Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Fast Forward
    • Latest Articles
    • Archive
  • Information
    • Instructions to Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • FAQs
    • For Subscribers
    • Terms & Conditions of Use
    • Permissions
  • Editorial Board
  • Alerts
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Virtual Issues
  • Feedback
  • Other Publications
    • Drug Metabolism and Disposition
    • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
    • Molecular Pharmacology
    • Pharmacological Reviews
    • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
    • ASPET

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Molecular Pharmacology
  • Other Publications
    • Drug Metabolism and Disposition
    • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
    • Molecular Pharmacology
    • Pharmacological Reviews
    • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
    • ASPET
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Molecular Pharmacology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Fast Forward
    • Latest Articles
    • Archive
  • Information
    • Instructions to Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • FAQs
    • For Subscribers
    • Terms & Conditions of Use
    • Permissions
  • Editorial Board
  • Alerts
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Virtual Issues
  • Feedback
  • Visit molpharm on Facebook
  • Follow molpharm on Twitter
  • Follow molpharm on LinkedIn
Research ArticleArticle

Slowly Signaling G Protein–Biased CB2 Cannabinoid Receptor Agonist LY2828360 Suppresses Neuropathic Pain with Sustained Efficacy and Attenuates Morphine Tolerance and Dependence

Xiaoyan Lin, Amey S. Dhopeshwarkar, Megan Huibregtse, Ken Mackie and Andrea G. Hohmann
Molecular Pharmacology February 2018, 93 (2) 49-62; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1124/mol.117.109355
Xiaoyan Lin
Psychological and Brain Sciences (X.L., A.S.D., M.H., K.M., A.G.H.), Program in Neuroscience (K.M., A.G.H.), and Gill Center for Biomolecular Science (K.M., A.G.H.), Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Amey S. Dhopeshwarkar
Psychological and Brain Sciences (X.L., A.S.D., M.H., K.M., A.G.H.), Program in Neuroscience (K.M., A.G.H.), and Gill Center for Biomolecular Science (K.M., A.G.H.), Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Megan Huibregtse
Psychological and Brain Sciences (X.L., A.S.D., M.H., K.M., A.G.H.), Program in Neuroscience (K.M., A.G.H.), and Gill Center for Biomolecular Science (K.M., A.G.H.), Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ken Mackie
Psychological and Brain Sciences (X.L., A.S.D., M.H., K.M., A.G.H.), Program in Neuroscience (K.M., A.G.H.), and Gill Center for Biomolecular Science (K.M., A.G.H.), Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrea G. Hohmann
Psychological and Brain Sciences (X.L., A.S.D., M.H., K.M., A.G.H.), Program in Neuroscience (K.M., A.G.H.), and Gill Center for Biomolecular Science (K.M., A.G.H.), Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF + SI
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Additional Files
  • Fig. 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1.

    Chemical structure of CB2 receptor agonist LY2828360, drawn by ChemBioDraw Ultra (version 14.0).

  • Fig. 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2.

    LY2828360 displays a delayed signaling profile at mouse CB2 receptors. (A) In CHO cells stably expressing mCB2 receptors, CP55940 recruited arrestin in a concentration-dependent manner, whereas LY2828360 failed to do so after 90-minute drug incubation. (B) In HEK cells stably transfected with mCB2, CP55940 concentration dependently internalized the mCB2; LY2828360 was less potent and efficacious. (C) In a forskolin-stimulated cAMP time course assay, CP55940 (1 µM) was efficacious and rapid in inhibiting forskolin-stimulated cAMP accumulation at 5 minutes, whereas LY2828360 (1 µM) was efficacious only after 30 minutes. (D) After PTX treatment, CP55940 (1 µM) modestly increased cAMP accumulation at 5 minutes, whereas LY2828360 (1 µM) failed to affect cyclase levels at all time points examined/tested. (E) CP55940 was potent and efficacious in inhibiting forskolin-stimulated cAMP accumulation at 5 minutes, whereas LY2828360 failed to affect cAMP levels at this time point. (F) After 30-minute incubation, however, LY2828360 concentration dependently inhibited forskolin-stimulated cAMP accumulation, and this inhibition was completely blocked by 1 µM SR144528(SR2). Forskolin-stimulated cAMP assays were performed in duplicate. All other assays were performed in triplicate. All data were plotted and analyzed using GraphPad Prism 4.

  • Fig. 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 3.

    LY282360 displays a delayed CB2 receptor– and G protein–dependent signaling profile in activating pERK1/2. (A) In HEK cells stably expressing mouse CB2 receptors, CP55940 (1 µM) increased phosphorylated ERK1/2 at 5-, 10-, 30-, and 40-minute time points, whereas LY2828360 (1 µM) had no effect at 5- and 10-minute time points but increased ERK1/2 phosphorylation at 20, 30, and 40 minutes. (B) PTX treatment abolished the 20-minute phosphorylation of ERK1/2 by LY2828360 (1 µM) and abolished the CP55940-mediated phosphorylation of ERK1/2 at the 5-minute time point, but it was retained at the 40-minute time point after PTX treatment. (C) CP55940 concentration dependently increased ERK1/2 phosphorylation at 5 minutes, whereas LY2828360 failed to affect pERK1/2 levels at this time point. (D) Conversely, after 20 minutes of treatment, CP55940 decreased ERK1/2 phosphorylation, whereas LY2828360 increased ERK1/2 phosphorylation, in a concentration- dependent manner. Both effects were blocked by the CB2 receptor antagonist SR144528 (1 µM) (SR2). All pERK1/2 assays were performed in triplicate. All the experimental data were plotted and analyzed using GraphPad Prism 4.

  • Fig. 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 4.

    Paclitaxel produced hypersensitivities to mechanical (A) and cold (B) stimulation. Nonchemotherapy control mice received cremophor-based vehicle in lieu of paclitaxel. Dose response of LY2828360, administered systemically (i.p.), on the maintenance of (C) mechanical and (D) cold allodynia in paclitaxel-treated WT (C57BL/6J) mice. The time course of LY2828360, administered systemically (3 mg/kg i.p.), on the maintenance of (E) mechanical and (F) cold allodynia in paclitaxel-treated WT mice. Data are expressed as mean ± S.E.M. (n = 6/group). *P < 0.05 vs. control, one-way analysis of variance at each time point, followed by Bonferroni’s post hoc test. #P < 0.05 vs. baseline before paclitaxel, repeated measures analysis of variance. &P < 0.05 vs. baseline after paclitaxel, repeated measures analysis of variance. BL, pre-paclitaxel baseline; Pac, baseline after paclitaxel.

  • Fig. 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 5.

    History of chronic LY2828360 treatment blocked the development of morphine tolerance in WT but not in CB2KO mice. (A) The testing scheme used to evaluate the two phases of treatment during the maintenance of neuropathic pain. History of chronic LY2828360 (3 mg/kg per day i.p. × 12 days in phase 1) treatment suppressed paclitaxel-induced (B) mechanical (C) cold allodynia in WT mice. History of chronic LY2828360 (3 mg/kg per day i.p. × 12 days in phase 1) blocked the development of tolerance to the antiallodynic effects of morphine (10 mg/kg per day × 12 days in phase 2) in WT but not in CB2KO mice for both mechanical (D) and cold (E) modalities. Data are expressed as mean ± S.E.M. (n = 6/group). *P < 0.05 versus Veh (1)-Veh (2), one-way analysis of variance at each time point, followed by Bonferroni’s post hoc test. #P < 0.05 vs. baseline before paclitaxel, repeated measures analysis of variance.

  • Fig. 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 6.

    Chronic LY2828360 treatment showed sustained antiallodynic efficacy in morphine-tolerant WT mice but not in CB2KO mice. (A) Testing scheme used to evaluate the two phases of treatment during the maintenance of neuropathic pain. Chronic LY2828360 (3 mg/kg per day i.p. × 12 days in phase 2) treatment suppressed paclitaxel-induced mechanical (B and D) and cold (C and E) allodynia in WT mice but not in CB2KO mice previously rendered tolerant to morphine (10 mg/kg per day i.p. × 12 days in phase 1). Data are expressed as mean ± S.E.M. (n = 6/group). Veh (1)-Veh (2) group is replotted from Fig. 5. *P < 0.05 vs. Veh (1)-Veh (2), one-way analysis of variance at each time point, followed by Bonferroni’s post hoc test. #P < 0.05 vs. baseline before paclitaxel, repeated measures analysis of variance.

  • Fig. 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 7.

    Chronic coadministration of low-dose LY2828360 (0.1 mg/kg per day i.p. × 12 days) with morphine (10 mg/kg per day i.p. × 12 days) blocked development of morphine tolerance in WT but not in CB2KO mice tested for both (A) mechanical and (B) cold allodynia. Data are expressed as mean ± S.E.M. (n = 6/group). *P < 0.05 vs. WT-Veh, one-way analysis of variance at each time point, followed by Bonferroni’s post hoc test. #P < 0.05 vs. baseline before paclitaxel, repeated measures analysis of variance.

  • Fig. 8.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 8.

    Impact of LY2828360 treatment on naloxone-precipitated opioid withdrawal in CB2 KO and WT mice. Naloxone (5 mg/kg i.p.) precipitates jumping in WT (A) and CB2KO (B) mice receiving morphine (10 mg/kg per day i.p. × 12 days) during phase 2 of chronic dosing. (C) A trend (P = 0.064) toward lower numbers of naloxone-precipitated jumps was observed in WT compared with CB2KO mice with similar histories of LY2828360 (3 mg/kg per day × 10 days during phase 1), followed by morphine (10 mg/kg per day i.p. × 12 days during phase 2) treatment. (D) Naloxone-precipitated (5 mg/kg i.p.) jumping trended lower in WT mice (P = 0.055) receiving coadministration of LY2828360 (0.1 mg/kg per day i.p. × 12 days) with morphine (10 mg/kg per day i.p. × 12 days) compared with CB2KO mice with the same histories of drug treatment. Naloxone did not precipitate jumping behavior in the absence of morphine. (E) Changes in body weight were greater at 2 hours compared with 0.5 hour after naloxone challenge. Data are expressed as mean ± S.E.M. (n = 6–8/group) *P < 0.05 vs. Veh (I)-Veh (II), one-way analysis of variance followed by Bonferroni’s post hoc test or one tailed t test as appreciate.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Additional Files
    • View popup
    TABLE 1 

