Review
Opioid receptors in the gastrointestinal tract

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regpep.2009.03.012Get rights and content

Abstract

Opium is arguably one of the oldest herbal medicines, being used as analgesic, sedative and antidiarrheal drug for thousands of years. These effects mirror the actions of the endogenous opioid system and are mediated by the principal μ-, κ- and δ-opioid receptors. In the gut, met-enkephalin, leu-enkephalin, β-endorphin and dynorphin occur in both neurons and endocrine cells. When released, opioid peptides activate opioid receptors on the enteric circuitry controlling motility and secretion. As a result, inhibition of gastric emptying, increase in sphincter tone, induction of stationary motor patterns and blockade of peristalsis ensue. Together with inhibition of ion and fluid secretion, these effects cause constipation, one of the most frequent and troublesome adverse reactions of opioid analgesic therapy. Although laxatives are most frequently used to ameliorate opioid-induced bowel dysfunction, their efficacy is unsatisfactory. Specific antagonism of peripheral opioid receptors is a more rational approach. This goal is addressed by the use of opioid receptor antagonists with limited absorption such as oral prolonged-release naloxone and opioid receptor antagonists that do not penetrate the blood-brain barrier such as methylnaltrexone and alvimopan. Preliminary evidence indicates that peripherally restricted opioid receptor antagonists may act as prokinetic drugs in their own right.

Introduction

Opium, the dried latex derived from the unripe seed capsules of the opium poppy, Papaver somniferum, is one of the oldest herbal medicines [1]. Its anesthetic and sedating properties are well described in “De Materia Medica” by Pedanius Dioscorides (Pedanios Dioskurides), a Greek physician in the service of the Roman emperor Nero in the 1st century AD [1]. “De Materia Medica” was compilated around 65 AD and is arguably the first textbook of pharmacology ever written. Dioscorides' work has been copied and annotated uncounted times, and the oldest surviving copy is treasured in the Austrian National Library in Vienna and indexed as “Codex Vindobonensis Medicus Graecus 1”. Recognized by UNESCO as a World Heritage book, this so-called “Vienna Dioscorides” dates from about 512 AD and is a superb example of Byzantine book-painting [1].

Apart from its effects to facilitate sleep and remove pain, opium has also been used to treat diarrhea since ancient times. Paracelsus (1493–1541) had such a high opinion of opium that he called it “Laudanum”, and this name was later used to denote alcoholic preparations of opium introduced by Thomas Sydenham (1624–1689) [1]. His famous recipe contained 1 lb of sherry wine, 2 oz of opium, 1 oz of saffron, 1 oz of cinnamon powder and 1 oz of clove powder [2]. Importantly, Sydenham also confirmed the efficacy of Laudanum in the treatment of diarrhea associated with dysentery [2]. The active ingredients of opium (e.g., morphine, noscapine, codeine, thebaine, and papaverine) were isolated in the first half of the 19th century [1]. Although not all of these compounds are ligands of opioid receptors, they are able to affect the function of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract by various mechanisms.

Paul Trendelenburg was arguably the first to discover that morphine inhibits the peristaltic reflex in the gut [3], a finding that he reported in his classic text on “Physiologische und pharmakologische Versuche über die Dünndarmperistaltik”, now available in an English translation [4]. Ever since, investigators were intrigued by the physiologic meaning of this discovery, and Otto Schaumann interpreted the pharmacologic effects of exogenous opiates on pain and bowel function as indicative of an endogenous protective system [5]. Schaumann [5] and William D.M. Paton [6] showed that morphine inhibited the release of acetylcholine in the isolated guinea pig ileum, and electrophysiologic studies began to reveal that opiates inhibit the function of the enteric nervous system [7].

After the identification of opiate receptors by Solomon H. Snyder and other investigators [8] the search was out for their endogenous ligand. In 1975, Hans Kosterlitz, together with John Hughes, identified leucine-enkephalin and methionine-enkephalin as the first endogenous opioid receptor agonists [9]. These pentapeptides were also found to occur in the gut [10], and subsequent analysis of their functional implications revealed that opioid receptor agonists interact with pathways of the enteric nervous system that regulate GI motility and secretion [11], [12], [13], [14], [15]. In addition, there is evidence that some GI effects of opioid receptor agonists may be mediated by opioid receptors in the brain [16]. However, experimental and clinical studies with opioid receptor antagonists that are unable to enter the brain have shown that the GI effects of opioid analgesics arise from a peripheral site of action [16].

