TABLE 3

Comparison of potencies between C2, C4, C5, C9, and C15 conjugates and controls to inhibit BC cell viability and migration

Each value represents the mean ± S.D. of potency (IC50) values generated from three to nine individual curves fit by nonlinear regression analysis.

Cell Typen per GroupMelatoninTamoxifen4-OH- TamoxifenMelatonin + TamoxifenMelatonin + 4-OH-TamoxifenC2C4C5C9C15
MCF-7
 Viability418 ± 18 nM12 ± 20 mM34 ± 41 mM328 ± 222 µM17 ± 29 mM69 ± 81 mM4 ± 4.31 nM440 ± 331 mM107 ± 17 mM abcde34 ± 15 µM
 Migration4309 ± 164 nM138 ± 117 µM13 ± 13 mM11 ± 0.1 nM131 ± 18 mM abc100 ± 156 µM e9 ± 11 mM e4 ± 3.3 µM e218 ± 48 mM abce1 ± 2 µM e
MMC
 Viability4427 ± 479 nM3 ± 3.1 µM4 ± 1.5 µM3 ± 2 µM7 ± 2.3 µM a13 ± 8 µM abcde243 ± 331 nM e6 ± 1.6 µM6 ± 2.8 µM333 ± 333 mM
 Migration4231 ± 392 nM21 ± 23 µM3 ± 3.6 µM31 ± 40 µM68 ± 33 µM ac221 ± 65 mM abcde5 ± 8 mM227 ± 200 nM e206 ± 25.7 µM abcde110 ± 149 nM
MDA-MB-231
 Viability452 ± 89 nM58 ± 67 mM26 ± 30 µM419 ± 354 mM69 ± 106 nM246 ± 178 µM37 ± 34 nM12 ± 11 µM d145 ± 70 mM477 ± 674 pM
 Migration4123 ± 239 µM30 ± 35 mM91 ± 84 µM229 ± 232 mM5 ± 3 µM559 ± 131 mM abcde11 ± 19 mM d3 ± 3 µM269 ± 119 µM173 ± 157 mM
BT-549
 Viability3504 ± 0.1 nM781 ± 7 mM30 ± 0.9 µM11 ± 19 mM24 ± 11 µM a24 ± 8 µM b6 ± 2 µM b24 ± 31 µM b34 ± 34 µM b2 ± 3 µM b
 Migration44 ± 6 µM11 ± 18 µM3 ± 3 µM24 ± 7 µM116 ± 93 µM579 ± 308 mM abcde9 ± 9 µM51 ± 62 µM328 ± 340 mM18 ± 23 nM
  • Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by the Newman–Keuls post hoc t test where significance was defined as P < 0.05. Letters denote significance between groups as follows: a, P < 0.05 vs. melatonin; b, P < 0.05 vs. tamoxifen; c, P < 0.05 vs. 4-OH- tamoxifen; d, P < 0.05 vs. melatonin + tamoxifen; and e, P < 0.05 vs. melatonin + 4-OH- tamoxifen.