    Potencies and efficacies of CP55940 and LY2828360 in arrestin, internalization, cyclase, and pERK1/2 assays at mouse CB2 receptors

    Duration of drug incubation is expressed in minutes. All assays were performed in triplicates except cAMP accumulation assays, which were performed in duplicate. EC50, 95% confidence intervals (CI), and the maximal effect (Emax) (mean ± S.E.M.) were obtained by plotting and analyzing the data using GraphPad Prism 4.

    CP55940LY2828360
    Drug Incubation EC5095% CIEmax ± S.E.M.EC50 95% CIEmax (%)±S.E.M.
    Arrestinmin
90nM
2.30.4–12.2%
125±1.6nM
NDND%
97.9±1.5
    internalization907.41.1–19.349.1±1.230.71.4–626.519.1±2.4
    Cyclase056.61.7–12.252.8±3.6NDND18.9±5.8
    30————13.610.4–45.353.4±1.9
    pERK1/20510.52.2–17.9136.2±4.1NDND4.1±2.5
    201.50.1–3.720.3±3.4339128.8–345.843.6±2.3
    • ND, Not determined or cannot be determined.

    • View popup
    TABLE 2 

    Potencies and efficacies of CP55940 and LY2828360 in internalization, cyclase, and pERK1/2 assays at human CB2 receptors

    Duration of drug incubation is expressed in minutes. cAMP accumulation assays were performed in duplicate. All other assays were performed in triplicate. EC50, 95% confidence intervals (CI), and the maximal effect (Emax, mean ± S.E.M.) were obtained by plotting and analyzing the data using GraphPad Prism 4.

    CP55940LY2828360
    Drug IncubationEC5095% CIEmax± S.E.M.EC5095% CIEmax±S.E.M.
    Internalizationmin
90nM
30.3–15.6%
33.9±4.6nM
NDND%
10.2±7.1
    Cyclase0512.32.9–18.359.6±8.3NDNDNDND
    35————16.74.6–59.642.8±2.7
    pERK1/2053.770.4–12.795.7±9.1NDND22.1±5.8
    3023.310.1–53.949.4±1.633.59.1–107.132.3±1.9
    • ND, Not determined or cannot be determined.

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Data Supplement

    • Supplemental Data -

      Supplemental Figure 1 - LY2828360 displays a delayed signaling profile at human CB2 receptors

      Supplemental Figure 2 - LY2828360 failed to affect IP1 levels through either mouse or human CB2 receptors

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Molecular Pharmacology: 93 (2)
Molecular Pharmacology
Vol. 93, Issue 2
1 Feb 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Editorial Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Molecular Pharmacology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Slowly Signaling G Protein–Biased CB2 Cannabinoid Receptor Agonist LY2828360 Suppresses Neuropathic Pain with Sustained Efficacy and Attenuates Morphine Tolerance and Dependence
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Molecular Pharmacology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Molecular Pharmacology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Research ArticleArticle

Role of CB2 in Morphine Tolerance and Dependence

Xiaoyan Lin, Amey S. Dhopeshwarkar, Megan Huibregtse, Ken Mackie and Andrea G. Hohmann
Molecular Pharmacology February 1, 2018, 93 (2) 49-62; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1124/mol.117.109355

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Research ArticleArticle

Role of CB2 in Morphine Tolerance and Dependence

Xiaoyan Lin, Amey S. Dhopeshwarkar, Megan Huibregtse, Ken Mackie and Andrea G. Hohmann
Molecular Pharmacology February 1, 2018, 93 (2) 49-62; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1124/mol.117.109355
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Authorship Contributions
    • Footnotes
    • Abbreviations
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF + SI
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • GABAAR Molecular Identity in Oligodendrocytes
  • Editing TOP2α Intron-19 5′ SS Circumvents Drug Resistance
  • SerpinA3N and drug induced liver injury
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

  • Home
  • Alerts
Facebook   Twitter   LinkedIn   RSS

Navigate

  • Current Issue
  • Fast Forward by date
  • Fast Forward by section
  • Latest Articles
  • Archive
  • Search for Articles
  • Feedback
  • ASPET

More Information

  • About Molecular Pharmacology
  • Editorial Board
  • Instructions to Authors
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Customized Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions
  • Terms & Conditions of Use

ASPET's Other Journals

  • Drug Metabolism and Disposition
  • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
  • Pharmacological Reviews
  • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
ISSN 1521-0111 (Online)

Copyright © 2021 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics