Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Fast Forward
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Sections
    • Archive
  • Information
    • Instructions to Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • FAQs
    • For Subscribers
    • Terms & Conditions of Use
    • Permissions
  • Editorial Board
  • Alerts
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Virtual Issues
  • Feedback
  • Submit
  • Other Publications
    • Drug Metabolism and Disposition
    • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
    • Molecular Pharmacology
    • Pharmacological Reviews
    • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
    • ASPET

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Molecular Pharmacology
  • Other Publications
    • Drug Metabolism and Disposition
    • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
    • Molecular Pharmacology
    • Pharmacological Reviews
    • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
    • ASPET
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Molecular Pharmacology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Fast Forward
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Sections
    • Archive
  • Information
    • Instructions to Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • FAQs
    • For Subscribers
    • Terms & Conditions of Use
    • Permissions
  • Editorial Board
  • Alerts
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Virtual Issues
  • Feedback
  • Submit
  • Visit molpharm on Facebook
  • Follow molpharm on Twitter
  • Follow molpharm on LinkedIn
Research ArticleArticle

Why does the Inner-Helix Mutation A413C Double the Stoichiometry of Kv1.3 Channel Block by Emopamil but not by Verapamil?

Alexei Rossokhin, Tobias Dreker, Stephen Grissmer and Boris S Zhorov
Molecular Pharmacology January 10, 2011, mol.110.068031; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1124/mol.110.068031
Alexei Rossokhin
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tobias Dreker
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stephen Grissmer
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Boris S Zhorov
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

hKv1.3 channels in lymphocytes are targets for chemotherapy of autoimmune diseases. Phenylalkylamines block Kv1.3 channels by poorly understood mechanisms. In the inactivation-reduced mutant H399T, the second mutation A413C in S6 substantially decreases potency of phenylalkylamines with a para-methoxy group at the phenylethylamine end, whereas potency of phenylalkylamines lacking this group is less affected. Intriguingly, completely demethoxylated emopamil blocks mutant H399T/A413C with a 2:1 stoichiometry. Here we generated a triple mutant H399T/C412A/A413C and found that its emopamil-binding properties are similar to those of the double mutant. These data rule out disulfide bonding Cys412-Cys413, which would substantially deform the inner-helix, suggest a clash of Cys413 with the para-methoxy group, and provide a distance constraint to dock phenylalkylamines in a Kv1.2-based homology model. Monte Carlo-minimizations predict that the verapamil ammonium group donates an H-bond to the backbone carbonyl of Thr391 at the P-loop turn, the pentanenitrilephenyl moiety occludes the pore, while the phenylethylamine meta- and para-methoxy substituents approach, respectively, the sidechains of Met390 and Ala413. In the double-mutant model, the Cys413 sidechains accept H-bonds from two emopamil molecules whose phenyl rings fit in the hydrophobic inter-subunit interfaces, while the pentanenitrilephenyl moieties occlude the pore. Since these interfaces are unattractive for a methoxylated phenyl ring, the ammonium group of respective phenylalkylamines cannot approach the Cys413 sidechain and binds at the focus of P-helices, while the para-methoxy group clashes with Cys413. Our study proposes an atomistic mechanism of Kv1.3 block by phenylalkylamines and highlights the intra- and inter-subunit interfaces as ligand-binding loci.

  • Structure-activity relationships and modeling
  • Mutagenesis/Chimeric approaches
  • Receptor binding studies
  • Received August 5, 2010.
  • Revision received January 7, 2011.
  • Accepted January 10, 2011.
  • The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
Next
Back to top

In this issue

Molecular Pharmacology: 103 (6)
Molecular Pharmacology
Vol. 103, Issue 6
1 Jun 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Editorial Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Molecular Pharmacology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Why does the Inner-Helix Mutation A413C Double the Stoichiometry of Kv1.3 Channel Block by Emopamil but not by Verapamil?
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Molecular Pharmacology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Molecular Pharmacology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Research ArticleArticle

Why does the Inner-Helix Mutation A413C Double the Stoichiometry of Kv1.3 Channel Block by Emopamil but not by Verapamil?

Alexei Rossokhin, Tobias Dreker, Stephen Grissmer and Boris S Zhorov
Molecular Pharmacology January 10, 2011, mol.110.068031; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1124/mol.110.068031

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Research ArticleArticle

Why does the Inner-Helix Mutation A413C Double the Stoichiometry of Kv1.3 Channel Block by Emopamil but not by Verapamil?

Alexei Rossokhin, Tobias Dreker, Stephen Grissmer and Boris S Zhorov
Molecular Pharmacology January 10, 2011, mol.110.068031; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1124/mol.110.068031
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Cysteine151 in Keap1 Drives CDDO-Me Pharmacodynamic Action
  • Allosteric Modulation of Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor 1
  • Mechanism of Selective Action of Paraherquamide A
Show more Article

Similar Articles

Advertisement
  • Home
  • Alerts
Facebook   Twitter   LinkedIn   RSS

Navigate

  • Current Issue
  • Fast Forward by date
  • Fast Forward by section
  • Latest Articles
  • Archive
  • Search for Articles
  • Feedback
  • ASPET

More Information

  • About Molecular Pharmacology
  • Editorial Board
  • Instructions to Authors
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Customized Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions
  • Terms & Conditions of Use

ASPET's Other Journals

  • Drug Metabolism and Disposition
  • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
  • Pharmacological Reviews
  • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
ISSN 1521-0111 (Online)

Copyright © 2023 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics