Influence of the N-1 alkyl chain length of cannabimimetic indoles upon CB1 and CB2 receptor binding
Introduction
In the 35 years since the isolation and elucidation of the structure of Δ9-THC (Gaoni and Mechoulam, 1964) considerable effort has gone into modifying the structure of cannabinoids as well as in developing compounds structurally diverse from the classical tricyclic structures. Several nontraditional cannabinoids have been discovered, including a series of 3-arylcyclohexanols such as CP-55 940, analogues of the endogenous ligand anandamide, and various aminoalkylindole (AAI) compounds (D’Ambra et al., 1992, Melvin et al., 1995; for review see Martin et al., 1995, Khanolkar and Makriyannis, 1999). According to the three-point interaction receptor model (Fig. 1), the hydroxyl group at C-1, the lipophilic side chain at C-3 and the orientation of the C-9 substituent (Edery et al., 1971, Binder and Franke, 1982, Razdan, 1986, Thomas et al., 1991) are essential to the bioactivity of Δ9-THC. For purposes of aligning the prototypical AAI, WIN 55,212-2, and Δ9-THC in a common pharmacophore, it has been proposed that the corresponding overlapping regions of the two respective molecules are the naphthyl ring and the cyclohexene ring, the carbonyl oxygen and the phenolic hydroxyl, and the morpholine unit and the C-3 pentyl side chain as depicted in Fig. 1 (Huffman et al., 1994).
Although WIN 55,212-2, related AAIs and other indole-derived compounds bear no obvious structural similarities to traditional cannabinoids, they have been shown to bind to brain cannabinoid receptors (CB1). The AAIs have been shown to produce a profile of behavioral effects characteristic of those observed with Δ9-THC and other classical and bicyclic cannabinoids that include antinociception, ring immobility, suppression of spontaneous activity, and hypothermia in mice (Compton et al., 1992). These pharmacological effects of Δ9-THC and WIN 55,212-2 are blocked by the CB1 receptor antagonist, SR 141716A (Rinaldi-Carmona et al., 1994, Perio et al., 1996). Cannabimimetic indoles are also associated with potent activity at inhibiting electrically induced contractions of the mouse vas deferens (Pertwee et al., 1995). In autoradiographic studies, the distribution of AAI binding sites was similar to that reported for classically identified cannabinoid binding sites (Jansen et al., 1992).
The cDNA corresponding to the central (CB1) receptor was cloned, isolated, and identified as a member of the G-protein linked super family of receptors (Matsuda et al., 1990). In vitro labeling of sections of the adult human brain with [3H] CP-55 940, a high affinity ligand, followed by quantitative receptor autoradiography revealed a heterogenous distribution of cannabinoid receptors throughout the brain (Herkenham et al., 1990, Devane et al., 1992). The cloning and isolation of the CB2 receptor from cDNA of the human promyelocytic leukemic HL60 cells by Munro et al. (1993) was followed by the determination of the distribution of these receptors in the cells of the immune system. The protein product from this clone showed 44% amino acid identity to the human CB1 receptor with the degree of identity rising to 68% for the transmembrane regions thought to be involved in ligand specificity (Munro et al., 1993). Transfection of the cDNA expression vector into Chinese hamster ovary cells and consequent binding assays allows the determination of ligands which are selective for CB1 or CB2 receptors (Munro et al., 1993, Huffman et al., 1996, Showalter et al., 1996).
The discovery that cannabinoids exert their pharmacological actions via at least two types of receptors, along with the discovery of endogenous cannabinoid ligands, prompted the development of a new generation of cannabimimetic analogues for probing differences in the pharmacophore of these receptor subtypes. These analogues are essential in elucidating the physiological and pharmacological role of cannabinoid receptors as well as the different structural features necessary for binding to either the CB1 or the CB2 receptor. In previous studies, we demonstrated that elimination of the oxygen bridge and aminoalkyl groups in WIN 55,212-2 resulted in indoles that were equally effective as cannabinoid agonists (Huffman et al., 1994, Pertwee et al., 1995, Wiley et al., 1998). The objective of the present investigation was to characterize the consequences of selected structural alterations at key positions of indoles and to determine whether receptor subtype selectivity could be achieved.
