Skip to main content
Log in

Randomized Clinical Study of a Histamine H3 Receptor Antagonist for the Treatment of Adults with Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder

  • Original Research Article
  • Published:
CNS Drugs Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background: Psychostimulants, including methylphenidate and amphetamine preparations, are commonly prescribed for the treatment of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children and adults. Histamine H3 receptors reside on non-histamine neurons and regulate other neurotransmitters (e.g. acetylcholine, noradrenaline [norepinephrine]) suggesting that H3 antagonists have the potential to improve attention and impulsivity. Research indicates that H3 receptor antagonists due to their novel mechanism of action may have a unique treatment effect offering an important alternative for the treatment of ADHD. Bavisant (JNJ-31001074) is a highly selective, orally active antagonist of the human H3 receptor with a novel mechanism of action, involving wakefulness and cognition, with potential as a treatment for ADHD.

Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of three dosages of bavisant compared with placebo in adults with ADHD.

Study design: This randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled, parallel-group, multicentre study evaluated three dosages of bavisant (1 mg/day, 3 mg/day or 10 mg/day) and two active controls in adults with ADHD. The study consisted of a screening phase of up to 14 days, a 42-day double-blind treatment phase and a 7-day post-treatment follow-up phase. Efficacy and safety assessments were performed.

Setting: The study was conducted at 37 study centres in the US from April 2009 through January 2010.

Participants: Men and women aged 18–55 years with an established diagnosis of ADHD as confirmed by clinician and self-report diagnostic measures were enrolled.

Intervention: Participants were randomly assigned equally to one of six treatment groups: placebo, bavisant 1 mg/day, 3 mg/day or 10 mg/day, atomoxetine hydrochloride 80 mg/day or osmotic-release oral system (OROS) methyl-phenidate hydrochloride 54 mg/day.

Main outcome measure: The primary efficacy endpoint was the change in the Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale, Version IV (ADHD-RS-IV) total score from baseline (day 1) to the end of the treatment phase (day 42), and included all randomized participants who received one or more doses of study drug and had baseline and one or more post-baseline assessments (intent-to-treat [ITT] population). Safety assessments included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), laboratory tests and ECG readings.

Results: 430 participants were randomized, 424 received one or more doses of study medication and 335 (78%) of those randomized completed the study. Study participants had a mean age of 33.9 years and were predominantly White men. Mean treatment duration ranged from 31.4 to 38.8 days across groups. Mean change from baseline in the total ADHD-RS-IV score at day 42 (primary efficacy endpoint) was −8.8 in the placebo group versus −9.3, −11.2 and −12.2 in the bavisant 1 mg/day, 3 mg/day and 10 mg/day groups, respectively; the change in the 10 mg/day group was not statistically superior to placebo (p = 0.161), and hence statistical comparisons of the 1 mg/day and 3 mg/day groups with placebo based on a step-down closed testing procedure were not performed. Mean change from baseline in the total ADHD-RS-IV score at day 42 was superior to placebo in the atomoxetine (−15.3) and OROS methylphenidate (−15.7) groups (p< 0.005). Secondary efficacy assessments demonstrated a similar pattern with a non-significant trend towards improvement in the bavisant groups. The two lower dosages showed a good tolerability profile, but the higher dosage of bavisant was less well tolerated, as evidenced by the incidence of total TEAEs (61.8%, 82.4%, 89.0%), and discontinuations due to TEAEs (4.4%, 7.4%, 19.2%) in the bavisant 1 mg/day, 3 mg/day and 10 mg/day groups, respectively, compared with 58.9% and 2.7%, respectively on placebo. In the atomoxetine and OROS methylphenidate groups, the incidence of total TEAEs was 83.8% and 82.4% and discontinuations due to TEAEs was 10.8% and 8.8%, respectively.

Conclusion: Bavisant, a highly selective, wakefulness-promoting H3 antagonist, did not display significant clinical effectiveness in the treatment of adults with ADHD.

