., A.D.); Department of Drug Design and Pharmacology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark (M.J., R.P.C., H.B.-O.); Department of Medicinal Chemistry 1, H. Lundbeck A/S, Valby, Denmark (P.K.); Department of Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Montana, Missoula, Montana (F.Y., K.B.H.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Feng Yi
Department of Molecular Screening, H. Lundbeck A/S, Valby, Denmark (M.J., K.F., A.D.); Department of Drug Design and Pharmacology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark (M.J., R.P.C., H.B.-O.); Department of Medicinal Chemistry 1, H. Lundbeck A/S, Valby, Denmark (P.K.); Department of Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Montana, Missoula, Montana (F.Y., K.B.H.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rasmus P. Clausen
Department of Molecular Screening, H. Lundbeck A/S, Valby, Denmark (M.J., K.F., A.D.); Department of Drug Design and Pharmacology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark (M.J., R.P.C., H.B.-O.); Department of Medicinal Chemistry 1, H. Lundbeck A/S, Valby, Denmark (P.K.); Department of Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Montana, Missoula, Montana (F.Y., K.B.H.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kasper B. Hansen
Department of Molecular Screening, H. Lundbeck A/S, Valby, Denmark (M.J., K.F., A.D.); Department of Drug Design and Pharmacology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark (M.J., R.P.C., H.B.-O.); Department of Medicinal Chemistry 1, H. Lundbeck A/S, Valby, Denmark (P.K.); Department of Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Montana, Missoula, Montana (F.Y., K.B.H.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hans Bräuner-Osborne
Department of Molecular Screening, H. Lundbeck A/S, Valby, Denmark (M.J., K.F., A.D.); Department of Drug Design and Pharmacology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark (M.J., R.P.C., H.B.-O.); Department of Medicinal Chemistry 1, H. Lundbeck A/S, Valby, Denmark (P.K.); Department of Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Montana, Missoula, Montana (F.Y., K.B.H.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paul Kilburn
Department of Molecular Screening, H. Lundbeck A/S, Valby, Denmark (M.J., K.F., A.D.); Department of Drug Design and Pharmacology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark (M.J., R.P.C., H.B.-O.); Department of Medicinal Chemistry 1, H. Lundbeck A/S, Valby, Denmark (P.K.); Department of Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Montana, Missoula, Montana (F.Y., K.B.H.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anders Damholt
Department of Molecular Screening, H. Lundbeck A/S, Valby, Denmark (M.J., K.F., A.D.); Department of Drug Design and Pharmacology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark (M.J., R.P.C., H.B.-O.); Department of Medicinal Chemistry 1, H. Lundbeck A/S, Valby, Denmark (P.K.); Department of Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Montana, Missoula, Montana (F.Y., K.B.H.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF + SI
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Additional Files
  • Fig. 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1.

    Concentration–response data for AICP and DCS at human NMDA receptor subtypes. (A) Chemical structures of agonists at the GluN1 glycine binding site. (B) Representative recordings of concentration–response data for AICP in the presence of 100 µM glutamate at recombinant human GluN1/2A and GluN1/2C receptors. (C, D) Concentration–response data for (C) AICP and (D) DCS at human NMDA receptor subtypes in the presence of 100 µM glutamate. Data are mean ± S.D. from 4 to 15 oocytes and are normalized to the maximal response to glycine (100 µM) measured in the same recording. The EC50 values and relative agonist efficacy (i.e., maximal responses relative to glycine) are listed in Table 1.

  • Fig. 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2.

    Relationship between the glutamate binding site and AICP activity. (A) Representative two-electrode voltage-clamp recordings of responses at rat GluN1/2A and GluN1/2C receptors to 100 µM glycine alone, 10 µM AICP alone, 100 µM glycine plus 10 µM AICP, or 100 µM glutamate plus 100 µM glycine. The mean responses normalized to control (glutamate plus glycine) ± S.E.M. from 6 to 8 oocytes are listed below the respective ligand applications. (B) Concentration–response data for AICP at rat NMDA receptor subtypes in the presence of either 30, 100, or 300 µM glutamate. Data are mean ± S.D. from 3 to 16 oocytes and are normalized to the maximal response to glycine (100 µM) plus the corresponding concentration of glutamate (30, 100, or 300 µM) measured in the same recording. The EC50 values and relative agonist efficacies (i.e., maximal responses relative to glycine) are listed in Supplemental Table 1.

  • Fig. 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 3.

    Activity of AICP and DCS at NMDA receptors with mutations in the glycine binding site. (A) Structure of glycine bound in the agonist binding site of the GluN1 subunit (PDB ID 5I57; Yi et al., 2016). Dashed lines indicate polar interactions between glycine (yellow carbon) and GluN1 residues (gray carbon). Mutated residues are indicated in bold text. (B–E) Concentration–response data for AICP (B and C) and DCS (D and E) at rat GluN1/2A and GluN1/2C receptors with mutations in the glycine binding site measured using two-electrode voltage-clamp recordings. The responses are normalized to the fitted maximal response. Data are mean ± S.D. from 3 to 29 oocytes, and the EC50 values are listed in Supplemental Table 2.

  • Fig. 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 4.

    Activity of AICP in the presence of high and low concentrations of glycine. (A) Representative two-electrode voltage-clamp recordings of responses at human GluN1/2B and GluN1/2C receptors to increasing concentrations of AICP in the continuous presence of 0.6 µM glycine plus 100 µM glutamate. White bars above the recordings indicate responses to 0.6 µM glycine in the absence of AICP. (B) Concentration–response data for AICP in the presence of 100 µM glutamate plus either 0.6 µM glycine (●) or 100 µM glycine (□) at human NMDA receptor subtypes (GluN1/2A–D). Data are normalized to the maximal response to glycine (100 µM) without AICP in the same recording. Data are mean ± S.D. from 4 to 10 oocytes. EC50 values and relative agonist efficacies (i.e., maximal responses relative to glycine) are listed in Supplemental Table 3.

  • Fig. 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 5.

    Relative agonist efficacy of AICP is controlled by residues in multiple receptor domains. (A) NMDA receptor structure (PDB ID 4PE5; Karakas and Furukawa, 2014) illustrating the subunit arrangement and the layered domain organization composed of the transmembrane domains (TMDs) and two extracellular layers formed by the agonist binding domains (ABDs) and the ATDs. Agonist binding sites for glycine in GluN1 and glutamate in GluN2 subunits as well as the known positions of homologous residues E790 in GluN2B and Q800 in GluN2C are highlighted. (B, C) Concentration–response data for (B) AICP and (C) DCS measured using two-electrode voltage-clamp recordings at rat wild-type and mutant GluN1/2B and GluN1/2C receptors. Data are mean ± S.D. from 8 to 18 oocytes. (D) Concentration–response data for AICP and DCS measured using two-electrode voltage-clamp recordings at rat GluN1/2A and GluN1/2C receptors and receptors with interchanged ATDs [GluN1/2A-(2C ATD) and GluN1/2C-(2A ATD)]. Data are mean ± S.D. from 6 to 29 oocytes. The EC50 values and relative agonist efficacies (i.e., maximal responses relative to glycine) are listed in Supplemental Table 4.

  • Fig. 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 6.

    Desensitization properties of NMDA receptors are not different for glycine and AICP responses. (A, B) Representative fast-application whole-cell patch-clamp of responses at rat GluN1/2B and GluN1/2C receptors to long exposures (2 seconds) with 100 µM glycine or 10 µM AICP in the continuous presence of 100 µM glutamate. The glycine (blue) and AICP (red) responses are shown on different time scales. (C) Scatterplot of rise times (10%–90%) of glycine and AICP responses from individual cells (D) Scatterplot of deactivation time constants (τdeactivation) of glycine and AICP responses from individual cells. (E) Scatterplot of the ratio between steady-state (SS) and peak amplitudes of glycine and AICP responses from individual cells. (F) Scatterplot of steady-state (SS) and peak amplitudes of AICP responses relative to the glycine response in the same cell. Mean ± S.D. is indicated in the scatterplots. N = 8 and N = 5 cells for GluN1/2B and GluN1/2C, respectively. *Statistically significantly different from the response to glycine at the same receptor subtype (P < 0.05, unpaired two-tailed t test). Values are listed in Table 2.

  • Fig. 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 7.

    AICP enhances responses from GluN1/2C receptors in the presence of physiologically relevant concentrations of glycine. (A) Representative two-electrode voltage-clamp recordings of responses at rat GluN1/2B and GluN1/2C receptors to increasing concentrations of AICP in the continuous presence of 10 µM glycine plus 300 µM glutamate. (B) Concentration–response data for AICP in the presence of 10 µM glycine plus 300 µM glutamate at rat GluN1/2A–D. Data are mean ± S.D. from six oocytes for each subtype. (C) Representative two-electrode voltage-clamp recordings of responses at rat GluN1/2B and GluN1/2C receptors to increasing concentrations of DCS in the continuous presence of 10 µM glycine plus 300 µM glutamate. (D) Concentration–response data for DCS in the presence of 10 µM glycine plus 300 µM glutamate at rat GluN1/2A–D. Data are mean ± S.D. from six to seven oocytes. (E, F) Representative two-electrode voltage-clamp recordings of responses at rat GluN1/2B and GluN1/2C receptors to (E) 1 µM glycine or (F) 10 µM glycine plus 300 µM glutamate with and without 1 µM AICP. Bar graphs of responses from rat GluN1/2A-D receptors to 1 µM AICP in the presence of either (E) 1 µM glycine or (F) 10 µM glycine plus 300 µM glutamate normalized to the response to 100 µM glycine plus 300 µM glutamate in the same recording. The responses are measured using two-electrode voltage-clamp electrophysiology and data are mean ± S.D. from 4 oocytes for each condition. *Statistically significantly different from the response in the absence of AICP at the same receptor subtype (P < 0.05, paired two-tailed t test).

Tables

  • Figures
  • Additional Files
    • View popup
    TABLE 1

    Concentration–response data for glycine site agonists at NMDA receptor subtypes

    Concentration–response data for glycine site agonists at recombinant human and rat NMDA receptor subtypes measured using two-electrode voltage-clamp electrophysiology in the presence of 100–300 µM glutamate.

    Receptor SubtypeGlycine Site AgonistsReceptor SpeciesEC50 (µM)pEC50 ± S.E.M.Rel. Imax (%)nHN
    GluN1/2A
     AICPHuman0.0667.18 ± 0.02100 ± 21.315
    Rat0.0367.49 ± 0.0592 ± 21.329
     GlycineHuman1.25.91 ± 0.01100 ± 11.76
     d-SerineHuman1.85.75 ± 0.0299 ± 11.85
     DCSHuman22.04.65 ± 0.0290 ± 21.36
    Rat18.04.75 ± 0.0191 ± 11.613
    GluN1/2B
     AICPHuman0.0257.60 ± 0.1910 ± 10.79
    Rat0.0147.86 ± 0.039 ± 01.114
     GlycineHuman0.586.24 ± 0.02101 ± 12.26
     d-SerineHuman0.986.01 ± 0.0597 ± 21.25
     DCSHuman7.35.14 ± 0.0663 ± 21.14
    Rat8.35.08 ± 0.0161 ± 01.412
    GluN1/2C
     AICPHuman0.00178.77 ± 0.04353 ± 60.916
    Rat0.00109.04 ± 0.03339 ± 101.017
     GlycineHuman0.336.48 ± 0.03103 ± 11.75
     d-SerineHuman0.476.33 ± 0.03106 ± 11.65
     DCSHuman4.45.36 ± 0.05151 ± 51.34
    Rat2.85.55 ± 0.01197 ± 21.518
    GluN1/2D
     AICPHuman0.0257.61 ± 0.0327 ± 11.414
    Rat0.0317.51 ± 0.0226 ± 11.511
     GlycineHuman0.146.84 ± 0.04100 ± 21.65
     d-SerineHuman0.356.46 ± 0.03101 ± 12.05
     DCSHuman3.15.51 ± 0.0676 ± 31.56
    Rat3.25.50 ± 0.0197 ± 01.66
    • N, number of oocytes; nH, Hill coefficient; (Rel.) Imax, fitted maximal response relative to the maximal response to glycine.

