Angiotensins have been shown to play a significant role in a variety of physiological functions including learning and memory processes. Relatively recent evidence supports the increasing importance of angiotensin IV (Ang IV), in many of these functions previously associated only with Ang II, including learning and memory. An interesting hypothesis generated by these results has been that Ang II is a precursor for the production of a more active peptide fragment, Ang IV. Since Ang II impairs learning and memory, when administered directly or released into the hippocampal dentate gyrus, and inhibits long term potentiation (LTP) in medial perforant path-dentate granule cell synapses, as well; it remained to be seen what effects Ang IV had on LTP in these same synapses. Results of this study show clearly that Ang IV significantly enhances LTP, and the enhancement is both dose and time dependent. The following solutions of Ang IV were administered over a five min period, at the end of baseline and before the first tetanus was applied: 2.39, 4.78, and 9.56 nM. An inverted U-type dose related effect was observed. A complex time related effect was observed with a maximum at 5 min, a return to normal LTP at 30 min and a minimum below normal at 90 min, and a return to normal LTP at 120 min. The effects of the 4.78 nM solution were determined at the following intervals between administration and the first tetanus: 5, 15, 30, 60, 90, and 120 min. The enhancement of LTP can be prevented by pretreatment with Divalinal, an Ang IV antagonist, without any effect on normal LTP. Two solutions of Divalinal were used; 5 nM and 5 microM, and the 5 microM was more effective and completely blocked the enhancement of normal LTP. Results were also obtained with 4.78 nM Nle1-Ang IV (Norleucine), an Ang IV agonist. Norleucine was less effective than Ang IV in the enhancement of normal LTP and displayed a similar time course of activity. Both Ang IV and Norleucine produced a significant suppression of normal LTP at 90 min; that remains to be explained. However, the inhibition by Ang IV was dose dependent and was blocked by Divalinal. The fact that the Ang IV enhancement of normal LTP was blocked by losartan, an Ang II AT1 receptor antagonist, is puzzling since Divalinal had no effect on the inhibition of LTP by Ang II.