Clinical Trial Registration Number: NCT00880217

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Table I
Table II
Fig. 2
Table III

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wilens TE, Faraone SV, Biederman J. Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in adults. JAMA 2004 Aug 4; 292(5): 619–23

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Biederman J, Faraone SV. Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Lancet 2005 Jul 16–22; 366(9481): 237–48

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Culpepper L, Mattingly G. A practical guide to recognition and diagnosis of ADHD in adults in the primary care setting. Postgrad Med 2008 Sep; 120(3): 16–26

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kessler RC, Adler L, Barkley R, et al. The prevalence and correlates of adult ADHD in the United States: results from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Am J Psychiatry 2006 Apr; 163(4): 716–23

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rosler M, Casas M, Konofal E, et al. Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in adults. World J Biol Psychiatry 2010 Aug; 11(5): 684–98

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Morrison J. Adult psychiatric disorders in parents of hyperactive children. Am J Psychiatry 1980 Jul; 137(7): 825–7

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Morrison JR. Childhood hyperactivity in an adult psychiatric population: social factors. J Clin Psychiatry 1980 Feb; 41(2): 40–3

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Spencer TJ, Adler LA, McGough JJ, et al. Efficacy and safety of dexmethylphenidate extended-release capsules in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Biol Psychiatry 2007 Jun 15; 61(12): 1380–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Faraone SV, Spencer TJ, Montano CB, et al. Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in adults: a survey of current practice in psychiatry and primary care. Arch Intern Med 2004 Jun 14; 164(11): 1221–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Greenhill L, Pliszka S, Dulcan M, et al. AACAP practice parameters: practice parameter for the use of stimulant medications in the treatment of children, adolescents, and adults. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2002; 41 (2 Suppl. ): 26S–49S

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Faraone SV, Spencer T, Aleardi M, et al. Meta-analysis of the efficacy of methylphenidate for treating adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. J Clin Psychopharmacol 2004 Feb; 24(1): 24–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Castells X, Ramos-Quiroga JA, Rigau D, et al. Efficacy of methylphenidate for adults with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: a meta-regression analysis. CNS Drugs 2011 Feb 1; 25(2): 157–69

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. US Food and Drug Administration. FDA directs ADHD drug manufacturers to notify patients about cardiovascular adverse events and psychiatric adverse events. Rockville (MD): National Press Office, 2007 Feb 21

    Google Scholar 

  14. Nissen SE. ADHD drugs and cardiovascular risk. N Engl J Med 2006 Apr 6; 354(14): 1445–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Vetter VL, Elia J, Erickson C, et al. Cardiovascular monitoring of children and adolescents with heart disease receiving stimulant drugs: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young Congenital Cardiac Defects Committee and the Council on Cardiovascular Nursing. Circulation 2008 May 6; 117(18): 2407–23

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Godfrey J. Safety of therapeutic methylphenidate in adults: a systematic review of the evidence. J Psychopharmacol 2009 Mar; 23(2): 194–205

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Rostain AL. Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in adults: evidence-based recommendations for management. Postgrad Med 2008 Sep; 120(3): 27–38

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Bangs ME, Tauscher-Wisniewski S, Polzer J, et al. Meta-analysis of suicide-related behavior events in patients treated with atomoxetine. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2008 Feb; 47(2): 209–18

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ramsay JR, Rostain AL. Adult ADHD research: current status and future directions. J Atten Disord 2008 May; 11(6): 624–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Weiss M, Safren SA, Solanto MV, et al. Research forum on psychological treatment of adults with ADHD. J Atten Disord 2008 May; 11(6): 642–51

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Esbenshade TA, Fox GB, Cowart MD. Histamine H3 receptor antagonists: preclinical promise for treating obesity and cognitive disorders. Mol Interv 2006 Apr; 6(2): 77–88, 59

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Passani MB, Blandina P. Histamine receptors in the CNS as targets for therapeutic intervention. Trends Pharmacol Sci 2011 Apr; 32(4): 242–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Passani MB, Lin JS, Hancock A, et al. The histamine H3 receptor as a novel therapeutic target for cognitive and sleep disorders. Trends Pharmacol Sci 2004 Dec; 25(12): 618–25

