Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

A functional analysis of PCNA-binding peptides derived from protein sequence, interaction screening and rational design

Abstract

Proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) has no intrinsic enzymatic function, but functions as a sliding platform to mediate protein interactions with the DNA strand. Many proteins interact with PCNA through a small conserved motif with consensus QxxLxxFF. This work uses Schizosaccharomyces pombe and human cells to analyse the function of PCNA-binding peptides. Interacting peptides were identified using two-hybrid screening; one (pep102) binds directly to a physiologically relevant site on PCNA. The EGFP-pep102 overexpression phenotype is consistent with competitive blocking of PCNA–protein interactions. Various PCNA-binding peptides were all shown to inhibit PCNA function by competitive binding in both human and S. pombe cells as EGFP fusion proteins. The action of a p21(WAF1/Cip1)-derived peptide was complicated by the presence of additional functional domains and possible post-translational modification. The activity of pep102 was hampered by low expression in both model systems. The peptide derived from rational design (con1) was stable, highly active in inhibiting PCNA function both S. pombe and human cells and showed a high affinity for PCNA both in vitro and in vivo. These results validate the use of functional screening in yeast to identify peptide aptamers that are functional in mammalian cells; such aptamers provide excellent leads for small molecule antiproliferative therapies.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams PD, Sellers WR, Sharma SK, Wu AD, Nalin CM, Kaelin Jr WG . (1996). Mol Cell Biol 16: 6623–6633.

  • al-Khodairy F, Fotou E, Sheldrick KS, Griffiths DJ, Lehmann AR, Carr AM . (1994). Mol Biol Cell 5: 147–160.

  • Ausubel FM, Brent R, Kingston RE, Moore DD, Seidman JG, Smith JA et al. (eds) (1993). Current Protocols in Molecular Biology. John Wiley and Sons Inc.: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cayrol C, Knibiehler M, Ducommun B . (1998). Oncogene 16: 311–320.

  • Chen IT, Smith ML, O'Connor PM, Fornace Jr AJ . (1995). Oncogene 11: 1931–1937.

  • Chuang LS, Ian HI, Koh TW, Ng HH, Xu G, Li BF . (1997). Science 277: 1996–2000.

  • Craven RA, Griffiths DJ, Sheldrick KS, Randall RE, Hagan IM, Carr AM . (1998). Gene 221: 59–68.

  • Flores-Rozas H, Kelman Z, Dean FB, Pan ZQ, Harper JW, Elledge SJ et al. (1994). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91: 8655–8659.

  • Gulbis JM, Kelman Z, Hurwitz J, O'Donnell M, Kuriyan J . (1996). Cell 87: 297–306.

  • Hall PA, Kearsey JM, Coates PJ, Norman DG, Warbrick E, Cox LS . (1995). Oncogene 10: 2427–2433.

  • Jonsson ZO, Hubscher U . (1997). Bioessays 19: 967–975.

  • Kamb A, Caponigro G . (2001). Curr Opin Chem Biol 5: 74–77.

  • Kelman Z . (1997). Oncogene 14: 629–640.

  • Kelman Z, Hurwitz J . (1998). Trends Biochem Sci 23: 236–238.

  • Kontopidis G, Wu SY, Zheleva DI, Taylor P, McInnes C, Lane DP et al. (2005). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102: 1871–1876.

  • Lee MG, Nurse P . (1987). Nature 327: 31–35.

  • Li Y, Dowbenko D, Lasky LA . (2002). J Biol Chem 277: 11352–11361.

  • MacNeill SA, Moreno S, Reynolds N, Nurse P, Fantes PA . (1996). Embo J 15: 4613–4628.

  • Mattock H, Jares P, Zheleva DI, Lane DP, Warbrick E, Blow JJ . (2001a). Exp Cell Res 265: 242–251.

  • Mattock H, Lane DP, Warbrick E . (2001b). Exp Cell Res 265: 234–241.

  • Moggs JG, Grandi P, Quivy JP, Jonsson ZO, Hubscher U, Becker PB et al. (2000). Mol Cell Biol 20: 1206–1218.

  • Moreno S, Klar A, Nurse P . (1991). Methods Enzymol 194: 795–823.

  • Otterlei M, Warbrick E, Nagelhus TA, Haug T, Slupphaug G, Akbari M et al. (1999). Embo J 18: 3834–3844.

  • Reynolds N, Warbrick E, Fantes PA, MacNeill SA . (2000). Embo J 19: 1108–1118.

  • Rossig L, Jadidi AS, Urbich C, Badorff C, Zeiher AM, Dimmeler S . (2001). Mol Cell Biol 21: 5644–5657.

  • Sazer S, Sherwood SW . (1990). J Cell Sci 97 (Pt 3): 509–516.

  • Smith ML, Chen IT, Zhan Q, Bae I, Chen CY, Gilmer TM et al. (1994). Science 266: 1376–1380.

  • Tournier S, Leroy D, Goubin F, Ducommun B, Hyams JS . (1996). Mol Biol Cell 7: 651–662.

  • Tsurimoto T . (1999). Front Biosci 4: D849–D858.

  • Waga S, Hannon GJ, Beach D, Stillman B . (1994). Nature 369: 574–578.

  • Warbrick E . (2000). Bioessays 22: 997–1006.

  • Warbrick E, Heatherington W, Lane DP, Glover DM . (1998). Nucleic Acids Res 26: 3925–3932.

  • Warbrick E, Lane DP, Glover DM, Cox LS . (1995). Curr Biol 5: 275–282.

  • Waseem NH, Labib K, Nurse P, Lane DP . (1992). Embo J 11: 5111–5120.

  • Xu H, Zhang P, Liu L, Lee MY . (2001a). Biochemistry 40: 4512–4520.

  • Xu X, Leo C, Jang Y, Chan E, Padilla D, Huang BC et al. (2001b). Nat Genet 27: 23–29.

  • Yang M, Wu Z, Fields S . (1995). Nucleic Acids Res 23: 1152–1156.

  • Zheleva DI, McInnes C, Gavine AL, Zhelev NZ, Fischer PM, Lane DP . (2002). J Pept Res 60: 257–270.

  • Zheleva DI, Zhelev NZ, Fischer PM, Duff SV, Warbrick E, Blake DG et al. (2000). Biochemistry 39: 7388–7397.

Download references

Acknowledgements

I thank Tony Carr for the nmt-EGFP plasmid and Daniella Zheleva for purified human PCNA. I also thank Sylvie Tournier for plasmids and helpful discussions and Alison Sparks for her help with FACS analysis. I thank all my colleagues for their help and support, especially David Lane and the members of his laboratory. This work was supported by the Association for International Cancer Research and the Cancer Research UK.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E Warbrick.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Warbrick, E. A functional analysis of PCNA-binding peptides derived from protein sequence, interaction screening and rational design. Oncogene 25, 2850–2859 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1209320

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1209320

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links