Involvement of central cannabinoid CB2 receptor in reducing mechanical allodynia in a mouse model of neuropathic pain

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejphar.2008.01.010Get rights and content

Abstract

We sought to examine the involvement of central cannabinoid CB2 receptor activation in modulating mechanical allodynia in a mouse model of neuropathic pain. JWH133 was demonstrated to be a selective cannabinoid CB2 receptor agonist in mice, reducing forskolin-stimulated cAMP production in CHO cells expressing mouse cannabinoid CB2 and cannabinoid CB1 receptors with EC50 values of 63 nM and 2500 nM, respectively. Intrathecal administration of JWH133 (50 and 100 nmol/mouse) significantly reversed partial sciatic nerve ligation-induced mechanical allodynia in mice at 0.5 h after administration. In contrast, systemic (intraperitoneal) or local (injected to the dorsal surface of the hindpaw) administration of JWH133 (100 nmol/mouse) was ineffective. Furthermore, the analgesic effects of intrathecal JWH133 (100 nmol/mouse) were absent in cannabinoid CB2 receptor knockout mice. These results suggest that the activation of central, but not peripheral, cannabinoid CB2 receptors play an important role in reducing mechanical allodynia in a mouse model of neuropathic pain.

Introduction

Two cannabinoid receptors, cannabinoid CB1 and cannabinoid CB2 receptors, have been cloned and characterized (for review, see Walker and Hohmann, 2005). Cannabinoid CB1 receptors are abundant in the central nervous system (CNS) while cannabinoid CB2 receptors are predominantly associated with the immune system (Herkenham et al., 1990, Galiegue et al., 1995). Cannabinoid CB1 receptors are present at sites involved in pain processing, such as primary afferent fibers, spinal cord, thalamus, periaqueductal grey and rostral ventromedial medulla (Tsou et al., 1998). Activation of the cannabinoid CB1 receptors induces antinociception (Scott et al., 2004, Yoon and Choi, 2003), however, it also produces many neurological effects that limit their therapeutic use (Scott et al., 2004, Sañudo-Peña et al., 2000).

Cannabinoid CB2 receptor agonists have been also known to produce antinociception without overt behavioral effects in neuropathic, inflammatory, postoperative, and acute pain models (Malan et al., 2001, Malan et al., 2003, Quartilho et al., 2003 Sañudo-Peña et al., 2000, Valenzano et al., 2005). These studies assumed that the primary site of action is peripheral structures, mostly immune cells. However, the role of cannabinoid CB2 receptor agonists in the CNS has not been well understood in connection to neuropathic pain. Increasing evidence suggests that cannabinoid CB2 receptor activation in the CNS may also contribute to the analgesic effects of cannabinoids. The cannabinoid CB2 receptor mRNA and protein are expressed in rat lumbar (L3–L4) spinal cord, though specific cell types were not determined (Beltramo et al., 2006, Walczak et al., 2005). Application of cannabinoid CB2 receptor agonists inhibits capsaicin-mediated calcitonin gene-related peptide release in rat spinal cord slices (Beltramo et al., 2006) and KCl-stimulated increase in intracellular calcium in rat dorsal root ganglion neurons (Sagar et al., 2005). Recently, Romero-Sandoval and Eisenach (2007) reported that the intrathecally administered cannabinoid CB2 receptor agonist, JWH015, reduced hypersensitivity in a rat postoperative pain model.

JWH133 has been reported as being a cannabinoid CB2 receptor-selective agonist with a Ki value against human cannabinoid CB2 receptors of 3–20 nM (Huffman et al., 1999, Stern et al., 2006) and against whole brain cannabinoid CB1 receptors of 670 nM (Huffman et al., 1999). Systemic administration of JWH-133 significantly reduced ipsilateral hind paw weight bearing deficit and paw volume in a rat carrageenan-induced inflammatory pain model (Elmes et al., 2005). These effects were abolished by the cannabinoid CB2 receptor-selective antagonist, SR144528, suggesting that the effect of JWH133 was cannabinoid CB2 receptor-mediated.

We sought to examine the involvement of central cannabinoid CB2 receptor activation in modulating mechanical allodynia in a mouse model of neuropathic pain induced by partial sciatic nerve ligation using JWH133. We first evaluated the in vitro agonist activity and selectivity of JWH133 for mouse cannabinoid CB2 and cannabinoid CB1 receptors. We next examined and compared the effects of JWH133 following intrathecal (i.t.), systemic (intraperitoneal; i.p.) and local (injected to the dorsal surface of the hindpaw; i.pw.) administration on partial sciatic nerve ligation-induced mechanical allodynia to determine a target site of action of cannabinoid CB2 receptor agonist. Finally, we used cannabinoid CB2 receptor knockout (KO) mice to confirm that the effect of JWH133 was mediated by the cannabinoid CB2 receptor.