    • View popup
    TABLE 2

    Time course of macroscopic NMDA receptor responses to glycine and AICP

    Data are from whole-cell patch-clamp recordings of rat GluN1/2B and GluN1/2C receptors expressed in HEK-293 cells. Here, 100 µM glycine or 10 µM AICP were applied using rapid solution exchange in the continuous presence of 100 µM glutamate (see Materials and Methods). Steady-state (SS) and peak responses were normalized to the glycine response from the same cell. The deactivation time course was described using mono-exponential fits, and the time constant is listed (τdeactivation). N is the number of cells, and the values are mean ± S.E.M.

    ResponseGluN1/2BGluN1/2C
    GlycineAICPGlycineAICP
    Rise time (10%–90%, ms)16 ± 274 ± 126.2 ± 0.646 ± 2
    SS/peak amplitude89 ± 181 ± 3100 ± 197 ± 1
    Peak amplitude (% of glycine)1008.1 ± 1.1100388 ± 18
    SS amplitude (% of glycine)1007.4 ± 1.0100376 ± 18
    τdeactivatiom (s)0.820 ± 0.03322.6 ± 4.20.662 ± 0.02184.3 ± 22.0
    N8855

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Data Supplement

    • Supplemental Tables -

      Supplemental Table 1. Influence of glutamate concentrations on AICP concentration-response data at rat

      NMDA receptor subtypes.

      Supplemental Table 2. Concentration-response data for AICP and DCS at wild type and mutant rat

      GluN1/2A and GluN1/2C receptors.

      Supplemental Table 3. Concentration-response data for AICP at human NMDA receptor subtypes in the

      presence of glycine.

      Supplemental Table 4. Concentration-response data for AICP and DCS at mutant and chimeric

      GluN1/2A, GluN1/2B, and GluN1/2C receptors.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Molecular Pharmacology: 92 (2)
Molecular Pharmacology
Vol. 92, Issue 2
1 Aug 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Editorial Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Molecular Pharmacology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Identification of AICP as a GluN2C-Selective N-Methyl-d-Aspartate Receptor Superagonist at the GluN1 Glycine Site
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Molecular Pharmacology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Molecular Pharmacology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Research ArticleArticle

AICP Is a GluN2C-Selective NMDA Receptor Superagonist

Maja Jessen, Kristen Frederiksen, Feng Yi, Rasmus P. Clausen, Kasper B. Hansen, Hans Bräuner-Osborne, Paul Kilburn and Anders Damholt
Molecular Pharmacology August 1, 2017, 92 (2) 151-161; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1124/mol.117.108944

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Research ArticleArticle

AICP Is a GluN2C-Selective NMDA Receptor Superagonist

Maja Jessen, Kristen Frederiksen, Feng Yi, Rasmus P. Clausen, Kasper B. Hansen, Hans Bräuner-Osborne, Paul Kilburn and Anders Damholt
Molecular Pharmacology August 1, 2017, 92 (2) 151-161; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1124/mol.117.108944
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Authorship Contributions
    • Footnotes
    • Abbreviations
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF + SI
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Cysteine151 in Keap1 Drives CDDO-Me Pharmacodynamic Action
  • Allosteric Modulation of Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor 1
  • Mechanism of Selective Action of Paraherquamide A
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

Advertisement
  • Home
  • Alerts
Facebook   Twitter   LinkedIn   RSS

Navigate

  • Current Issue
  • Fast Forward by date
  • Fast Forward by section
  • Latest Articles
  • Archive
  • Search for Articles
  • Feedback
  • ASPET

More Information

  • About Molecular Pharmacology
  • Editorial Board
  • Instructions to Authors
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Customized Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions
  • Terms & Conditions of Use

ASPET's Other Journals

  • Drug Metabolism and Disposition
  • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
  • Pharmacological Reviews
  • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
ISSN 1521-0111 (Online)

Copyright © 2023 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics