PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Christina B. Falk-Petersen AU - Frederik Rostrup AU - Rebekka Löffler AU - Stine Buchleithner AU - Kasper Harpsøe AU - David E. Gloriam AU - Bente Frølund AU - Petrine Wellendorph TI - Molecular Determinants Underlying Delta Selective Compound 2 Activity at <em>δ</em>-Containing GABA<sub>A</sub> Receptors AID - 10.1124/molpharm.121.000266 DP - 2021 Jul 01 TA - Molecular Pharmacology PG - 46--56 VI - 100 IP - 1 4099 - http://molpharm.aspetjournals.org/content/100/1/46.short 4100 - http://molpharm.aspetjournals.org/content/100/1/46.full SO - Mol Pharmacol2021 Jul 01; 100 AB - Delta selective compound 2 (DS2; 4-chloro-N-[2-(2-thienyl)imidazo[1,2-a]pyridin-3-yl]benzamide) is one of the most widely used tools to study selective actions mediated by δ-subunit–containing GABAA receptors. DS2 was discovered over 10 years ago, but despite great efforts, the precise molecular site of action has remained elusive. Using a combination of computational modeling, site-directed mutagenesis, and cell-based pharmacological assays, we probed three potential binding sites for DS2 and analogs at α4β1δ receptors: an α4(+)δ(−) interface site in the extracellular domain (ECD), equivalent to the diazepam binding site in αβγ2 receptors, and two sites in the transmembrane domain (TMD) - one in the α4(+)β1(−) and one in the α4(−)β1(+) interface, with the α4(−)β1(+) site corresponding to the binding site for etomidate and a recently disclosed low-affinity binding site for diazepam. We show that mutations in the ECD site did not abrogate DS2 modulation. However, mutations in the TMD α4(+)β1(−) interface, either α4(S303L) of the α4(+) side or β1(I289Q) of the β1(−) side, convincingly disrupted the positive allosteric modulation by DS2. This was consistently demonstrated both in an assay measuring membrane potential changes and by whole-cell patch-clamp electrophysiology and rationalized by docking studies. Importantly, general sensitivity to modulators was not compromised in the mutated receptors. This study sheds important light on the long-sought molecular recognition site for DS2, refutes the misconception that the selectivity of DS2 for δ-containing receptors is caused by a direct interaction with the δ-subunit, and instead points toward a functional selectivity of DS2 and its analogs via a surprisingly well conserved binding pocket in the TMD.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT δ-Containing GABAA receptors represent potential drug targets for the treatment of several neurological conditions with aberrant tonic inhibition, yet no drugs are currently in clinical use. With the identification of the molecular determinants responsible for positive modulation by the known compound delta selective compound 2, the ground is laid for design of ligands that selectively target δ-containing GABAA receptor subtypes, for better understanding of tonic inhibition, and ultimately, for rational development of novel drugs.