Section snippets

Reagents

Selective cannabinoid CB2 ligands JWH133 (3-[1.1-Diethylbutyl]-1deoxy-Δ8-tetrahydrocannabinol) and AM1241 ((R,S)-3-(2-Iodo-5-nitrobenzoyl)-1-(1-methyl-2-piperidinylmethyl)-1H-indole) were purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, Mo., USA) and synthesized by Pfizer Global Research and Development Nagoya Laboratories, respectively. Non-selective cannabinoid agonists WIN55212-2 ((R)-(+)-[2,3-dihydro-5-methyl-3-(4-morpholinylmethyl)pyrrolo[1,2,3-de]-1,4-benzoxazin-6-yl]-1-naphthalenylmethanone mesylate)

cAMP assay

The ability of JWH133 to activate mouse cannabinoid CB2 and cannabinoid CB1 receptors was assessed in a functional cAMP assay using CHO cells expressing recombinant mouse cannabinoid receptors. In mouse cannabinoid CB2 receptors, JWH133 showed a concentration-dependent inhibition of forskolin-induced cAMP accumulation with an EC50 value of 63 nM and a maximum inhibition of 106% (Fig. 1A). In mouse cannabinoid CB1 receptors, JWH133 demonstrated a weak potency with an EC50 value of 2500 nM and a

Discussion

Cannabinoid CB2 receptor agonists reduce hypersensitivity in neuropathic pain models (for review, see Whiteside et al., 2007) such as spinal nerve ligation and partial sciatic nerve ligation models. In this report we used a mouse model of neuropathic pain induced by partial sciatic nerve ligation. The reasons why we used this model and detected the mechanical allodynia instead of mechanical hyperalgesia were as follows: (1) preliminary experiments conducted in our laboratory demonstrated that

References (32)

  • TsouK. et al.

    Immunohistochemical distribution of cannabinoid CB1 receptors in the rat central nervous system

    Neuroscience

    (1998)
  • ValenzanoK.J. et al.

    Pharmacological and pharmacokinetic characterization of the cannabinoid receptor 2 agonist, GW405833, utilizing rodent models of acute and chronic pain, anxiety, ataxia and catalepsy

    Neuropharmacology

    (2005)
  • WalczakJ.S. et al.

    Behavioral, pharmacological and molecular characterization of the saphenous nerve partial ligation: a new model of neuropathic pain

    Neuroscience

    (2005)
  • Wieseler-FrankJ. et al.

    Glial activation and pathological pain

    Neurochem. Int.

    (2004)
  • BeltramoM. et al.

    CB2 receptor-mediated antihyperalgesia: possible direct involvement of neural mechanisms

    Eur. J. Neurosci.

    (2006)
  • BinghamB. et al.

    Species-specific in vitro pharmacological effects of the cannabinoid receptor 2 (CB2) selective ligand AM1241 and its resolved enantiomers

    Br. J. Pharmacol.,

    (2007)
  • Cited by (72)

    • Pharmacological potential of JWH133, a cannabinoid type 2 receptor agonist in neurodegenerative, neurodevelopmental and neuropsychiatric diseases

      2021, European Journal of Pharmacology
      Citation Excerpt :

      For instance, administration of CB2R agonists hindered capsaicin-induced calcitonin gene-related peptide release in rat spinal cord slices (Beltramo et al., 2006) and KCl-mediated increases in intracellular calcium in rat dorsal root ganglion neurons (Sagar et al., 2005). Yamamoto et al. (2008) reported that intrathecal administration of JWH133 markedly inhibited mechanical allodynia in mice induced by partial sciatic nerve ligation, whereas systemic or local administration did not show any effect. Moreover, the analgesic activity of intrathecal JWH133 was abolished in CB2R-deficient mice, suggesting that stimulation of central, but not peripheral, CB2Rs attenuates mechanical allodynia in this neuropathic pain model.

    • Cannabinoid receptor agonists from Conus venoms alleviate pain-related behavior in rats

      2021, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior
      Citation Excerpt :

      The selectivity of the subfractions may also be distinct, as the antinociceptive effects of 3Tex/2 were completely blocked by the CB1-selective, but not the CB2-selective antagonist, in contrast with 3Tex/4 which was modestly attenuated by both. Although involvement of CB2 in pain processing is not as clear as of that of the CB1 receptor, particularly for persistent neuropathic pain, there is accumulating evidence that activation of CB2 can also play a role in antinociception (La Porta et al., 2013; Yamamoto et al., 2008; Elmes et al., 2004; Griffin et al., 1997; Li et al., 2017; Guindon and Hohmann, 2008; Rahn et al., 2007; Nackley et al., 2004; Ibrahim et al., 2006; Malan Jr. et al., 2001). CB1 agonists are known to produce rewarding effects and thus may have some abuse liability.

    • The cannabinoid CB<inf>2</inf> receptor agonist LY2828360 synergizes with morphine to suppress neuropathic nociception and attenuates morphine reward and physical dependence

      2020, European Journal of Pharmacology
      Citation Excerpt :

      We previously showed that CB2-selective agonists preferentially suppress activity in spinal nociceptive neurons under pathological conditions that cause sensitization (Nackley et al., 2004). The CB2 agonist JWH-133 suppressed mechanically evoked responses in neuropathic rats (Sagar et al., 2005) but these antinociceptive effects were absent in neuropathic CB2KO mice (Yamamoto et al., 2008). These findings parallel our observations that LY2828360 reduced allodynia in mice exhibiting neuropathic nociception but did not alter acute nociception in control (paclitaxel-naïve) mice.

    • Identification and biochemical analyses of selective CB<inf>2</inf> agonists

      2019, European Journal of Pharmacology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Furthermore, the experimental evidence suggests that cannabinoid CB2 receptors may have a beneficial role in regulating the immune response, inflammation, and the associated pain. Cannabinoid CB2 receptor agonists attenuate inflammatory and neuropathic pain without the psychoactive effects caused by activation of cannabinoid CB1 receptor or opioid receptors (Ibrahim et al., 2006; Malan et al., 2003; Yamamoto et al., 2008). Over half of American adults experience pain, and as many as one in ten suffer from chronic pain, or daily pain for at least three months (Nahin, 2015).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text