Influence of the g− conformation of Ser and Thr on the structure of transmembrane helices
Introduction
While roughly 15–30% of the eukaryote genes encode membrane proteins (Fleishman et al., 2006), less than 2% of the structures deposited at the Protein Data Bank correspond to this class (http://pdbtm.enzim.hu/) (Tusnady et al., 2005). Transmembrane (TM) α-helical proteins constitute the majority of integral membrane proteins (Fleishman et al., 2006). In addition to canonical α-helices, these TM bundles are also formed by non-canonical π-like helices, 310-like helices and kinked helices (Rigoutsos et al., 2003). Predicting and quantifying distortions within TM segments is important for understanding processes as diverse as ligand recognition, protein function, and protein folding (Deupi et al., 2007, Bowie, 2005). Helix distortions are most commonly induced by Pro, which can be identified with more than 90% reliability simply by looking at Pro abundance in a multiple sequence alignment (Yohannan et al., 2004). However, it has been shown that other residues are also able to induce distortions in the structure of TMs (Rigoutsos et al., 2003). For instance, we have previously shown that both Ser and Thr residues, either alone (Ballesteros et al., 2000) or in combination with Pro (Govaerts et al., 2001, Deupi et al., 2004), also induce distinctive distortions in TMs. Membrane proteins, thus, incorporate in the sequence of their TMs specific residues like Pro, Gly, Ser, and Thr (Senes et al., 2000), introducing a flexible point and assisting in helix movements (Sansom et al., 2000) or stabilizing local regions of structural relevance.
In addition to its role in modulating the structure of TMs, Ser and Thr residues are also reported to play key roles in preserving the overall structure of membrane proteins (Lopez-Rodriguez et al., 2002), stabilizing the interactions between TMs (Dawson et al., 2002, Eilers et al., 2002), and regulating protein function (Munshi et al., 2003, Jongejan et al., 2005, Pellissier et al., 2009). In addition, mutations involving polar residues in TM segments are often associated with protein malfunction (Partridge et al., 2004, Smit et al., 2007), being the most common disease-causing mutations in membrane proteins (Joh et al., 2008).
These roles of Ser and Thr are ultimately encoded in the chemical properties of their polar side chains. The short side chains of Ser and Thr have a limited rotamer conformational space. The gauche− (g−), gauche+ (g+), and trans (t) staggered conformations are strongly preferred relative to the eclipsed conformations. The only exception is the t conformation of Thr, which is unfavorable due to the steric clash of the side chain methyl group with the backbone carbonyl at the i − 3 position (McGregor et al., 1987). Ser and Thr in g+ or g− are capable to hydrogen bond the backbone carbonyl in the previous turn of the helix (McGregor et al., 1987).
We have previously shown that the g− conformation of Ser and Thr residues modifies the conformation of Ser/Thr-containing α-helices (Ballesteros et al., 2000). This conclusion was achieved from statistical analysis of crystal structures of mostly soluble proteins, with only four structures of membrane proteins included in the analysis. It has been suggested that the membrane environment considerably perturbs the rotamer frequencies compared to soluble proteins (Chamberlain and Bowie, 2004). Thus, the present study aims to provide additional insight into the structural consequences of the different rotamer conformations of Ser and Thr on the overall geometry of TMs, combining two complementary sets of structural data: a database of helix stretches extracted exclusively from crystal structures of membrane proteins, and ensembles of model TMs generated by molecular dynamics (MD) simulations in an explicit hydrophobic environment.
Section snippets
Database of transmembrane helix segments
The atomic coordinates of the membrane proteins listed in Table 1 were extracted from the RCSB Protein Data Bank (Berman et al., 2000). The coordinates of all TM stretches with a length of 12 residues and bearing Ala (as a control), Ser or Thr in the 8th position were extracted for analysis. Selection of longer stretches would have lead to a reduction of the sample size. Only stretches with Ala/Ser/Thr exposed to the membrane were kept for analysis, in order to avoid interfering effects from
Influence of Ser and Thr side chain conformation in the structure of the helix backbone
Table 2 summarizes the mean and standard deviation of the backbone φ and ψ dihedral angles of Ser and Thr residues in their possible rotamer conformations and of Ala (control) calculated from the experimental structures extracted from the Protein Data Bank (i.e. AlaPDB, SerPDBg−, ThrPDBg−, SerPDBg+, ThrPDBg+, SerPDBt, and ThrPDBt). We have previously shown that there is a clear influence of the environment on the main chain conformation (φ and ψ dihedral angles) of α-helices (Olivella et al.,
Conclusions
Ser and Thr are the most prevalent polar residues in TMs, each constituting 5% of the residues (Senes et al., 2000). These amino acids, unlike other polar or charged residues, do not destabilize TMs (Monne et al., 1999), as their hydrogen bonding potential can be satisfied by interacting with the carbonyl oxygen in the preceding turn of the same helix (Gray and Matthews, 1984) (Fig. 1). To assess the influence of this side chain-backbone hydrogen bond interaction in the structure of TMs, we
Acknowledgments
This work has been supported by grants from the Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia (Spain) (MEC, SAF2006-04966, SAF2007-67008) and Instituto de Salud Carlos III (RD07/0067/0008). X.D. is supported by MEC through the Ramon y Cajal program.
References (43)
- et al.
Serine and threonine residues bend α-helices in the χ1 = g− conformation
Biophys. J.
(2000) - et al.
Analysis of side-chain rotamers in transmembrane proteins
Biophys. J.
(2004) - et al.
Proline-induced distortions of transmembrane helices
J. Mol. Biol.
(2002) - et al.
