Elsevier

Brain Research

Volume 207, Issue 1, 23 February 1981, Pages 109-127
Brain Research

The excitatory action of acetylcholine on hippocampal neurones of the guinea pig and rat maintained in vitro

https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-8993(81)90682-XGet rights and content

Abstract

In preliminary experiments on 39 identified pyramidal cells in the in vitro slice preparation of the guinea-pig hippocampus the depolarization evoked by acetylcholine (ACh) applied by microiontophoresis was always associated with an increase in membrane resistance. In 9 slices cut from the rat hippocampus similar results were obtained from 24 cells.

In a more detailed analysis on 13 cells from the rat hippocampus, whose mean resting potential was — 74 mV and mean resting input resistance 33 Mω, the mean peak depolarization evoked by ACh was 11.6 mV and the mean increase in membrane resistance 12 Mω. The reversal potential for the excitatory action of ACh was 29 mV more hyperpolarizing than the resting membrane potential. The depolarization evoked by ACh was linearly related to the corresponding increase in membrane before and after the application of ACh. This was true throughout each of the individual applications of ACh and of the peak response evoked by each of the 13 applications. The constancy of this relationship is compatible with the usual model used to describe synaptic events thought to be mediated by the closure of ionic channels which are open in the absence of the transmitter. The onset of the response to ACh was always approximately 4 times slower than that evoked by a near equipotent microiontophoretic application of glutamate from an adjacent barrel of the same multibarrelled micropipette. Following the application of ACh, recovery was also slow and, on average, was approximately 10 times longer than that following a near equipotent application of glutamate. It is suggested that the slow onset and offset of the responses evoked by ACh are not compatible with models based on diffusion and are best explained by postulating a sequential generation of one or more intermediates.

References (70)

  • RinzelJ. et al.

    Transient response in a dendritic neuron model for current injection at one branch

    Biophys. J.

    (1974)
  • RommelspacherH. et al.

    Effects of electrical stimulation on acetylcholine levels in central cholinergic nerve terminals

    Brain Research

    (1974)
  • SchwartzkroinP.A.

    Characteristic of CA1 neurones recorded intracellularly in the hippocampal in vitro slice preparation

    Brain Research

    (1975)
  • SkredeK.K.R. et al.

    The transverse hippocampal slice: a well defined cortical structure maintained in vitro

    Brain Research

    (1971)
  • SmithC.M.

    Acetylcholine release from the cholinergic septo-hippocampal pathway

    Life Sci.

    (1974)
  • WoodyC.D. et al.

    Effects of acetylcholine and cyclic GMP on input resistance of cortical neurones in awake cats

    Brain Research

    (1978)
  • ZieglgänsbergerW. et al.

    The mechanism of inhibition of neuronal activity by opiates in the spinal cord of cat

    Brain Research

    (1976)
  • ZieglgänsbergerW. et al.

    Cat spinal motoneurones exhibit topographic sensitivity to glutamate and glycine

    Brain Research

    (1979)
  • ZieglgänsbergerW. et al.

    A cholinergic mechanism in the spinal cord of cats

    Neuropharmacology

    (1974)
  • AdamsP.R. et al.

    Actions of γ-aminobutyric acid on sympathetic ganglion cells

    J. Physiol. (Lond.)

    (1975)
  • BaylorD.A. et al.

    Receptive fields of cones in the retina of the turtle

    J. Physiol. (Lond.)

    (1971)
  • BiscoeT.J. et al.

    Micro-electrophoretic studies of neurones in the cat hippocampus

    J. Physiol. (Lond.)

    (1966)
  • BlackmanJ.G. et al.

    On the time course of the electrical response of salivary gland cells ofNauphoeta cinerea to iontophoretically applied dopamine

    J. Physiol. (Lond.)

    (1979)
  • BoltonT.B.

    Rate of offset of action of slow-acting muscarinic antagonists is fast

    Nature (Lond.)

    (1972)
  • BoltonT.B.

    On the latency and form of the membrane response of smooth muscle to the ioontophoretic application of acetylcholine or carbachol

  • BrownD.A. et al.

    Muscarinic suppression of a novel voltage-sensitive K+ current in a vertebrate neurone

    Nature (Lond.)

    (1980)
  • BrownD.A. et al.

    Depolarization of neurones in the isolated olfactory cortex of the guinea pig by γ-aminobutyric acid

    Brit. J. Pharmacol.

    (1979)
  • ClarkR. et al.

    A stereotaxic animal frame with stepping motor-driven micromanipulator

    J. Physiol. (Lond.)

    (1975)
  • DingledineR. et al.

    Intracellular recording from pyramidal neurones in the in vitro transverse hippocampal slice

    J. Physiol. (Lond.)

    (1977)
  • DingledineR. et al.

    ACh-evoked excitation of cortical neurones

    J. Physiol. (Lond.)

    (1977)
  • DoddJ. et al.

    Intracellular recording from CA3 pyramidal neurones of hippocampal slices and the action of iontophoretic acetylcholine

  • DreifussJ.-J. et al.

    Cortical inhibition and γ-aminobutyric acid

    Exp. Brain Res.

    (1969)
  • DudarJ.D.

    Glutamic acid sensitivity of hippocampal pyramidal cell dendrites

    Acta physiol. scand.

    (1972)
  • EngbergI. et al.

    dl-Homocysteate-induced motoneurone depolarization with membrane conductance decrease

    Brit. J. Pharmacol.

    (1975)
  • EngbergI. et al.

    The action of N-methyl-d-aspartic and kainic acids on motoneurones with emphasis on conductance changes

    Brit. J. Pharmacol.

    (1978)
  • Cited by (150)

    • Modeling and simulation of organophosphate-induced neurotoxicity: Prediction and validation by experimental studies

      2016, NeuroToxicology
      Citation Excerpt :

      A major difference between glutamatergic and GABAergic synapses is that glutamatergic synapses are located on dendritic spines, whereas GABAergic synapses are located directly on dendritic shafts of pyramidal neurons. A number of pharmacological studies showed that ACh facilitates CA1 pyramidal cell discharges by blocking two distinct families of potassium channels, calcium-dependent potassium channels (SK, MK and BK) and the potassium channel responsible for the M current (KCNQ) that is functionally associated with the muscarinic ACh receptor type M1 (Biscoe and Straughan 1966; Benardo and Prince 1981; Dodd et al., 1981; Benardo et al., 1982; Halliwell and Adams, 1982; Krnjevic and Ropert 1982; Ropert and Krnjevic, 1982; Benardo and Prince, 1982a,b; Cole and Nicoll, 1983, 1984a,b; Muller and Misgeld, 1986). Calcium-dependent potassium channels are activated by increased intracellular calcium concentrations resulting from AP discharge and are responsible for the after-hyperpolarization (AHP) that follows AP production (Hotson and Prince, 1980; Alger and Nicoll, 1980a,b).

    • Acetylcholine, GABA and neuronal networks: A working hypothesis for compensations in the dystrophic brain

      2015, Brain Research Bulletin
      Citation Excerpt :

      It was shown that trains of stimuli delivered at 10–20 Hz, within the range at which putative septal cholinergic cells discharge during theta rhythm (Brazhnik and Fox, 1999), result in a robust recruitment of a mAChR-mediated synaptic response in interneurons and pyramidal neurons (Morton and Davies, 1997). mAChRs mediate excitement of pyramidal neurons by modulating ionic conductance directly and indirectly (Dodd et al., 1981; Cole and Nicoll, 1983; Halliwell, 1990). Activation of mAChRs was shown to have a double effect on GABAergic interneurons, directly increasing the frequency and amplitude of spontaneous inhibitory postsynaptic currents (IPSCs) while at the same time depressing monosynaptically evoked IPSCs and the frequency of mIPSCs (Behrends and ten Bruggencate, 1993).

    • A picoliter 'fountain-pen' using co-axial dual pipettes

      2003, Journal of Neuroscience Methods
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    *

    Present address: Dept. of Neurobiology, Harvard Medical School, 25 Shattuck Street, Boston, Mass. 02115, U.S.A.

    **

    Present address: Department of Pharmacology, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, North Carolina, N.C. 27514, U.S.A.

    View full text