TABLE 2

Comparison of efficacies between C2, C4, C5, C9, and C15 conjugates to inhibit BC cell viability and migration

Each value represents the mean ± S.D. of maximum inhibitory effect of each drug conjugate represented as the percentage of vehicle for viability and the percentage of baseline for migration assays.

Cell TypeC2C4C5C9C15
MCF-7
 Viability66 ± 2 abcde29 ± 7 abcde10 ± 0.3 ab65 ± 2 abcde86 ± 2.4 acde
 Migration20 ± 11 ab10 ± 15 ab2 ± 2 a19 ± 11 ab−13 ± 5 d
MMC
 Viability79 ± 6 a57 ± 22 ab65 ± 7 ab79 ± 9 a97 ± 11 cde
 Migration44 ± 34 abcde7 ± 40 a1 ± 2.3 a39 ± 39 abe−32 ± 5
MDA-MB-231
 Viability63 ± 1.4 abd98 ± 22 ce75 ± 1.7 ad68 ± 2 abd104 ± 6.7 ce
 Migration33 ± 13 ab30 ± 36 ab10 ± 7 ab35 ± 10 abcde−43 ± 27 acde
BT-549
 Viability80 ± 16 abce66 ± 4 ab67 ± 6 ab88 ± 27 cde93 ± 7 acde
 Migration42 ± 12 abcd20 ± 4 a0 ± 056 ± 29 abcde−61 ± 14 abcde
  • Values were derived from three to nine individual curves fit by nonlinear regression analysis. Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by the Newman–Keuls post hoc t test where significance was defined as P < 0.05. Letters denote significance between groups as follows: a, P < 0.05 vs. vehicle; b, P < 0.05 vs. C2; c, P < 0.05 vs. C4; d, P < 0.05 vs. C5; e, P < 0.05 vs. C9.