The current review starts by providing a brief overview of the neurobiologic mechanisms whereby opioids modify GI function. After addressing the use of opioid receptor agonists as antidiarrheal drugs, the article goes on to discuss emerging strategies to avoid opioid-induced bowel dysfunction (OBD) and the clinical utility of peripheral opioid receptor antagonists.

Section snippets

The endogenous opioid system in the gut

Independently of their plant, mammalian or synthetic origin, opioids are neuroactive substances, their actions being mediated by the principal μ-, κ- and δ-opioid receptors. Many neuroactive drugs act on the gut because the alimentary canal is equipped with the largest collection of neurons outside the brain, known as the enteric nervous system. Enteric neurons originating from the myenteric and submucosal plexuses supply all layers of the alimentary canal and thus are in a position to regulate

Opioid physiology and pharmacology in the gastrointestinal tract

Once released from enteric neurons, opioid peptides modify GI function by interaction with opioid receptors on the enteric circuitries that control motility and secretion. The inhibitory effect of opioid receptor agonists on peristalsis in the guinea pig small intestine is thought to arise primarily from interruption of neuroneuronal and neuroeffector transmission within enteric nerve pathways governing muscle activity [7], [14], [15], [21], [22]. Transmission is blocked both via presynaptic

Management of diarrhea by direct and indirect opioid receptor agonists

The actions of opioid receptor agonists to inhibit GI secretory activity and transit are therapeutically exploited in acute and chronic diarrhea as well as in irritable bowel syndrome associated with diarrhea [28]. Two therapeutic options are currently available: loperamide and racecadotril. The action of loperamide is predominantly mediated by μ-opioid receptors and restricted to the gut because the drug is poorly absorbed and fails to cross the blood-brain barrier at concentrations needed to

The problem of opioid-induced bowel dysfunction

Despite many attempts to develop alternative therapeutics, opioid analgesics remain the mainstay of therapy in many patients with moderate to severe pain. Unfortunately, the use of opioid analgesics is associated with a number of adverse effects among which those on the GI tract are most troublesome in terms of frequency and severity. The traditional approach to treat opioid-induced constipation is laxative comedication, although only about 50% of the patients experience satisfactory relief [19]

Specific management of opioid-induced bowel dysfunction

The pharmacologic management of OBD involves two approaches (Fig. 2): nonspecific treatment with laxatives and specific treatment with opioid receptor antagonists [19], [35], [38]. Since the nonspecific regimens often do not provide satisfactory relief, various opportunities in the specific treatment of OBD have been explored. The primary objective of these approaches is to prevent GI symptoms rather than treat established motor stasis due to opioid use [15], [19], [29], [38]. Apart from

Opioid receptor antagonists as potential prokinetics

Endogenous opioid peptides are thought to play a role in the fine tuning of digestion [11], [13], [15]. Thus, distention-evoked peristalsis can be facilitated by naloxone in various preparations of the guinea pig, rabbit, cat and rat isolated small intestine [12], [14], [26]. In the guinea pig small intestine, the effect of naloxone is mimicked by selective antagonists at μ- and κ-opioid receptors, but not by antagonism at δ-opioid receptors [26]. It follows that endogenous opioid peptides

Conclusions

Although its implications have not yet been disclosed in full detail, the GI opioid system is involved in the regulation of motor and secretory activity. While stimulation of GI opioid receptors by loperamide or racecadotril can be exploited to stop diarrhea, constipation is one of the most frequent and troublesome adverse effects of opioid analgesics. The development of opioid receptor antagonists with restricted access to the central nervous system has opened up a new avenue to selectively

Acknowledgements

Work in the author's laboratory is supported by FWF — The Austrian Scientific Research Funds, the Austrian Federal Ministry of Science and Research, and the Zukunftsfonds Steiermark.

References (75)

  • W. Meissner et al.

