Abstract
After providing a brief overview of the basics of fluorescence and FRET, this chapter discusses the most commonly used methods to record FRET. Emphasis is on microscopy methods that are widely used for biosensor imaging. We cover choice of instruments, describe various ways to detect FRET based on intensity as well as on donor lifetime, and provide some guidelines to match particular recording methods with specific scientific experiments. We end with an extensive discussion on further practical considerations that may greatly affect the success of the experiments.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
van der Krogt GN, Ogink J, Ponsioen B, Jalink K (2008) A comparison of donor–acceptor pairs for genetically encoded FRET sensors: application to the Epac cAMP sensor as an example. PLoS One 3:e1916
Steyer JA, Almers W (2001) A real-time view of life within 100 nm of the plasma membrane. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2:268–276
Nakano A (2002) Spinning-disk confocal microscopy – a cutting-edge tool for imaging of membrane traffic. Cell Struct Funct 27:349–355
Gadella Jr TWJ (ed) (2009) FRET and FLIM techniques. Lab Techn Biochem Mol Biol 33: 1–534, Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Jares-Erijman EA, Jovin TM (2003) FRET imaging. Nat Biotechnol 21:1387–1395
Pietraszewska-Bogiel A, Gadella TW (2011) FRET microscopy: from principle to routine technology in cell biology. J Microsc 241:111–118
van Rheenen J, Langeslag M, Jalink K (2004) Correcting confocal acquisition to optimize imaging of fluorescence resonance energy transfer by sensitized emission. Biophys J 86:2517–2529
Verveer PJ, Wouters FS, Reynolds AR, Bastiaens PI (2000) Quantitative imaging of lateral ErbB1 receptor signal propagation in the plasma membrane. Science 290:1567–1570
Goedhart J et al (2012) Structure-guided evolution of cyan fluorescent proteins towards a quantum yield of 93%. Nat Commun 3:751
Ponsioen B et al (2004) Detecting cAMP-induced Epac activation by fluorescence resonance energy transfer: Epac as a novel cAMP indicator. EMBO Rep 5:1176–1180
Palmer AE, Giacomello M, Kortemme T, Hires SA, Lev-Ram V, Baker D, Tsien RY (2006) Ca2+ indicators based on computationally redesigned calmodulin-peptide pairs. Chem Biol 13:521–530
Goedhart J, Vermeer JE, Adjobo-Hermans MJ, van Weeren L, Gadella TW Jr (2007) Sensitive detection of p65 homodimers using red-shifted and fluorescent protein-based FRET couples. PLoS One 2:e1011
Lee SJ, Escobedo-Lozoya Y, Szatmari EM, Yasuda R (2009) Activation of CaMKII in single dendritic spines during long-term potentiation. Nature 458:299–304
Waters JC (2009) Accuracy and precision in quantitative fluorescence microscopy. J Cell Biol 185:1135–1148
Kardash E, Bandemer J, Raz E (2011) Imaging protein activity in live embryos using fluorescence resonance energy transfer biosensors. Nat Protoc 6:1835–1846
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Goedhart, J., Hink, M.A., Jalink, K. (2014). An Introduction to Fluorescence Imaging Techniques Geared Towards Biosensor Applications. In: Zhang, J., Ni, Q., Newman, R. (eds) Fluorescent Protein-Based Biosensors. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 1071. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-62703-622-1_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-62703-622-1_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana Press, Totowa, NJ
Print ISBN: 978-1-62703-621-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-62703-622-1
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols