Kinetic constants determined from the concentration dependence of MDZ oxidation by CYP3A4 wild-type and mutants.
1′-OH | 4-OH | Ratio | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Vmax | KM | Vmax/KM | Vmax | KM | Vmax/KM | Vmax/KM(1′OH)/Vmax/KM(4-OH) | |
min−1 | μM | μM/min | min−1 | μM | μM/min | ||
WT | 8.9 (0.3) | 3.7 (0.9) | 2.4 | 10.9 (0.3) | 64.0 (4.0) | 0.17 | 14 |
S119Aa | 12.7 (0.6) | 27.3 (4.5) | 0.46 | 40.0 (2.2) | 114.1 (12.8) | 0.35 | 1.3 |
I120Wb 1-c | 23.5 (0.7) | 1.9 (0.6) | 12.1 | 8.5 (0.3) | 93.7 (8.0) | 0.09 | 134 |
L210Aa | 20.5 (0.9) | 22.3 (3.4) | 0.92 | 28.6 (0.7) | 42.0 (3.1) | 0.68 | 1.4 |
F304Aa | 12.6 (0.6) | 12.9 (2.6) | 0.98 | 23.9 (1.3) | 65.3 (8.8) | 0.37 | 2.7 |
F304Wb 1-c | 17.5 (0.4) | 2.4 (0.5) | 7.2 | 6.9 (1.0) | 87.8 (28.3) | 0.08 | 92 |
T309F | 2.7 (0.1) | 3.3 (0.9) | 0.83 | – | |||
I369W | 4.1 (0.4) | 89.0 (21.3) | 0.05 | – | |||
L373F1-d | 5.8 (0.3) | 36.4 (6.6) | 0.16 | 17.3 (0.7) | 154.6 (12.1) | 0.11 | 1.4 |
L479Fa | 16.2 (0.7) | 9.3 (2.1) | 1.75 | 7.0 (0.9) | 83.9 (23.6) | 0.08 | 21 |
The values in parentheses show the average deviation obtained from the fit of the Michaelis-Menton equation to a single kinetic data set. The experiments were done multiple times (n = 2–4) using multiple protein preparations without significant change in the ratio ofV max/K M(1′-OH)/V max/K M(4-OH).
a,b Due to very high rate of metabolite formation with some of the mutants, the incubations were done using 5 (a) and 3 (b) pmol of the enzyme in these cases.
↵1-c The reaction kinetics of 1′-OH MDZ formation by I120W and F304W possibly showed a small extent of inhibition at higher substrate concentrations (see Fig. 4) as reported for wild-type CYP3A4 (Gorski et al., 1994; Ghosal et al., 1996; Perloff et al., 2000). A reanalysis of the reaction kinetics by a model incorporating Michaelis-Menton kinetics with uncompetitive substrate inhibition showed no significant change in the K M and V maxvalues (shown by dotted lines in Fig. 4) compared with those determined using the Michaelis-Menton equation. The K inbdetermined from these fits showed very large standard deviations and is therefore not reported.
↵1-d Eiselt et al. (2001).