Section snippets
Drugs
Δ9-THC was obtained from the National Institute on Drug Abuse. All indole-derived compounds were synthesized in the laboratory of Dr John Huffman (Clemson University, Clemson, SC). [3H] CP-55 940 was purchased from Dupont-NEN (Wilmington, DE).
Cell culture
Human CB2 cDNA was provided by Dr Sean Munro, (MRC Lab, Cambridge, UK). The human CB2 cDNA was expressed in chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells as previously described (Showalter et al., 1996). Briefly, transfected CB2 CHO cell lines were maintained in
Results
The first series of indoles differ from WIN 55,212-2 by the lack of a methyl group at C-2 and the substitution of the N-methylmorpholino by a N-alkyl side chains of varying length (Table 1). Binding to both receptors was very weak with N-alkyl side chain lengths of either one or two carbon atoms. Increasing the carbon chain length to a propyl (JWH-072) had little influence on CB1 binding but affinity at CB2 increased almost 15-fold. Optimal binding at the CB1 receptor was observed with butyl,
Discussion
Previously, in light of evidence the cannabinoid receptor in implicating the pharmacological activity and binding affinity of WIN 55,212-2, a structural comparison to Δ9-THC was undertaken (Huffman et al., 1994). The best fit alignment illustrated a three-point attachment for each compound with regions of Δ9-THC presumed to correspond with those on the indole structure, respectively: (a) the cyclohexene and naphthalene ring; (b) the phenolic hydroxyl and carbonyl group; and (c) the carbon side
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by NIDA grants DA 03590 and DA 03672 (to B.R.M.), and DA 05274 (to M.E.A.) and DA-03590 (to J.W.H.). The authors would also like to thank Michelle Phillips, Dr Julia A.H. Lainton and Dong Dai for the preparation of compounds described previously.
References (30)
A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding
Anal. Biochem.
(1976)- et al.
Design, synthesis, and pharmacology of cannabimimetic indoles
Biomed. Chem.
(1994) - et al.
Distribution of cannabinoid receptors in rat brain determined with aminoalkylindoles
Brain Res.
(1992) - et al.
Structure-activity relationships of anandamide, an endogenous cannabinoid ligand
Life Sci.
(1999) - et al.
Pharmacological characterization of three novel cannabinoid receptor agonists in the mouse isolated vas deferens
Eur. J. Pharmacol.
(1995) - et al.
SR 141716A, a potent and selective antagonist of the brain cannabinoid receptor
FEBS Lett.
(1994) - et al.
Is there a THC receptor?: current perspectives and approached to the elucidation of the molecular mechanism of action of the psychotropic constituents of cannabis sativa
- et al.
Relationship between the inhibition constant (Ki) and the concentration of inhibitor which causes 50% inhibition (IC50) in an enzymatic reaction
Biochem. Pharmacol.
(1973) - et al.
Aminoalkylindole analogues: cannabimimetic activity of a class of compounds structurally distinct from Δ9-THC
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.
(1992) - et al.
Cannabinoid structure-activity relationships: correlation of receptor binding and in vivo activities
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.
(1993)
Conformationally restrained analogues of pravadoline: nanomolar potent, enantioselective, (aminoalkyl)indole agonists of the cannabinoid receptor
J. Med. Chem.
Isolation and structure of a brain constituent that binds to the cannabinoid receptor
Science
Structural requirements for cannabinoid activity
Ann. NY Acad. Sci.
Aminoalkylindoles: structure-activity relationships of novel cannabinoid mimetics
J. Med. Chem.
Isolation, structure and partial synthesis of an active constituent of hashish
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
Cited by (228)
Pharmacological evaluation of new generation OXIZID synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonists
2024, European Journal of PharmacologySomatic and anxiety-like behaviors in male and female rats during withdrawal from the non-selective cannabinoid agonist WIN 55,212–2
2024, Pharmacology Biochemistry and BehaviorCannabinoids as multifaceted compounds
2023, PhytochemistryNew cannabinoid receptor type 1 and 2 agonists and applications to understanding the endocannabinoid system: A chemical approach
2023, Neurobiology and Physiology of the Endocannabinoid SystemSynthetic cannabinoid receptor agonists: An overview
2023, Neurobiology and Physiology of the Endocannabinoid System