Skip to main content
Log in

Isolation and partial characterization of three methotrexate-resistant phenotypes from Chinese hamster ovary cells

  • Published:
Somatic Cell Genetics

Abstract

Three mechanisms for resistance to methotrexate (Mtx) have been identified in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells selected for resistance to this drug. First-step selections produce cells with either an apparent structural alteration in the enzyme dihydrofolate reductase (class I), or a decreased permeability to the drug (class II). Mutagenesis with ethyl methanesulfonate increases the proportion of Mix-resistant cells 5–10-fold. Second-step selections to higher resistance using class I resistant cells as parents results in cells with an increased activity of the reductase enzyme (class III) with no apparent further qualitative alterations in the enzyme. All three classes of resistant cells retain their Mix-resistant phenotype when cultured under nonselectivve conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature cited

  1. Albrecht, A., Biedler, J. L., and Hutchison, D. J. (1972).Cancer Res. 32:1539–1546.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Nakamura, H., and Littlefield, J. W. (1972).J. Biol. Chem. 247:179–187.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Littlefield, J. W. (1969).Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 62:88–95.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fischer, G. A. (1961).Biochem. Pharmacol. 7:75–80.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hakala, M. J., Zakrzewski, S. F., and Nichol, C. A. (1961).J. Biol. Chem. 236:952–958.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Fischer, G. A. (1962).Biochem. Pharmacol. 11:1233–1237.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sirotnak, F. M., Kurita, S., and Hutchison, D. J. (1968).Cancer Res. 28:75–80.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Harrap, K. R., Hill, B. T., Furness, M. E., and Hart, L. J. (1971).Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 186:312–324.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hänggi, U. J., and Littlefield, J. W. (1976). Submitted.

  10. Hänggi, U. J., and Littlefield, J. W. (1974).J. Biol. Chem. 249:1390–1397.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Thompson, L. H., and Baker, R. M. (1973). InMethods in Cell Biology, Vol. 6, (ed.) Prescott, D. M. (Academic Press, New York) pp. 209–281.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Stanners, C. P., Elicieri, G. L., and Green, H. (1971).Nature (London), New Biol. 230:52–54.

    Google Scholar 

  13. McBurney, M. W., and Whitmore, G. F. (1974).Cell 2:173–182.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Seeger, D. R., Cosulich, D. B., Smith, J. M., Jr., and Hultguist, M. E. (1949).J. Am. Chem. Soc. 71:1753–1758.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Blakley, R. L. (1969).The Biochemistry of Folic Acid and Related Pteridines (Amsterdam, North Holland Publishing Company) pp. 92–94.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mathews, C. K., and Huennekens, F. M. (1963).J. Biol. Chem. 238:3436–3442.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hillcoat, B. L., and Blakley, R. L. (1966).J. Biol. Chem. 241:2995–3001.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lowry, O. H., Rosebrough, N. J., Farr, A. L., and Randall, R. J. (1951).J. Biol. Chem. 193:265–275.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Blakley, R. L. (1969).The Biochemistry of Folic Acid and Related Pteridines (Amsterdam, North Holland Publishing Company) pp. 157–161.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sirotnak, F. M., and Donsbach, R. C. (1972).Cancer Res. 32:2120–2126.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Goldman, I. D. (1973). InDrug Resistance and Selectivity, (ed.) Mihrich, E. (Academic Press, New York) pp 336–343.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Goldman, I. D. (1969).J. Biol. Chem. 244:3779–3785.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Divekar, A. Y., Vaidya, N. R., and Braganca, B. M. (1967).Biochim. Biophys. Acta 135:927–936.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Baker, R. M., Brunette, D. M., Mankovitz, R., Thompson, L. H., Whitmore, G. F., Siminovitch, L., and Till, J. E. (1974).Cell 1:9–21.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Mankovitz, R., Buchwald, M., and Baker, R. M. (1974).Cell 3:221–226.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Chan, V. L., Whitmore, G. F., and Siminovitch, L. (1972).Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 69:3119–3123.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Somers, D. G., Pearson, M. L., and Ingles, C. J. (1975).J. Biol. Chem. 250:4825–4831.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Lobban, P., Siminovitch, L., and Ingles, C. J. (1976).Cell 8:65–70.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Beaudet, A. L., Roufa, D. J., and Caskey, C. T. (1973).Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 70:320–324.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Sharp, J. D., Capecchi, N. E., and Capecchi, M. R. (1973).Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 70:3145–3149.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Capecchi, M. R., Capecchi, N. E., Hughes, S. H., and Wahl, G. (1974).Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 71:4732–4736.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Wahl, G. M., Hughes, S. H., and Capecchi, M. R. (1975).J. Cell Physiol. 85:307–320.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Sirotnak, F. M., and Donsbach, R. C. (1973).Cancer Res. 33:1290–1294.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Sirotnak, F. M., and Donsbach, R. C. (1975).Cancer Res. 35:1737–1744.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Orkin, S. H., and Littlefield, J. W. (1971).Exp. Cell Res. 69:174–180.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Chang, S. E., and Littlefield, J. W. (1976).Cell 7:391–396.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Paigen, K., Swank, R. T., Tomino, S., and Ganschow, R. D. (1975).J. Cell Physiol. 85:379–392.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Flintoff, W.F., Davidson, S.V. & Siminovitch, L. Isolation and partial characterization of three methotrexate-resistant phenotypes from Chinese hamster ovary cells. Somat Cell Mol Genet 2, 245–261 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01538963

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01538963

Keywords

Navigation