Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Fast Forward
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Sections
    • Archive
  • Information
    • Instructions to Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • FAQs
    • For Subscribers
    • Terms & Conditions of Use
    • Permissions
  • Editorial Board
  • Alerts
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Virtual Issues
  • Feedback
  • Submit
  • Other Publications
    • Drug Metabolism and Disposition
    • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
    • Molecular Pharmacology
    • Pharmacological Reviews
    • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
    • ASPET

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Molecular Pharmacology
  • Other Publications
    • Drug Metabolism and Disposition
    • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
    • Molecular Pharmacology
    • Pharmacological Reviews
    • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
    • ASPET
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Molecular Pharmacology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Fast Forward
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Sections
    • Archive
  • Information
    • Instructions to Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • FAQs
    • For Subscribers
    • Terms & Conditions of Use
    • Permissions
  • Editorial Board
  • Alerts
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Virtual Issues
  • Feedback
  • Submit
  • Visit molpharm on Facebook
  • Follow molpharm on Twitter
  • Follow molpharm on LinkedIn
Research ArticleArticle

Protective Effect of a Locked Retinal Chromophore Analog against Light-Induced Retinal Degeneration

Songqi Gao, Tanu Parmar, Grazyna Palczewska, Zhiqian Dong, Marcin Golczak, Krzysztof Palczewski and Beata Jastrzebska
Molecular Pharmacology October 2018, 94 (4) 1132-1144; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1124/mol.118.112581
Songqi Gao
Department of Pharmacology, School of Medicine (S.G., T.P., M.G., K.P., B.J.) and Cleveland Center for Membrane and Structural Biology (M.G., K.P., B.J.), Case Western Reserve University, and Polgenix Inc., Department of Medical Devices (G.P., Z.D.), Cleveland, Ohio
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tanu Parmar
Department of Pharmacology, School of Medicine (S.G., T.P., M.G., K.P., B.J.) and Cleveland Center for Membrane and Structural Biology (M.G., K.P., B.J.), Case Western Reserve University, and Polgenix Inc., Department of Medical Devices (G.P., Z.D.), Cleveland, Ohio
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Grazyna Palczewska
Department of Pharmacology, School of Medicine (S.G., T.P., M.G., K.P., B.J.) and Cleveland Center for Membrane and Structural Biology (M.G., K.P., B.J.), Case Western Reserve University, and Polgenix Inc., Department of Medical Devices (G.P., Z.D.), Cleveland, Ohio
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Zhiqian Dong
Department of Pharmacology, School of Medicine (S.G., T.P., M.G., K.P., B.J.) and Cleveland Center for Membrane and Structural Biology (M.G., K.P., B.J.), Case Western Reserve University, and Polgenix Inc., Department of Medical Devices (G.P., Z.D.), Cleveland, Ohio
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marcin Golczak
Department of Pharmacology, School of Medicine (S.G., T.P., M.G., K.P., B.J.) and Cleveland Center for Membrane and Structural Biology (M.G., K.P., B.J.), Case Western Reserve University, and Polgenix Inc., Department of Medical Devices (G.P., Z.D.), Cleveland, Ohio
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Krzysztof Palczewski
Department of Pharmacology, School of Medicine (S.G., T.P., M.G., K.P., B.J.) and Cleveland Center for Membrane and Structural Biology (M.G., K.P., B.J.), Case Western Reserve University, and Polgenix Inc., Department of Medical Devices (G.P., Z.D.), Cleveland, Ohio
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Beata Jastrzebska
Department of Pharmacology, School of Medicine (S.G., T.P., M.G., K.P., B.J.) and Cleveland Center for Membrane and Structural Biology (M.G., K.P., B.J.), Case Western Reserve University, and Polgenix Inc., Department of Medical Devices (G.P., Z.D.), Cleveland, Ohio
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Fig. 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1.

    Protective effect of 11-cis-6mr-retinal against bright-light–induced retinal degeneration in Abca4−/−Rdh8−/− mice. (A) Scheme of mouse treatment. 11-cis-6mr-retinal or DMSO vehicle was administered to 4–6-week-old Abca4−/−Rdh8−/− or WT BALB/c mice by intraperitoneal injection 30 minutes before exposure to bright light (10,000 lux) for 30 minutes for Abca4−/−Rdh8−/− mice and 12,000 lux for 60 minutes for WT BALB/c mice. Then, mice were kept in the dark for 7–14 days before examination. The morphology of the retina was assessed by OCT and SLO in vivo imaging, as well as by H&E staining and immunohistochemistry. Retinal function was assessed by ERG. TPM imaging was used to determine abnormalities in photoreceptor cells on the 4th day after treatment. (B) Representative OCT images obtained 7 days after treatment of mice with 11-cis-6mr-retinal (20 mg/kg b.wt.) 30 minutes before exposure to white light at 10,000 lux for 30 minutes. After light illumination, mice were kept in the dark until morphologic examination. INL, inner nuclear layer. Asterisk indicates severely disrupted photoreceptor structures in DMSO-treated control mice. (C) Quantification of the ONL thickness obtained in 10 mice per treatment group. Error bars indicate standard deviations. Changes in the ONL thickness observed after treatment with 11-cis-6mr-retinal compared with DMSO-treated group were statistically significant (P < 0.001); no significant difference in the ONL thickness was observed between animals unexposed to light and those treated with 11-cis-6mr-retinal (P = NS). Statistical significance was calculated with the one-way analysis of variance and post hoc Student’s t test, unpaired two-tailed. (D) Representative SLO images show AF spots in the retina of a mouse exposed to light after pretreatment with DMSO (center). Mice unexposed to bright light (left) or exposed to bright light after pretreatment with 11-cis-6mr-retinal (right) exhibited much fewer spots. (E) Quantification of AF spots performed in 10 mice per treatment group. Error bars indicate standard deviation. Changes in the number of AF spots after treatment with 11-cis-6mr-retinal compared with the DMSO-treated group were statistically significant (P < 0.001). No significant difference was observed between animals unexposed to light and those exposed to light after treatment with 11-cis-6mr-retinal (P = NS). Statistical significance was calculated with one-way ANOVA and post hoc, the Student’s t test, unpaired two-tailed. (F) Examination of retinal morphology after staining with H&E in paraffin sections prepared from eyes collected from Abca4−/−Rdh8−/− mice either unexposed to light or exposed to bright light after the indicated treatments. Asterisk indicates severely disrupted photoreceptor structures in DMSO-treated control mice. (G) Examination of retinal morphology by immunohistochemistry in cryosections prepared from the eyes collected from Abca4−/−Rdh8−/− mice either unexposed to light or exposed to bright light after the indicated treatments. Sections were stained with an anti-rhodopsin C terminus specific antibody (red), which indicates the structural organization of rod photoreceptors; PNA staining (green), which indicates the health of cone photoreceptors; and DAPI staining of nuclei (blue). Asterisk indicates severely disrupted photoreceptor structures in DMSO-treated control mice. Scale bar, 50 µm.

  • Fig. 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2.

    Treatment with 11-cis-6mr-retinal protects photoreceptor cells from light-induced degeneration. Abca4−/−Rdh8−/− albino mice on a C57B6/J and 129SV background were treated with 11-cis-6mr-retinal (20 mg/kg b.wt.) or DMSO vehicle 30 minutes before bright-light exposure for 60 minutes and then kept in the dark. On day 3 after light exposure, TPM imaging was performed in intact mouse eyes immediately after enucleation to quantify enlarged photoreceptors and assess the effect of 11-cis-6mr-retinal. (A) Three-dimensional views of the photoreceptor-RPE interface. Enlarged photoreceptors are visible as fluorescent pillars with a diameter >2 µm (the diameter of unaffected photoreceptors was ∼1.2 µm). The center of the RPE layer was set at z = 0 µm, and the section through the photoreceptor cell layer is shown 10 µm below. (B) Representative, large-field images of the retina and RPE are shown. The RPE is visible at the edges of the images as the curvature of the intact eyeball brings it in focus. (C) Quantification of the enlarged photoreceptors. The number of enlarged photoreceptors caused by illumination with bright light was significantly decreased (P = 0.02) in mice treated with 11-cis-6mr-retinal before light exposure. Error bars represent S.D. Statistical significance was calculated with the Student’s t test, unpaired two-tailed.