    A randomised controlled trial with prolonged-release oral oxycodone and naloxone to prevent and reverse opioid-induced constipation

    Eur J Pain

    (2009)
  • D. Vondrackova et al.

    Analgesic efficacy and safety of oxycodone in combination with naloxone as prolonged release tablets in patients with moderate to severe chronic pain

    J Pain

    (2008)
  • J. Russell et al.

    Antagonism of gut, but not central effects of morphine with quaternary narcotic antagonists

    Eur J Pharmacol

    (1982)
  • R.K. Portenoy et al.

    Subcutaneous methylnaltrexone for the treatment of opioid-induced constipation in patients with advanced illness: a double-blind, randomized, parallel group, dose-ranging study

    J Pain Symptom Manage

    (2008)
  • H. Fukuda et al.

    The selective μ opioid receptor antagonist, alvimopan, improves delayed GI transit of postoperative ileus in rats

    Brain Res

    (2006)
  • D.M. Paulson et al.

    Alvimopan: an oral, peripherally acting, μ-opioid receptor antagonist for the treatment of opioid-induced bowel dysfunction — a 21-day treatment-randomized clinical trial

    J Pain

    (2005)
  • L. Webster et al.

    Alvimopan, a peripherally acting μ-opioid receptor (PAM-OR) antagonist for the treatment of opioid-induced bowel dysfunction: results from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-finding study in subjects taking opioids for chronic non-cancer pain

    Pain

    (2008)
  • J. Gonenne et al.

    Effect of alvimopan and codeine on gastrointestinal transit: a randomized controlled study

    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol

    (2005)
  • P. Holzer et al.

    Analgesia up to the twentieth century

  • G.R. Hamilton et al.

    In the arms of Morpheus: the development of morphine for postoperative pain relief

    Can J Anaesth

    (2000)
  • W.J. Lammers et al.

    Translating Trendelenburg; back to the future

    Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol

    (2006)
  • P. Trendelenburg

    Physiological and pharmacological investigations of small intestinal peristalsis

    Arch Exp Pathol Pharmakol

    (1917)

    Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Arch Pharmacol

    (2006)
  • O. Schaumann

    Pain, the protective system and combinations with morphine-like effect

    Wien Med Wschr

    (1959)
  • W.D.M. Paton

    The action of morphine and related substances on contraction and on acetylcholine output of coaxially stimulated guinea-pig ileum

    Br J Pharmacol

    (1957)
  • J.D. Wood et al.

    Function of opioids in the enteric nervous system

    Neurogastroenterol Motil

    (2004)
  • S.H. Snyder

    Opiate receptors in normal and drug-altered brain function

    Nature

    (1975)
  • J. Hughes et al.

    Identification of two related pentapeptides from the brain with potent opiate agonist activity

    Nature

    (1975)
  • J. Hughes et al.

    The distribution of methionine-enkephalin and leucine-enkephalin in the brain and peripheral tissues

    Br J Pharmacol

    (1977)
  • W. Kromer

    Endogenous and exogenous opioids in the control of gastrointestinal motility and secretion

    Pharmacol Rev

    (1988)
  • P. Holzer

    Opioids and opioid receptors in the enteric nervous system: from a problem in opioid analgesia to a possible new prokinetic therapy in humans

    Neurosci Lett

    (2004)
  • G.J. Sanger et al.

    The role of endogenous opiates in the control of gastrointestinal motility: predictions from in vitro modelling

    Neurogastroenterol Motil

    (2004)
  • P. Holzer

    Treatment of opioid-induced gut dysfunction

    Expert Opin Investig Drugs

    (2007)
  • L. Manara et al.

    The central and peripheral influences of opioids on gastrointestinal propulsion

    Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol

    (1985)
  • P. Holzer et al.

    The gut as a neurological organ

    Wien Klin Wochenschr

    (2001)
  • J.B. Furness

    The enteric nervous system

    (2006)
  • A. Kurz et al.

    Opioid-induced bowel dysfunction: pathophysiology and potential new therapies

    Drugs

    (2003)
  • C. Sternini et al.

    The opioid system in the gastrointestinal tract

    Neurogastroenterol Motil

    (2004)
  • Cited by (298)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text