Motifs of serine and threonine can drive association of transmembrane helices
J. Mol. Biol.
(2002) - et al.
Ser and thr residues modulate the conformation of pro-kinked transmembrane alpha-helices
Biophys. J.
(2004) - et al.
Comparison of helix interactions in membrane and soluble alpha-bundle proteins
Biophys. J.
(2002) - et al.
Transmembrane protein structures without X-rays
Trends Biochem. Sci.
(2006) - et al.
The TxP motif in the second transmembrane helix of CCR5: a structural determinant in chemokine-induced activation
J. Biol. Chem.
(2001) - et al.
Intrahelical hydrogen bonding of serine, threonine and cysteine residues within alpha-helices and its relevance to membrane-bound proteins
J. Mol. Biol.
(1984) - et al.
Analysis of the relationship between side-chain conformation and secondary structure in globular proteins
J. Mol. Biol.
(1987)
A turn propensity scale for transmembrane helices
J. Mol. Biol.
Ligand binding and micro-switches in 7tm receptor structures
Trends Pharmacol. Sci.
Influence of the environment in the conformation of alpha-helices studied by protein database search and molecular dynamics simulations
Biophys. J.
Non-alpha-helical elements modulate polytopic membrane protein architecture
J. Mol. Biol.
Statistical analysis of amino acid patterns in transmembrane helices: the GxxxG motif occurs frequently and in association with β-branched residues at neighboring positions
J. Mol. Biol.
Modeling charged protein side chains in lipid membranes
J. Gen. Physiol.
Reconstruction of protein backbones from the brix collection of canonical protein fragments
PLoS Comput. Biol.
Helanal: a program to characterize helix geometry in proteins
J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn.
The Protein Data Bank
Nucleic Acids Res.
Solving the membrane protein folding problem
Nature
AMBER 9
Cited by (26)
The ADORA1 mutation linked to early-onset Parkinson's disease alters adenosine A<inf>1</inf>-A<inf>2A</inf> receptor heteromer formation and function
2022, Biomedicine and PharmacotherapyCitation Excerpt :The lack of side chain in Gly might facilitate local helix flexibility, changing the collective dynamics of the helix [52]. However, the short side chain of Ser may also induce local structural distortions by forming a hydrogen bond interaction with the carbonyl backbone in the previous turn of the helix in the χ1 rotameric gauche- (g-) or gauche+ (g+) states [53,54]. Therefore, we evaluated and compared the flexibility and conformation of TM 7 in A1Rwt and A1RG279S by molecular dynamic (MD) simulations.
Experimental and computational analysis of biased agonism on full-length and a C-terminally truncated adenosine A<inf>2A</inf> receptor
2020, Computational and Structural Biotechnology JournalFunctional and pharmacological characterization of an S5 domain hERG mutation associated with short QT syndrome
2019, HeliyonCitation Excerpt :In fact the S5 helix does not make any interactions with S4 in the cryoEM structures of hERG and EAG (Figs. 7 and 8). An alternative explanation for the gating effects of the I560T mutation is threonine-induced bending of the S5 helix [48]: the polar hydroxyl side chains of threonine and serine interact poorly with lipid chains and may preferentially hydrogen-bond with the backbone carbonyl oxygen of amino acids three or four residues towards the N-terminus in helices (T556 and F557 in the case of I560T in hERG) as commonly found in transmembrane helices of membrane proteins (e.g. [48, 49, 50]). This interaction induces a small bend in the helix that would be expected to perturb S5 interactions in I560T hERG.
Design and structural characterisation of monomeric water-soluble α-helix and β-hairpin peptides: State-of-the-art
2019, Archives of Biochemistry and BiophysicsCitation Excerpt :They can act as hinge residues precluding α-helicity, when their χ1 dihedral angle is in a g– conformation (χ1 = +60°). This is probably due to the formation of a hydrogen bond between the hydroxyl hydrogen of the side chain and the i–3 or i–4 carbonyl oxygen [124,125]. Regarding Cys residues, most of them form disulphide bonds in proteins, which restricts the conformational space and contribute to structure stability.
Functional elements of the gastric inhibitory polypeptide receptor: Comparison between secretin- and rhodopsin-like G protein-coupled receptors
2015, Biochemical PharmacologyCitation Excerpt :In the inactive model of GIPR (as in the crystal structure of GCGR), the β-branched side chain of Thr3436.37 forms a hydrogen-bond interaction with Tyr3927.53 and hydrophobic-hydrophobic interactions with Leu2413.50 (Fig. 3C). These interactions are possible only if the side chain of T3436.37 adopts the unfavorable trans conformation, due to the steric clash of the side chain methyl group with the backbone carbonyl at i-3 [40]. In order to test the influence of this TM 6 restraint in class B activation, we engineered the T3436.37A mutant.
Side-chain to main-chain hydrogen bonding controls the intrinsic backbone dynamics of the amyloid precursor protein transmembrane helix
2014, Biophysical JournalCitation Excerpt :Furthermore, our results support the notion that noncanonical conformations within TMD helices can be encoded intrahelically, rather than resulting from interhelical interactions (42). Extensive side-chain/main-chain backbonding within membrane-spanning helices has been noted before in crystallized polytopic membrane proteins (7,9) and simulated model helices (8,10–12). The drastic effects of removing the backbonds seen in this study may relate to the presence of the preexisting G37G38 hinge.
- 1
Present address: Department of Theoretical and Computational Biophysics, Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, Am Faßberg 11, 37077 Göttingen, Germany.
- 2
These authors contributed equally to this work.