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Raddatz R, Tao M, Hudkins RL. Histamine H3 antagonists for treatment of cognitive deficits in CNS diseases. Curr Top Med Chem 2011; 10(2): 153–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Conners C, Erhardt D, Sparrow E. Conners’ Adult ADHD Rating Scales (CAARS): technical manual. North Tonawanda (NY): Multi-Health Systems, 1999

    Google Scholar 

  26. National Institutes of Mental Health. Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) scale. Psychopharmacol Bull 1985; 21: 839–43

    Google Scholar 

  27. Strattera® (atomoxetine hydrochloride) [prescribing information]. Indianapolis (IN): Eli Lilly and Co, 2011

  28. Concerta® (methylphenidate hydrochloride) [prescribing information]. Fort Washington (PA): McNeil-PPC, Inc., 2007

  29. Fayyad J, De Graaf R, Kessler R, et al. Cross-national prevalence and correlates of adult attention-deficit hyper-activity disorder. Br J Psychiatry 2007 May; 190: 402–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Adler LA, Spencer T, Faraone SV, et al. Training raters to assess adult ADHD: reliability of ratings. J Atten Disord 2005 Feb; 8(3): 121–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Guy W. ECDEU Assessment Manual for Psychopharmacology: US Department of Health, Education and Welfare Publication (ADM) 76-338. Rockville (MD): National Institute of Mental Health, 1976

    Google Scholar 

  32. Hess DW, Kennedy CH, Hardin RA, et al. Attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder and learning disorders. In: Kennedy C, Moore J, editors. Military neuropsychology. New York (NY): Springer Publishing, 2010: 199–226

    Google Scholar 

  33. Kay GG, Michaels MA, Pakull B. Simulated driving changes in young adults with ADHD receiving mixed amphetamine salts extended release and atomoxetine. J Atten Disord 2009 Jan; 12(4): 316–29

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Gassmann-Mayer C, Jiang K, McSorley P, et al. Clinical and statistical assessment of suicidal ideation and behavior in pharmaceutical trials. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2011 Oct; 90(4): 554–60

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Posner K, Melvin GA, Stanley B, et al. Factors in the assessment of suicidality in youth. CNS Spectr 2007 Feb; 12(2): 156–62

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Marcus R, Peritz E, Gabriel K. On closed testing procedures with special reference to ordered analysis of variance. Biometrika 1976; 63: 655–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Rom DM, Costello RJ, Connell LT. On closed test procedures for dose-response analysis. Stat Med 1994 Aug 15; 13(15): 1583–96

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Adler LA, Zimmerman B, Starr HL, et al. Efficacy and safety of OROS methylphenidate in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel group, dose-escalation study. J Clin Psychopharmacol 2009 Jun; 29(3): 239–47

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Medori R, Ramos-Quiroga JA, Casas M, et al. A randomized, placebo-controlled trial of three fixed dosages of prolonged-release OROS methylphenidate in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Biol Psychiatry 2008 May 15; 63(10): 981–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Janssen Research & Development, LLC, provided funding for the design and conduct of the clinical study (31001074ATT2001), including collection, management and analysis of the data.

Richard Weisler was the principal investigator for the study and received no compensation for time spent in the preparation of this manuscript. Dr Weisler has been a consultant to, on the speaker’s bureaus of, and received research support from Johnson & Johnson or an operating company (McNeil Pharmaceutical, Janssen). He owns Johnson & Johnson stock in mutual funds or in managed accounts with no direct control.