  • Fig. 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 3.

    Effect of 11-cis-6mr-retinal pretreatment on visual function in Abca4−/−Rdh8−/− mice exposed to bright light. (A) Single-flash ERG responses to increasing light intensity obtained under dark conditions in mice either unexposed to light or exposed to bright light after treatment with either DMSO or 11-cis-6mr-retinal at a dose of 20 mg/kg b.wt. (B) ERG responses compared between treatment groups revealed significant protective effects in 11-cis-6mr-retinal-treated mice before acute light illumination as compared with DMSO-treated mice in both scotopic a- and b-waves and in photopic b-waves (C). ERG measurements were carried out in 10 mice per group.

  • Fig. 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 4.

    11-cis-6mr-retinal prevents bright light-induced retinal degeneration in WT mice. BALB/c mice were injected intraperitoneally with 11-cis-6mr-retinal (20 mg/kg b.wt.) 30 minutes before exposure to white light at 12,000 lux for 1 hour and then kept in the dark for 7 days before examination of retinal morphology and function. (A) Representative OCT images show substantial protection of the ONL in mice pretreated with 11-cis-6mr-retinal compared with DMSO-treated control mice. Asterisk indicates severely disrupted photoreceptor structures in DMSO-treated control mice. Scale bar, 50 µm. (B) Quantification of the ONL thickness in mice unexposed to light or in mice treated with either DMSO vehicle or 11-cis-6mr-retinal before exposure to bright light in five mice per each treatment group. Error bars indicate standard deviation. Statistical significance was calculated with one-way ANOVA and post hoc Student’s t test, unpaired two-tailed. (C) Representative SLO images show AF spots in the retina of mice unexposed to light or exposed to bright light after pretreatment either with DMSO vehicle or 11-cis-6mr-retinal. Scale bar, 50 µm. (D) Quantification of AF spots in five mice per treatment group. Error bars indicate standard deviations. Changes in the number of AF spots after treatment with 11-cis-6mr-retinal compared with DMSO-treated group were statistically significant (P < 0.001). No significant difference was observed between mice unexposed to light and those treated with 11-cis-6mr-retinal (P = NS). Statistical significance was calculated with one-way ANOVA and post hoc Student’s t test, unpaired two-tailed. (E) Examination of gross retinal morphology after H&E staining of paraffin sections from eyes collected from WT mice either unexposed to light or exposed to bright light after indicated treatments. Asterisk indicates severely disrupted photoreceptor structures in DMSO-treated control mice. Scale bar, 50 µm. (F) Examination of retinal morphology by IHC in cryosections prepared from eyes of BALB/c mice either unexposed to light or exposed to bright light after indicated treatments. Sections were stained with an anti-rhodopsin C terminus specific antibody (red) that indicates the structural organization of rod photoreceptors. PNA staining (green) denotes the health of cone photoreceptors, and DAPI staining (blue) reveals the nuclei. Asterisk indicates severely disrupted photoreceptor structures in DMSO-treated control mice. Scale bar, 50 µm. (G) Visual function determined by ERG responses. ERG recordings revealed significant protective effects in 11-cis-6mr-retinal-treated mice before acute-light illumination as compared with DMSO-treated mice in both scotopic a- and b-waves and in photopic b-waves. ERG measurements were carried out in five mice per group.

  • Fig. 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 5.