Richard Weisler, MD, in his career, has also been a consultant to, on the speaker’s bureaus of, and/or received research support from the following: Abbott, speaker’s bureau, consultant, received research support; Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, consultant; Astra Zeneca, speaker’s bureau, consultant, received research support; Biovail, speaker’s bureau, consultant, received research support; Bristol-Myers Squibb, speaker’s bureau, consultant, received research support, stockholder has held or holds stock; Burroughs Wellcome, speaker’s bureau, received research support; Cenerx, received research support; Centers of Disease Control and Prevention, consultant; Cephalon, speaker’s bureau, consultant, received research support; Ciba Geigy, speaker’s bureau, received research support; CoMentis, received research support; Corcept, consultant, Cortex, stockholder has held or holds stock; Dainippon Sumitomo Pharma America, received research support; Eisai, received research support; Eli Lilly, speaker’s bureau, consultant, received research support; Forest, speaker’s bureau, consultant, received research support; GlaxoSmithKline, speaker’s bureau, consultant, received research support; Lundbeck, received research support; Medicinova, received research support; Medscape Advisory Board, consultant; Merck, received research support, stockholder has held or holds stock; National Institute of Mental Health, consultant, received research support; Neurochem, received research support; New River Pharmaceuticals, received research support; Novartis, speaker’s bureau, received research support; Organon, speaker’s bureau, consultant, received research support; Otsuka America Pharma, consultant; Pfizer, speaker’s bureau, consultant, received research support, stockholder has held or holds stock; Pharmacia, consultant, received research support; Repligen, received research support; Saegis, received research support; Sandoz, received research support; Sanofi, speaker’s bureau, consultant, received research support; Sanofi-Synthelabo, speaker’s bureau, consultant, received research support; Schwabe/Ingenix, received research support; Sepracor, received research support; Shire, speaker’s bureau, consultant, received research support; Solvay, speaker’s bureau, consultant; Sunovion, speaker’s bureau, consultant, received research support; Synaptic, received research support; Takeda, received research support; TAP, received research support; Transcept Pharma, consultant, received research support; TransTech, consultant; UCB Pharma, received research support; Validus, speaker’s bureau, consultant; Vela, received research support; and Wyeth, speaker’s bureau, consultant, received research support.

Gahan Pandina, Ella Daly, Kimberly Cooper and Cristiana Gassmann-Mayer are employees of Janssen Research & Development, LLC, and own stock in Johnson & Johnson.

All authors met International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) criteria and all those who fulfilled those criteria are listed as authors. Bradford Challis, an employee of Janssen Research & Development, LLC, contributed to writing of the initial draft with author guidance, copy editing and incorporating author comments. The study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00880217.

The following investigators in the US participated in the study (listed in alphabetical order): Richard Anderson (Saint Charles, MO), Valerie Arnold (Memphis, TN), Brian Bortnick (Atlanta, GA), Matthew Brams (Houston, TX), Daniel Chueh (Santa Ana, CA), Eduardo Cifuentes (Charleston, SC), Andrew Cutler (Brandenton, FL), Bernadette D’Souza (Dayton, OH), Beal Essink (Portland, OR), Donald Garcia Jr (Austin, TX), John Giblin (Little Rock, AR), Michael Greenbaum (Libertyville, IL), James Grimm (Eugene, OR), Linda S. Harper (Orlando, FL), Shivkumar Hatti (Media, PA), Willis Holloway (Oklahoma City, OK), Angela House (Eagle, ID), William Jonakin (Boise, ID), Mark Joyce (Jacksonville, FL), David Krakow (Mount Kisco, NY), Suena Massey (Washington, DC), Eliot Moon (Wildomar, CA), Jeffrey Newcorn (New York, NY), Margarita Nunez (St. Petersburg, FL), Nader Oskooilar (Los Alamitos, CA), Americo Padilla (South Miami, FL), Nilesh Patel (Wharton, TX), Richard Rubin (Burlington, VT), Keith Saylor (Herndon, VA), Frederick Schaerf (Fort Myers, FL), Scott Segal (North Miami, FL), Mary Shemo (Charlottesville, VA), Steve Skarky (Oklahoma City, OK), Vicky Spratlin (Atlanta, GA), Jerry Steiert (Seattle, WA), Leslie Taylor (Middleton, WI), Haydn Thomas (Prairie Village, KS), Kathleen Toups (Lafayette, CA), Mark Turner (Meridian, ID), Bradley Vince (Overland Park, KS), Richard Weisler (Raleigh, NC), Joel Young (Rochester Hills, MI).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ella J. Daly.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Weisler, R.H., Pandina, G.J., Daly, E.J. et al. Randomized Clinical Study of a Histamine H3 Receptor Antagonist for the Treatment of Adults with Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder. CNS Drugs 26, 421–434 (2012). https://doi.org/10.2165/11631990-000000000-00000

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/11631990-000000000-00000

Keywords

Navigation