    Effect of 11-cis-6mr-retinal on the retinoid cycle. WT C57BL/6J mice were injected intraperitoneally with DMSO vehicle, 11-cis-6mr-retinal at a dose of 20 mg/kg b.wt., or retinylamine [a potent inhibitor of the visual cycle (Golczak et al., 2005)] at a dose of 4 mg/kg b.wt., 30 minutes before illumination with white light at 2000 lux for 5 minutes. Scotopic ERG responses were recorded immediately after exposure to light and every 5 minutes thereafter for a total of 60 minutes. Increasing amplitudes of both a-waves (A) and b-waves (B) after light illumination in mice treated either with DMSO or 11-cis-6mr-retinal were noted but were much slower in mice treated with retinylamine. Five mice per group were used for these ERG measurements. Error bars represent standard deviation.

  • Fig. 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 6.

    Effect of 11-cis-6mr-retinal on photoreceptor generation of ROS in Abca4−/−Rdh8−/− mice exposed to bright light. (A) Dark-adapted Abca4−/−Rdh8−/− mice were injected intraperitoneally with the ROS probe DHE 1 day after illumination with 10,000 lux white light for 30 minutes. These mice were treated with either DMSO or 11-cis-6mr-retinal (20 mg/kg b.wt.) 30 minutes before light exposure. Mice unexposed to bright light also were treated with the DHE probe. Eyes were harvested 1 hour later, fixed, and processed for cryosectioning. The ROS signal detected on sections from different experimental groups, was obtained with a fluorescence microscope. DAPI staining was used to visualize nuclei and the retinal layers. Scale bar, 50 µm. (B) Quantification of fluorescence intensity in arbitrary units obtained from various regions of the photoreceptor cell layers (mean ± standard deviation). Changes in fluorescence intensity observed in the photoreceptor layers after treatment with 11-cis-6mr-retinal compared with the DMSO-treated group were statistically significant (P < 0.001). No significant difference was observed between mice unexposed to light and those treated with 11-cis-6mr-retinal (P = NS). Statistical significance was calculated with the one-way ANOVA and post hoc Student’s t test, unpaired two-tailed.

  • Fig. 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 7.

    Detection of 11-cis-6mr-retinal-bound pigment in mouse eyes. 11-cis-6mr-retinal (20 mg/kg b.wt.) was administered to Abca4−/−Rdh8−/− or WT mice 30 minute before their exposure to bright light for 30 minutes. After illumination, mice were kept in the dark. This procedure was repeated three times. On the 4th day (24 hours after the third treatment), eyes were harvested, and pigment was purified by 1D4 anti-rhodopsin immunoaffinity chromatography. Additionally, Lrat−/− mice were injected intraperitoneally with 11-cis-6mr-retinal for three consecutive days, and 24 hours after the last injection, eyes were collected and used for pigment purification. UV-visible spectra of the rhodopsin or rhodopsin/11-cis-6mr-retinal-bound opsin mixture purified from Abca4−/−Rdh8−/− mice (A), WT mice (B), or Lrat−/− mice (C) that were either untreated (black spectrum) or treated with 11-cis-6mr-retinal (green spectrum), left panel. Difference spectra were obtained by subtracting the UV-visible spectrum of the light-illuminated sample from the spectrum recorded in the dark; right panel.

  • Fig. 8.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 8.

    Detection and quantification of 11-cis-6mr-retinal (20 mg/kg b.wt.) in mouse eyes. (A) Elution profiles for 11-cis-6mr-retinal oximes (solid line) and d5-all-trans-retinal oximes (dashed line). Chromatograms represent ion intensities for m/z = 312.3 [M + H]+ and m/z = 305.3 [M + H]+, respectively. The MS spectrum averaged between 12 and 13 minutes of elution indicates ions corresponding to the oximes of endogenous retinal (a) (m/z = 300.3 [M+H]+), d5-all-trans-retinal (b), and 11-cis-6mr-retinal (c). Fragmentation patterns for 11-cis-6mr-retinal oximes and d5-all-trans-retinal oximes are shown in (B) and (C), respectively. Characteristic fragmentation profiles for these compounds were used to design the selected reaction monitoring-based detection and quantification method. (D), Dose-dependent accumulation of 11-cis-6mr-retinal retinal in mouse eyes of Abca4−/−Rdh8−/−. The observed accumulation of 11-cis-6mr-retinal in mouse eyes was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Statistical significance was calculated with the Student’s t test, unpaired two-tailed.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    TABLE 1

    Dose-dependent effect of 11-cis-6mr-retinal on retinal health in Abca4−/−Rdh8−/−mice

    The thickness of the ONL and the number of AF spots were evaluated in OCT or SLO images, respectively, obtained from Abca4−/−Rdh8−/− mouse eyes under different treatments. Mice were kept in the dark, treated with DMSO, or with different doses (4, 8, 12, or 20 mg/kg) of 11-cis-6mr-retinal 30 minutes before bright-light illumination. Morphologic changes induced by bright light were largely prevented by pretreatment with 11-cis-6mr-retinal at 20 mg/kg; the ONL thickness and AF spot counts closely resembled those of mice not exposed to bright light. Partial protection was achieved with 11-cis-6mr-retinal at 12 mg/kg. Statistical significance was calculated with the Student’s t test, unpaired two-tailed for two-group comparison, and one-way ANOVA test (SigmaPlot 11.0 software) for multiple group comparison.

    TreatmentOCT ONL Thickness Statistical Significance (P)SLO AF, Spot CountsStatistical Significance (P)
    µmP valueSpot countsP value
    No light58 ± 3NA4 ± 2NA
    DMSO4 ± 2NA1200 ± 100NA
    11-cis-6mr-retinal (4 mg/kg b.wt.)5 ± 3NS1100 ± 200NS
    11-cis-6mr-retinal (8 mg/kg b.wt.)15 ± 10<0.051000 ± 200<0.05
    11-cis-6mr-retinal (12 mg/kg b.wt.)27 ± 18<0.001400 ± 100<0.001
    11-cis-6mr-retinal (20 mg/kg b.wt.)58 ± 3<0.0014 ± 3<0.001
    • AF, autofluorescence; ANOVA, analysis of variance; DMSO, dimethylsulfoxide; NA, not applicable; NS, not statistically significant; OCT, optical coherence tomography; ONL, outer nuclear layer; SLO, scanning laser ophthalmoscopy.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Molecular Pharmacology: 94 (4)
Molecular Pharmacology
Vol. 94, Issue 4
1 Oct 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Editorial Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Molecular Pharmacology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Protective Effect of a Locked Retinal Chromophore Analog against Light-Induced Retinal Degeneration
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Molecular Pharmacology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Molecular Pharmacology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Research ArticleArticle

Therapeutic Effects of 11-cis-6-Membered Ring-Retinal

Songqi Gao, Tanu Parmar, Grazyna Palczewska, Zhiqian Dong, Marcin Golczak, Krzysztof Palczewski and Beata Jastrzebska
Molecular Pharmacology October 1, 2018, 94 (4) 1132-1144; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1124/mol.118.112581

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Research ArticleArticle

Therapeutic Effects of 11-cis-6-Membered Ring-Retinal

Songqi Gao, Tanu Parmar, Grazyna Palczewska, Zhiqian Dong, Marcin Golczak, Krzysztof Palczewski and Beata Jastrzebska
Molecular Pharmacology October 1, 2018, 94 (4) 1132-1144; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1124/mol.118.112581
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Authorship Contributions
    • Footnotes
    • Abbreviations
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Hexahydroquinoline derivatives activate ADGRG1/GPR56
  • Action of Org 34167 on HCN channels
  • The effects of echinocystic acid on Kv7 channels
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

Advertisement
  • Home
  • Alerts
Facebook   Twitter   LinkedIn   RSS

Navigate

  • Current Issue
  • Fast Forward by date
  • Fast Forward by section
  • Latest Articles
  • Archive
  • Search for Articles
  • Feedback
  • ASPET

More Information

  • About Molecular Pharmacology
  • Editorial Board
  • Instructions to Authors
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Customized Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions
  • Terms & Conditions of Use

ASPET's Other Journals

  • Drug Metabolism and Disposition
  • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
  • Pharmacological Reviews
  • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
ISSN 1521-0111 (Online)

Copyright © 2023 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics